Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Black Forest Labs Grok Imagine Image xAI

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

22.3 arena score

#32 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Grok Imagine Image

23.4 arena score

#25 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Grok Imagine Image

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a clear source from the left.
  • + Realistic textures on the book cover and wooden table.
  • + Accurate glass reflections and physics-compliant placement of the sphere.
  • The plant in the background is very blurry, making it less 'partially visible through the glass' as requested.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + High visual clarity of the green plant and its visibility through the glass cube.
  • + Nice texture on the red book and wooden table surface.
  • + Creative composition with a more centered, eye-catching arrangement.
  • The blue sphere is levitating mid-air inside the cube, which defies gravity unlike the ground-seated sphere in Model A.
  • The cube is shaped more like a tall rectangular prism than a cube.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the prompt with high accuracy, particularly regarding the soft window lighting and the physical realism of the objects. Grok Imagine produced a visually striking image but struggled with spatial logic, as the sphere is floating and the cube is not actually a cube. FLUX.2 is preferred for its adherence to both the prompt and realism.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent preservation of the specific man provided in the source image, including his hairstyle and plaid coat.
  • + Faithfully maintains the exact car model (Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupé) from the source.
  • + Perfectly captures the requested California coastline setting with appropriate lighting and motion blur.
  • The driver's position is slightly high in the seat, making him look a bit large for the cabin.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Beautiful landscape composition with vivid colors and high clarity.
  • + Good sense of motion on the wheels and road.
  • Completely failed to use the man from the source image, replacing him with a different person.
  • Slightly altered the car model's headlights and bumper details compared to the source.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the instructions perfectly, successfully combining the man and the car from the source images into a convincing new setting. Grok Imagine Image failed as an image editor by completely ignoring the provided person and generating a generic driver instead.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent handling of wet pavement reflections and light rain visualization
  • + High detail in the character's face and clothing texture
  • + Strong composition with a cinematic shallow depth of field
  • Misses the 'motion blur from passing cars' requirement as the background cars are static
  • The bicycle geometry is slightly warped near the rear wheel and chain area

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Successfully incorporates motion blur from passing cars
  • + Captures an 'imperfect framing' look that feels more candid and less staged
  • + Atmospheric 50mm film-like quality with authentic street details
  • The subject's face is obscured and lacks the 'natural skin texture' requested
  • Lower overall resolution and clarity compared to the competitor
  • The man's interaction with the bicycle is somewhat anatomically confusing due to the crop

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a much more detailed and aesthetically pleasing image with beautiful textures and lighting, though it fails to include the requested motion blur. Grok Imagine Image perfectly captures the motion blur and candid framing but falls short on facial detail and clarity. FLUX.2 is the likely winner for its superior visual quality and adherence to the character's description.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent depiction of skin texture and faint scarring
  • + Highly detailed and realistic engraving on the plate armor
  • + Accurate bead placement in the hair braids
  • Lighting feels slightly flat and less atmospheric
  • Leather straps look a bit generic compared to the armor detail

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Superb atmospheric lighting and warm torchlight reflections
  • + Very high fidelity on armor engravings and texture
  • + Stronger emotional expression and cinematic composition
  • Some hair strands appear slightly messy or unnatural against the light
  • The beads in the hair are a bit larger than typical small beads

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, but Grok Imagine takes the lead due to its superior atmospheric lighting and cinematic quality, which perfectly captures the 'warm torchlight' and 'bokeh' elements of the prompt. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provides a very clean and detailed technical image, but it lacks the moody, battle-worn ambiance achieved by Grok Imagine.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent grid layout with a clean, high-end editorial feel.
  • + High-quality, realistic food photography that looks appetizing and consistent.
  • + Effective use of white space and modern font choices.
  • Text consists mostly of gibberish characters and misspelled section headers.
  • The information hierarchy is a bit disorganized with 'Mains' appearing twice.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Successfully includes legible header text for all requested categories (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains).
  • + Dynamic composition with food elements breaking the grid for a more energetic look.
  • + Stronger adherence to the specific menu structure requested.
  • Frequent repetition of items (e.g., 'Steak Frites' and 'Grilled Salmon' appear multiple times).
  • Some food images (like the blue plate with the fish) look less realistic and more like clip art.
  • The 'grid' requested is less structured and more of a collage.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a much more professional and aesthetically pleasing design with high-quality food photography, though its text rendering is poor. Grok Imagine Image succeeds in following the specific category instructions and renders legible text, but the repetition of menu items and lower-quality assets make it feel less polished. FLUX.2 is preferred for overall design quality, while Grok is better for functional layout representation.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and buns
  • + Clean and professional starburst design for the price
  • Severely garbled and misspelled main title text
  • Failed to 'explode' the burger, showing a mostly assembled sandwich instead

