OmniGen v2 VectorSpaceLab vs Seedream 4.0 ByteDance

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent photographic quality and sharp focus
• + Realistic materials, especially the leather texture on the red book
• + Vibrant colors and clean composition

• − The green plant is placed behind the cube but doesn't appear clearly viewed 'through' the glass due to framing
• − The glass cube appears more like an open glass trough or thick-walled container rather than a hollow cube

Seedream 4.0

• + Perfectly depicts the plant viewed through the glass cube as requested
• + Atmospheric lighting with realistic shadows and sunbeams
• + Correct perspective and object placement

• − The bottom of the glass cube has a strange mirrored effect that reflects the sphere but doesn't match the table texture
• − The image has a slightly softer focus compared to Model A

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent surface reflections that look highly realistic
• + Good facial detail on the man
• + Clean and vibrant color palette

• − The man is walking/standing with the bike rather than repairing it
• − Composition looks too staged and centered for a candid prompt
• − Cars in the background are stationary rather than having requested motion blur

Seedream 4.0

• + Successfully captures the man in the act of repairing the bike
• + Followed the motion blur prompt for passing cars perfectly
• + Matches the candid, imperfect framing request well

• − Overall image is a bit soft and lacks fine detail
• − Some anatomical issues with the man's hands and the bike tools
• − Rain is barely visible compared to Model A

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent floral engraving on the armor.
• + Clean, clear facial features with sharp eyes.
• + Good inclusion of braided hair with beads.

• − The skin lacks the 'battle-worn' scars and heavy dirt requested, appearing too pristine.
• − The bokeh sparks look like static orange dots rather than flying embers.

Seedream 4.0

• + Perfect adherence to 'battle-worn' with realistic skin texture, scars, and dirt.
• + Highly detailed leather straps, buckles, and chainmail underlayer.
• + Dynamic lighting and bokeh sparks that feel integrated into the scene.

• − The hair braids are slightly messy in terms of how they connect to the beads.

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent structure that successfully mimics a real multi-page menu layout.
• + Better adherence to the 'grid' and 'sections' requirements of the prompt.
• + Professional use of color blocking and graphic accents.

• − Significant spelling errors in the headers like 'Restaurated' and 'Pizzzzan'.
• − The text in the menu body is illegible gibberish.

Seedream 4.0

• + Perfect text rendering for the requested section titles.
• + High-quality, appetizing food photography.
• + Clean sans-serif typography as requested.

• − Fails to create a functional 'menu layout', appearing more like a mood board or collage.
• − Missing any actual item names, descriptions, or prices.
• − The grid feels cramped and lacks the professional whitespace of a modern menu.

OmniGen v2

• + Text rendering is very clean and readable
• + Excellent contrast and vibrancy in the lighting effects
• + Perfectly followed the 'starburst' shape request for the price

• − Failed the core 'exploded burger' prompt, showing a fully assembled burger instead
• − Missing the currency symbol (€) for the price
• − The image looks more like a 2D digital illustration than photorealistic

Seedream 4.0

• + Successfully captured the 'exploded' motion with suspended components
• + Text perfectly followed the 'fiery, glowing effect' instruction
• + High degree of photorealistic detail in the ingredients and background

• − Incorrectly rendered the price as €5.99 instead of €6.99
• − The composition feels a bit cluttered with two burgers/stacks instead of one clear exploded stack

OmniGen v2

• + Successfully renders the date correctly.
• + Captures a clean chalkboard aesthetic with a wooden frame.

• − Numerous spelling errors including 'SPECALS', 'Lemont', and 'Musonhom'.
• − Text layout is cluttered and suffers from overlapping characters and incoherent formatting.
• − Fails to use elegant cursive for the title as requested.

Seedream 4.0

• + Excellent text spelling and legibility for all menu items.
• + Features realistic chalk smudges, dust, and authentic handwriting texture.
• + Perfect adherence to layout instructions, including the elegant cursive title and specific menu prices.
• + Beautiful atmospheric lighting and background context of a cozy café.

• − Missing the final digit '4' in the date (rendered as '2026' but the prompt implied April 30).

OmniGen v2

• + Clean, vibrant colors with a clear silhouette.
• + Correctly interprets the space setting with stars and planetoids.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − The horse's anatomy is slightly stylized and lacks realistic texture.

Seedream 4.0

• + High visual quality with cinematic lighting and detailed textures.
• + Dynamic composition with the horse rearing.

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is still riding on top of the horse.
• − The reins are physically incoherent, passing through the horse's neck and appearing tangled.

