Victorian Greenhouse Oasis
Vote
Text-to-Image
17 models were given the same prompt, and the community voted blind on which outputs looked best. How it works
#1 — Nano Banana Pro
Prompt
“Hyper-photorealistic interior of a lush Victorian glass greenhouse filled with exotic tropical plants, vibrant blooming orchids, tall ferns, colorful butterflies in flight, sunlight filtering through ornate glass roof creating realistic caustics and dew on leaves, intricate iron framework visible, misty atmosphere, 8K masterpiece.”
Challenge Rankings
| # | Model | Elo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nano Banana Pro
Google
|
1283 |
| 2 |
GPT Image 1.5
OpenAI
|
1267 |
| 3 | FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal | 1253 |
| 4 |
Seedream 4.0
ByteDance
|
1251 |
| 5 | Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI | 1214 |
| 6 | ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) Vyro AI | 1213 |
| 7 |
Wan 2.6
Alibaba
|
1206 |
| 8 |
Seedream 5.0 Lite
ByteDance
|
1200 |
| 9 |
Reve Image 1.0
Reve AI
|
1199 |
| 10 |
FLUX.2 [max]
Black Forest Labs
|
1190 |
| 11 |
Nano Banana
Google
|
1181 |
| 12 |
Z-Image Turbo
Alibaba
|
1179 |
| 13 |
FLUX.2 [flex]
Black Forest Labs
|
1178 |
| 14 |
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
Google
|
1168 |
| 15 |
Seedream 4.5
ByteDance
|
1154 |
| 16 |
Grok Imagine Image Pro
xAI
|
1129 |
| 17 |
Grok Imagine Image
xAI
|
1060 |
Nano Banana Pro leads the challenge with a 1283 Elo, though GPT Image 1.5 trails by only 16 points despite a significantly lower price tier ($0.009 vs $0.067 per image). FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo remains highly competitive in third place (1253 Elo), delivering a 62.5% win rate at roughly five times the speed of the top two models.
Elo vs Cost
Elo vs Speed
4 without speed data omitted.
Competitors
17 models, ranked by Elo
1
2
3
Highlighted Battles
The most competitive head-to-head matchups, selected by closeness and vote count.