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Successfully captured the 'exploded' view with components suspended in air
  • + Perfect text rendering for both 'MAGIC BURGER' and 'LIMITED TIME ONLY'
  • + Stronger adherence to the fiery, glowing aesthetic requested in the prompt
  • Some sauce droplets look slightly digital or artificial
  • Tomato slices are a bit repetitive in lighting

Verdict: Grok Imagine Image is the clear winner as it followed every instruction in the prompt, including the complex 'exploded' composition and accurate text rendering. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B failed to create the exploded effect and produced unintelligible text for the main title, despite having very high-quality textures on the food itself.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent realistic chalk texture on the individual letters.
  • + Authentic smudging and dust on the chalkboard surface.
  • + Good adherence to the cursive requirement for the menu items.
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'Truffle', 'Mushroom', 'Grilled', and 'Octopus'.
  • Composition feels slightly flat compared to the requested café atmosphere.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Perfect spelling across all menu items and dates.
  • + Better atmospheric composition with the blurred café background.
  • + Highly legible while still maintaining a believable chalk style.
  • The handwriting style is a bit more rigid and less 'elegant cursive' than requested in the prompt.
  • The 'S' in 'SPECIALS' is rendered twice or with odd spacing on the first line.

Verdict: Grok Imagine Image is the winner because it successfully spelled all the complex menu items requested, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B struggled significantly with spelling despite having a slightly more realistic chalk texture. Grok Imagine Image also provided a better sense of 'cozy café' atmosphere through the surrounding environmental details.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully integrated character features from Image 2 including the sunglasses, scarf, and black clothing.
  • + Maintainted the exact complex pose and composition of Image 1.
  • + Matched the lighting and vibrant yellow environment perfectly.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + High resolution and visual clarity.
  • Completely failed the character swap instruction, retaining the woman from Image 1.
  • Altered the pose slightly by raising the back leg, failing the 'exact pose' requirement.
  • Ignored all specific character details from Image 2 like the scarf and eyewear.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B successfully followed the complex instructions, merging the character's identity from Image 2 with the specific pose and environment of Image 1. In contrast, Grok Imagine Image failed to perform the edit at all, essentially reproducing Image 1 with minor anatomical changes and no character swap.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent detail on the space suit and horse anatomy
  • + Crisp cinematic lighting with a clear background planet
  • + Correctly places the astronaut and horse together in a cohesive scene
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top, not the horse
  • The scale of the horse relative to the planet's atmospheric dust is physically confusing

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Successfully adhered to the spatial constraint of the horse being on top
  • + Dynamic, vibrant colors with a very surreal atmosphere
  • + Good rendering of the horse's musculature and flowing mane
  • The connection between the horse and astronaut is awkward with one hoof clipping/touching the hand
  • The astronaut's pose feels somewhat disconnected from the overall composition

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produced a much more technically polished and highly detailed image, it failed the specific logical constraint of having the horse 'on top.' Grok Imagine captured the surreal nature of the prompt and followed the spatial instruction, making it the more accurate response despite slightly less realistic textures.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent adherence to the source outfit in Image 2, capturing the pea coat, plaid scarf, and jeans perfectly.
  • + Superb preservation of the original person's face, hair, and vitiligo patterns.
  • + Realistic integration of the clothing onto the body with appropriate shadows.
  • The person's torso remains partially bare under the coat, which contradicts how the shirt was worn in the source image.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Near-perfect preservation of the background and the character's facial features/hair.
  • Complete failure to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a generic royal costume.
  • Anatomical distortion in the left hand which appears mangled.
  • Missed all specific clothing details like the plaid scarf and pea coat.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the instructions accurately, successfully transferring the specific street-style outfit from Image 2 onto the subject of Image 1 while keeping his identity intact. Grok Imagine completely ignored the clothing reference provided in Image 2, substituting it with a 'regal' costume that wasn't requested, and introduced structural artifacts in the hands.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent realistic textures on the capybara's fur and the jacket
  • + Convincing composition showing the depth from the front seat to the back seat
  • + Captures the bored, non-chalant expression of the businesswoman perfectly
  • The vehicle interior looks more like a small vintage car than a standard New York taxi
  • The steering wheel placement and dashboard are a bit abstract

