Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs OmniGen v2 VectorSpaceLab

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

18.4 arena score

#50 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

OmniGen v2

16.9 arena score

#56 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX1.1 [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

OmniGen v2

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealism with realistic glass refractions and textures.
  • + Highly accurate lighting consistent with the 'window light from the left' instruction.
  • + Sophisticated composition with a tall, rectangular glass form.
  • The glass container is a rectangular prism rather than a true cube.
  • The sphere is levitating rather than sitting on the bottom surface.

OmniGen v2

  • + Successfully rendered a geometric cube shape as requested.
  • + The small blue sphere sits naturally on the bottom surface.
  • + Good adherence to the spatial arrangement of all objects.
  • The plant is completely blurred in the background, making it less 'visible through the glass' than Image A.
  • The glass appears slightly thick and less like a clear glass cube, resembling more of an acrylic container.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions very well. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more photorealistic image with superior light handling and textures, though it failed the specific 'cube' geometry by stretching it vertically. OmniGen v2 adhered better to the requested cube shape and object placement, but the overall image quality and lighting depth are slightly lower compared to FLUX1.1 [pro].

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'cinematic but realistic' and 'candid' style.
  • + Realistic pavement reflections and low-light atmosphere.
  • + Successfully captures motion blur from background traffic.
  • The bicycle structure is anatomically broken/fragmented in the center.
  • The subject is more 'holding' than 'repairing' the bike.

OmniGen v2

  • + The bicycle maintains a cohesive and believable structure.
  • + The man's pose is slightly more indicative of inspecting or repairing.
  • + Captures the reflection on the wet asphalt effectively.
  • Failed to include motion blur for passing cars.
  • Rain effect looks like static digital noise rather than misty light rain.
  • Lighting is too flat and lacks the cinematic depth requested.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] better captures the technical photographic requests like 50mm depth of field, motion blur, and cinematic lighting, though it fails significantly on the structural integrity of the bicycle. OmniGen v2 provides a much cleaner subject but fails to execute the environmental prompts like motion blur and looks more like a standard digital photo than a cinematic candid shot. FLUX1.1 [pro] is the winner for its superior atmosphere and adherence to the complex photographic descriptors.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Exceptional level of skin texture, including realistic pores and fine scars.
  • + Captures a gritty 'battle-worn' aesthetic with masterfully rendered lighting.
  • The braids with beads mentioned in the prompt are present but very understated and obscured by loose hair.
  • The crop is extremely tight, cutting off much of the ornate armor detail.

OmniGen v2

  • + Clearly depicts the requested braided hair with beads and ornate engraved plate armor.
  • + Stronger adherence to the 'torchlight' prompt with high-contrast warm lighting and distinct bokeh.
  • The character looks too clean and polished, missing the 'battle-worn' and scarred texture requested.
  • The dirt on the face appears as artificial dark spots rather than realistic grime.

Verdict: FLUX 1.1 [pro] produced a much more realistic and gritty portrait with superior skin textures and an authentic battle-worn feel, though it struggled with the specific hair details. OmniGen v2 followed the literal prompt instructions for braids and armor engraving better, but the final output looks overly clean and synthetic like a video game render. FLUX 1.1 [pro] is the winner for its professional photographic quality and convincing portrayal of the character's condition.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent presentation for a casual dining context including realistic silverware and menu layers.
  • + High-quality, realistic food photography that feels cohesive within the layout.
  • + Stronger adherence to the 'bold sans-serif' font request with professional typography.
  • The text content contains several illegible characters and logical errors in pricing.
  • The layout is more of a product shot than a flat design file, which might limit its utility as a template.

OmniGen v2

  • + Successfully follows the grid-based layout instructions with clear section headers.
  • + Strong use of vibrant accent colors as requested in the prompt.
  • + Provides a clean, front-facing orientation suitable for a design mock-up.
  • Poor spelling and typography, including 'APPTETIZES' and 'PIZZZZAN'.
  • The food images are lower in visual quality and appear slightly more artificial than Model A.
  • The text bodies are represented by illegible filler lines rather than actual mock-text.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] provides a much more professional and aesthetically pleasing result with superior food photography and a realistic lifestyle presentation. While OmniGen v2 provides a literal grid layout, its poor spelling and lower-quality graphics make it less successful for a professional design task.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic texture on the burger ingredients.
  • + High-quality rendering of glowing text and atmosphere.
  • + Includes all requested text elements accurately.
  • The burger is mostly intact rather than fully exploded into components.
  • The price is missing the starburst element requested.

