Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs Z-Image Turbo Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [max]

25.8 arena score

#10 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Z-Image Turbo

25.3 arena score

#12 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [max]

81.8%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Z-Image Turbo

18.2%

win rate

81.8% 0.0% ties 18.2%
Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent photographic quality with realistic textures and lighting.
  • + Strong adherence to all spatial requirements, including plant visibility through glass.
  • + Sophisticated lighting showing soft window light and caustic reflections.
  • The plant is slightly less 'behind' the cube compared to Model B, though still partially visible through it.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Good adherence to the basic prompt elements.
  • + Clean composition with a natural-looking wooden table.
  • Lower overall resolution and clarity compared to Model A.
  • The plant is almost entirely blurred out, losing the 'partially visible through the glass' effect.
  • Lighting is flat compared to the soft directional light requested.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] significantly outperforms Z-Image Turbo in terms of visual fidelity, lighting complexity, and material textures. While both models followed the prompt's spatial instructions well, FLUX.2 [max] created a much more convincing scene with realistic glass reflections and a higher-quality render of the book and plant.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo
67% wins 0% ties 33% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to technical prompts like shallow depth of field and motion blur.
  • + Highly realistic skin textures and fine details on the jacket and bicycle.
  • + Atmospheric lighting and reflections that create a cinematic feel.
  • Minor anatomical distortion where the hand and the brake/wire of the bike merge.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Clear, well-lit subject and clean bicycle geometry.
  • + Shows the full body of the subject in a natural pose.
  • Failed to produce the requested 'shallow depth of field' and 'motion blur'.
  • Lacks the 'cinematic' and 'no stylization' quality, appearing more like a standard digital snapshot.
  • The rain effect is barely visible and the pavement reflections are underwhelming.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the prompt instructions much more accurately, successfully incorporating complex photography elements like shallow depth of field, motion blur on passing cars, and detailed skin textures. Z-Image Turbo produced a generic, sharp image that ignored most of the atmospheric and technical camera requirements. FLUX.2 [max] is the clear winner for its superior realism and mood.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent skin texture with realistic pores and fine hairs
  • + Highly intricate engraving detail on the pauldron armor
  • + Superior integration of beads into the hairstyle
  • The scars look a bit like surface-level ink rather than deep healed wounds
  • The lighting is less dramatic compared to image B

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Dynamic lighting with a visible torch source creating strong highlights
  • + Great depiction of the cloth underlayer and leather elements
  • + Effective use of sparks and atmospheric bokeh
  • Armor texture is slightly smoother and less detailed than model A
  • Slightly less 'close' as a portrait compared to the framing of model A
  • Beads in the hair look a bit more like generic white dots in some sections

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] provides a superior close-up with incredible micro-details in the skin, eyes, and metal engravings, making it feel truly lifelike. Z-Image Turbo captures the 'battle-worn' atmosphere better with its lighting and torch inclusion, but it lacks the ultra-fine texture found in FLUX.2. Overall, FLUX.2 is the winner for its technical precision and adherence to the 'highly detailed' part of the prompt.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo
75% wins 0% ties 25% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Perfect adherence to section headers (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
  • + High-quality, distinct food photos in a clean grid
  • + Excellent text rendering for main titles and price columns
  • Small body text is mostly gibberish
  • The 'Appetizers' section contains photos of pizzas and burgers

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Modern, high-contrast block layout
  • + Higher quality individual food photography
  • + Clean minimalist orange and black color scheme
  • Failed to include 'Mains' as a separate section header, merging it into 'Pizza Mans'
  • Incorrect text spelling in headers ('SE TIIION')
  • Layout is a bit cluttered with large blocks overlapping food photos

