Neutral Expression to Genuine Smile
Vote12 models were given the same image and edit instruction, and the community voted blind on which outputs looked best. How it works
#1 — Nano Banana
Edit instruction
{
"action": "image_edit",
"reference": "uploaded neutral portrait",
"change": "Warm genuine Duchenne smile: lips curved up, slight natural teeth, soft eye crinkles, subtle cheek raise",
"details": "Realistic smiling skin (dimples if present, soft cheek shadows), slightly brighter eyes; keep exact eye shape/color/iris",
"preserve_exact": "Face identity/structure, eyes/nose/lips/eyebrows, hair, skin texture/pores/freckles, makeup, clothing, head pose, background, lighting, shadows, framing",
"no_changes": "No face shape change, no new features, no gaze shift, no hair/clothing/lighting/background edits",
"style": "Ultra-photorealistic 8K portrait, sharp face focus, natural soft lighting, realistic skin glow"
}
Voters were asked to judge by
Identity preserved
Natural smile
No geometry changes
Challenge Rankings
| # | Model | Elo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nano Banana
|
1266 |
| 2 |
Seedream 4.5
|
1240 |
| 3 |
GPT Image 1.5
|
1236 |
| 4 |
Nano Banana Pro
|
1216 |
| 5 |
Grok Imagine Image
|
1211 |
| 6 |
Seedream 5.0 Lite
|
1166 |
| 7 |
FLUX.2 [pro]
|
1157 |
| 8 |
Wan 2.6
|
1145 |
| 9 |
Grok Imagine Image Pro
|
1132 |
| 10 |
FLUX.2 [max]
|
1123 |
| 11 |
Reve Image 1.0
|
1113 |
| 12 |
Seedream 4.0
|
1105 |
Google's Nano Banana leads the editing challenge with a 1266 Elo and a 77.6% win rate, delivering results more than twice as fast as its closest competitor, Seedream 4.5 (1240 Elo). Despite being the most affordable model in the top five, GPT Image 1.5 maintains a competitive 1236 Elo, and noticeably outperforms the more expensive Nano Banana Pro (1216 Elo) and Grok Imagine Image Pro (1132 Elo).
Elo vs Cost
Elo vs Speed
3 without speed data omitted.
Competitors
12 models, ranked by Elo
1
2
3
Highlighted Battles
The most competitive head-to-head matchups, selected by closeness and vote count.