Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 Black Forest Labs Grok Imagine Image xAI

Settled by community votes across 1 shared challenge, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

17.8 arena score

#36 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Grok Imagine Image

24.1 arena score

#19 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Grok Imagine Image

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 1

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Grok Imagine Image
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Successfully renders the specific date requested
  • + Captures a clean, well-lit café ambiance with a polished frame
  • Terrible text rendering with many spelling errors and redundant lines
  • Handwriting looks more like a digital marker font than authentic textured chalk
  • Fails to provide the elegant cursive style for the title

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Excellent prompt adherence with near-perfect spelling of all menu items
  • + Highly realistic chalk texture with authentic smudge marks and dust
  • + Beautiful elegant cursive handwriting for the title as requested
  • Slightly cuts off the bottom of the sign in the composition

Verdict: Grok Imagine is the clear winner as it followed every instruction, including specific text strings, handwriting styles, and the requested chalk texture. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 struggled significantly with the text rendering, producing incoherent phrases and 'gibberish' while failing to capture the authentic look of chalk on a board.

Next steps

Explore each model