GPT Image 1 OpenAI vs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent internal reflections of the blue sphere on the bottom glass surface.
• + Clean, modern aesthetic with high resolution and no noticeable artifacts.
• + Perfect adherence to the lighting direction and object placement.

• − The glass cube looks more like a frame than a solid object in some areas, such as the top surface.
• − The blue sphere appears slightly matte and textured compared to what might be expected inside glass.

Wan 2.7

• + Realistic wood texture on the table adds a sense of tangible history.
• + Stronger depiction of the plant being clearly visible through the glass panels.
• + Convincing glass refraction and multiple reflections on the various interior facets.

• − The book appears to be merging slightly with the top of the glass cube.
• − There is a secondary blue sphere reflection on the left that looks more like a ghost object than a reflection.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent preservation of the man's identity, including his hairstyle and clothing details like the scarf.
• + Very high-quality integration of the car into a dynamic California coastline environment.
• + Maintains the car's aesthetic and structural details from the source image while adding motion blur.

• − The man's scale within the car seems slightly too large or high up.

Wan 2.7

• + The scenery capture of the coastline is vibrant and aesthetically pleasing.
• + Correctly places the car on a winding coastal road with appropriate lighting.

• − Completely fails to preserve the identity or appearance of the man from the source image.
• − The person in the car is distorted and unrecognizable.
• − The car's proportions feel slightly flattened compared to the source.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh
• + Highly detailed skin texture and facial features
• + Strong cinematic lighting and color grading

• − Cars in the background are static rather than having motion blur
• − The framing is quite polished, lacking the 'imperfect' snapshot feel

Wan 2.7

• + Captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid street' vibe accurately
• + Excellent wet pavement reflections
• + Authentic Japanese street setting with realistic background elements

• − Lacks the requested shallow depth of field
• − Skin texture is slightly smoother and less detailed than Image A
• − The horizontal road lines show some minor AI geometric inconsistency

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent depiction of ornate, dark-wash engraved plate armor.
• + Superior lighting and color palette that feels cinematic and moody.
• + Highly realistic skin textures with believable dirt and faint scarring.

• − The beads in the hair are few and quite dark, making them hard to see.
• − Leather straps and cloth underlayers are mostly obscured by the tight framing.

Wan 2.7

• + Perfect adherence to the 'beads in braids' and 'leather straps' prompts.
• + Clearly visible scars that look more 'battle-worn' than Model A.
• + Stronger contrast on the metal surfaces showing clear torchlight reflections.

• − The bokeh circles in the background are a bit distracting and look digitally inserted.
• − The skin texture on the forehead and the beard rendering feel slightly more artificial compared to Model A.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent font legibility for headers and prices
• + High-quality, appetizing food photography
• + Clean layout that closely follows the grid request

• − Nonsense placeholder text in descriptions
• − Missing 'Mains' section header despite having a main course item

Wan 2.7

• + Sophisticated and complete branding including logo and contact info
• + Strong adherence to the grid layout with multiple food categories
• + Realistic overall composition including lifestyle props

• − Text is very small and becomes illegible at the bottom
• − Several spelling errors in menu item names like 'Calanrfri' and 'Bisge'

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the bun and patty
• + Clean and highly legible glowing typography
• + Sophisticated composition with realistic lighting from embers

• − Missed the '6' in the price starburst rendering it as €.99
• − Wait time for the burger is less dynamic, feeling more stacked than 'exploded'

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully captured the 'exploded' dynamic motion with flying ingredients
• + Correctly included all requested text elements including the price €6.99
• + Vibrant and high-energy illustrative style

• − The 'Magic Burger' text has a busy, clip-art feel with literal flames on top
• − Less photorealistic rendering compared to the competitor
• − Strange floating nuts or seeds on the left side that weren't in the prompt

GPT Image 1

• + Text rendering is perfectly accurate to the requested items
• + Genuine chalk texture with realistic grain and smudging
• + Successful variation in letter size and slant as requested

• − Failed to provide 'elegant cursive' for the title
• − The composition is a bit tight with the bottom text cutoff
• − Simpler background lacks the requested 'cozy café' atmosphere

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent 'cozy café' atmosphere with lighting and decor
• + High visual quality and clear layout
• + Text is stylistically consistent across the entire board

• − Text looks like a digital font rather than natural chalk handwriting
• − Title is not in cursive as requested
• − Minor artifacts near the board edges

GPT Image 1

• + Successfully integrated clothing elements like the patterned scarf and black sunglasses from Image 2.
• + Followed the complex pose from Image 1 with reasonable body positioning.
• + Accurately matched the yellow background and red ottoman from the source environment.

