GPT Image 1 OpenAI vs Qwen Image 2.0 Alibaba

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent photographic quality with realistic textures on the book and sphere.
• + Accurately represents the blue sphere resting naturally on the bottom of the cube.
• + High level of visual clarity and clean composition.

• − The glass cube looks more like a frame with thick seams rather than a solid glass object.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Captures the 'glass' material well with realistic reflections and refractions.
• + Accurate lighting direction from the window on the left.

• − The blue sphere is levitating inside the cube, which feels physically unnatural.
• − Confusing reflections make it look like there are multiple spheres inside the cube.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh realism
• + Highly realistic skin textures and fine details on the face
• + Captures a very cinematic mood and lighting

• − Physical logic of the bicycle frame and chain is somewhat distorted
• − Lacks the motion blur of passing cars requested in the prompt

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Naturalistic framing that feels more like a candid street photo
• + Better integration of the rain effect and wet pavement reflections
• + More realistic bicycle geometry compared to Image A

• − Misses the shallow depth of field and 50mm lens look, appearing too sharp in the background
• − Fails to include motion blur on the passing car
• − Contains a distracting cropped person on the right edge

GPT Image 1

• + Exceptional photographic realism on the skin textures and eyes.
• + Highly intricate engraving detail on the plate armor that matches the 'worn' aesthetic.
• + Perfect execution of the shallow depth of field and warm lighting.

• − The 'small beads' in the hair are a bit subtle and few compared to the prompt.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent depiction of multiple braids with colorful beads.
• + Good visible layering of cloth, leather, and metal.
• + Clear portrayal of 'battle-worn' through distinct facial scars.

• − Anatomical issues with the hand and fingers on the sword hilt.
• − Lighting is a bit harsh and lacks the subtler 'warm torchlight' atmosphere of Image A.
• − The background fire is less 'bokeh' and more distracting than the prompt suggests.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent font legibility with clean sans-serif typography.
• + Realistic, high-quality food photography with vibrant colors.
• + Professional layout that balances text and imagery effectively.

• − Minor spelling errors in placeholder text like 'descrigion'.
• − Includes a 'Main' item under the Pizza column, slightly breaking the grid logic.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Stronger adherence to the 'grid' request with a 3x3 layout.
• + Consistent rounded-corner photo styling fits the modern minimalist theme.

• − Text is largely unintelligible gibberish.
• − Pricing and text alignment are messy and overlap some images.
• − Lower quality food renderings with some AI artifacts in the pizza toppings.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent typography with a consistent glowing-ember style across all text elements.
• + High-quality, photorealistic textures on the burger bun and patty.
• + Perfect composition with a centered exploded view that feels balanced and professional.

• − The price in the starburst is missing the '6', rendering as '€.99'.
• − The background is slightly less dynamic than requested, focusing more on sparks than fiery atmosphere.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Dynamic use of steam and falling droplets to create a strong sense of motion.
• + Accurate rendering of the price '€6.99' in a sharp, vibrant starburst.
• + Intense fiery background that matches the 'glancing embers' requirement perfectly.

• − The 'exploded' effect is less pronounced, with several ingredients still clumped together.
• − The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is small and lacks the 'fiery, glowing effect' specified.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent text legibility and spelling accuracy
• + Consistent chalk texture across all letters
• + Followed the specific pricing and menu items accurately

• − Failed to provide the requested 'elegant cursive' for the title
• − The handwriting looks somewhat digital and uniform rather than having natural variations
• − Missed the 'cozy café' background, showing only the board

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Successfully rendered the title in a cursive-influenced style
• + Beautiful 'cozy café' background with realistic lighting and smudged chalk effects
• + Handwriting has very natural variations in stroke weight and slant

• − Minor layout issues with the pricing on the third item
• − Does not follow the line-by-line formatting as strictly as the other model

GPT Image 1

• + High cinematic visual quality with realistic lighting and textures.
• + Clear, detailed composition and excellent rendering of the astronaut suit.

• − Failed the primary prompt constraint of having the horse on top of the astronaut.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Creative interpretation with scale-like textures on the horse skin.
• + Vibrant colors and interesting floating water droplets add to the surrealism.