OmniGen v2

  • + Follows the starburst requirement for the price.
  • + Bold, graphic design that fits a commercial advertisement style.
  • + Clear, legible typography.
  • The burger is not exploded or suspended as requested.
  • The texture looks more like a 3D digital illustration than photorealistic.
  • Missing the Euro symbol and some secondary text is cut off.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] provides much higher visual fidelity and more accurate text rendering, though it failed to properly 'explode' the burger components. OmniGen v2 adhered better to specific layout requests like the starburst, but the overall image quality is lower and less realistic.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic quality and realistic café background bokeh.
  • + Very legible handwriting that looks like actual chalk.
  • + Captures the aesthetic of a cozy café with appropriate lighting.
  • Failed to accurately render the specific text requested, duplicating and modifying the octopus item incorrectly.
  • Invented words like 'Chipkies' and 'Herbss' despite a specific prompt.

OmniGen v2

  • + Successfully included almost all requested text elements, including the cookies.
  • + Chalk texture looks realistic with dusty edges and smudging.
  • Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items such as 'SPECALS' and 'glite free'.
  • Text layout is cluttered and messy, with overlapping lines and inconsistent spacing.
  • Lacks a realistic background environment, appearing more like a flat graphic.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much more visually appealing and professional-looking image that could pass for a real photograph, though it struggled with the specific text requirements. OmniGen v2 attempted to follow the prompt's content more closely but failed significantly in execution, resulting in messy, misspelled text and a flat composition. FLUX1.1 [pro] is preferred for its superior aesthetic quality and coherent handwriting.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and texture detail in the suit and fur.
  • + Dynamic composition with dramatic posing and hazy celestial background.
  • + Strong artistic merit with a gritty, realistic aesthetic.
  • Completely failed the negative constraint to put the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • Anatomical issues with the horse's front legs appearing disjointed from the body.

OmniGen v2

  • + Clean colors and sharp lighting.
  • + Good contrast between the subject and the celestial background.
  • Completely failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • Composition is very static and generic compared to the cinematic request.
  • The astronaut's leg is clipping through the horse's body and saddle in an unrealistic way.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific spatial logic test of putting the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, defaulting to the common trope of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX1.1 [pro] is the preferred image because it far exceeds OmniGen v2 in terms of cinematic quality, texture, and visual atmosphere, whereas OmniGen v2 has significant clipping errors and a flatter appearance.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent atmospheric lighting and photorealism
  • + Clearly places the passenger in the back seat as requested
  • + Detailed capybara fur and logical interaction with the scene

OmniGen v2

  • + Features a sharp, high-contrast subjects
  • + Accurately renders the yellow taxi cap on the capybara's head
  • Failed to place the passenger in the back seat; they are sitting next to the driver
  • Severe anatomical errors: a human hand is growing out of the capybara's arm to hold the steering wheel
  • Confused the perspective, looking into the car from the outside rather than being inside the taxi

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] followed the prompt more accurately by correctly placing the businesswoman in the back seat and creating a realistic interior perspective. OmniGen v2 struggled with the spatial requirements of the prompt and produced a significant anatomical artifact where the capybara has human hands.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent atmospheric lighting and texture on the jack-o-lantern
  • + Highly detailed thorny border and creepy twisted trees
  • + Correct date and location text placement
  • Repeated text lines for Time and Location make the bottom look messy
  • The text on the scroll banner contains a typo ('univted')
  • The overall layout is very vertically oriented despite the square frame request

OmniGen v2

  • + Strong typography for the main title with an 'invitation' feel
  • + Good use of the scroll banner element
  • + Clearer visibility of the requested spider webs
  • Several spelling errors including 'FRIETS' and 'THE ARCAS'
  • Illustration style is more cartoonish than 'cinematic' or 'polished'
  • Layout feels cluttered at the bottom

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] significantly outperforms OmniGen v2 in terms of visual fidelity, lighting, and 'gothic' atmosphere, although it struggles with redundant text lines. OmniGen v2 has much better title typography, but is held back by numerous spelling errors and a flatter, more clip-art style illustration.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent soft-refined 3D textures with realistic subsurface scattering on the fish.
  • + Superior variety in the miniature sushi models and garnish.
  • + Very clean typography that integrates well with the aesthetic.
  • Omitted the requested flag icon.
  • The text 'SUSHI' is slightly small and lacks the high contrast requested.

