Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 Black Forest Labs Qwen Image 2.0 Pro Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 2 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

17.8 arena score

#36 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

22.3 arena score

#27 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 2

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Successfully rendered the correct date and title.
  • Significant spelling errors and repetitions in the menu items.
  • Text does not follow the requested cursive style for the title.
  • The 'chalk' texture looks more like a digital marker or clean whiteboard pen.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

  • + Excellent adherence to all text prompts with near-perfect spelling.
  • + Realistic chalk texture with smudges and natural variations.
  • + Successfully implemented the cursive style requested for several parts of the board.
  • The title is in print rather than the requested 'elegant cursive' style.
  • Slightly less centered composition compared to the other model.

Verdict: Qwen Image 2.0 Pro is the clear winner as it correctly rendered the complex menu items with high accuracy and a much more realistic chalk texture. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 struggled with the text generation, resulting in garbled words like 'Octemon' and 'Buthowith'.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Strong composition with a central focus on the jack-o-lantern
  • + Atmospheric, dark aesthetic following the gothic theme
  • Poor text rendering with numerous spelling errors in the bottom section
  • Highly repetitive scrolls and nonsensical word fragments

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

  • + Perfect text accuracy for all requested fields
  • + Excellent adherence to the border details including webs and thorns
  • + Dynamic lighting with the green glow and detailed bat character designs
  • The shadow of the pumpkin is a bit simplistic/solid black
  • The scroll texture is slightly blurred compared to the sharpness of the border

Verdict: Qwen Image 2.0 Pro is the clear winner as it successfully rendered all requested text perfectly, including the specific date and location. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 struggled significantly with the text requirements, resulting in gibberish and typos, and failed to incorporate the specific 'thorns and webs' border requested.

Next steps

Explore each model