Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

27.9 arena score

#3 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 3 in Text-to-Image
Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

22.1 arena score

#34 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

66.7%

win rate

Ties

8.3%

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

25.0%

win rate

66.7% 8.3% ties 25.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent physical accuracy with a realistic glass terrarium-style cube containing the sphere.
  • + The plant is correctly positioned behind the glass, appearing distorted by the refraction.
  • + Very high photorealism in the wood textures and lighting.
  • The red book has some garbled text on the spine.
  • The blue sphere has a slight reflection that doesn't perfectly match its base contact.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Clean, stylized aesthetic with highly legible text on the book spine.
  • + Vibrant colors and a very smooth, high-quality render finish.
  • Physical impossibility where the blue sphere is floating centered inside a solid block of glass.
  • The glass object is a solid block rather than a hollow cube, and it lacks the internal space suggested by 'inside the cube'.
  • The plant's leaves are behind the cube but the refraction doesn't realistically align with the edges of the object.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt with significantly better physical logic, depicting a hollow glass cube with a sphere resting at the bottom and a plant visible through the transparency. Imagen 4.0 Ultra generated a more polished-looking image with better text, but it failed the spatial logic of the prompt by making the sphere hover inside a seemingly solid block of glass.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'motion blur from passing cars' prompt requirement
  • + Highly realistic wet pavement with detailed reflections and rain particles
  • + Inclusion of scattered tools and a kickstand adds to the storytelling and realism
  • The bike's front wheel is slightly merged into the pavement and puddle
  • The man's hands appear somewhat mangled and anatomically incorrect upon close inspection

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Superior rendering of a '50mm lens' look with a tight, candid framing
  • + Rain droplets visible on the man's jacket provide a great sense of texture
  • + The man's anatomical details, especially his hands and face, are more coherent than Model A
  • Missed the 'motion blur from passing cars' requirement; the car in the background is static and sharply defined
  • The bicycle has structural inconsistencies, such as the handlebars appearing reversed or incorrectly angled

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the complex prompt more closely, successfully including the requested motion blur and a wider street scene that feels authentic to the location. However, Imagen 4.0 Ultra captured a better 'candid' feel with superior skin textures and more realistic hands, despite failing to add motion to the background vehicles.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealistic skin texture and lifelike eyes
  • + Highly detailed and authentic-looking leather straps with weathered texture
  • + Natural integration of the torchlight and burning embers
  • The engraving on the armor is a bit busy and lacks some clarity compared to model b

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Stronger adherence to the requested 'hair braided with small beads' prompt with numerous braids
  • + Very clear and elegant engraving on the plate armor
  • + Dynamic lighting on the armor panels
  • The skin texture appears slightly more processed and less lifelike than model a
  • The torch in the background has a slightly artificial, stiff placement

