Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

P-Image Edit PrunaAI Vidu Q2 ShengShu Technology

Settled by community votes across 7 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

P-Image Edit

9.5 arena score

#29 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Vidu Q2

19.8 arena score

#42 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

P-Image Edit

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Vidu Q2

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 7

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
P-Image Edit
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's original proportions and design details.
  • + The California coastline background is very realistic with good atmospheric perspective.
  • + Seamless integration of the man's hair and identity from the reference image.
  • The man's scale relative to the interior feels slightly small.
  • The motion blur on the wheels is a bit inconsistent with the stationary wheel hub.

Vidu Q2

  • + The man's facial features and expression are very clear and recognizable from the source.
  • + Great sense of high-speed motion with the road and wheels.
  • + Strong, vibrant composition that captures the requested theme perfectly.
  • The car's proportions are slightly altered, making the hood look wider and shorter than the source.
  • The man's left hand on the steering wheel has anatomical issues.

Verdict: Both models handled the complex task of merging two distinct subjects into a new environment very well. P-Image Edit preserved the original car's geometry more accurately, whereas Vidu Q2 did a better job of making the man's face recognizable and expressive. P-Image Edit is the likely winner for its more realistic lighting and professional-grade composition.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
P-Image Edit
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Successfully incorporates the black and white scarf and sunglasses from Image 2.
  • + Captures the character's facial features and hair texture quite well.
  • Confused the poses, resulting in a leg floating in the air that doesn't match Image 1's stance.
  • Inconsistent clothing blending, showing a red sleeve from the original image on a black sweatshirt.
  • The long hair from Image 1 was kept instead of using the short hair from the character in Image 2.

Vidu Q2

  • + Highly accurate recreation of the character's face, sunglasses, and full clothing ensemble.
  • + Perfectly replicates the complex pose and environment from Image 1.
  • + Excellent visual quality and integration of the black sweatshirt texture.
  • Added a watch that wasn't present in either source image.
  • Slight anatomical distortion on the fingers of the right hand.

Verdict: Vidu Q2 is the clear winner as it successfully follows the complex instructions to merge a specific character and pose. P-Image Edit fails on the pose recreation, leaving a leg floating mid-air and keeping the long hair from the pose reference rather than the short hair of the character reference.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
P-Image Edit
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Successfully integrated the full outfit including jeans and shoes.
  • + Maintained the person's face and unique skin patterns quite well.
  • + Handled the pose adaptation by creating a full-body view from a half-body source.
  • The fabric of the coat looks slightly like a low-resolution texture overlay.
  • Added a gold chain that was not present in Image 2.
  • Changed the composition from a close-up/medium shot to a wide shot unnecessarily.

Vidu Q2

  • + High visual quality with realistic fabric texture and lighting.
  • + Correctly matched the accessories like the sunglasses and watch from Image 2.
  • + Preserved the composition of the source image much better than the competitor.
  • Failed to add the jeans and shoes as requested, opting for a sleeveless vest version of the coat.
  • Altered the face by adding a mustache and changing the eye area with glasses.
  • The skin pattern on the arm looks somewhat distorted compared to the source image.

Verdict: P-Image Edit was more successful at the overall task of dressing the person in the entire outfit (jeans and shoes included), although it changed the camera distance to do so. Vidu Q2 produced a higher-quality texture and more accurate accessories, but it drastically failed the instruction to keep the face unchanged by adding facial hair and failed to include the bottom half of the outfit.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
P-Image Edit
Before After
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent preservation of the original image's face and background.
  • + Provides a distinct, thick hair texture as requested.
  • The hairline transition is sharp and looks like a wig overlay.
  • The curly texture doesn't perfectly match the coarser texture of the existing beard.

Vidu Q2

  • + Natural-looking hairline with fine hair detail integrated into the scalp.
  • + The hair texture and color perfectly match the subject's existing beard and eyebrows.
  • + Maintains the lighting and facial structure of the source image.
  • None notable.

Verdict: Vidu Q2 is the clear winner because it creates a seamless, believable integration of the new hair with the existing features. It matches the color and texture of the beard perfectly, whereas P-Image Edit's result looks like a digital overlay with a disconnected, wig-like hairline.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
P-Image Edit
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent caricature style that maintains a strong likeness to the source person.
  • + Successfully incorporates all requested elements: anchor desk/mic, hockey players/rink, and dogs.
  • + Clean, professional illustration quality with high detail in the background.
  • The dog in the bottom right has strange, anatomical artifacts (heart-shaped objects) growing out of its back.
  • The anchor desk setup is slightly cluttered with nonsensical small objects.

Vidu Q2

  • + Great creative integration of the themes, such as the dog wearing a hockey jersey.
  • + Dynamic pose and expression that feels very 'caricature' in nature.
  • + Preserves the subject's outfit (denim shirt and black top) quite accurately.
  • The hand holding the microphone has six fingers and severe anatomical distortion.
  • The person's facial likeness is slightly more generic compared to the source than Model A.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job translating the source image and instructions into a themed caricature. P-Image Edit (Model A) is the winner because it provides a much higher quality rendering with a better facial likeness, whereas Vidu Q2 (Model B) suffers from significant anatomical errors, specifically a six-fingered hand holding the microphone.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
P-Image Edit
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent preservation of the characters' specific facial structures and expressions.
  • + Beautifully soft, dreamy color palette that matches the prompt.
  • + High-quality hand-painted digital art style with soft lighting.
  • Changed the background from a city street to a generic park with clouds, losing the original context.
  • The art style is more akin to modern web-manhwa or generic digital illustration than specifically Studio Ghibli.

Vidu Q2

  • + Successfully captures the specific Studio Ghibli line-art and cel-shading aesthetic.
  • + Preserves the original city street background while stylizing it in a painterly way.
  • + Accurately recreates the iconic facial expressions of the meme in the target art style.
  • A few minor painting artifacts/jitters on the man's jeans.
  • The woman in the red dress has a slightly generic facial structure compared to the source.

Verdict: While P-Image Edit created a very aesthetically pleasing and clean image, it failed to preserve the source background. Vidu Q2 followed the prompt much more accurately by capturing the specific line-work and shading characteristic of Studio Ghibli while maintaining the structural integrity of the entire original scene, including the background.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
P-Image Edit
Before After
Vidu Q2

AI Judge Analysis

P-Image Edit

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'windy' hair request.
  • + Preserves the identity and features of the woman and dog almost perfectly.
  • + Maintains the background lighting and colors from the original image.
  • The flying leaves look more like small yellow petals and lack variety in size or color.
  • The hair looks a bit unnatural and symmetric in its floating state.

Vidu Q2

  • + Natural and high-quality rendering of falling autumn leaves with depth of field effects.
  • + Good hair motion that looks realistic to a breeze from the side.
  • + Successfully adds a lively, energetic atmosphere to the scene.
  • Changes the facial features of the woman significantly from the source image.
  • Minor changes to the background elements and the dog's fur texture.

Verdict: P-Image Edit was much better at preserving the original subjects' faces and details, but its 'falling leaves' and hair motion felt a bit static and artificial. Vidu Q2 created a much more visually appealing and 'energetic' scene with realistic motion and depth, though it failed to preserve the woman's original face. Vidu Q2 is the winner because it successfully executed the spirit of the edit instruction with superior artistic quality.

Next steps

Explore each model