GPT Image 1 OpenAI vs Qwen Image Alibaba

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent depiction of the plant through the glass, showing distortion and color shifts.
• + High detail on the textures of the book pages and the blue sphere.
• + Accurate lighting that matches the 'soft window light from the left' instruction.

• − The glass cube appears to have a metal or reflective base rather than being fully glass.
• − The sphere seems to be floating rather than resting on the bottom surface.

Qwen Image

• + Clean, minimalist composition that accurately places all requested items.
• + The glass cube has realistic internal reflections and light refraction on the tabletop.
• + Consistent depth of field with the plant correctly positioned in the background.

• − The plant is not visible *through* the glass cube as requested, but rather entirely behind its silhouette.
• − The blue sphere's reflection on the bottom surface suggests a mirrored base rather than clear glass.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent skin texture and realistic facial details
• + Strong cinematic atmosphere with effective shallow depth of field
• + Natural-looking rain and wet surface reflections

• − The bike anatomy is slightly compressed to fit the frame
• − Motion blur on the background cars is subtle rather than pronounced

Qwen Image

• + Full body composition shows the entire scene and bicycle
• + Clear rain streaks and strong pavement reflections
• + Follows the bicycle color prompt accurately

• − Faces and hands lack the fine detail and realism of the competitor
• − The white car in the background looks somewhat static and digital
• − Less successful at capturing the 'imperfect framing' requested, appearing more like a standard stock photo

GPT Image 1

• + Exceptional photographic realism in skin texture and eyes
• + Natural integration of warm torchlight and subtle bokeh sparks
• + Consistent engraving details on the armor

• − The beads in the hair are very subtle and blend in with the hair color
• − Missing visible leather straps mentioned in the prompt

Qwen Image

• + Explicitly includes colorful beads, leather straps, and chainmail layers
• + Higher contrast and more dynamic action-oriented lighting
• + Clear depiction of the torch source

• − Face scars look like painted-on makeup rather than actual skin trauma
• − Sparks look like digital clipart rather than light artifacts
• − Anatomical issues with how the braid connects to the head

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent high-resolution food photography that looks appetizing and professional.
• + Clean, readable typography with clear section headers.
• + Professional minimalist layout that frames the food photos perfectly.

• − Nonsense filler text for descriptions ('Apperoiation descrigion').
• − Partial crop of the bottom images.

Qwen Image

• + Successful implementation of the grid layout for photos as requested.
• + Captures the full 'page' layout of a menu with a brand header.
• + Vibrant color accents used in the background of photo tiles.

• − Extremely poor text rendering with garbled characters and illegible fonts.
• − Low-quality, AI-distorted food images that look artificial.
• − Lacks the crisp, high-end feel of a professional dining menu.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the food components
• + Perfect character spacing and glowing effects on all requested text
• + Balanced composition with high-quality embers

• − The price tag contains a typo showing '.99' instead of '6.99'

Qwen Image

• + Dynamic sense of motion with many small flying ingredients
• + Correctly rendered the specific price and currency
• + Vibrant and exciting fiery background

• − Text lacks the requested glowing effect for the secondary phrases
• − The burger itself is less an 'exploded view' and more a solid burger with side debris

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent chalk texture on the individual letters
• + Perfect spelling and date accuracy
• + Consistent stylistic variations that feel truly handwritten

• − Failed to provide the 'elegant cursive' requested for the title
• − The framing is a tight crop rather than showing the 'cozy café' atmosphere

Qwen Image

• + Successfully captured the cozy café background and full chalkboard context
• + Dynamic layouts for the price points and menu items
• + Good cursive-leaning title style as requested

• − Text error in the year rendering it as '20026'
• − The text looks more like a digital brush than realistic chalk texture
• − Noticeable artifacts and smudged text at the bottom of the board

GPT Image 1

• + High visual quality with a rich, cinematic color palette.
• + Excellent textures on both the space suit and the horse's coat.
• + Strong composition with a dynamic pose.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse.

