Nano Banana Google vs Qwen Image Edit 2511 Alibaba

Nano Banana

• + Perfectly preserves the specific Rolls-Royce model from the source image.
• + Includes the man from the source image sitting in the driver's seat.
• + Excellent background integration with realistic motion blur and coastal scenery.

• − The man is quite small in the frame and lacks some of the detail from the source.

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + Excellent subject preservation, keeping the man's face, hair, and outfit almost identical to the source.
• + High quality interior detail that matches the Rolls-Royce aesthetic.
• + Captures the 'California' vibe well with the addition of palm trees.

• − The car interior is somewhat generic and doesn't explicitly preserve the unique dashboard/steering wheel of the original Rolls-Royce.
• − The perspective change is more drastic than Model A.

Nano Banana

• + Successfully integrated clothing elements like the black sweatshirt, scarf, and sunglasses from Image 2 onto the character.
• + Maintained the exact pose and yellow environment from Image 1.
• + The clothing text and scarf patterns are rendered realistically onto the existing person's frame.

• − Failed to swap the person's face/identity, keeping the woman from Image 1 instead of the man from Image 2.
• − The sunglasses are poorly blended onto the face with visible artifacts.

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + Maintained the original character's face and appearance in the background.
• + Preserved the red color of the sweatshirt from Image 1.

• − Failed the primary task by overlaying Image 1's subject on top of Image 2 instead of merging the identities.
• − Anatomy of the feet and legs is severely distorted where they meet the red box.
• − The composition is a messy collage rather than a recreated character/pose.

Nano Banana

• + Excellent preservation of the source person face and unique skin features
• + Background remains perfectly identical to the original
• + Realistic fabric texture on the coat

• − Failed to dress the person, and instead hung the coat behind/beside them
• − Only transferred parts of the outfit, missing the jeans and shoes
• − Incorrect scarf pattern color (red instead of dark teal/green)

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + Successfully applied the full outfit including coat, scarf, jeans, sunglasses and shoes
• + Maintains the exact scarf pattern and color from the reference image
• + Excellent lighting and shadow integration with the original background

• − Completely changed the person's face and hair, failing the primary preservation requirement
• − Lost the unique skin features (vitiligo) of the person from Image 1
• − Modified the pose significantly to match Image 2's vibe

Nano Banana

• + Excellent preservation of the original facial features and skin texture.
• + The hairline looks natural and blends well with the existing forehead skin.
• + Matches the hair color and texture perfectly to the person's existing beard.

• − The hair volume is slightly conservative compared to the request for 'full, thick' hair.

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + Successfully added a very full and thick head of hair.
• + Maintains the background and clothing from the original image effectively.

• − The hair texture has a plastic, 'AI-generated' sheen that looks unnatural.
• − The hairline is too low and creates a strange overlap with the glasses' temple.
• − The facial features have been slightly smoothed or altered compared to the original.

Nano Banana

• + Successfully incorporates all three elements: TV anchor, dogs, and hockey.
• + The 'Puck News Network' theme and dog hockey audience are very creative.
• + Maintains a clear likeness to the original subject while applying caricature distortion.

• − The fingers holding the newspaper are slightly garbled.
• − Text on the newspaper and score board is somewhat messy compared to the main title.

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + Strong, clean line art style characteristic of modern caricatures.
• + Preserves the subject's smile and facial features well in a cartoon format.

• − Completely missed the 'hockey' requirement of the prompt.
• − The speech bubble contains nonsensical gibberish text.
• − Strange artifacts like a candle on the desk and a floating hand gesture.

Nano Banana

• + Subtly softens the lighting and skin textures.
• + Maintains the exact geometry and proportions of the original photo.

• − Failed to transform the photo into an illustration style.
• − Does not exhibit typical Studio Ghibli artistic traits like hand-painted backgrounds or line art.
• − The blurred foreground figure is inconsistent with the requested animation style.

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + Successfully applied a clear illustration style with linework and hand-painted textures.
• + Exhibits the requested Studio Ghibli palette of soft pastels and dreamy lighting.
• + Maintains excellent preservation of the original pose, expressions, and clothing details.

• − Minor facial structural changes make the characters look slightly different from the source photo.

Nano Banana

• + Excellent adherence to the request for blowing hair and flying leaves.
• + Maintains very high identity preservation of the woman and the dog.
• + The leaves have a natural, scattered appearance with varied sizes.

• − The leash has a slight alignment artifact where a leaf overlaps it.
• − Some leaves look a bit like static stickers rather than having motion blur.

Qwen Image Edit 2511

• + High energy in the hair movement with a more symmetrical, 'windy' effect.
• + Good preservation of the background elements and the overall scene structure.
• + Incorporates green leaves which contrast well with the existing foliage.

• − The hair has some structural artifacts and looks slightly disconnected from the head.
• − The dog's tail has a strange, smudged texture at the base.
• − The woman's facial features changed slightly compared to the source image.