Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

27.9 arena score

#3 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 3 in Text-to-Image
Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Seedream 5.0 Lite

23.7 arena score

#23 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

66.7%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Seedream 5.0 Lite

33.3%

win rate

66.7% 0.0% ties 33.3%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealism with realistic dust and imperfections on the glass cube.
  • + Sophisticated lighting and reflections on the wooden table and internal glass surfaces.
  • + High level of detail in the book texture and wood grain.
  • The glass cube has an internal vertical seam or edge that looks slightly disconnected.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Clean, minimalist composition that strictly adheres to the prompt.
  • + Clear visibility of the plant through the glass.
  • + Accurate spatial relationships between all objects.
  • Lighting feels flatter and less natural compared to the other image.
  • The sphere has a very matte, CGI-like texture compared to the realistic glass surroundings.
  • Lower detail in textures like the book cover and wood.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a significantly more realistic and visually compelling image with rich textures and complex light reflections. While Seedream 5.0 Lite follows the prompt perfectly, its output looks more like a 3D render than a real photograph, lacking the fine details and atmosphere present in the FLUX.2 image.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, hair, and specific clothing patterns
  • + Realistic perspective from inside the car to the coastline
  • + Natural-looking lighting and motion blur on the road
  • The steering wheel is positioned on the right side (UK style) for a California road
  • Small artifacts in the car's interior details

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly preserves the exterior model of the car from the source image
  • + Accurately represents a beautiful California coastal cliffside
  • + Correct left-hand drive alignment for the location
  • The man's facial features and hair texture are significantly altered from the source image
  • The composition feels a bit like a static cutout placed on a background

Verdict: Both models followed the complex editing instructions well. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo succeeded in preserving the identity of the person perfectly while placing them in a new environment, though it swapped the steering wheel to the right. Seedream 5.0 Lite preserved the car and location logic better, but failed at identity preservation by changing the man's face and hair.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'imperfect framing' prompt with a gritty, realistic street photography feel.
  • + Strong technical details like the complex bike mechanics, tools on the ground, and puddle reflections.
  • + Superior skin textures and age-appropriate facial features for an elderly man.
  • The front wheel of the bicycle appears to be clipping into or through the pavement surface.
  • Minor coherence issues with the brake cables connecting to the basket area.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Clean cinematic lighting with good color contrast between the blue jacket and red bike.
  • + Accurate representation of local Japanese street signage in the background bokeh.
  • + Effective use of shallow depth of field and motion blur on the passing vehicle.
  • The skin texture appears slightly too smooth and lacks the requested 'natural' and 'imperfect' grit.
  • Composition is a bit too standard and 'perfect' for a requested 'candid street photo' with 'imperfect framing'.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo better captured the requested 'imperfect' and 'candid' aesthetic, producing an image that looks much more like genuine 50mm street photography. Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a high-quality cinematic image, but it feels more staged and lacks the detailed grit and naturalistic skin textures found in the FLUX output.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Exceptional textural detail on the aged leather straps and engraved metal.
  • + Highly realistic skin details including pores, fine dirt, and authentic-looking scars.
  • + Dynamic lighting with believable bokeh sparks and a clear torch source.
  • The braid execution is a bit messy, with some beads appearing to float or blend into the hair strands.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Strong warm lighting that beautifully emphasizes the 'paladin' aesthetic and metal reflections.
  • + Clean, well-defined braids that perfectly incorporate the requested beads.
  • + Good composition with a clear focus on the subject's face.
  • The skin texture looks somewhat smoothed and plastic compared to the 'battle-worn' request.
  • The armor engraving lacks the depth and tactile realism of Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the winner because it captures the 'battle-worn' aspect much more effectively with grittier skin textures, realistic scars, and weathered equipment. While Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a very clean and attractive 'fantasy' look with excellent braids, it fails to deliver the high-fidelity detail on the leather and cloth requested by the prompt.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite
67% wins 0% ties 33% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent high-fidelity food photography
  • + Clean minimalist layout with professional spacing
  • + Faithful adherence to the requested 'sections' and 'grid' layout.
  • Text contains gibberish/nonsense words
  • Pricing logic is inconsistent (pizzas for $300 vs $2.50)