Qwen Image

• + Clear, high-resolution imagery with bright lighting.
• + Accurate rendering of space suit details and horse anatomy.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse.
• − The composition feels slightly more generic and less 'surreal' than requested.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur and the taxi cap.
• + Stronger cinematic lighting that captures a moody New York night vibe.
• + More accurate capybara anatomy compared to the other model.

• − The 'paws' on the steering wheel look slightly anthropomorphized and fuzzy.
• − The background passenger's face is quite blurry.

Qwen Image

• + Clearer, more detailed background passenger with a perfect bored expression.
• + Includes a taxi sign on top of the car for added context.
• + Good composition with more of the vehicle interior visible.

• − The hands on the wheel are unsettlingly humanoid and do not resemble capybara paws.
• − The text on the roof sign is gibberish ('YOXI').
• − The capybara's neck and head connection to the jacket looks slightly less natural.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent typography with a cohesive gothic font choice
• + All text requested is legible and correctly spelled
• + Highly polished, cinematic lighting with a moody atmosphere

• − Merged the 'Time' and 'Location' lines incorrectly at the bottom
• − Composition is a bit top-heavy with the large title

Qwen Image

• + Included the thorn border explicitly as requested
• + All event details at the bottom are typed correctly on separate lines
• + Used a clear parchment paper background effect

• − Title text contains spelling errors and overlapping letters
• − The extra line of decorative text at the top is gibberish
• − The scroll banner text is split awkwardly between the scroll and the background

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent text rendering with clean, centered typography.
• + Higher fidelity PBR materials, especially visible in the realistic texture of the salmon and rice grains.
• + Strong adherence to the '45° top-down isometric' and 'clean' prompt requirements.

• − The diorama base is a bit plain and bulky compared to the elegant garnish.

Qwen Image

• + Vibrant, appealing color palette with a nicely layered diorama base.
• + Includes more thematic elements like the physical flag and chopstick rest.
• + Good 'cartoon' interpretation of the sushi shapes.

• − The word 'SUSHI' is slightly off-center and the flag icon is poorly integrated next to it.
• − The perspective on the chopsticks and the physical flag pole feels slightly inconsistent with the isometric view.
• − Lower overall clarity and texture detail compared to Model A.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent sense of motion and 'tumbling' as requested in the prompt.
• + Superior integration of lighting and 'god rays' for a cinematic feel.
• + Highly expressive and realistic animal anatomy.

• − The fox's front right paw is a bit blurry/poorly defined.

Qwen Image

• + Features very clear, distinct butterflies with high-contrast patterns.
• + Good use of bokeh and foreground dew sparkles in the meadow.

• − The composition feels static and posed rather than 'tumbling together'.
• − The kitten has an anatomical error with a third front leg/paw visible underneath it.
• − The lighting on the animals feels a bit flat compared to the intense background sun.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent typography with correct spelling and accents.
• + Clean minimalist vector aesthetic.
• + Accurate adherence to the cloche and banner request.

• − Ignored the request for a light background, providing a black one instead.
• − Subtle texture is barely visible.

Qwen Image

• + Followed the color scheme and light background request perfectly.
• + Included the requested subtle texture on the background.
• + Nice steam illustration above the cloche.

• − Severe spelling and typography errors, mangling the name into 'FLOraiAN'.
• − The banner construction is slightly clunky for a minimalist logo.

GPT Image 1

• + Excellent vector iconography with a high-end graphic design feel.
• + Precise adherence to the specified NASA-inspired color palette.
• + Includes names of the astronauts with clean, professional typography.

• − Confused the prompt instructions, creating a misspelled label 'EARLLUNAR' and misaligning labels to icons.
• − Layout is a bit disjointed due to the placement of text boxes.

Qwen Image

• + Better flow and narrative structure, following the sequence from Earth to the lunar surface.
• + Includes a fairly accurate NASA logo recreation.
• + Incorporates a clear numbering system for the mission steps.

• − Several spelling errors like 'Tranar Orbit' and 'Aldin'.
• − Poorly rendered astronaut icons and text at the bottom.
• − Vector quality is lower with some blurred edges around the rocket exhaust.