Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

22 models were given the same prompt, and the community voted blind on which outputs looked best. How it works

Winning image by FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo for Geometric Composition

#1 — FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

Prompt

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

Challenge Rankings

22 models

#	Model	Price	¢/img	Elo
1	FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal	$	0.8¢	1276
2	ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) Vyro AI	$$	3¢	1239
3	Grok Imagine Image Pro xAI	$$$	7¢	1224
4	FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal	$	0.5¢	1217
5	Nano Banana 2 Google	$$	2.2¢	1209
6	Nano Banana Google	$$	3.9¢	1207
7	Seedream 4.0 ByteDance	$$	3¢	1204
8	FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs	$$	3¢	1198
9	Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI	$$$	6.5¢	1195
10	GPT Image 1.5 OpenAI	$	0.9¢	1185
11	FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs	$$$	6¢	1185
12	Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001 Google	$$$	6¢	1183
13	Z-Image Turbo Alibaba	$	0.5¢	1180
14	FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs	$$	1.2¢	1179
15	Qwen Image 2512 Alibaba	$$	2¢	1175
16	Nano Banana Pro Google	$$$	6.7¢	1168
17	GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI	$	0.5¢	1160
18	Grok Imagine Image xAI	$$	2¢	1160
19	Reve Image 1.0 Reve AI	$$	4¢	1159
20	Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance	$$	3.5¢	1156
21	FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs	$$	1.5¢	1155
22	Seedream 4.5 ByteDance	$$	4¢	1055

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo leads the challenge with a 1276 Elo and 75.0% win rate, outperforming premium rivals like Grok Imagine Image Pro (1224 Elo) at roughly one-ninth of the price. Despite the lower cost, budget-tier models like FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo and FLUX.2 [dev] Flash maintain a 50+ point Elo lead over high-cost alternatives such as FLUX.2 [flex] and Imagen 4.0 Ultra.