• − The facial likeness to the man in Image 2 is poor and looks like a caricature.
• − Anatomy of the feet and legs is distorted and lacks the clarity of the source image.
• − The hand positioning is awkward and does not match the graceful gesture in Image 1.

Wan 2.7

• + Perfectly preserved the source image 1 without any degradation.

• − Completely failed to perform the edit, ignoring Image 2 entirely.
• − Did not change the character, clothing, or facial features as requested.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and dark, moody atmosphere
• + Dynamic pose of the horse creates a stronger sense of movement in space
• + Consistent textures on the spacesuit and horse leather

• − The horse's front legs have slightly distorted hoof anatomy
• − The reins appear to blend into the horse's neck in an unrealistic way

Wan 2.7

• + Bright, clear visualization of galaxies and planets in the background
• + Very clean anatomical rendering of the horse's legs and hooves
• + High level of detail on the astronaut's suit and gloves

• − The horse is much Larger than the Earth below, which feels less 'cinematic' and more like a collage
• − Lighting is a bit flat compared to the dark void of space

GPT Image 1

• + Perfectly replicates the specific clothing items from Image 2, including the pea coat, plaid scarf, and watch.
• + Preserves the subject's facial features and vitiligo patterns with high accuracy.
• + Successfully integrates the clothing into the lighting and atmosphere of the original beach scene.

• − The scale of the subject in the frame is slightly changed from the original wide shot to a medium-up shot.

Wan 2.7

• + Maintains the original full-body composition and background environment.
• + Correctly applies vitiligo patterns to the subject's visible hands.

• − Completely failed the instruction to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a generic gothic/regal ensemble.
• − The face is slightly altered and less recognizable than the original person.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara fur and jacket
• + Great cinematic lighting and shallow depth of field
• + Accurately places the passenger in the back seat as requested

• − The text on the cap is a bit generic
• − The composition is quite tight, showing less of the car interior

Wan 2.7

• + Sharp level of detail across the entire frame
• + Good depiction of the Manhattan background and taxi exterior elements

• − The passenger is placed in the front seat instead of the back seat
• − The capybara's fur has a slightly synthetic, needle-like appearance
• − The anatomical transition between the capybara head and the human-like torso is less seamless

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent moody, cinematic lighting that fits the 'gothic' and 'fright' theme
• + High-quality text rendering with elegant gothic typography
• + Clean and atmospheric composition that feels like a professional poster

• − Confused the 'Time' and 'Location' fields at the bottom
• − The parchment is extremely dark, making some of the background details hard to see

Wan 2.7

• + Perfect text accuracy, including all requested event details and many creative additions
• + Extremely intricate border with webs and thorns as requested
• + Stronger 'vintage parchment' aesthetic with high contrast between elements

• − The illustration style is more 'cartoonish' than 'cinematic'
• − The composition is a bit cluttered with many competing elements

GPT Image 1

• + Successfully adds a significant amount of thick hair.
• + Retains the background and clothing perfectly.

• − The hairline is very high and unnatural, resembling a wig.
• − Alters the shape of the face and eyebrows significantly, losing the original likeness.
• − The hair texture is somewhat fuzzy and lacks realistic sheen.

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent realism in hair texture and flow.
• + Preserves the subject's facial features and identity much better than GPT Image 1.
• + Natural-looking hairline that blends well with the existing temples and sideburns.

• − The volume of hair is slightly less 'full' compared to the other model, though more realistic.
• − Slight softening of the skin texture compared to the original image.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent typography rendering with clean, centered alignment.
• + Great 'cartoon' but 'PBR' balance with soft, appealing textures.
• + Simpler, cleaner composition that emphasizes the diorama feel.