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Clearer view of the New York city background through the windshield
  • + Accurately places the businesswoman in the back seat with better spatial lighting
  • + Includes realistic taxi details like the fare meter on the dashboard
  • The capybara's face looks slightly less photorealistic than in model A
  • The capybara's paws look more like bird talons or sharp claws than actual capybara feet

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a much more intimate and high-fidelity image with superior fur textures and character expressions, though the car itself feels small. Grok Imagine Image handles the environment and taxi specific details better, but fails on the biological accuracy of the capybara's paws and has a slightly more 'plastic' look to the lighting.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Atmospheric cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern
  • + Excellent integration of the thorny border and cobwebs
  • Major text typos like 'Hallbwom' and 'niisation'
  • Missing the 'Time' detail in the bottom text segment

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Perfect text rendering for all requested titles and details
  • + Strong adhering to the 'parchment poster' aesthetic with torn edges
  • + Well-composed scroll banner and clean gothic typography
  • The transition to the black background around the parchment is a bit harsh
  • Slightly less depth in the atmospheric lighting compared to Image A

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B captures a more cinematic atmosphere, it fails significantly on text accuracy and completeness. Grok Imagine succeeds in rendering all requested text perfectly, including specific dates and slogans, while still maintaining high-quality gothic imagery.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Before After
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully added a thick and textured head of hair.
  • + Excellent preservation of lighting, facial features, and the background environment.
  • + Realistic integration of hair strands near the ears and forehead.
  • The hair volume is quite large, which changes the silhouette significantly.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Provides a very natural and sensible hairstyle for the subject.
  • + Perfectly preserves all original details, lighting, and textures.
  • + The hairline is extremely realistic and fits the original head shape well.
  • The hair is somewhat thin on top compared to the 'full, thick' request.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of preserving the original image's integrity. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provided a much thicker, more voluminous head of hair as requested, whereas Grok Imagine Image provided a more conservative style that, while realistic, felt slightly less 'full' than the prompt suggested. Grok Imagine Image is the winner for its seamless integration and more believable hairline, despite the slightly lower volume.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent PBR textures and lighting realism
  • + Perfectly maintains the 45-degree isometric angle
  • + Minimalist and clean aesthetic
  • Text is truncated to 'SUSH' instead of 'SUSHI'
  • The flag icon is incorrect, resembling the flag of Austria instead of Japan

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Captured all required text and icons perfectly
  • + Excellent wood and rice shaders for a 3D cartoon style
  • + Followed the small raised diorama base instruction well
  • Lighting is slightly harsher compared to the soft request
  • Lower resolution appearance on the edges of some elements

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B has slightly more sophisticated lighting and texture work, it failed significant prompt requirements by misspelling the text and providing the wrong flag. Grok Imagine Image correctly followed all text, iconography, and layout instructions while maintaining a high-quality 3D diorama aesthetic, making it the superior choice for this specific prompt.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully creates a vibrant, newsroom caricature style.
  • + Good preservation of hair color and facial expression from the source.
  • + Includes two well-illustrated dogs matching the prompt.
  • Completely misses the 'hockey' requirement.
  • The background text is nonsensical (e.g., 'TVA ANCAR').

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including the news anchor job, dogs, and hockey.
  • + High quality caricature rendering that maintains a strong likeness to the source person.
  • + Clear, legible text readably identifies the theme ('EVENING NEWS').
  • The tiny hands are a bit disproportionate even for a caricature.
  • The hockey dog sitting on the desk has a slight floating appearance.

