Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) Vyro AI Wan 2.6 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 4 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)

26.8 arena score

#6 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Wan 2.6

23.4 arena score

#23 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Best Image-to-Video right now
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)

33.3%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.6

66.7%

win rate

33.3% 0.0% ties 66.7%
Shared challenges 4

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent high-quality food photography
  • + Clean minimalist layout that mimics a real physical menu
  • Text is completely illegible and gibberish
  • Does not follow the grid layout for photos as requested

Wan 2.6

  • + Strong adherence to the grid layout for photos
  • + Includes requested colorful accents and bold sans-serif fonts
  • + Text is much more legible with clear pricing and section headers
  • The food photos are repetitive, showing almost exclusively pizza
  • Includes a strange price tag of $0.09

Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the superior choice for this prompt because it successfully followed the layout instructions, specifically the grid pattern for photos and the inclusion of vibrant accents. While ImagineArt 1.5 had higher individual photo quality, it failed to produce legible text or a cohesive grid, whereas Wan 2.6 created a functional-looking menu structure with readable sections.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)
Wan 2.6
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent 3D rendering of the text in isometric space
  • + High detail in the variety of sushi types and textures
  • + Perfectly followed the 45-degree isometric perspective
  • The 'S' in 'SUSHI' is slightly garbled in the 3D text
  • The flag icon is integrated into the 3D text in a slightly cluttered way

Wan 2.6

  • + Very clean, minimalist aesthetic aligned with 'ultra-clean' prompt
  • + Perfectly rendered, legible 2D text and flag icon
  • + Strong execution of the miniature diorama on a base
  • The sushi variety is more limited compared to Model A
  • Text is rendered as a 2D overlay rather than being part of the 3D scene

Verdict: ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) excels in creating a complex 3D scene where the text exists within the isometric space, offering a higher variety of sushi with impressive textures. Wan 2.6 provides a cleaner, more minimalist interpretation with perfect text legibility, though it feels less like a unified 3D diorama because the text is a 2D graphic. ImagineArt 1.5 is the winner for better adhering to the isometric request for all elements, including the text.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent typography rendering with the requested accent mark.
  • + Professional vector emblem composition with a balanced circular layout.
  • + Strong adherence to the vintage/retro aesthetic with sophisticated line work.
  • The steam effect looks a bit like stylized worms or noodles.
  • The cloche is oddly split in half visually.

Wan 2.6

  • + Strong text adherence and clean typography.
  • + Excellent use of texture on the background per the prompt.
  • + Simple, minimalist design that functions well as a logo.
  • The 'Est. 1720' banner is tiny and awkwardly placed behind the cloche.
  • The composition feels a bit bottom-heavy with large empty space above.

Verdict: ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) creates a more cohesive and professional vector emblem that feels like a real vintage logo. While Wan 2.6 captures the background texture better, its composition is less balanced and the banner requested in the prompt is poorly integrated compared to ImagineArt 1.5.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)
Wan 2.6
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully included all six requested infographic steps and milestones.
  • + Adhered perfectly to the NASA-inspired color palette and flat-vector style.
  • + Clean, complex composition that functions well as a narrative poster.
  • Contains spelling errors in text labels (e.g., 'Tranclutal', 'Alerin').
  • Iconography is a bit repetitive, using spheres for both Earth and Moon steps.

Wan 2.6

  • + Simple, legible typography with correct spelling of astronaut names.
  • + Clean minimalist aesthetic that fits the modern vector theme.
  • Failed to include the six requested infographic steps and their associated icons.
  • Lacks the visual complexity and information density requested in the prompt.
  • The composition is mostly empty space and does not function as an infographic.

Verdict: ImagineArt 1.5 (Preview) followed the complex prompt instructions for a 6-step infographic, providing a detailed narrative poster with the correct NASA color palette. Wan 2.6 provided a very simple title card that ignored the majority of the instructions, including all the specific steps and icons. Despite some spelling errors, ImagineArt 1.5 is the clear winner for prompt adherence and utility.

Next steps

Explore each model