• − Failed the primary prompt constraint of having the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − Anatomical issues with the horse's front legs and hoof alignment.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent photorealistic lighting and depth of field
• + Clear, high-quality text on the taxi cap
• + The businesswoman’s expression and pose perfectly match the 'bored' requirement

• − The capybara's paws are somewhat indistinctly merged with the steering wheel

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Dynamic composition and vibrant colors
• + Captures both characters clearly within the frame
• + Detailed texture on the capybara's fur and jacket

• − The passenger is sitting in the front seat instead of the back seat as requested
• − Minor anatomical artifacts on the capybara's paws
• − The passenger's hair and the taxi exterior have slightly surreal lighting

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent adherence to the 'dark parchment' and 'cinematic lighting' requirements.
• + Superior typography choice that feels authentically gothic and well-integrated into the art.
• + Better implementation of the spooky border with subtle webs and thorns.

• − Merged the Time and Location text incorrectly, omitting '7pm' and listing the location next to the 'Time' header.
• − The jack-o-lantern's glow is less vibrant than the competitor's.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Perfect text accuracy for all event details including date, time, and location.
• + High visual clarity and sharp details on the trees and jack-o-lantern.
• + Dynamic composition with the scroll banner and twisted trees framing the pumpkin.

• − The parchment is a bit too bright, losing some of the 'dark parchment' moody aesthetic requested.
• − The typography for the bottom details is a standard serif font which clashes slightly with the gothic theme.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent 3D cartoon miniature aesthetic with soft, clay-like textures.
• + Perfect alignment of requested text and icon elements.
• + Clean, professional lighting and shadows on a consistent diorama base.

• − The rice texture is slightly simplified into spheres rather than realistic grains.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Good realistic textures on the fish and wood grain of the diorama base.
• + Varied selection of sushi types including nigiri, maki, and unagi.

• − Missed the 'cartoon' aspect of the prompt, opting for a photorealistic style instead.
• − The text is less integrated into the 3D scene compared to the other model.
• − The 45-degree isometric angle is slightly shallow.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent depiction of dynamic movement through the animals' poses
• + Highly effective use of god rays and warm sunrise lighting
• + Very clean anatomical details for all four animals

• − The fox looks a bit too similar in facial structure to the puppy
• − Bokeh is quite heavy, losing some of the 'lush meadow' detail in the background

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Perfectly captures the 'tumbling together' part of the prompt with physical interaction
• + Great variety of colorful wildflowers enhancing the meadow scene
• + Sharp focus on the fur textures and butterfly details

• − The fox's eyes and face look a bit distorted while it is on its back
• − Shadows on the kitten's face are a bit harsh compared to the 'warm sunrise' request

GPT Image 1

• + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the 'emblem style' instruction.
• + Excellent typography and formatting of the banner.
• + Accurate text rendering including the 'è' accent.

• − Ignored the 'light background' instruction, providing a black background instead.
• − The steam element is very simple and somewhat disconnected from the cloche.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Successfully applied the warm brown and cream tones on a light, textured background.
• + Creative integration of the steam element inside the cloche.
• + Good aesthetic appeal with a clear vintage feel.

• − Included a strange scroll-like artifact or tail on the banner that breaks symmetry.
• − Typography is a bit generic compared to the requested 'classic' style.
• − The cloche dome rendering is less 'minimalist vector' and more illustrative/shaded.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent typography with very clean, modern font choices
• + Strong vector aesthetics that perfectly match the flat-design request
• + Creative addition of astronaut silhouettes that enhance the infographic feel

• − Several spelling errors including 'EARLLUNAR' and missing icons for specific steps
• − Layout is a bit cluttered and lacks a clear chronological flow

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Successfully includes all 6 requested steps in a clear vertical hierarchy
• + Excellent adherence to the NASA-inspired color palette
• + Accurate technical drawings of the lunar module for the descent and landing stages

• − Spelling error in 'Translunjar'
• − Some text elements overlap with icons, slightly reducing legibility