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo takes the lead by a small margin due to the incredible realism of the skin and leather textures, whereas Imagen 4.0 Ultra felt slightly more stylized in its rendering of the character's face.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to layout requests including specific sections for appetizers, pizza, and mains.
  • + Strong textual rendering with readable header and menu items.
  • + Professional use of color accents and white space following a minimalist aesthetic.
  • Includes several pizza photos in the Appetizers and Mains sections, showing poor photo-content logic.
  • Small text elements contain some gibberish characters.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Clean, ultra-minimalist grid layout that feels very modern.
  • + Consistent photographic style across all food items.
  • + Good use of simple color flags next to text labels.
  • Fails to properly separate content into the three requested sections (Appetizers/Pizza/Mains are cramped together at the top).
  • Text rendering is largely illegible for the item descriptions and names.
  • Significant dead space at the bottom of the composition.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the superior choice because it creates a functional, logical menu layout with distinct sections and readable text that adheres strictly to the prompt details. While Imagen 4.0 Ultra produces a clean aesthetic, it fails to organize the content into the requested sections and the text is mostly gibberish.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent typography with a genuine fiery, glowing neon effect.
  • + Highly photorealistic textures on the patty and bun.
  • + Dynamic composition with splashes of sauce that enhance the 'exploded' feel.
  • The starburst for the price is a bit messy and overlaps with background sparks.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Clean, symmetrical composition that is well-suited for a commercial ad.
  • + Strong adherence to all text elements and the starburst requirement.
  • + Vibrant colors and high clarity on the vegetable layers.
  • The text lighting is more of a flat gradient than the requested 'fiery, glowing effect'.
  • The bun texture looks slightly plastic or hyper-real compared to Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo takes the lead due to its superior rendering of the 'fiery, glowing effect' on the text, which feels integrated into the scene. While Imagen 4.0 Ultra has a cleaner layout, FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo captures the requested 'photorealistic detail' and 'dynamic motion' with more convincing textures and sauce splashes.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic dusty residue and smudge marks.
  • + Highly authentic handwritten style with natural variations in letter size and spacing.
  • + Successfully completed the truncated menu item with contextually appropriate text.
  • The '9' at the end of the cookie line is redundant and slightly messy.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Perfect text accuracy and completion of the final line.
  • + Very clean and readable layout.
  • + Text is centered and well-balanced within the frame.
  • The text looks a bit too much like a digital font rather than authentic chalk handwriting.
  • The chalk texture is too uniform and lacks the realistic pressure variations found in actual writing.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a much more convincing chalkboard image with realistic smudges, varying chalk pressure, and a natural handwritten feel. While Imagen 4.0 Ultra is more precise with the text layout, the letters have a 'perfect' digital quality that misses the 'handwritten-style' and 'chalk texture' requirements of the prompt. FLUX.2 also intelligently completed the truncated prompt for the third item.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and environmental detail.
  • + Dynamic pose with a high level of realistic texture on the horse and spacesuit.
  • + Strong adherence to the surreal 'in space' vibe with clear celestial bodies.
  • Completely failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Includes creative details like a horse space helmet and glowing lunar boots.
  • + Clean composition with a focused subject.
  • Completely failed the specific positioning instruction; the astronaut is on top of the horse.
  • Visual style is slightly more 'digital art' and less cinematic than the competitor.

