Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

HiDream E1 HiDream AI Seedream 4.5 ByteDance

Settled by community votes across 4 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

HiDream E1

0.7 arena score

#33 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Seedream 4.5

26.1 arena score

#9 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

HiDream E1

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Seedream 4.5

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 4

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
HiDream E1
Before After
Seedream 4.5

AI Judge Analysis

HiDream E1

  • + Successfully added a large volume of hair as requested.
  • + Matches the hair color to the existing beard reasonably well.
  • Failed to preserve the background, replacing it with a distorted desert landscape.
  • Severely altered the subject's face, adding strange textures and changing facial structure.
  • Poor hair texture that looks like a synthetic wig or plastic.

Seedream 4.5

  • + Excellent source preservation, keeping the background and clothing identical to the original image.
  • + Realistic hair texture and natural hairline that integrates perfectly with the existing facial features.
  • + Maintains the original lighting and skin details of the subject.
  • The hairstyle is relatively conservative compared to the 'full, thick head of hair' prompt, though it is technically accurate.

Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it successfully performed a seamless edit while preserving every detail of the original image's background and facial identity. In contrast, HiDream E1 almost entirely regenerated the image, failing to preserve the source background and significantly distorting the person's face.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
HiDream E1
Seedream 4.5

AI Judge Analysis

HiDream E1

  • + Successfully incorporates a hockey rink background with players
  • + Achieves an exaggerated caricature style with large features
  • + Includes a dog and news-style blazer
  • Facial likeness to the source image was lost during the transformation
  • The hand holding the dog has anatomical issues
  • The dog's lower body is poorly rendered

Seedream 4.5

  • + Excellent preservation of the source subject's facial features while applying a caricature scale
  • + Better source preservation of the background elements and the subject's clothing style
  • + High visual quality in objects like the hockey stick and microphone or desk
  • The caricature exaggeration is mainly limited to head size rather than facial features
  • The dog is a bit small and less integrated into the main action of the image

Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the winner because it maintained a clear and recognizable likeness of the woman in the source image while perfectly integrating all three requested elements (broadcasting, hockey, and dogs). HiDream E1 created a fun caricature, but the woman no longer looks like the source subject, and there are several AI artifacts, particularly with the hands.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
HiDream E1
Seedream 4.5

AI Judge Analysis

HiDream E1

  • + Successfully captures the requested warm, nostalgic mood through colors.
  • + Maintains the core composition and character positions of the source image.
  • Lacks the specific Studio Ghibli art style, looking more like general webtoon art.
  • Changes clothing details significantly, such as the man's plaid shirt and the primary woman's dress color.

Seedream 4.5

  • + Excellent adherence to the Studio Ghibli aesthetic, including character design and watercolor textures.
  • + Preserves source details perfectly, such as the exact plaid pattern and color on the man's shirt.
  • + Accurately replicates the background elements while applying the requested 'dreamy' texture.
  • The facial expressions are slightly more neutral than the dramatic expressions in the source image.

Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it masterfully blends the specific Studio Ghibli artistic style with the technical requirements of image editing, preserving the intricate details of the original photo like the plaid shirt. HiDream E1 fails to capture the Ghibli look, instead producing a generic digital illustration that loses many details from the source image.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
HiDream E1
Before After
Seedream 4.5

AI Judge Analysis

HiDream E1

  • + Strongly defines the motion for the hair
  • + Maintains high color saturation and sharpness
  • Leaves look like static clipart and lack depth or realistic motion blur
  • The dog's face is significantly altered from the original
  • The hand holding the leash has anatomical distortions

Seedream 4.5

  • + Excellent sense of motion with realistic motion blur on the leaves
  • + Better source preservation of the woman and dog's facial features
  • + More natural hair movement that flows with the wind direction
  • Some minor artifacts around the dog's rear leg
  • Overall image contrast is slightly lowered compared to source

Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it successfully captures the 'dynamic' feel of the prompt through realistic motion blur on the flying leaves and natural-looking hair. HiDream E1 adds leaves that appear flat and pasted-on, and it fails to preserve the identity and quality of the subjects from the original image.

Next steps

Explore each model