ARENA Leaderboard
See how AI image models stack up against each other. How it works
Best AI Models for Photorealism
Ranking the best AI text to image models for photorealism, based on 2 blind community-voted challenges.
Highlights
5 imagesBest AI Models for Photorealism
| # | Model | Elo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Seedream 4.5
|
1262 |
| 2 |
Nano Banana Pro
|
1244 |
| 3 |
GPT Image 1.5
|
1240 |
| 4 |
FLUX.2 [max]
|
1231 |
| 5 | ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) Vyro AI | 1229 |
| 6 |
GPT Image 1 Mini
|
1217 |
| 7 |
Grok Imagine Image Pro
|
1212 |
| 8 |
Nano Banana 2
|
1211 |
| 9 |
Seedream 4.0
|
1204 |
| 10 |
FLUX.2 [pro]
|
1204 |
| 11 |
Nano Banana
|
1204 |
| 12 |
Z-Image Turbo
|
1200 |
| 13 |
Seedream 5.0 Lite
|
1192 |
| 14 |
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001
|
1185 |
| 15 |
FLUX.2 [dev]
|
1185 |
| 16 |
Qwen Image 2512
|
1174 |
| 17 |
Grok Imagine Image
|
1171 |
| 18 | Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI | 1166 |
| 19 |
FLUX.2 [flex]
|
1165 |
| 20 |
Recraft V4
|
1160 |
| 21 |
GPT Image 2
|
1158 |
| 22 | FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal | 1133 |
| 23 |
Recraft V4 Pro
|
1128 |
| 24 | FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal | 1127 |
| 25 |
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
|
1077 |
Seedream 4.5 leads the photorealism category with an 81.0% win rate and 1262 Elo, outperforming GPT Image 1.5 which holds a lower 75.0% win rate despite its high overall ranking. While Nano Banana Pro secures the second position at 1244 Elo, GPT Image 1.5 offers the highest photorealistic fidelity within the budget-tier at nearly 87% lower cost per image than the category leader.
Elo vs Cost
Elo vs Speed
Highlighted Battles
The most competitive head-to-head matchups, selected by closeness and vote count.
FLUX.2 [flex] vs Z-Image Turbo
Candid Street Photography
50% · 25% · 25%
Qwen Image 2512 vs Grok Imagine Image
Candid Street Photography
50% · 50%
Z-Image Turbo vs GPT Image 2
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
100% · 0%
Grok Imagine Image vs GPT Image 2
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
0% · 100%