Verdict: Both FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo and Imagen 4.0 Ultra failed the logical challenge to place the horse on top of the astronaut, both reverting to the standard trope of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the preferred image because it delivers a much higher level of detail, better cinematic lighting, and a more immersive atmosphere despite the shared prompt adherence failure.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealism with gritty, cinematic lighting and textures.
  • + Accurately places the passenger in the back seat as requested.
  • + The capybara's fur and the taxi's exterior details are highly realistic.
  • The passenger is seated in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The capybara's paws look more like human hands with animal skin stretched over them.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Successfully positions the woman in the back seat at a distance.
  • + High clarity and clean composition that captures all elements of the prompt.
  • + The 'bored' expression of the businesswoman is well-executed.
  • The image has a smooth, digital art aesthetic rather than the requested photorealistic style.
  • The capybara's paws are rendered with large, sharp claws that don't match the species.
  • The 'TAXI' sign is on its cap rather than the car roof, and the car interior feels a bit generic.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo achieves a far superior photorealistic finish, feeling like a real movie still, though it failed the spatial instruction to place the passenger in the back seat. Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001 followed the spatial instructions perfectly but failed to deliver a photorealistic image, resulting in a CGI or digital illustration look. FLUX.2 is preferred for its convincing textures and lighting, despite the seating error.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to the vintage parchment texture requested.
  • + Highly cinematic lighting with realistic textures and moody atmospheric depth.
  • + Perfect rendering of text and layout, feeling like a cohesive physical poster.
  • The thorn border is a bit messy and overlaps the edge of the parchment in a repetitive way.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Crystal clear typography and crisp vector-like graphics.
  • + Good use of the scroll banner element above the pumpkin.
  • + Distinctively sharp thorns and cobweb details.
  • Lacks the requested 'vintage' and 'parchment' aesthetic, feeling more like a modern digital illustration.
  • The lighting is flat and lacks the cinematic quality of the competing image.
  • The background trees look like generic silhouettes.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo significantly outperformed Imagen 4.0 in capturing the 'vintage gothic' mood, producing a textured, atmospheric poster that feels authentic to the prompt. While Imagen 4.0 produced clean text, its overall style was too clean and digital, missing the parchment and moody lighting requirements that FLUX.2 handled with ease.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
0% wins 50% ties 50% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent realistic textures for the salmon and rice, meeting the PBR materials request.
  • + Perfectly clean typography and layout for the text and flag icon.
  • + Very high visual clarity and professional 3D rendering style.
  • The diorama base is a bit large relative to the plate, leaving significant empty space.
  • Only shows one type of sushi, whereas a 'scene' of the dish often implies more variety.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Great variety of sushi types (nigiri, maki, tamago, ebi) creating a more interesting scene.
  • + Superior stylized 'cartoon' aesthetic with soft, pillowy textures.
  • + Better use of the diorama base area with integrated garnishes and a secondary plate.
  • Individual rice grains look a bit like cobblestones or popcorn rather than realistic rice texture.
  • The 45-degree angle is slightly flatter than the more traditional isometric view seen in Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, including the specific text and flag requirements with high accuracy. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo leans more towards hyper-realistic textures with a premium 3D feel, while Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001 provides a more diverse and charming cartoon-style miniature scene that feels more complete as a diorama. Imagen is preferred for its creative variety and better fulfillment of the 'cartoon' and 'diorama' aspects of the prompt.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photo-realism with natural textures and lighting.
  • + Realistic interaction between animals, including a convincing 'tumbling' pose for the fox.
  • + Very detailed treatment of dew drops and soft bokeh in the background.
  • The kitten has a slightly distorted paw/leg where it meets the fox.
  • The butterflies look a bit stiff compared to the rest of the realism.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Perfectly captures the 'god rays' aspect of the prompt with dramatic lighting.
  • + Vibrant, clean composition with high contrast.
  • + Clear inclusion of all requested animals in playful upright poses.
  • Leans heavily into a digital illustration or 3D render style rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'.
  • The animals look like static character models rather than living creatures in a scene.
  • The bunny's anatomy and size relative to the fox feel slightly off.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the 'hyper-photorealistic' instruction much more effectively, creating a scene that looks like a high-end nature photograph. Imagen 4.0 Ultra provided a beautiful and vibrant image, but it has a very distinct 'Disney Pixar' digital art style that ignores the request for realism. FLUX.2's lighting and fur textures are superior for the requested 8K masterpiece look.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
67% wins 0% ties 33% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent typography with strong visual hierarchy and perfect spelling of special characters.
  • + Superior texture application that gives an authentic aged paper and printed ink feel.
  • + Balanced composition with professional-grade vector illustration details.
  • The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center within the banner.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Clean, minimalist design that adheres well to a vector emblem style.
  • + Accurate representation of all prompt elements including the cloche and banner.
  • The steam is very faint and lacks the graphic impact of the rest of the logo.
  • Layout feels a bit generic compared to the first model, with less sophisticated typography.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced a more authentic and visually rich vintage logo, excelling in texture and typography. While Imagen 4.0 Ultra also followed the prompt accurately, its execution felt more like a modern clip-art recreation rather than a high-end vintage emblem.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent text rendering with accurate labels for mission milestones and astronaut names.
  • + Follows the specific mission steps (Launch, Orbit, Translunar, etc.) accurately and in a logical sequence.
  • + Clean, high-quality vector-style illustrations and a correct NASA-inspired palette.
  • The layout is a bit scattered with repetitive icons (e.g., two Translunar labels).
  • Included some nonsensical text like 'Saturn Iicon'.

Imagen 4.0 Ultra Generate 001

  • + Clean vertical layout that resembles a professional infographic template.
  • + Strong adherence to the flat-vector aesthetic with consistent iconography.
  • Complete failure in text generation, producing gibberish labels like 'SPUSTUR' and 'MEENNSTUING'.
  • The iconography does not clearly represent the specific mission steps requested (e.g., no clear Saturn V or trajectory arc).
  • Does not follow the requested sequential steps for the Apollo 11 mission accurately.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo significantly outperformed the other model by following the specific educational content of the prompt, including accurate mission steps and legible labels for the crew. While its layout is slightly disorganized, it provides actual information, whereas Imagen 4.0 Ultra produced a visually pleasing template filled with unintelligible gibberish and irrelevant icons.

Next steps

Explore each model