Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

DALL-E 2 OpenAI FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 Black Forest Labs

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

DALL-E 2

15.8 arena score

#59 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

19.0 arena score

#47 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

DALL-E 2

0.0%

win rate

Ties

50.0%

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

50.0%

win rate

0.0% 50.0% ties 50.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Features a wooden table and a glass cube.
  • Fails to include the red book on top.
  • Fails to include a blue sphere inside the cube (it appears to be a red liquid/solid).
  • The composition is poorly balanced with a giant blue object in the background that was not requested.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including the sphere inside and book on top.
  • + High visual quality with realistic lighting and reflections.
  • + Accurately represents the spatial relationships requested.
  • The glass cube has an internal shelf that was not explicitly requested but helps house the sphere.

Verdict: DALL-E 2 failed significantly on this complex spatial prompt, missing key objects like the red book and blue sphere, and introducing a large blue pot not in the prompt. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 followed every instruction perfectly, producing a clear, high-quality image with correct placement of all items and realistic lighting.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Successfully captures an 'imperfect framing' candid style.
  • + Strong reflections on wet pavement.
  • The subject is heavily out of focus, failing to show the requested 'natural skin texture' or the elderly Japanese man's face.
  • Low resolution and grainy texture.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent adherence to the elderly Japanese man subject with natural skin texture.
  • + High visual quality with clear rain-slicked pavement reflections.
  • + Realistic bicycle anatomy and detailed background.
  • The framing is very centered and staged rather than 'imperfect' as requested.
  • Lacks the 'motion blur from passing cars' specified in the prompt.

Verdict: DALL-E 2 attempted the abstract 'imperfect framing' and 'motion blur' aspects but failed significantly on the primary subject, producing an image where the man is unidentifiable and out of focus. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 produced a much higher quality, realistic image that perfectly captured the person, the bicycle, and the wet atmosphere, even though it ignored the instruction for imperfect framing and motion blur.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Successfully captures a gritty, weathered texture
  • + Strong bokeh light implementation
  • Coherence is extremely poor, looking more like a macro shot of a miniature or rusted object than a person
  • Fails to show face, lifelike eyes, or braided hair almost entirely
  • Low resolution and blurry details

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Exceptional adherence to complex prompt details like beads in hair and faint scars
  • + Excellent technical quality with lifelike eyes and sharp skin textures
  • + Perfect execution of warm torchlight and depth of field
  • The 'battle-worn' aspect is slightly clean, looking more like a movie set than actual grime
  • Small nonsensical text artifact in the bottom right corner

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 far outperforms DALL-E 2 in every category, providing a sharp and highly accurate interpretation of the prompt. While DALL-E 2 produced a messy and incoherent image that lacks the requested subject features, FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 delivered a stunning cinematic portrait with intricate textures and lighting.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Strong bold sans-serif typography
  • + Artistic interpretation of food photos in a geometric grid
  • + High resolution rendering of the main text
  • Nonsensical text throughout the bottom half
  • Does not follow the requested menu sections (Appetizers/Pizza/Mains)
  • Image slices look abstract and messy rather than like professional food photography

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Perfectly adheres to the requested layout sections including Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains
  • + Extremely clean, professional, and realistic menu design
  • + Consistent grid layout with recognizable food illustrations/photos
  • Includes some spelling errors like 'Apptizers' and 'Pizzal'
  • Text at very small sizes becomes blurry/garbled

Verdict: DALL-E 2 fails significantly on prompt adherence, providing an abstract layout with nonsensical sections and messy visuals. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 perfectly captures the requested menu structure, including specific categories like Mains and Pizzas, in a highly professional and clean aesthetic.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Successfully captures a chaotic, fiery atmosphere.
  • + The glowing text effect matches the requested theme.
  • Failed significantly on text accuracy with 'MARGIC' and 'BAGUEC'.
  • Very low photo-realism with blurry, indistinct food textures.
  • Missing the required pricing and starburst elements.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent photo-realistic detail on the burger ingredients.
  • + High-quality composition with clean, legible text and a starburst element.
  • + Good adherence to the 'exploded' burger request with floating components.
  • Included a typo in 'LIIMITED' and a redundant garbled text line.
  • Failed to apply the 'fiery, glowing effect' to the text as requested.
  • The price in the starburst is incorrect (€.99 vs €6.99).

