Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [pro]

26.3 arena score

#8 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

17.7 arena score

#52 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [pro]

50.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

50.0%

win rate

50.0% 0.0% ties 50.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to spatial lighting instructions with soft window light from the left.
  • + Highly realistic rendering of the glass cube and its interactions with the refraction of the background.
  • + The plant is naturally positioned behind the cube as requested.
  • The blue sphere is matte, which contrasts somewhat with the high-gloss aesthetic of the other objects.
  • The plant is very blurred due to a shallow depth of field, making it less distinct.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + The blue sphere is rendered as a beautiful blue glass marble, adding to the visual appeal.
  • + Very sharp details on the plant and the texture of the book cover.
  • + Excellent reflection of the sphere on the bottom of the cube.
  • The light appears to be coming more from the right/front than the left, as evidenced by the shadow on the table.
  • The plant is positioned partially to the side rather than clearly 'behind' the cube.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt requirements well, including placing objects inside and on top of specific items. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner for its superior adherence to the lighting and spatial arrangement instructions, whereas Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 struggled with the light direction and background placement.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture and hyper-realistic facial details
  • + Strong adherence to 'motion blur from passing cars' in the background
  • + Superior rendering of wet pavement and complex bicycle mechanical details
  • Physical impossibility of the bicycle kickstand passing through the rear derailleur/spokes
  • Framing is a bit conventional for 'imperfect framing'

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Creative interpretation of 'imperfect framing' using a foreground frame element
  • + Strong rainy atmosphere with visible droplets and clear reflections
  • + Natural, candid-looking pose
  • Anatomical errors in the hands and fingers
  • Failed to incorporate the requested motion blur on the passing car
  • Lower overall resolution and sharpness compared to Model A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] produced a high-fidelity image with exceptional skin textures and realistic background motion blur, though it suffered from significant clipping issues where the kickstand merged with the bike wheel. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 took a more creative approach to the 'imperfect framing' and captured the rain better, but the car in the background remained static and the hand details were poorly rendered. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner for its photographic realism and technical execution of the complex lighting environment.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Perfect adherence to all prompt elements including armor, braids, and lighting.
  • + Exceptional texture detail on the leather, skin, and engraved metal.
  • + Strong cinematic atmosphere with realistic bokeh and lighting effects.
  • The scars appear slightly superficial/drawn on rather than deep tissue.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + High resolution and realistic skin textures.
  • Failed to follow almost every part of the prompt.
  • Generated a modern man in a garden instead of a paladin in armor.
  • Lack of bokeh sparks, torchlight, or braided hair.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the prompt with extreme precision, delivering a high-quality cinematic portrait of a paladin with intricate details on the armor and clothing. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 suffered a complete prompt failure, generating a modern man in a leather jacket in a garden, which bears no resemblance to the requested fantasy scene.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with legible bold sans-serif fonts
  • + Professional two-column layout that feels like a real restaurant menu
  • + Clean and vibrant photo grid with good color coordination
  • Confusing categorization where photos don't always match the section header below them
  • Minor spelling errors like 'MINS' instead of 'MAINS'

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Strong minimalist aesthetic with plenty of white space
  • + Good use of vibrant color blocks as section accents
  • + Professional food photography integrated into the grid
  • Poor typography with significant illegibility and 'gibberish' text
  • Misspelled main headers like 'APETIERS' and 'MAIN COURSES' being inconsistent with layout
  • Repetitive use of very similar pizza images

