FLUX.1 Kontext [max] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.1 Krea [dev] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent handling of light and shadows, including caustic light patterns on the table.
• + Highly realistic glass textures and refractions.
• + Accurate prompt adherence for all specified elements.

• − The plant is somewhat blurry and less distinct than Model B.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Clean, simple composition with clear object placement.
• + Good material texture on the book cover.
• + The plant is more clearly visible through the glass as requested.

• − The lighting is a bit flat and lacks the realistic behavior of light passing through glass seen in Model A.
• − The blue sphere has a slightly artificial, overly perfect surface compared to the rest of the scene.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent skin texture and realistic hand details.
• + Highly accurate interaction with the bike chain and gears.
• + Great atmosphere with believable rain effects and puddles.

• − The rain streaks are a bit thick and uniform.
• − Misses the specific request for motion blur from passing cars.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Successfully captures the motion blur of background cars as requested.
• + Good composition that feels like a candid street snapshot.
• + Skin and hair textures are natural and age-appropriate.

• − The man is standing/walking with the bike rather than repairing it.
• − Anatomical issues with the hands, which appear lumpy and poorly defined.
• − The bicycle's geometry is slightly warped.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Exceptional skin texture and facial detail
• + Vibrant and moody lighting that highlights the metal engraving
• + Follows the close portrait framing requested by the prompt

• − Missed the beads in the hair braids
• − Eyes are stylized/glowing, which may be more 'fantasy' than 'lifelike'

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Included the small beads in the braided hair
• + Highly detailed engraving on the plate armor and leather straps
• + The blood/dirt textures on the face are very realistic

• − The framing is more of a medium shot than the requested close portrait
• − The skin texture on the face is slightly smoother compared to Model A

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent typography rendering for the 'MENU' heading.
• + Clean and balanced grid layout that feels spacious.
• + High-quality, consistent food photography that looks like professional studio shots.

• − Text descriptions below headings are garbled and illegible.
• − Lacks the requested specific sections for 'appetizers' and 'mains' in plain English.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Followed the instructions for specific sections like 'APPETIZERS' and 'MAINES' very well.
• + Effective use of the grid layout for vibrant food photography.
• + Bold sans-serif headers enhance readability and hierarchy.

• − The food photos are slightly more cluttered and less 'minimalist' than the other model.
• − The pricing numbers are repetitive and unrealistic across all items.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent integration of text with a fiery, glowing effect as requested.
• + Highly dynamic composition with various ingredients scattered realistically in 3D space.
• + Sharp, photorealistic textures on the burger bun and lettuce.

• − The 'starburst' for the price was interpreted as a literal sun icon rather than a graphic element.
• − The burger is mostly assembled rather than fully 'exploded' with all components visible.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Successfully captured the 'exploded' view where individual layers are clearly separated.
• + Strong cinematic lighting with bright orange flames and glowing embers.
• + Included multiple starburst icons as requested by the prompt.

• − The pricing and secondary text lack the requested fiery, glowing effect.
• − Contains hallucinatory gibberish text at the bottom of the frame.
• − The price text is slightly distorted and overlaps the fire poorly.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent text accuracy with no spelling errors in the menu items.
• + Natural chalk textures and realistic smudge marks on the board.
• + Distinct but consistent hand-lettered style throughout.

• − The title is in print-style block letters rather than the requested 'elegant cursive'.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Successfully used a cursive script for the menu items.
• + Good visual framing and lighting for a café atmosphere.

• − Significant spelling errors and hallucinations in the text (e.g., 'Gruffle', 'tceman', 'Chvcuations').
• − Included five menu items instead of the requested three.
• − Text looks slightly more like a digital font overlay than real chalk.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent horse and space suit details.
• + Beautiful lighting and cinematic atmosphere.
• + High anatomical accuracy for both the horse and the astronaut.

• − Failed the logical constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse, not the other way around.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Successfully attempted the logical reversal with the horse being supported by equipment 'on top' of the astronaut's setup.
• + High contrast and sharp details on the planetary background.

