Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 Black Forest Labs Z-Image Turbo Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 2 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

17.8 arena score

#36 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Z-Image Turbo

24.7 arena score

#15 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Z-Image Turbo

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 2

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Z-Image Turbo
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent chalk texture on the board surface
  • + Correct date and title formatting
  • + Realistic lighting and shadows within the café environment
  • Significant spelling errors and repetitive text hallucinations
  • The handwriting is all block letters instead of the requested cursive title
  • The prices and item names are scrambled and incoherent

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Very high spelling accuracy across all menu items
  • + Clean and legible layout
  • + Correctly interpreted the incomplete prompt for 'Brown Butter Cookies'
  • The handwriting style is not cursive as specifically requested in the prompt
  • Text looks a bit too clinical despite the chalk texture
  • Minor spelling error in 'Mustroom'

Verdict: Z-Image Turbo is the clear winner as it successfully rendered almost all the requested text with high legibility and correct pricing, whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 suffered from significant text hallucinations and repetition. While neither model successfully produced 'elegant cursive' for the title, Z-Image Turbo's overall adherence to the menu content was far superior.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Z-Image Turbo

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Strong cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern
  • + Clean graphic design layout
  • + Good centered jack-o-lantern illustration
  • Numerous spelling errors in the lower portion of the invitation
  • Fails to include the parchment texture requested
  • Text rendering is inconsistent across different lines

Z-Image Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to aesthetic details like parchment, thorns, and webs
  • + Mostly accurate text rendering with clear gothic fonts
  • + Dynamic composition with twisted trees and tombstones in the background
  • Minor typo in 'The Archves' (should be Arches)
  • The small scroll banner at the top is very tiny compared to the main text

Verdict: Z-Image Turbo is the clear winner as it successfully captured the requested 'dark parchment' and 'thorns and webs' aesthetic, whereas FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 produced a dark gradient background instead. Furthermore, Z-Image Turbo rendered the event details with near-perfect accuracy and appropriate fonts, while FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 suffered from significant spelling malfunctions in the bottom half of the image.

Next steps

Explore each model