• − The raised diorama base lacks a plate-like rim, appearing more like a block.
• − The flag icon is slightly simple and lacks the polished feel of the text.

Wan 2.7

• + Features a wider variety of sushi types and more detailed garnish like soy sauce and napkins.
• + Stronger 3D depth in the text and flag element.
• + Beautifully rendered materials with realistic specular highlights on the fish.

• − The text is not centered as requested, skewed to the top right.
• − The diorama base has a slight artifact where the gold trim meets the corner.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent caricature style with watercolor textures and exaggerated facial features.
• + Strong thematic integration with a news desk, anchor papers, and a dog hockey player on the 'over-the-shoulder' graphic.
• + Maintains character likeness while successfully transforming her into a humorous illustration.

• − The transition between her body and the news desk is slightly cluttered with the hockey stick placement.
• − Does not preserve the original 'selfie' pose, opting for a seated anchor position instead.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully incorporates all elements including multiple dogs, a hockey rink, and news gear.
• + Preserves the 'selfie' arm pose from the original source image.
• + Captures a vibrant, modern digital comic art style.

• − Contains spelling errors in speech bubbles ('Dogs Rolee!').
• − The composition is quite cluttered with overlapping elements and floating text bubbles.
• − The hockey integration feels a bit disjointed with a tiny floating rink and a dog in a helmet.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent dynamic composition showing joyful movement and interaction
• + Captures beautiful 'god rays' and warm golden lighting perfectly
• + Strong emotional expressions on all the animals' faces

• − Anatomy on the fox's front right leg is slightly distorted and blurry

Wan 2.7

• + Features a diverse variety of colorful wildflowers as requested
• + Detailed fur textures and realistic dew sparkles in the grass
• + Includes all requested species clearly within the frame

• − The fox's face looks slightly older and less 'kit-like' compared to the others
• − The composition feels a bit more static and posed rather than tumbling or playful

GPT Image 1

• + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli art style including eye shapes and color palette
• + Atmospheric use of soft textures and warm, nostalgic lighting
• + Strong adherence to the 'hand-painted' instruction

• − Faces are generalized and lose the specific likeness of the people in the original meme
• − Pattern on the man's shirt is simplified into lines rather than a plaid pattern

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent preservation of the original subjects' faces and expressions
• + Accurately replicates the plaid pattern of the man's shirt
• + Creates a clean watercolor-inspired aesthetic

• − Art style is more of a westernized watercolor sketch than Studio Ghibli
• − Lighting is flat compared to the dreamy atmosphere requested

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent depiction of wind-blown hair with high energy
• + Added a motion-appropriate tail pose for the dog
• + High density of falling leaves consistent with the prompt

• − Visible artifacts where the leash meets the woman's hand
• − Changed the background bridge and some foliage details incorrectly

Wan 2.7

• + Strong source preservation of the background and original character features
• + Smooth and realistic hair motion
• + Subtle but effective motion blur on the falling leaves

• − The leash now appears to float or intersect poorly with the woman's hand
• − Fewer leaves compared to Model A, feeling slightly less energetic

GPT Image 1

• + Clean vector aesthetic suitable for a modern minimalist logo
• + Accurate spelling of the brand name and date

• − Failed to provide a light background as requested
• − Minimalist style resulted in a very basic cloche design

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully applied the requested warm brown/cream tones and light background
• + Excellent vintage character with subtle paper texture
• + Clear and accurate text rendering for 'Est. 1720'

• − Spelling error in the main brand name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian')
• − Cloche dome rendering is a bit complex for a strictly minimalist logo

GPT Image 1

• + Features clean and legible vector-style icons
• + Maintains a consistent and accurate NASA-inspired color palette
• + The layout is bold and fits the 'infographic poster' style well

• − Several spelling errors like 'EARLLUNAR'
• − Missing specific icon steps such as Lunar Orbit
• − The text alignment is disorganized and lacks a clear flow

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent vertical infographic flow that logically follows the mission steps
• + High level of detail with supporting text for each stage
• + Superior composition with a clear title and professional margins

• − Minor spelling errors in smaller text like 'Tranquiliry' and 'Descript'
• − The astronaut icons are very generic compared to the rest of the graphics