• − The horse's front legs and the integration with the tech are anatomically confusing.
• − The horse is still essentially being ridden by the astronaut, missing the core requested reversal.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent photorealism with highly detailed fur and lighting textures.
• + Follows the request for a 'bored' expression on the human passenger accurately.
• + Great depth of field and bokeh effect in the background.

• − The passenger is holding the phone to her ear like a call rather than 'looking at' it as requested.
• − The capybaras paws are not both clearly on the steering wheel.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Includes both paws on the steering wheel as specified in the prompt.
• + Depicts the passenger looking at the phone screen as requested.
• + Clearer view of the taxi interior and the capybara's outfit.

• − Includes an extra, unnecessary person in the passenger seat.
• − The background cityscape is slightly less realistic and more generic than Model A.
• − The woman looking at the phone has distorted, poorly rendered fingers.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent typography with clear, legible text matching the prompt almost perfectly.
• + Great cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern and environmental detail.
• + Balanced composition that feels like a professional poster.

• − Redundant text at the bottom repeating 'The Arches, NYC'.
• − The date uses commas '30,10,2026' instead of the requested dots.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Beautiful parchment texture and decorative border work.
• + Appealing illustration style for the trees and jack-o-lantern.

• − Significant spelling errors including 'Pasty Halloween' and 'nights frights'.
• − Failed to include all event details clearly at the bottom as requested.
• − Text in the scroll is cluttered and repetitive.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent soft 3D textures and stylized materials
• + Coherent composition with more interesting elements like chopsticks and wasabi
• + Perfect text centering and nice typography

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon
• − Perspective is slightly flatter than the requested 45-degree angle

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Successfully included the Japan flag icon
• + Accurate 45-degree isometric perspective and lighting
• + Clean, minimalist aesthetic that fits the diorama prompt

• − Lighting is a bit harsh for a 'gentle lighting' request
• − The sushi model is much simpler and less appealing than Model A's

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Excellent use of 'god rays' and warm sunrise lighting consistent with the prompt.
• + Superior fur texture and soft detail on all animals.

• − The animals are largely static rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling' as requested.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Better captures the sense of movement and 'playfully chasing' with dynamic posing.
• + Clean composition with distinct, well-rendered butterflies.

• − Failed to include the requested baby bunny, showing two kittens instead.
• − Visual style leans slightly more 'digital' than 'hyper-photorealistic' compared to the other model.
• − Lighting is less dramatic, lacking the requested 'dew sparkles' and prominent god rays.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Perfect text accuracy for 'Caffè Florian' including the correct accent.
• + Excellent adherence to the 'minimalist' and 'vector emblem' style keywords.
• + Clean, balanced composition with a professional layout.

• − The steam effect is very simple compared to the more detailed cloche.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Beautifully detailed etching style for the cloche and steam.
• + Effective use of vintage texture and framed background.

• − Spelling error in the main name, rendering 'Café Flanelín' instead of 'Caffè Florian'.
• − Included extra nonsensical text 'IRGA' at the bottom.
• − Less 'minimalist' than requested, leaning more towards a complex illustration.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent flat-vector illustration style with a unified aesthetic.
• + Accurately represents major components like the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
• + Incorporates a clear sense of space and trajectory lines.

• − Confuses labels, such as labeling Earth as 'Moon' and 'Translunar Laarth'.
• − Includes an irrelevant ringed planet (Saturn) which wasn't part of the direct mission path.
• − Text rendering has significant misspellings throughout the labels.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Follows the requested numbering structure (1-6) for mission steps.
• + Cleaner, more minimalist iconography typical of modern infographics.
• + Brighter, more strictly adhered NASA-inspired color palette.

• − Completely fails to include the lunar module or rocket icons, using generic astronauts instead.
• − The logic and sequence of icons are chaotic and do not match the scientific steps provided.
• − Includes four astronaut silhouettes for a three-person mission.