OmniGen v2

  • + Includes a flag icon as requested, although the colors are incorrect for Japan.
  • + Bold, high-contrast typography that stands out clearly.
  • + Good adherence to the isometric perspective and diorama base.
  • The sushi models contain strange artifacts, such as the shrimp tail protruding from a salmon-style roll.
  • The flag icon does not represent the Japanese flag.
  • Textures are a bit more plastic and less 'refined' than the competitor.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much higher quality 3D render with beautiful texture work and a sophisticated aesthetic, though it missed the flag icon. OmniGen v2 achieved the bold text and flag requirement but suffered from logical errors in the sushi design and lower visual fidelity. FLUX1.1 [pro] is the preferred choice for its professional, polished finish.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent fur texture rendering and realistic lighting effects.
  • + Includes high-quality swarm of butterflies and intricate floral background.
  • + Realistic anatomy and expressive, life-like eyes for the animals.
  • Missing the fourth animal requested (red fox kit); only three animals are present.
  • The animals are sitting still rather than 'tumbling' or 'chasing' as per the prompt.

OmniGen v2

  • + Strong adherence to the sun rays and golden sunrise lighting request.
  • + Vibrant, high-contrast colors that match a 'joyful' vibe.
  • Failed to include all four animals (missing the rabbit).
  • Lacks photorealism; the style is highly 'AI-plastic' and cartoonish.
  • Visible artifacts and poor anatomical blending, especially on the fox-like creature's proportions.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] significantly outperforms OmniGen v2 in terms of visual quality and photorealism, capturing beautiful fur details and natural lighting. While both models failed to include all four requested animals, FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much more professional and aesthetically pleasing image, whereas OmniGen v2 resulted in a saturated, cartoonish style that ignored the 'hyper-photorealistic' instruction.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent vintage illustrative style with complex detailing
  • + Perfectly captures the warm brown and cream color palette
  • + Professional vector emblem composition with elegant flourishes
  • Misspelled the main text as 'FRANILIAN' instead of 'FLORIAN'
  • The dome resembles a building or cupola more than a kitchen cloche

OmniGen v2

  • + Accurately depicts the cloche dome requested in the prompt
  • + Clean minimalist vector lines
  • + Good balance of elements and readable 'Est. 1720'
  • Significant text error in the primary brand name ('CAFFFLORIN')
  • Lacks the 'subtle texture' and vintage sophistication indicated in the prompt

Verdict: While OmniGen v2 more accurately followed the subject prompt by creating a recognizable cloche dome, it failed on branding with a compressed, misspelled name. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much higher quality, professional-looking logo that better captured the requested vintage aesthetic and texture, though it also struggled with the spelling of the brand name.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
OmniGen v2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Strong visual composition with a clear central focus.
  • + Accurate NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + Includes most mission stages in a readable vertical layout.
  • Step numbering is chaotic and repetitive (two 6s, two 2s).
  • A lot of garbled placeholder text in the body copy.
  • Confuses 'Saturn V' with 'Saturn Vicon' based on prompt literalism.

OmniGen v2

  • + Follows the modern vector infographic style more strictly.
  • + Icons are clean and consistent.
  • + Uses the specified color palette effectively.
  • Incorrect mission number (Apollo 17 instead of 11).
  • Failed to include all 6 requested steps, showing only 3 main sections.
  • Significant spelling errors in the headers (APOLO, NSA).

Verdict: Both models struggled with the complex multi-step instructions and text rendering. FLUX1.1 [pro] created a more aesthetically pleasing poster with better overall composition and the correct mission title, despite the redundant and incorrectly ordered numbering. OmniGen v2 achieved a better 'vector' feel but failed on basic details like the mission name and the number of steps required.

Next steps

Explore each model