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner due to its significantly higher image quality and better overall prompt adherence, despite some minor text typos. DALL-E 2 produced a very low-resolution, messy image with nonsensical text that failed to meet the 'photorealistic' requirement.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + The texture looks like genuine chalk strokes on a blackboard.
  • The text is completely illegible and does not follow the prompt.
  • The resolution is low and the image is heavily cropped.
  • It fails to render the specific menu items requested.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Successfully renders the specific date and most keywords from the menu items.
  • + High visual quality with realistic lighting and a clear café setting.
  • + The composition is well-balanced and resembles a professional chalkboard.
  • The handwriting looks more like a digital marker font than actual chalk on a board.
  • Includes several repetitive and garbled phrases instead of the clean list requested.
  • Significant spelling errors such as 'Risortto', 'Octemon', and 'Buthowith'.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner as it followed the prompt's instructions for specific text and date, whereas DALL-E 2 produced incomprehensible gibberish. While FLUX.1 struggled with perfect spelling and the 'chalk' texture feels a bit too much like a digital pen, it provided a coherent and aesthetically pleasing image that actually functions as a menu.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
0% wins 100% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Successfully captures a cinematic space background with realistic-looking stardust and astronomical bodies.
  • + Correctly places an astronaut and a horse in the scene together.
  • Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • Poor image quality with significant artifacts, smudging, and a low-resolution appearance.
  • Anatomy of both the horse and astronaut is distorted and lacks detail.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Followed the difficult logical constraint of placing a horse on top of an 'astronaut' (interpreted here as astronaut equipment).
  • + Exceptional visual clarity and high-resolution details on the fur and mechanical parts.
  • + Dynamic composition with a surreal, cinematic lighting style.
  • The astronaut is represented as robotic equipment/backpack rather than a human in a suit.
  • Anatomical strangeness where a second horse head/neck appears to emerge from the back.

Verdict: DALL-E 2 completely failed the core logical reversal requested in the prompt, providing a standard, low-quality image of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 successfully interpreted the surreal 'horse on top' instruction with high fidelity and cinematic detail, though it translated the 'astronaut' into mechanical equipment.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Follows the instruction of having a person looking at a phone screen.
  • Severely lacks photorealism with significant warping and artifacts.
  • The capybara is unrecognizable and looks like a distorted puppet.
  • Failed to include the capybara's hat and jacket correctly.
  • Composition is fragmented and chaotic.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent photorealistic quality and lighting.
  • + Strict adherence to all prompt details including the hat, jacket, and bored expression.
  • + Perfectly executed composition showing the interior relationship between driver and passenger.
  • The passenger is holding two phones instead of one.
  • The steering wheel is on the wrong side for a standard US taxi.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner, producing a high-quality, professional image that looks like a real photograph despite the minor error of the passenger holding two phones. DALL-E 2 failed to produce a coherent image, with monstrously distorted characters and a lack of aesthetic appeal.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Features a hand-drawn, authentic vintage aesthetic
  • + Includes the requested twisted trees and bats correctly
  • Text is completely illegible and nonsensical
  • Low resolution and lacks the requested central glowing jack-o-lantern
  • Missing specific event details like date and location

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent composition with a clear central glowing jack-o-lantern
  • + High resolution with clean, cinematic lighting
  • + Successfully includes the specific date, time, and location requested in the prompt
  • Notable typos in the sub-text and labels such as 'Tine' and 'Theaches'
  • The border is slightly simplistic despite the spooky theme