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect legibility and accurate spelling of menu items
  • + Consistent design with clear color-coded sections
  • + Logical pricing for a casual dining establishment
  • Food photography looks slightly more artificial/stock-like
  • Composition is a bit more basic compared to the professional editorial look of Model A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a much more visually stunning and professional-looking graphic design with high-quality photography, but the text is largely gibberish. Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a fully functional, readable menu with perfect spelling, which makes it more practical for a real-world use case despite the slightly less sophisticated visual aesthetic.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent text integration with a realistic fiery, glowing texture.
  • + Highly detailed burger texture, especially for the patty and bun.
  • + Strong sense of motion with flying sauce droplets and ember particles.
  • The starburst for the price is a bit cluttered with fire effects, slightly reducing price readability.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Clean, readable text layout and bright neon-like glowing effect.
  • + Good separation of burger ingredients enhancing the 'exploded' view.
  • + Vibrant lighting on the cheese and tomatoes.
  • The text looks more like a 2D neon overlay rather than being integrated into the fiery scene.
  • The perspective on the lower bun is slightly tilted in a way that feels less natural compared to the rest of the stack.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced a more cohesive and professional-looking advertisement, with impressive fiery textures on the typography that perfectly match the background. While Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt well and maintained clarity, its text feels like a simple digital overlay whereas FLUX.2's text feels like it exists within the physical space of the image.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and dust on the board.
  • + Perfect spelling for all requested menu items and numbers.
  • + Natural handwritten variation in letter size and slant that looks authentic.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Clear, legible handwriting style.
  • + Consistent chalk color and weight.
  • Multiple spelling errors including 'Heriss' for Herbs, 'Beliter' for Butter, and 'frese opstoons'.
  • The title is in print-style caps rather than the requested elegant cursive.
  • The texture of the board feels more like a digital overlay than local chalk.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt with high precision, accurately rendering all text with perfect spelling and a very realistic chalk aesthetic. Seedream 5.0 Lite struggled with several spelling errors and failed to provide the cursive style requested for the title.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Successfully preserved the clothing and scarf details from Image 2.
  • + Maintained the lighting and background color from Image 1.
  • Serious anatomical failure with a second head (from Image 1) appearing under the character's arm.
  • Failed to match the requested pose, creating a floating/jumping position instead of the balance pose.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Accurately replicated the exact pose and body position from Image 1.
  • + Successfully integrated the character, face, and clothing from Image 2 into the new scene.
  • + Maintained better anatomical coherence than the competitor.
  • The sunglasses are slightly distorted compared to the source image.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed all instructions perfectly, successfully placing the character from Image 2 into the difficult pose of Image 1 with good anatomical consistency. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo failed significantly by including the original person's head from Image 1 as a separate entity and completely changing the pose to a generic jump.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + High resolution with cinematic lighting and atmosphere.
  • + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse and suit textures.
  • Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Vibrant, colorful space background.
  • + Clear composition and sharp character rendering.
  • Completely ignored the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut, instead defaulting to the common trope of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the preferred image due to its superior cinematic lighting and grounded, realistic textures compared to the more saturated but flat look of Seedream 5.0 Lite.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Successfully transferred the complex jewelry and heavy layers from Image 2.
  • + Maintained the exact composition and background from Image 1.
  • Completely failed to preserve the base person from Image 1, replacing the face and hair with the person from Image 2.
  • Added excessive jewelry that was not present in Image 2.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly preserved the base person's face, hair, and unique skin patterns from Image 1.
  • + Accurately transferred the coat, scarf, glasses, and watch from Image 2 while adapting them to the pose.
  • + Maintained the original lighting and background integrity.
  • The transition between the neck and the shirt collar is slightly blurred.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo failed the primary instruction of the edit, which was to keep the person from Image 1 unchanged; instead, it swapped the entire person. Seedream 5.0 Lite performed an excellent edit, perfectly mapping the clothing from Image 2 onto the subject from Image 1 while maintaining his identity and features.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealism in lighting and textures
  • + The businesswoman's expression and posture perfectly match the 'bored' prompt
  • + High visual coherence and clean details on the taxi sign
  • The capybara is positioned in the center, and the businesswoman is in the passenger seat rather than the requested back seat
  • The capybara's hands look slightly more human-like than animal-like

