Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev]

24.5 arena score

#18 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

17.6 arena score

#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev]

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with realistic soft window light and shadows.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the wood grain, glass, and book cover.
  • + Accurate physical representation of the glass cube with appropriate thickness and reflections.
  • The sphere appears slightly disconnected from the bottom surface of the cube.
  • The plant in the background is a bit blurry compared to the main subjects.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Sharp, clear rendering of the green plant and sphere details.
  • + Strong compositional balance with vibrant colors.
  • The glass cube is missing several panels, appearing more like a frame or wireframe than a solid cube.
  • The base of the cube appears to be a mirror rather than clear glass as requested.
  • Lighting is harsh and directional rather than the requested 'soft' window light.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed all spatial and material instructions perfectly, creating a realistic scene with accurate soft lighting. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 failed on the geometry of the cube, resulting in missing glass panels and a mirrored base that contradicts the 'glass cube' prompt.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to the motion blur request for passing cars.
  • + Very realistic skin textures and facial details on the man.
  • + Highly detailed bicycle components and convincing wet pavement reflections.
  • The bicycle frame geometry is slightly warped and incoherent near the man's lap.
  • The placement of the man right next to fast-moving cars feels slightly dangerous/unrealistic for the context.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Creative interpretation of 'imperfect framing' with the frame-within-a-frame composition.
  • + Excellent reflections on the wet pavement.
  • + The bicycle design is more structurally sound and coherent than in Model A.
  • Failed to include motion blur on the passing cars as requested.
  • The skin texture is slightly smoother and less realistic than the 'natural' request.
  • The man's face is partially cropped out by the top framing element.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the technical prompts much more closely, specifically capturing the motion blur and the natural skin textures of the elderly man. While Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 provided a more artistic framing and a cleaner bicycle model, it missed the key prompt requirement for motion blur and had slightly less realistic skin rendering.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt details including the braided hair with beads and battle-worn scars.
  • + High-quality textures on the engraved armor and weathered leather straps.
  • + Perfect execution of the warm torchlight lighting and bokeh sparks.
  • The transition between the hair braids and the armor/neckline is slightly cluttered.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Natural-looking outdoor lighting.
  • + Clear focus on the subject.
  • Completely failed to follow the prompt, depicting a modern man in a garden instead of a paladin in armor.
  • Lacks armor, torchlight, scars, and specific hair details requested.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the prompt with extreme precision, delivering a cinematic and detailed portrait of a fantasy paladin with excellent material rendering. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 failed the prompt entirely, providing a standard photo of an elderly man in a garden that bears no relation to the requested fantasy characters or setting.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with consistent bold sans-serif fonts
  • + Professional two-column layout that realistically simulates a physical menu booklet
  • + High-quality food photography with realistic lighting and appetizing detail
  • Confusing categorization with multiple pizza sections and gibberish titles like 'PIZZAU'
  • The grid arrangement is slightly staggered rather than a strict uniform grid

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Strong adherence to the 'grid' requirement with a clean, modular layout
  • + Effective use of vibrant color blocks as section dividers
  • + More logical pricing and item distribution across the page
  • Text rendering is noticeably poorer with smaller font weights becoming illegible
  • Image variety is low, with several photos appearing very similar
  • Spelling errors in main headers like 'APETIERS'

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produces a more convincing and aesthetically professional menu with superior text legibility and high-quality photography, though the information architecture is a bit chaotic. Imagen 4.0 captures the 'grid' concept better and uses color accents effectively, but suffers from poor text rendering and repetitive imagery. FLUX.2 [dev] is the winner for its overall polish and professional graphic design feel.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography with a cohesive flaming neon effect.
  • + The burger photography looks very professional and appetizing.
  • + The background lighting and embers create a strong sense of depth.
  • The cheese looks slightly flat and synthetic compared to the other high-quality textures.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Strong text rendering and successful integration of the price starburst.
  • + Good exploded view logic with multiple layers shown clearly.
  • + Textured, glowing effect on the font is very consistent with the prompt.
  • The lighting on the burger feels a bit dull compared to the background.
  • The composition is a bit crowded with the larger price tag and double patties.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt instructions perfectly, including specific text and currency symbols. FLUX.2 [dev] is the winner because the food photography quality is superior, featuring more realistic textures on the bun and meat, and a more dynamic sense of light and motion.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and varying pressure.
  • + Flowing, elegant cursive calligraphy for the title.
  • + Accurate spelling and completion of the 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies' item.
  • The alignment of the second item 'with Lemon & Herbs' is slightly disjointed.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Clean, highly legible handwriting.
  • + Good use of a wooden frame for composition.
  • + Correct price placement for most items.
  • Spelling errors present, such as 'Octuphus' and 'Cookes'.
  • Text looks more like a digital font than actual chalk on a board.
  • Duplicated the third menu item with a partially empty line above it.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] significantly outperforms Imagen 4.0 in this challenge by delivering a much more realistic chalk texture and adhering perfectly to the long-form text requirements. While Imagen 4.0 created a very clean image, it struggled with spelling ('Octuphus') and layout logic, whereas FLUX.2 captured the authentic feel of a handwritten cafe chalkboard.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and environmental detail featuring Earth and a nebula.
  • + Realistic horse anatomy and believable integration of the rider.
  • + High-quality texture on the space suit and horse fur.
  • Failed the specific negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Clear, sharp focus on the subjects with a clean background.
  • + Good detail in the astronaut's face through the visor.
  • Failed the specific negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • The composition feels a bit static compared to the dynamic pose of the other image.