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the prompt more accurately by providing all three requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains) with highly legible headers and a professional vertical layout. Z-Image Turbo produced more striking food photography but suffered from significant spelling errors and failed to properly categorize the menu sections as requested.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'exploded' layout with clearly separated components.
  • + Exceptional text rendering with several distinct fonts and effects.
  • + High photorealistic detail on the textures of the meat and bread.
  • The starburst for the price looks a bit like a flat graphic compared to the 3D scene.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Strong fiery atmosphere and lighting integration.
  • + The price starburst is beautifully rendered with a 3D fiery effect.
  • + Good edible appeal with glossy sauce highlights.
  • Failed the 'exploded' instruction as ingredients are still mostly stacked.
  • Includes repetitive text ('MAGIC BURGER BURGER').
  • Lower resolution/clarity on the text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY'.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the complex layout instructions much better, delivering a true 'exploded' view with all text elements perfectly rendered and positioned. Z-Image Turbo created a more cohesive fiery atmosphere and a better price starburst, but it failed the core structural prompt of separating the components and introduced redundant text.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent text rendering with perfect spelling across all items.
  • + Beautifully realistic chalk texture with slight smudges and authentic letter variations.
  • + Superior lighting and composition including the lamp and wooden board frame.
  • The cursive is more of a slanted script than traditional decorative cursive.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Natural-looking handwritten style with good stroke weights.
  • + Good layout that fills the board space effectively.
  • Confused spelling on 'Mustroom' instead of 'Mushroom'.
  • Missing hyphen in the price of the octopus menu item.
  • Inconsistent chalk texture compared to the photorealism of the competitor.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] is the clear winner, delivering flawless spelling and a highly realistic atmosphere that includes authentic chalk dust and professional lighting. Z-Image Turbo captures the handwriting style well but falters on spelling ('Mustroom') and overall image fidelity.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting with a detailed spiral galaxy background.
  • + The composition feels grounded yet surreal by placing the subject on an asteroid.
  • + High-fidelity rendering of the spacesuit and horse texture.
  • The astronaut has a third phantom leg appearing behind the horse's saddle.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Dynamic action pose with the horse in a leaping motion.
  • + Clean, bright rendering of the astronaut's suit.
  • The background is very plain and lacks the 'cinematic' and 'highly detailed' feel of space.
  • Anatomical issues with the horse's legs, particularly the rear right leg.
  • The lighting is flat and does not match the environment.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] creates a much more cinematic and atmospheric image with beautiful background details and lighting, despite a significant anatomical error involving a third leg. Z-Image Turbo captures the basic prompt but feels like a composite against a flat background, lacking the surreal detail requested. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner for its superior artistry and visual complexity.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent photorealism in the textures of the leather jacket and car interior.
  • + Precise adherence to the 'both front paws on the steering wheel' instruction.
  • + Natural-looking lighting and depth of field that feels like a real photograph.
  • The capybara is wearing gloves, which was not requested and masks its paws.
  • The proportions of the capybara's body are slightly anthro-morphed/elongated to fit the seat.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Great character design for the capybara with a very professional expression.
  • + Excellent background bokeh and lighting that captures the New York night atmosphere.
  • Fails the steering wheel instruction, with one paw floating in the air.
  • Anatomy of the paws/hands looks slightly distorted and less 'capybara-like'.
  • The business woman in the back looks slightly like a mannequin rather than a real person.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] is the winner as it fully adheres to the physical positioning requested in the prompt, placing both paws on the wheel, and features superior textures in the car interior. Z-Image Turbo produces a more front-facing, charming character, but fails the specific steering wheel instruction and has less realistic lighting.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling in all fields
  • + Highly cinematic lighting and atmospheric depth
  • + Clean and professional graphic design layout
  • The thorns and webs border is a bit subtle compared to the parchment edges

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Strong tactile parchment texture that feels very vintage
  • + Creative use of layered scrolls for the text fields
  • Contains a typo in the location ('Archves' instead of 'Arches')
  • The secondary banner text is very small and lacks the requested scroll background
  • The composition feels a bit cluttered with overlapping elements