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Correctly places the businesswoman in the back seat as requested
  • + Excellent rendering of capybara paws on the steering wheel
  • + Very detailed taxi interior and dashboard
  • The perspective from outside-in makes the spatial arrangement feel slightly cramped
  • The woman's hand holding the phone has some minor digital artifacts

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a more aesthetically pleasing image with superior lighting and realism, it fails on the spatial instruction to place the passenger in the back seat. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed all prompt instructions including the specific seating arrangement and paw placement, making it the more accurate interpretation despite slightly lower textural realism.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent typography with a cohesive gothic font choice
  • + Higher level of detail in the background illustration and border
  • + Perfect adherence to all text fields and location details
  • The parchment effect is slightly more subtle than Model B

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Strong 'vintage' parchment texture
  • + Good use of the scroll banner element
  • The font for the bottom details is less elegant and feels disjointed
  • The composition feels a bit more cluttered with the larger border elements
  • Lower clarity in the background trees and sky

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a much more polished and professional-looking invitation with superior typography and a more atmospheric illustration. Seedream 5.0 Lite captures the vintage parchment texture well, but the layout and font choices for the event details at the bottom feel less integrated and refined.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent preservation of the source background, clothing, and facial features.
  • + The hair texture matches the coarseness of the existing beard well.
  • The hairline on the forehead looks slightly artificial and stamped on.
  • The choice of a large afro-style haircut feels less natural for the subject's existing features compared to a standard cut.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Provides a very realistic, age-appropriate hairstyle that flows naturally with the head shape.
  • + Perfect preservation of the facial features, lighting, and environment.
  • + Natural-looking hairline and seamless blending with the sideburns.
  • The hair on top is slightly soft in focus compared to the sharp facial features.

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of preserving the source image while adding hair. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo added thick, curly hair that technically meets the prompt but looks a bit like an overlay, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite provided a much more convincing integration that looks like the man's actual hair, with a better-rendered hairline.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent material rendering with realistic rice grains and salmon marbling.
  • + Precise typography and layout with a perfectly integrated flag icon.
  • + Natural lighting and shadows that give the diorama a high-end 3D render feel.
  • The camera angle is slightly lower than the requested 45° isometric view.
  • The wooden base texture is a bit coarse compared to the 'soft refined' request.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Captures the 'soft refined texture' and 'cartoon scene' aesthetic perfectly.
  • + Exactly follows the 45-degree isometric top-down perspective.
  • + Clean, minimalist composition with variety in the sushi types.
  • The text is slightly off-center and the font is a bit more 'bubbly' than 'bold'.
  • Shadows on the sushi pieces are somewhat inconsistent with the light source.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a much more realistic and professionally polished image with superior text rendering and material details. Seedream 5.0 Lite technically follows the requested isometric angle and 'cartoon' style better but fails to match the high clarity and graphic design precision of FLUX.2.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent caricature style with highly exaggerated proportions.
  • + Successfully incorporates all elements (dogs, hockey, TV desk) into a cohesive scene.
  • + Maintains a recognizable facial likeness to the source subject through the caricature.
  • Text on the desk is nonsensical gibberish.
  • The composition is a bit crowded with many competing elements.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Very clean, cute cartoon art style.
  • + Legible and accurate text rendering on the nameplate.
  • + Maintains the outfit from the source image.
  • Lacks the 'exaggerated' and 'humorous' nature of a true caricature.
  • The hand holding the hockey stick is poorly rendered with merged fingers.
  • The composition is a bit generic compared to the requested prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt much more effectively by creating a true, exaggerated caricature that seamlessly blended the hockey rink and the news desk into one humorous scene. While Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a clean image with better text, it felt more like a standard avatar than an exaggerated caricature and suffered from clear anatomical errors in the hand.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent fur texture and realistic anatomy for all animals.
  • + Dynamic interaction between animals conveys the 'tumbling' and 'chasing' aspect well.
  • + Sophisticated lighting with subtle dew drops and natural God rays.
  • The bunny's scale feels a bit small compared to the kitten.
  • Slightly less color variety in the butterflies compared to Model B.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Very charming character designs with highly expressive, cute eyes.
  • + Vibrant butterfly colors and soft, dreamy golden hour atmosphere.
  • + Good central composition with clear separation between subjects.
  • Lean towards a stylized/3D render look rather than the 'hyper-photorealistic' request.
  • The fox's anatomy and pose look slightly unnatural and toy-like.
  • The fur detail is smoother and less defined than in Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt's request for hyper-photorealism more effectively, providing intricate fur detail and realistic god rays. While Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a very cute and wholesome image, it felt more like a high-end 3D animation still rather than a photorealistic scene. FLUX.2 also captured the dynamic 'tumbling together' action more convincingly.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Captures the soft watercolor aesthetic and nostalgic mood of Studio Ghibli films perfectly.
  • + Successfully reimagines the background with cherry blossoms and soft lighting.
  • + Preserves the iconic expressions and poses of the original meme with great character design.
  • Changes the blur/focus levels of the foreground figure, making her much sharper than in the source image.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Provides a clean, cel-shaded anime look reminiscent of standard digital animation.
  • + Accurately preserves the original background layout and street details.
  • + Maintains the relative focus and composition of the source image perfectly.
  • Lacks the 'hand-painted textures' and 'dreamy' atmosphere specifically requested in the prompt.
  • Colors are a bit flat and don't reflect the requested warm, nostalgic mood as well as Image A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the qualitative instructions much better, delivering the specific watercolor textures and nostalgic lighting associated with Studio Ghibli. Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a high-quality anime conversion, but it feels more like a standard modern digital anime than the specific 'hand-painted' painterly style requested. FLUX.2 is the clear winner for its artistic interpretation while maintaining the integrity of the original meme.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Successfully added hundreds of falling leaves across the frame
  • + Hair is spread symmetrically to suggest a strong breeze
  • + High preservation of the source background and woman's face
  • Flying leaves appear a bit small and repetitive
  • Motion blur on leaves is minimal, reducing the 'dynamic' feel