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner as it followed every instruction, including the layout of a central pumpkin and specific event details, while maintaining high visual quality. DALL-E 2 failed to include the primary subject (the pumpkin) and produced entirely garbled text that makes the invitation unusable.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Captured a clean isometric perspective.
  • + Maintains a vibrant, saturated color palette.
  • Failed significantly on text rendering, displaying 'Sush' instead of the requested labels.
  • Poor subject representation with unrecognizable, blob-like sushi shapes.
  • Included strange geometric artifacts that don't match the prompt.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'diorama base' and 'stylized 3D' aesthetic.
  • + High-quality rendered textures for the salmon and rice.
  • + Followed the text layout and flag icon instructions much more closely.
  • Failed to spell 'SUSHI' correctly, repeating 'JAPAN' with a spelling error ('JAPAN' and 'JAPAN' with a dot).
  • The text is slightly cut off at the top edge of the frame.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner as it successfully captured the miniature 3D diorama aesthetic and rendered realistic stylized sushi, whereas DALL-E 2 produced abstract shapes and broken text. While FLUX.1 struggled with the specific 'SUSHI' text, its overall composition and visual quality far exceed the outdated and incoherent output of DALL-E 2.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Includes all main entities from the prompt including a large puppy and a kitten.
  • Severely lacks photorealism with significant anatomical deformities in the animals.
  • Butterflies and animals appear poorly composited and distorted.
  • Images are blurry and lack the '8K' level of detail requested.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting and atmospheric requests including god rays and sparkles.
  • + High-quality fur textures and expressive eyes that match the 'wholesome' vibe.
  • + Clean composition with sharp details and vibrant colors.
  • Failed to include the 'baby bunny', instead generating multiple cats or cat-fox hybrids.
  • Composition is a bit crowded with five animals instead of the four specified.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 delivers a high-quality, professional-looking image with beautiful lighting and textures that perfectly capture the requested aesthetic, despite slightly missing the mark on the specific animal count (missing the bunny). DALL-E 2 followed the prompt's subjects more literally but failed completely on visual quality, producing distorted and low-resolution results that are not usable as 'masterpiece' art.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Matches the requested color palette well
  • + Captures a minimalist silhouette of a cloche
  • Text is nonsensical and fails core prompt requirements
  • Distorted and messy graphic elements with significant artifacts
  • Lacks requested banner and texture

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Successfully includes the requested banner and 'Est. 1720' text
  • + Clean vector-style execution with a cohesive vintage aesthetic
  • + Highly detailed cloche design with ornate flourishes
  • Misspelled the primary brand name as 'Cafe Flamilan' and 'Caffee'
  • Visual style is more ornate than 'minimalist' as requested

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner as it demonstrates significantly higher graphic quality and adherence to the layout elements like the banner and established date. While it struggled with the spelling of 'Florian', DALL-E 2 produced completely illegible text and poorly rendered shapes that do not resemble a professional logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

DALL-E 2
FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

AI Judge Analysis

DALL-E 2

  • + Captures the requested navy, white, and red color palette effectively.
  • + The layout has a complex, tech-heavy aesthetic reminiscent of vintage mission control diagrams.
  • Text is largely nonsensical and features major misspellings like 'ALLPOO'.
  • Fails to follow the specific 1-6 step sequence requested in the prompt.
  • The visual style is cluttered and lacks the 'clean' vector look requested.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Follows the instructional sequence of steps much more logically than Model A.
  • + Successfully renders 'APOLLO 11' text clearly and matches the flat-vector style perfectly.
  • + The icons are consistent, crisp, and organized along a clear horizontal timeline.
  • Small body text is still garbled and nonsensical.
  • The landing lunar module icon is a bit disconnected from the rest of the timeline flow.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the clear winner as it directly translates the prompt's logical structure into a clean, modern infographic. While DALL-E 2 produces a chaotic mess with unfortunate text errors, FLUX provides a legible title and a sequence of icons that actually represent the mission stages requested.

Next steps

Explore each model