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] is the clear winner as it followed all textual instructions perfectly, including the specific banner text and location name. While Z-Image Turbo captures a nice tactile vintage texture, its spelling error and cramped composition make it less effective as a functional invitation.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [max]
Before After
Z-Image Turbo
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Successfully added a full head of hair with realistic texture.
  • + Excellent preservation of the jacket, background, and original person's features.
  • + Matches the lighting of the scene perfectly.
  • Unnecessarily modified the beard color to include white/grey patches not present in the original.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Maintains the original skin tone and facial structure well.
  • Completely failed the main edit instruction (remains bald).
  • Significantly altered the background environment from desert scrub to dry grass.
  • Modified the clothing details despite the prompt to preserve features.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] successfully executed the requested edit, providing a realistic head of hair while keeping the background and person's likeness intact. Z-Image Turbo failed to add any hair and also altered the background of the image, which was not requested.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Perfectly followed the flag requirement by including the Japanese flag.
  • + Excellent miniature diorama construction with multiple levels and realistic textures.
  • + Superior text rendering and alignment.
  • The camera angle is slightly lower than a true 45-degree isometric view.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Very clean, soft textures that match the '3D cartoon' style requested.
  • + Good centered composition with a clear focus on the main subject.
  • Incorrectly used the flag of China instead of Japan.
  • Perspective of the plate feels slightly warped compared to the base.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed every part of the prompt, including the correct flag and a well-structured multi-level diorama. Z-Image Turbo produced a high-quality stylized image but failed the logical check by placing a Chinese flag next to the text for Japan.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt requirements including caricature style, hockey, and profession.
  • + Cleverly combines the elements by placing a news desk on center ice.
  • + Maintains recognizable facial features and hair from the source image within a cartoon aesthetic.
  • Text on the scoreboards is slightly garbled.
  • The hands are a bit simplified, common for caricature styles but lacking polish.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Successfully added a small dog in the background.
  • + Preserved the original photo quality and facial features perfectly.
  • Failed to follow the core instruction to create an exaggerated caricature.
  • Completely missed the hockey and TV anchor profession themes.
  • The edit is too subtle for the requested 'humorous and exaggerated' prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] successfully interpreted the complex prompt, creates a high-quality caricature that integrates all requested elements: the anchor desk, the hockey rink, and the dogs. Z-Image Turbo essentially failed the prompt, providing a minor modification to the original photo while ignoring the style and thematic requests.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent prompt adherence with all four animals clearly defined and interacting with butterflies.
  • + Superior lighting with realistic god rays and dew sparkles that create a high-end cinematic feel.
  • + Higher level of detail in the fur texture and the variety of wildflowers in the meadow.
  • The fox's anatomy is a bit stiff in its leaping pose.
  • The kitten's size is slightly small relative to the bunny.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Very cute, expressive facial expressions on the puppy and kitten.
  • + Bright, vibrant colors that reinforce the 'joyful wholesome vibe'.
  • + Clean composition with a clear focal point.
  • The puppy's paw appears to be merging strangely with the bunny's back.
  • Lower overall resolution and less 'hyper-photorealistic' than requested, feeling more like a digital illustration.
  • Missing some of the atmospheric details like the dew sparkles and distinct god rays seen in the other version.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] is the clear winner as it successfully captured the hyper-photorealistic requirement with sophisticated lighting and complex environmental details like dew and god rays. Z-Image Turbo produced a very cute image, but it struggled with anatomical merging (puppy paw and bunny) and lacked the technical '8K masterpiece' finish that FLUX.2 [max] achieved.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Successfully translates the image into a hand-painted anime aesthetic.
  • + Captures the Ghibli-inspired soft lighting and pastel color palette perfectly.
  • + Preserves the composition and poses of the original meme accurately.
  • The facial expressions are slightly softened, losing the intense 'scandalized' look of the woman on the right.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Extremely high fidelity to the original source image's identity and details.
  • Completely fails the edit instruction to transform the image into an illustration style.
  • Maintains a realistic photo aesthetic instead of adopting Studio Ghibli attributes.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] provides a near-perfect execution of the prompt, transforming the iconic 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme into a charming Studio Ghibli–style watercolor illustration while maintaining the scene's composition. Z-Image Turbo failed to apply any significant stylistic changes, essentially returning a slightly modified version of the original photograph.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [max]
Before After
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'hair blowing in the wind' instruction.
  • + Highly effective use of leaves to create a sense of depth and motion.
  • + Perfectly preserves nearly all original facial features and clothing details.
  • Some leaves in the foreground are slightly blurry/out of focus, though this contributes to the motion effect.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Successfully adds leaves to the scene.
  • + Preserves the general layout of the original image.
  • The 'blowing hair' effect is very subtle compared to the request.
  • Significant changes made to the woman's face, making her look like a different person.
  • The golden retriever's face and tail have been noticeably altered from the source.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] is the clear winner as it successfully implemented the dynamic motion requests—especially the hair—while maintaining high fidelity to the original subject's appearance. Z-Image Turbo struggled with source preservation, person-hallucinating a different face for the woman and failing to create a convincing wind effect on the hair.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Perfect adherence to typography and punctuation with the grave accent in 'Caffè'
  • + Excellent emblem composition including the requested banner and circular frame
  • + High-quality subtle paper texture on the background
  • The 'steam' lines are a bit thin and faint

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Strong minimalist vector style with high contrast
  • + Correct spelling and accentuation of the text
  • + Clear cloche iconography
  • The layout is less integrated as an 'emblem' compared to Model A
  • The background lacks the 'subtle texture' requested
  • The steam effect is very abstract and minimal

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] produced a much more sophisticated and professional-looking logo that captures the 'vintage' and 'emblem' aspects of the prompt perfectly. Z-Image Turbo followed the instructions well, but the final result feels like a basic clip-art arrangement compared to the cohesive design of FLUX.2 [max].

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [max]
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Excellent typography and spelling of astronaut names and mission phases.
  • + Great logical flow and layout that captures almost all the requested infographic steps.
  • + High-quality vector aesthetic that feels professional and informative.
  • Repeats the label 'Earth Orbit' three times at the top of the columns.
  • The Saturn V rocket silhouette is slightly generic but still fits the style.

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Clean white background that fits the 'modern vector' request well.
  • + Bold, readable color palette that adheres to NASA-inspired tones.
  • Significant spelling errors including 'APOLIO' and 'Translurian'.
  • Failed to include all requested steps and icons in a logical sequence.
  • Composition feels cluttered and lacks a clear narrative flow compared to an infographic.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] is the clear winner as it successfully creates a cohesive infographic with a logical progression and accurate text, including the names of the crew. Z-Image Turbo suffers from major spelling hallucinations and fails to organize the information into a structured sequence as requested.

Next steps

Explore each model