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Leaves are varied in size and angle, creating a better sense of depth
  • + Hair movement is realistic and well-integrated
  • + Excellent preservation of the original image identity
  • Fewer leaves than Model A might feel less 'energetic'
  • Some leaves look slightly pasted on without sufficient motion blur

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, preserving the original woman and dog perfectly while adding wind effects. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo provided a more intense flurry of small leaves and very dramatic hair, while Seedream 5.0 Lite added fewer but larger, more distinct leaves that create a better sense of three-dimensional space.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Perfect text rendering including the 'è' accent and the specific date.
  • + Excellent vintage texture and weathered paper effect.
  • + Sophisticated vector emblem style with high-quality line work and shading.
  • Smallest amount of 'steam' elements compared to the other model.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Accurate text spelling and date rendering.
  • + Clean, minimalist design that follows the prompt instructions.
  • + Good use of the cloche dome as a central visual element.
  • The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center within the banner.
  • The background texture is very faint, lacking the promised vintage grit.
  • The typography for 'Caffè Florian' feels a bit more modern/stock than 'classic'.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced a superior logo with much higher attention to professional graphic design details, such as the curved typography and the realistic distressed texture on the background. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt well and rendered the text accurately, but the layout and overall aesthetic feel more like a basic clipart arrangement rather than a refined vintage emblem.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Seedream 5.0 Lite
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + High level of illustrative detail in the lunar module and Saturn V icons.
  • + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors in names or labels.
  • + Good use of the requested NASA-inspired color palette.
  • The layout is cluttered and the flow of information is confusing.
  • Included redundant elements like two Earths and two Translunar labels.
  • Followed the prompt instructions for content but failed to present them as a logical step-by-step sequence.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly organized linear layout that clearly follows the requested 6-step sequence.
  • + Maintains a consistent flat-vector icon style as requested in the prompt.
  • + Clean, professional infographic design with clear numbering and labeling.
  • Subtle typo in step 3 (labeled 'TRANSLUMAR' instead of 'Translunar').
  • Iconography is somewhat generic compared to the detailed illustrations in the other model.
  • The Saturn V rocket silhouette is slightly simplified and lacks the requested 'crisp' NASA detail.

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced much more detailed and aesthetically pleasing illustrations, it failed to create a coherent infographic, resulting in a disorganized jumble of icons. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the structural requirements of the prompt perfectly, delivering a clear 1-6 step sequence that functions as a real infographic, despite a minor spelling error in step 3.

Next steps

Explore each model