Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

P-Image Edit PrunaAI Wan 2.7 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 7 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

P-Image Edit

9.5 arena score

#29 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Wan 2.7

20.5 arena score

#39 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

P-Image Edit

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.7

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 7

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
P-Image Edit
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's original design and color.
  • + Accurately represents the man from the source image behind the wheel.
  • + Dynamic motion blur on the road and wheels creates a realistic sense of speed.
  • The man's scale relative to the car is slightly too small.

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully places the car on a coastal highway.
  • + Good lighting and shadows that match the outdoor environment.
  • Fails to use the specific man from the source image, replacing him with a generic figure.
  • The face of the driver is distorted and poorly rendered.
  • The car's dimensions and details are subtly altered from the source.

Verdict: P-Image Edit is the clear winner as it successfully combined both source images, correctly identifying the specific man and the specific car to create the scene. Wan 2.7 failed to preserve the identity of the person from the second source image and produced a distorted face.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
P-Image Edit
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Successfully integrated face and scarf elements from Image 2.
  • + Maintained a strong resemblance to the character's clothing color scheme and sunglasses.
  • + Followed the complex leg and stool arrangement from Image 1.
  • Confused the hair logic by blending Image 1's long hair with the short-haired male character.
  • Anatomical failure in the upper arm, creating a floating red sleeve disconnected from the shoulder.
  • Inconsistent clothing application where some limbs have black sleeves and others have red.

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfect preservation of the original Image 1 background and pose.
  • + High visual quality with no weird artifacts or glitches.
  • Complete failure to perform any editing; the character from Image 2 was not integrated at all.
  • Instruction following is zero for the character swap task.

Verdict: P-Image Edit attempted the complex task of merging the character and pose, and while it suffered from significant anatomical ghosts and confused hair logic, it successfully mapped the identity and accessories. Wan 2.7 failed the task entirely, simply returning the source image (Image 1) without any modifications. Therefore, P-Image Edit is the preferred choice for actually engaging with the prompt instructions.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
P-Image Edit
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent adherence to the specific clothing items (peacoat, plaid scarf, blue jeans) from Image 2.
  • + Maintains the person's identity and facial features with high accuracy.
  • + Correctly preserves the wood structure and environment from the base image.
  • Added a thick gold chain and yellow-laced boots that were not in either source image.
  • The body proportions appear slightly shortened and compressed compared to the original person's height.

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully preserves the subject's face, skin patterns (vitiligo), and general hair style.
  • + Good integration of the person into the beach environment with realistic lighting.
  • Failed the clothing instruction entirely by generating a generic ornate coat instead of the specific peacoat/scarf outfit from Image 2.
  • Anatomical issues with the hands, including an extra thumb/finger structure on the right hand.
  • Source preservation is weak as it changed the subject's pose significantly.

Verdict: P-Image Edit successfully followed the core instruction to dress the person in the specific outfit from Image 2, including the blue peacoat, jeans, and plaid scarf. While it took some creative liberties with the shoes and jewelry, Wan 2.7 failed the primary task by generating a completely different, unrelated outfit and introduced significant anatomical artifacts in the hands.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
P-Image Edit
Before After
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Successfully adds a full head of hair with high density
  • + Perfectly preserves all original elements of the scene, facial features, and clothing
  • The hair texture looks somewhat synthetic/plasticky and coiled
  • The hairline is slightly too sharp and the volume is a bit exaggerated for a realistic look

Wan 2.7

  • + Extremely realistic hair texture and natural-looking density
  • + Seamless integration of the hairline and temples with the existing beard and skin
  • + Flawless preservation of the source image identity and environmental lighting
  • Slightly less 'full' than requested compared to the volume in the other model, though more realistic

Verdict: Wan 2.7 provides a much more convincing and natural result, with hair that looks biologically consistent with the subject's existing beard and skin texture. While P-Image Edit successfully added a large volume of hair, the texture and hairline appear more like a wig, whereas Wan 2.7 looks like a genuine photograph of the person.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
P-Image Edit
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent caricature of the subject that maintains her likeness while exaggerating features for humor.
  • + Creative integration of all three themes, placing her as an anchor directly on an ice rink with hockey players.
  • + High quality illustration style with clean lines and a professional layout.
  • The dog element is a bit small and secondary compared to the hockey theme.
  • Text on the background screens is nonsensical.

Wan 2.7

  • + Strong emphasis on the 'dogs' element of the prompt with multiple humorous canine characters.
  • + Good preservation of the source image's pose (the outstretched selfie arm).
  • + Legible and relevant text in speech bubbles.
  • The hockey element is minimal, represented only by a small puck and a miniature rink on the desk.
  • The caricature style feels slightly less polished and more generic than Model A.
  • The outfit was changed to a suit, losing the denim shirt from the original.

Verdict: P-Image Edit (Model A) is the winner as it creates a much more cohesive and impressive scene, placing the subject directly into an exaggerated professional environment that blends her job with hockey. While Wan 2.7 (Model B) does a great job with the dogs and maintaining the selfie pose, it feels more like a collection of stickers rather than a fully realized caricature of a 'TV anchor job'.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
P-Image Edit
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent preservation of the original pose and character lineup.
  • + Captures the dreamy background and pastel colors requested.
  • + Maintains clean, illustrative lines consistent with modern anime styles.
  • The background is completely changed from an urban street to a park, losing source context.
  • Artificial-looking shadows on the faces.

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully preserves the original urban background while applying a painterly texture.
  • + Achieves a beautiful watercolor/hand-painted aesthetic that feels very nostalgic.
  • + Characters' facial expressions are more closely aligned with the original meme's intensity.
  • The color palette is slightly muted and yellowish compared to the requested 'soft pastel'.
  • Minor anatomical artifacts in the woman's hair on the left.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of stylizing the famous meme. P-Image Edit creates a cleaner, more vibrant 'anime' look but replaces the background entirely, whereas Wan 2.7 provides a superior 'hand-painted' texture and preserves the original environment, making the transformation feel more cohesive as an edit.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
P-Image Edit
Before After
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'hair blowing in wind' instruction with a dramatic, symmetrical effect.
  • + Adds a large quantity of colorful leaves throughout the scene to enhance the sense of motion.
  • + Maintains the identity of the person and dog perfectly.
  • The wind effect on the hair is slightly stylized and surreal rather than naturalistic.

Wan 2.7

  • + Provides a more naturalistic wind effect on the hair that feels realistic to the environment.
  • + Good source preservation, keeping the background and character details consistent.
  • + The leaves integrated have varied motion blur, adding to the energetic feel.
  • The motion effect is more subtle compared to Model A.
  • Fewer leaves added toward the top of the frame than requested for a 'lively' feel.

Verdict: P-Image Edit followed the instructions more boldly, creating a very dynamic and energetic scene with a high volume of flying leaves and dramatic hair motion. Wan 2.7 is more realistic and subtle, but P-Image Edit's interpretation better captures the requested 'energetic and lively' atmosphere through more aggressive editing of the hair and debris.

Next steps

Explore each model