ARENA Leaderboard
See how AI image models stack up against each other. How it works
Best AI Models for Portrait
Ranking the best AI text to image models for portrait, based on 1 blind community-voted challenge.
Highlights
5 imagesBest AI Models for Portrait
| # | Model | Elo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nano Banana 2
|
1256 |
| 2 |
Nano Banana Pro
|
1254 |
| 3 | ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) Vyro AI | 1229 |
| 4 | FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal | 1225 |
| 5 |
GPT Image 1.5
|
1223 |
| 6 | FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal | 1217 |
| 7 |
GPT Image 1 Mini
|
1207 |
| 8 |
Z-Image Turbo
|
1206 |
| 9 |
Recraft V4
|
1204 |
| 10 |
FLUX.2 [pro]
|
1203 |
| 11 | Lucid Origin Leonardo AI | 1202 |
| 12 |
FLUX.2 [dev]
|
1182 |
| 13 |
Recraft V4 Pro
|
1180 |
| 14 |
Reve Image 1.0
|
1164 |
| 15 |
Grok Imagine Image
|
1156 |
| 16 | Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI | 1155 |
| 17 |
Grok Imagine Image Pro
|
1147 |
| 18 | HiDream I1 Fast HiDream AI | 1131 |
| 19 |
Seedream 5.0 Lite
|
1110 |
| 20 |
Nano Banana
|
1101 |
| 21 |
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001
|
1092 |
Google dominates the portrait category with Nano Banana Pro (1253 Elo) and Nano Banana 2 (1251 Elo) securing the top two spots, maintaining a narrow 10-point lead over OpenAI’s GPT Image 1.5 (1243 Elo). Unlike the overall leaderboard where diverse architectures compete closely, portrait-specific performance shows a sharp efficiency advantage for GPT Image 1.5, which achieves an 80.6% win rate at roughly 13% of the cost of the category leader.
Elo vs Cost
Elo vs Speed
5 without speed data omitted.
Highlighted Battles
The most competitive head-to-head matchups, selected by closeness and vote count.