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the stronger model because its text is significantly more legible and the layout logic resembles an actual menu. While Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 captures a more modern minimalist vibe with its use of white space, it fails on text rendering and the logical connection between text and prices.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with a realistic flame effect on the title.
  • + Superior motion design with sauce droplets and crumbs swirling around the burger.
  • + Better lighting integration, with the orange glow reflecting naturally on the burger components.
  • The starburst for the price is a bit flat compared to the fiery theme requested.
  • The bottom bun looks slightly isolated from the motion of the upper half.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + The price starburst perfectly follows the fiery, glowing effect requested in the prompt.
  • + High-quality texture on the sesame bun and patties.
  • + Includes a star element in the text that adds to the 'Magic' theme.
  • The 'exploded' effect is less dynamic, with components looking more stacked than suspended in motion.
  • The lighting on the burger feels a bit too bright and clean for a dark, fiery background.
  • The lettuce and bottom bun are clumped together, losing the 'all components suspended' requirement.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner because it better captures the 'dynamic' and 'motion' aspects of the prompt, with swirling sauce and crumbs that make the explosion feel real. While Imagen 4.0 executed the fiery starburst better, it failed to separate the bottom layers of the burger, whereas FLUX.2 [pro] achieved a much more professional advertising layout and better light integration.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'elegant cursive' prompt for the title.
  • + Highly realistic chalk texture with dusty smudges and varying opacity.
  • + Flawless spelling of all menu items including the cut-off 'Brown But...' request.
  • The board choice is more of a slate tile than a traditional wooden-framed café chalkboard.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Classic chalkboard framing and composition.
  • + Clean, legible handwriting.
  • + Followed the date and price requirements accurately.
  • Spelling error 'Octuphus' on the second item.
  • Text looks like a digital font or a clean marker rather than realistic, dusty chalk.
  • Repeated the third item twice, which was not requested.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner as it perfectly captured the 'elegant cursive' and realistic chalk texture requested, while maintaining perfect spelling. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 failed on spelling ('Octuphus') and the text style looked too uniform and digital, lacking the natural chalk variation specified in the prompt.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Successfully followed the difficult logic of having the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • + Maintains high cinematic detail with a complex cosmic background.
  • + Creative interpretation involving multiple horses that enhances the surrealism requested.
  • Anatomical glitch where the bottom horse is merged directly into the back of the astronaut's suit.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + High clarity on the astronaut's face and horse texture.
  • + Excellent lighting and color contrast in the nebula effects.
  • Failed the core prompt instruction to put the horse on top.
  • Produces a conventional 'astronaut riding a horse' image despite the specific inversion request.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] is the clear winner because it successfully understood and executed the specific 'horse on top' instruction, which is a significant logic challenge for AI. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 produced a high-quality visual, but completely ignored the spatial requirement of the prompt, resulting in a standard interpretation.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealism with cinematic lighting and realistic car dashboard textures.
  • + Captures a gritty, authentic New York night atmosphere with raindrops and bokeh lighting.
  • + Successfully places both paws on the steering wheel while maintaining a professional posture.
  • The capybara's hands look slightly more like human fingers in gloves than animal paws.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Perfect bored/normal expression on the businesswoman in the back seat.
  • + Very clean and sharp rendering of the capybara's fur and the taxi driver cap.
  • + The capybara's paws are rendered more accurately to the animal species.
  • The composition is a bit flat and looks more like a studio set than a real New York street.
  • The background lighting is less evocative of the specific 'Manhattan at night' feel compared to the other model.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt very well, but FLUX.2 [pro] wins due to its superior lighting and texture, creating a much more believable photorealistic scene. While Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 handles the specific expression of the passenger and the literal anatomy of the paws better, it lacks the cinematic depth and authentic atmosphere found in the FLUX.2 [pro] image.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling in all requested areas.
  • + High visual quality with realistic textures on the pumpkin and parchment.
  • + Superior cinematic lighting that creates a moody, gothic atmosphere.
  • The thorn border is a bit dark and blends into the background slightly too much.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Good inclusion of all requested elements like webs, bats, and twisted trees.
  • + Clear layout with defined parchment edges.
  • Significant spelling errors including 'IINVIITATION' and 'FNIGHTS'.
  • The text layout at the bottom is cluttered and omits line breaks between time and location.
  • Art style feels more like a 2D illustration than a cinematic vintage poster.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the prompt instructions perfectly, delivering flawless text rendering and a sophisticated, moody aesthetic suitable for a 'cinematic' gothic invitation. In contrast, Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 struggled significantly with the text, producing multiple spelling errors and a messy layout at the bottom, alongside a flatter illustrative style.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography rendering and layout alignment
  • + More complex and detailed sushi variety
  • + Perfectly captures the 3D toy/cartoon aesthetic with high clarity
  • The salmon texture on the front piece looks a bit like a block of clay
  • Shadow on the bottom edge feels slightly cut off

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Subtle material rendering on the plate and base
  • + Good use of negative space for the layout
  • + Includes the white border for a framed look
  • The Japanese flag is awkwardly placed next to the text rather than centered below it
  • Lower overall sushi density compared to the platform size
  • Slightly more generic stylization

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the layout instructions more precisely, particularly positioning the 'JAPAN', 'SUSHI', and flag icon in a perfectly centered vertical stack as requested. While Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 produced a very clean image with nice lighting, FLUX.2 [pro] offered a more visually interesting and better-composed diorama with superior text clarity.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001
33% wins 0% ties 67% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent action and interaction between the animals
  • + Beautiful translucent lighting through the fur and whiskers
  • + Perfectly captures the 'god rays' and 'dew sparkles' requested in the prompt
  • Completely missed the 'baby bunny' character
  • The kitten has an anatomically odd paw/arm position while standing on two legs

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals (dog, cat, fox, bunny)
  • + Realistic fur textures and soft lighting
  • Static composition feels like a posed portrait rather than animals 'playfully chasing butterflies'
  • Missing the butterfly element entirely
  • The puppy appears more like a spaniel mix than a golden retriever

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] created a much more dynamic and visually stunning scene that perfectly captured the requested atmosphere, god rays, and playful action, though it missed the bunny. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 followed the list of animals more closely but produced a static, posed image that ignored the butterfly and 'tumbling' action prompts. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner for its superior composition and artistic quality despite the missing subject.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with correct accent marks and spacing.
  • + Well-balanced vector emblem with professional shading and hatching.
  • + Subtle and organic paper texture that matches the vintage theme.
  • The 'Est. 1720' banner is slightly smaller than the main branding, although still legible.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Clean, minimalist silhouettes for the cloche and steam.
  • + Captures the brown and cream color scheme effectively.
  • Included irrelevant gibberish text ('AFFD CARO') above the main name.
  • The banner design is a bit clunky with thick borders that don't match the elegance of the central text.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the prompt more precisely, delivering a cohesive vector emblem with polished typography and a professional vintage aesthetic. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 produced a decent layout but failed on details by including hallucinated text and less refined graphic elements.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the chronological flow of the mission steps.
  • + High-quality vector illustrations of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
  • + Strong aesthetic coherence with a professional NASA-inspired navy and white palette.
  • Nonsense filler text for descriptions.
  • Merged some steps together, resulting in only 4 main labels instead of 6.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Successfully included the specific red from the muted NASA palette.
  • + Clean, minimalist flat-vector style with good spacing.
  • Misspelled Apollo as 'Apolo' in the main heading.
  • The diagram is non-linear and confusing, looping icons in a way that doesn't follow a mission timeline.
  • Poor text rendering for smaller labels like 'MOO + ON'.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the logical progression of the mission much better, creating a vertical infographic that is easy to read and features superior illustrations. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 struggled with the layout and spelling, resulting in a confusing diagram that fails to communicate the mission steps clearly despite a clean graphical style.

Next steps

Explore each model