FLUX.2 [max] vs Qwen Image Edit 2511
Head-to-head across 6 challenges
FLUX.2 [max]
41.1%
win rate
Ties
1.1%
Qwen Image Edit 2511
57.9%
win rate
Challenge Results
Man and Car in California
Editing“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent preservation of the specific Rolls Royce car model from the source.
- + Synthesized the man's hair and clothing (plaid coat, scarf) accurately into the scene.
- + Realistic lighting and shadow integration of the car onto the coastal road.
- − The man's facial features changed significantly, losing the likeness and smile from the source.
- − The man's scale relative to the car seems slightly too small.
Qwen Image Edit 2511
- + Maintained the man's facial features and smiling expression more accurately than Model A.
- + Highly detailed interior rendering that matches the luxury aesthetic.
- + Very clear and iconic 'California coastline' background with palm trees.
- − Failed to preserve the specific car model, changing it to a generic convertible interior.
- − The steering wheel placement and hands have some proportional issues.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] succeeded in keeping the specific car from the source image but failed to maintain the man's character likeness, whereas Qwen Image Edit 2511 perfectly preserved the man's face and clothing but completely changed the car. FLUX.2 [max] is the winner for better overall scene composition and for actually using the provided car image rather than generating a new one.
Bald man challenge
Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent integration of the new hair with the existing sideburns and beard
- + Preserves the original facial features and lighting perfectly
- + Realistic salt-and-pepper texture that matches the subject's age
- − The hair has a slightly 'pasted on' look at the very top crown where highlights are a bit flat
Qwen Image Edit 2511
- + Successfully adds a full head of hair as requested
- + Maintains the background and clothing from the source image
- − The hair texture appears oily or plastic-like with unrealistic highlights
- − The hairline and temples look unnatural and do not blend well with the original facial structure
- − The hair changed the shape of the forehead slightly in an unflattering way
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] provides a significantly more realistic result by matching the hair's color and texture to the subject's existing beard, whereas Qwen Image Edit 2511 produces a wig-like effect with unnatural, shiny strands. FLUX.2 [max] also did a better job of maintaining the subject's identity and facial structure while adding the hair.
Night Sky Transformation
Editing“Change the scene to night: a deep, dark sky with subtle, glistening stars visible behind the mountain.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the exact architecture and landscape of the original.
- + Realistic transition to night with natural star placement and believable lighting.
- + Subtle, high-quality rendering of the mountain under dark sky conditions.
- − The lighting on the mountain peak remains slightly bright for a midnight scene, though it looks like moonlight.
Qwen Image Edit 2511
- + Successfully changed the time of day to night.
- + Greatly preserved the foreground town and mountain structures from the source image.
- − The added stars are highly artificial, resembling a repetitive grid of uniform white dots.
- − The stars ignore the presence of clouds, appearing in front of hazy atmosphere in an unrealistic way.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] provides a much more professional and realistic edit, seamlessly transitioning the golden hour scene to a believable night view with natural-looking stars. Qwen Image Edit 2511 correctly identifies the task but fails significantly on execution, adding a repetitive, low-quality star texture that feels like a poorly applied overlay.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent adherence to the 'hand-painted textures' and 'soft pastel colors' request.
- + Captures the iconic Studio Ghibli character design style with rounder eyes and simplified features.
- + Strong aesthetic consistency and nostalgic mood throughout the entire canvas.
- − The faces look quite different from the original individuals in the source image.
Qwen Image Edit 2511
- + Maintains a higher facial similarity to the people in the source photo.
- + Clean vector-like lines and clear composition.
- + Preserves background architectural elements more accurately than Model A.
- − Lacks the requested 'hand-painted texture', feeling more like a modern digital manhwa/webtoon style.
- − Colors are somewhat saturated, missing the 'soft pastel' and 'warm, nostalgic' requirement.
Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] followed the artistic instructions much more effectively, delivering a piece that genuinely looks like a Studio Ghibli watercolor painting with appropriate textures and character designs. Qwen Image Edit 2511 preserved the source identities better but failed to capture the Ghibli aesthetic, resulting in a generic digital illustration style.
Neutral Expression to Genuine Smile
Editing{
"action": "image_edit",
"reference": "uploaded neutral portrait",
"change": "Warm genuine Duchenne smile: lips curved up, slight natural teeth, soft eye crinkles, subtle cheek raise",
"details": "Realistic smiling skin (dimples if present, soft cheek shadows), slightly brighter eyes; keep exact eye shape/color/iris",
"preserve_exact": "Face identity/structure, eyes/nose/lips/eyebrows, hair, skin texture/pores/freckles, makeup, clothing, head pose, background, lighting, shadows, framing",
"no_changes": "No face shape change, no new features, no gaze shift, no hair/clothing/lighting/background edits",
"style": "Ultra-photorealistic 8K portrait, sharp face focus, natural soft lighting, realistic skin glow"
}
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent Duchenne smile with authentic eye crinkles and cheek raising.
- + Impressive preservation of the original hair texture and background details.
- + Maintains skin texture and freckles while modifying the muscle movement.
- − Slight shift in underlying bone structure makes the face look a bit wider/different than the source.
Qwen Image Edit 2511
- + Strong preservation of the source facial identity and overall structure.
- + Successfully adds slight eye crinkles and a pleasant smile as requested.
- + Preserves the specific iris color and eye shape perfectly.
- − The skin texture appears slightly excessively smoothed on the cheeks compared to the source.
- − The smile feels a bit more forced/mechanical than the 'genuine' request in Model A.
Verdict: Both models did an exceptional job preserving the source image. FLUX.2 [max] created a more convincing and 'genuine' Duchenne smile with superior anatomy around the eyes, though it slightly altered the face shape. Qwen Image Edit 2511 better preserved the exact face shape and skin detail of the source but produced a slightly less natural smile; however, it wins for its ability to maintain the original woman's identity more precisely.
Golden Hour Stroll
Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.2 [max]
- + Excellent adherence to the 'wind' instruction with realistic hair physics.
- + Preserves the original facial features and identity very well.
- + Includes many small, varied leaves that feel naturally integrated.
- − The woman's left hand (center) is slightly distorted compared to the original.
- − Some leaves are placed awkwardly over the subject's clothing.
Qwen Image Edit 2511
- + Highly dynamic and energetic hair movement.
- + Vibrant leaves with varied colors that add a sense of life.
- + Good preservation of the dog and general background.
- − Higher 'hallucination' on the hair strands, which look a bit like floating wires.
- − Mouth and teeth details on the woman are slightly more AI-stylized than the source.
Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but FLUX.2 [max] produced a more convincing and realistic wind effect that better preserved the subject's original appearance. Qwen Image Edit 2511 created a more dramatic, stylized hair movement, but the strand rendering felt slightly less natural than FLUX.2 [max].
FLUX.2 [max]
Black Forest Labs' flagship image generation model delivering state-of-the-art quality with exceptional realism, precision, and consistency for both text-to-image and advanced image editing
Qwen Image Edit 2511
Alibaba's Qwen image editing model for instruction-based image modifications and transformations