Verdict: Both FLUX.2 [dev] and Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 failed to follow the specific surreal instruction for the horse to be 'on top' of the astronaut. However, FLUX.2 [dev] is the superior image due to its much more cinematic composition, realistic lighting, and detailed background environment.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent capybara face and fur texture with a calm expression
  • + Perspective captures both the driver and the passenger effectively
  • + Realistic lighting on the capybara's face from the dashboard and exterior
  • The passenger's hands and phone interaction are slightly blurred and jumbled
  • The capybara's paws look somewhat like human hands in gloves

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + High photographic clarity throughout the interior
  • + Great interpretation of the 'bored' expression for the passenger
  • + Sophisticated costume design with a more detailed taxi cap and necktie
  • The steering wheel placement is logically flawed, appearing to originate from the passenger's knee area
  • The capybara's paws are rendered with claws that look slightly unnatural

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but FLUX.2 [dev] produced a more coherent scene with realistic perspective. While Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 featured a superior character expression for the businesswoman, the technical failure of the steering wheel placement makes FLUX.2 [dev] the more believable image overall.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography with perfect spelling of all text segments.
  • + Included all requested elements like thorns and twisted trees in a cohesive layout.
  • + Strong cinematic lighting with a moody, dark gothic aesthetic.
  • The parchment edges look slightly more digital/artificial compared to the inner illustration.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Beautiful parchment texture with realistic tattered edges.
  • + Good use of color contrast in the sky and center jack-o-lantern.
  • Several spelling errors including 'IINVITATION' and 'FNIGUTS'.
  • The text layout at the bottom is cramped and messy, merging 'LOCATION' and 'TIME' incorrectly.
  • Missed the 'thorns' part of the border request.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] significantly outperformed Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 by following all text instructions perfectly, including the specific banner phrasing and event details. While Imagen has nice parchment textures, its rendering of text is riddled with typos and layout issues that make it unusable as a party invitation.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent typography with clean, centered layout and accurate flag icon.
  • + Higher detail in the sushi models, showing clear grain in the fish and texture in the rice.
  • + Stronger adherence to the requested 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft PBR-style lighting.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Clean isometric perspective and diorama base.
  • + Good color contrast between the light blue background and the subject.
  • + Effective use of negative space.
  • The text layout is slightly unbalanced with the flag to the right rather than centered below.
  • The rice grains look like uniform white beads rather than realistic sushi rice.
  • Unnecessary white border around the square image frame.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the prompt more closely, particularly regarding the text placement and the flag icon centering. Its sushi models feature more natural textures and soft lighting that better fits the 'refined 3D cartoon' style compared to Imagen 4.0 Fast, which produced a slightly more clinical, bead-like texture for the rice.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Perfectly followed all subject requirements including the golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, and butterflies.
  • + Excellent lighting effects with clear 'god rays' and dew sparkles as requested.
  • + Exceptional detail in the fur texture and 'big expressive eyes'.
  • Included an extra bunny that wasn't explicitly requested.
  • The kitten's eye direction is slightly disconnected from the others.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Good composition with the animals grouped closely together.
  • + Warm, pleasant lighting that fits the sunrise theme.
  • + High level of detail on the fox kit and rabbit.
  • Failed to include butterflies, which was a key action element of the prompt.
  • Incorrectly rendered the golden retriever as a brown/white spaniel-type dog and the tabby kitten as a solid black/dark cat.
  • Lacks the requested 'god rays' and dew sparkles.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the prompt nearly perfectly, including all specific animal breeds and the action of chasing butterflies, while also capturing the atmospheric lighting effects of god rays and dew. Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 failed on several specific prompt instructions, missing the butterflies and incorrectly identifying the requested animal breeds and colors. FLUX.2 [dev] is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence and atmospheric detail.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent text legibility and accuracy
  • + Highly balanced emblem-style composition
  • + Consistent vintage texture and color palette
  • Steam effect is very stylized and simple

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Clean vector lines and professional spacing
  • + Sophisticated use of negative space for steam
  • Background color leans blue rather than the requested cream
  • Includes some nonsensical filler text above the main title

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] followed the color palette and text requirements more accurately than Imagen 4.0. While both models produced high-quality logos, FLUX.2 [dev] maintained a more coherent vintage aesthetic and better adherence to the cream background prompt.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev]
Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • + Excellent vector iconography with high-quality gradients.
  • + Accurate and legible labels for key astronauts in the top right.
  • + Includes all requested stages with visually distinct and appropriate illustrations.
  • Labels at the bottom and some in the middle are illegible gibberish.
  • The grid layout feels slightly cluttered with redundant icons for Saturn and Launch.
  • The background is very dark, leaning more towards a space scene than a clean infographic poster.

Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001

  • + Stronger adherence to the flat-vector style requested.
  • + Follows the NASA-inspired color palette more consistently than the other model.
  • + Clearer diagrammatic flow between the steps.
  • Significant spelling errors in every label (e.g., 'Apolo', 'Moor', 'Vicon').
  • Nonsensical layout of lines that do not clearly follow the lunar mission sequence.
  • Low-quality icon for Earth and repetitive use of the 'Launch' label.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] produces much higher quality individual icons and handles complex typography (like the crew names) far better than the competition. While Imagen 4.0 Fast Generate 001 captures the 'flat-vector' aesthetic and palette more accurately, its severe spelling failures and incoherent diagram flow make it less useful as an infographic. FLUX.2 [dev] is the preferred choice for its visual polish and creative interpretation of the mission stages.

Next steps

Explore each model