Verdict: Grok Imagine Image is the clear winner as it successfully incorporated all parts of the multi-prompt request, specifically the hockey element which FLUX.2 [klein] 4B completely ignored. Grok also maintained a better facial likeness to the source image while achieving a cleaner, more professional caricature aesthetic.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent handling of god rays and lighting
  • + Realistic fur textures and anatomical proportions
  • + Includes butterflies as requested
  • Missing the baby bunny requested in the prompt
  • Includes two kittens instead of a single kitten and a bunny

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Includes all four animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Strong dynamic sense of movement and 'tumbling'
  • + Vibrant, high-contrast colors
  • Anatomical distortions, especially on the bunny's face and puppy's back leg
  • Missing the butterflies specifically mentioned in the prompt
  • Rendering style leans towards AI-stylized rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produces a much more realistic and aesthetically pleasing image with superior lighting and texture, but it completely fails the prompt requirement to include a bunny. Grok Imagine succeeds in including all requested animals and capturing the 'tumbling' energy, but at the cost of anatomical correctness and specific details like butterflies. FLUX.2 is the better quality image, but Grok Imagine is more faithful to the specific entities in the prompt.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'soft pastel colors' and 'dreamy' prompt requirements.
  • + Creates a cohesive watercolor aesthetic that feels hand-painted.
  • + Maintains character positions and clothing patterns very accurately.
  • The jealous expression of the woman on the right is lost, turning into a smile.
  • The background architectural details are significantly altered compared to the source.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Perfectly preserves the key storytelling element: the jealous facial expression of the girlfriend.
  • + Colors and line art are very reminiscent of modern Ghibli or Makoto Shinkai styles.
  • + Keeps the specific street layout and background elements like the red vehicle more faithful to the original.
  • The colors are slightly more saturated than the 'soft pastel' request.
  • Line art is a bit cleaner/digital looking compared to the 'hand-painted textures' request.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job transforming the meme into an anime style. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B followed the stylistic 'pastel' and 'dreamy' instructions more closely, but it failed to preserve the core narrative of the image by making the girlfriend look happy. Grok Imagine Image is the winner because it successfully applied the Ghibli aesthetic while maintaining the emotional context and facial expressions that make the original image recognizable.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Before After
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Successfully added wind-swept motion to the hair.
  • + The flying leaves feel integrated into the 3D space of the scene.
  • The leaf colors are a bit muted compared to the vibrant original scene.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Excellent wind effect on both the hair and the dog's ears.
  • + Bright, energetic leaf colors that pop against the foliage.
  • Some leaves appear to be floating unnaturally on top of the subject's clothing like stickers.

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but Grok Imagine Image provided a more holistic energetic feel by applying the wind effect to both the woman's hair and the dog's ears, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B only focused on the woman. Grok's use of bright orange leaves also adds a better sense of dynamic contrast, even if some leaves look slightly less grounded in the perspective.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Clean vector emblem style
  • + Accurate classic typography
  • + Balanced composition with the banner
  • Failed to spell 'Caffè Florian' correctly, outputting 'Caffè Flaxtion'
  • Redundant 'Est. 1720' text appearing twice

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Perfect spelling of 'Caffè Florian'
  • + Stronger visual interest with the steam and cloche details
  • + Excellent capture of the requested brown and cream color scheme
  • Redundant 'Est. 1720' text appearing twice
  • A strange handle-like artifact on the right side of the cloche

Verdict: Grok Imagine Image is the winner because it successfully spelled the requested name, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 4B hallucinated 'Flaxtion'. While both models struggled with redundant text (repeating the year), Grok Imagine Image produced a more visually engaging logo with better typography.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
Grok Imagine Image

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 4B

  • + Features more complex vector illustrations with subtle gradients as requested.
  • + Good layout balance between the rocket and the lunar module.
  • Poor text rendering with several illegible words and misspellings.
  • Doesn't clearly number the steps as requested by the prompt.
  • The rocket design is generic and doesn't strongly resemble a Saturn V.

Grok Imagine Image

  • + Excellent adherence to the requested steps, including specific numbering 1 through 6.
  • + Highly accurate text rendering for the main titles and crew names.
  • + Perfect adherence to the 'NASA-inspired' color palette and flat-vector style.
  • Includes some redundant text like 'NASA inspired' directly in the image.
  • Small typos present in secondary labels like '3rajcory' and 'Moom'.

Verdict: Grok Imagine Image is the clear winner as it followed every instruction in the prompt, including the specific sequence of six steps and consistent iconography. While FLUX.2 [klein] 4B produced a nice aesthetic, its text was largely gibberish and it failed to logically map out the infographic's progression.

Next steps

Explore each model