P-Image Edit PrunaAI vs Seedream 4.0 ByteDance

P-Image Edit

• + Excellent preservation of the source car's detail and scale.
• + Captures the iconic California coastline aesthetic perfectly with motion blur on the road.

• − The man is barely visible behind the steering wheel and lacks the detail of the source image.
• − The man's hair appears slightly simplified compared to the source.

Seedream 4.0

• + Successfully preserves the man's specific clothing (plaid coat, black scarf, olive shirt) from the source image.
• + Great integration of both source subjects into a new, coherent environment.

• − The car's proportions are slightly distorted, looking a bit shortened compared to the original Royce.
• − The man's scale within the vehicle feels a bit too large.

P-Image Edit

• + Successfully merges the scarf and clothing style from Image 2 onto the pose from Image 1.
• + High fidelity face and sunglasses preservation from the character reference.
• + Maintains the complex leg and foot positioning from the original pose.

• − Confusing hair integration, combining the character's hair with long flowing locks that don't match either source well.
• − Anatomy on the raised leg is elongated and unnatural.

Seedream 4.0

• + Successfully integrates the character's clothing and scarf onto a dynamic pose.
• + The lighting transition on the arms matches the environment well.

• − Failed the pose instruction, simplifying the complex leg and torso rotation from Image 1 significantly.
• − The face is severely distorted with unnatural eyes and lost identity from Image 2.
• − Poor hand and foot anatomy with blurry details.

P-Image Edit

• + Excellent preservation of the original person's face and unique features
• + High-quality integration of the clothing onto the body in a full-body shot
• + Successfully matched the scarf pattern and coat style

• − Added a large gold chain and bright yellow laces that were not in the reference image
• − The face appears slightly flatter than the original image

Seedream 4.0

• + Strong adherence to the specific footwear and scarf pattern from the reference image
• + Good pose adaptation relative to the original body position

• − Violated the 'keep face completely unchanged' instruction by adding a mustache and sunglasses
• − The skin texture on the face looks significantly different/distorted compared to the source

P-Image Edit

• + Excellent preservation of the original image's texture and facial features
• + High-detail hair rendering with realistic light interaction
• + Creative and stylistic curly hair choice that feels natural

• − The hairline on the forehead is slightly abrupt against the skin

Seedream 4.0

• + Great hair density and volume
• + Matches the texture of the original beard well
• + Seamless blending at the temples

• − The forehead area is distorted, making the head look unnaturally square and elongated
• − The hairline is too symmetrical and looks slightly artificial

P-Image Edit

• + Perfectly captures the caricatured art style with exaggerated features.
• + Includes all thematic elements: TV anchor desk, hockey rink background, and dog companion.
• + High-quality illustration with vibrant colors and clear, consistent design.

• − The text on the screens and tickers contains nonsensical gibberish.
• − The dog at the bottom right has a strange, red mechanical-looking object on its back.

Seedream 4.0

• + Maintains the photographic aesthetic while applying a classic big-head caricature effect.
• + Preserves the original background setting and color palette of the source image.
• + Effectively incorporates the anchor desk, hockey jersey, stick, and a realistic dog.

• − The hand holding the phone is distorted with multiple anatomical errors.
• − The micro-microphone on the desk is poorly rendered and lacks detail.
• − The blend between the caricature head and the photographic body feels somewhat jarring.

P-Image Edit

• + Excellent preservation of the original subjects' facial features and structures.
• + Vibrant pastel colors and a clean digital illustration style.
• + Strong adherence to the original composition and outfits.

• − Style leans more towards generic manhua/webtoon than the hand-painted Studio Ghibli aesthetic.
• − Background feels a bit busy with the floral elements.

Seedream 4.0

• + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli 'watercolor' and hand-painted texture requested.
• + Soft, dreamy lighting and color palette are spot on for the Ghibli theme.
• + Strong simplification of character designs typical of the studio's animation style.

• − Loss of likeness for the original subjects, particularly the man's facial structure.
• − The expression of the 'disappointed girlfriend' is softened, losing the comedic edge of the original meme.

P-Image Edit

• + Excellent preservation of the source image details and subject features.
• + Distinct and dramatic blowing hair effect that matches the prompt well.
• + High image clarity with no added blur.

• − The flying leaves look somewhat like static clip-art and lack motion blur.
• − The hair strands look slightly stiff and unnatural in their symmetrical spread.

Seedream 4.0

• + Dynamic leaves with realistic motion blur and size variation.
• + Natural-looking hair motion that feels integrated with the environment.
• + Good preservation of the original scene and subjects.

• − Slight loss of facial detail compared to the original image.
• − The added sun flare effect in the top right was not requested and feels slightly artificial.