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent image clarity and resolution
• + Accurate depiction of a yellow cap and dark jacket
• + High-quality skin and fur textures

• − Anatomic failure: human hands are emerging from the capybara's sleeves
• − The woman is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat
• − The capybara head looks like a 2D mask superimposed on a human body

Seedream 4.0

• + Correct composition with the passenger in the back seat
• + Anatomically correct capybara paws on the steering wheel
• + Realistic lighting and classic taxi cab aesthetic

• − The passenger's face is slightly blurry and lacks detail
• − Minor lighting artifacts on the taxi door handle area

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent typography for the main title
• + High-contrast, clean graphic design approach
• + Includes almost all requested text elements correctly

• − Text on the scroll banner is nonsensical gibberish
• − The pumpkin is a flat silhouette rather than a detailed lantern
• − Location name is misspelled as 'The Arcas'

Seedream 4.0

• + Superior 'cinematic lighting' and realistic textures
• + Followed the thorny border and web instructions perfectly
• + All text, including location and date, is spelled correctly and legible

• − The scroll banner text is slightly messy/shaky compared to the rest of the typography
• − The overall composition is a bit more crowded than OmniGen v2

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent typography with clean drop shadows
• + High-clarity isometric perspective
• + Vibrant colors and high-gloss 3D textures

• − The flag icon is incorrect (blue, yellow, and red striping)
• − Sushi anatomy is a confusing hybrid of nigiri and maki

Seedream 4.0

• + Highly accurate Japanese flag icon
• + Excellent variety and realism in the sushi models (nigiri, maki, and ikura)
• + Sophisticated use of materials and subsurface scattering

• − The black text lacks the 'miniature' 3D aesthetic of the rest of the image
• − The diorama base is less 'raised' than Model A, appearing more like a simple tray

OmniGen v2

• + Bright and colorful visual appeal
• + Clean composition with centered subjects

• − Failed to include all four animals, missing the bunny specifically
• − Style is distinctly illustrative/cartoonish rather than hyper-photorealistic
• − Animals are static rather than playful or tumbling

Seedream 4.0

• + Includes all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit
• + Captures the requested 'playful chasing' and 'tumbling' movement perfectly
• + Achieves a high level of photorealism with detailed fur and realistic lighting

• − The fox kit has a slightly awkward pose with its paws
• − Some dew sparkles appear more like floating bokeh or lens flares

OmniGen v2

• + Excellent preservation of the original image's composition and specific clothing details
• + Clean cel-shaded art style that captures a modern anime look
• + High clarity and sharp line work

• − Loses the 'distracted boyfriend' narrative by making all characters friendly/neutral
• − Style leans more towards generic modern anime than the specific hand-painted Ghibli aesthetic

Seedream 4.0

• + Perfectly captures the 'The Tale of the Princess Kaguya' inspired watercolor Ghibli style
• + Exceptional hand-painted textures and soft pastel color palette
• + Maintains the narrative tension with the girlfriend's concerned expression

• − Background is simplified into abstract colors, losing the street setting
• − Faces are more simplified compared to the source image

OmniGen v2

• + Strongly effective dynamic hair motion.
• + Consistent color palette across the subject.
• + Adds falling leaves as requested.

• − Significant loss of detail and texture from the source image.
• − Heavy smoothing/filtering makes the image look more like a digital painting than a photo.
• − Background elements like the bridge and distant people are heavily simplified.

Seedream 4.0

• + Excellent preservation of the source image's texture and detail.
• + Highly realistic integration of blowing hair.
• + Leaves are added with realistic motion blur and lighting.

• − The leash handle has been slightly altered compared to the original.

OmniGen v2

• + Clean vector-style execution
• + Good color contrast between rich brown and cream

• − Significant spelling error in name ('CAFFFLORIN')
• − Layout feels a bit unbalanced with the large Est. 1720 at the bottom

Seedream 4.0

• + Perfect text rendering including the accented character
• + Excellent use of subtle texture on the background and logo
• + Higher quality illustration of the cloche and steam

• − The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center within its banner

OmniGen v2

• + Strong adherence to the requested color palette
• + Professional grid-based layout

• − Nonsense text and incorrect mission number (Apollo 17 vs 11)
• − Icons do not match the specific requested steps

Seedream 4.0

• + Excellent adherence to all six requested steps
• + High level of text legibility and accuracy for names and stages
• + Visual representations of icons match the prompt perfectly

• − Slightly less 'flat-vector' than requested, appearing more like an illustration
• − Minor typo in 'Descent Surfcce'