Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

27.9 arena score

#3 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 3 in Text-to-Image
Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

17.0 arena score

#55 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent realism in the glass texture and reflections.
  • + Accurate interpretation of 'partially visible through the glass' for the plant.
  • + Warm, natural lighting that fits the requested 'soft window light'.
  • The glass cube looks more like a hollow glass box with thick walls than a solid cube.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfectly depicts a solid glass cube as requested.
  • + Clean, minimalist composition.
  • + High quality texture on the book cover.
  • The plant is completely obscured by the cube's reflections rather than visible through it.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally without a clear physics reasoning.
  • The reflections on the glass facets are somewhat confusing/inconsistent.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the spatial instructions more accurately, particularly regarding the plant's visibility through the cube and the sphere's placement on the bottom surface. While Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 produced a more solid-looking cube, it failed to make the plant visible through the glass as requested and resulted in a less natural-looking scene.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid photograph' prompt instructions
  • + High level of realism in the mechanical details of the bicycle
  • + Realistic motion blur on passing vehicles and natural pavement reflections
  • The visible rain effect is a bit sparse compared to the wetness of the ground

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Strong bokeh effect and cinematic color grading
  • + Good skin texture on the man's face
  • Anatomical issues with the man's hands appearing mutated
  • Nonsensical bicycle anatomy where the chain and frame merge
  • Framing is too clean and lacks the 'imperfect' candid feel requested

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo significantly outperforms Imagen 4.0 by providing a much more realistic and anatomically correct image. While Imagen 4.0 has a pleasing cinematic color palette, it fails on basic mechanical realism of the bike and suffers from significant artifacts in the hands, whereas FLUX.2 captures the candid, gritty street photography aesthetic perfectly.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealistic skin texture with subtle scarring and dirt.
  • + Complex, realistic armor engraving with believable wear and tear.
  • + Natural hair braiding with a diverse variety of beads.
  • The torch flame looks slightly disconnected from its source.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Strong, dramatic warm lighting highlights on the armor.
  • + Incredibly intricate and clean filigree engraving on the plate mail.
  • + Unique take on the beaded braids with metallic cylindrical beads.
  • Skin texture appears somewhat plastic or CGI-like compared to Model A.
  • The 'scars' look more like deep wrinkles or lines rather than healed battle wounds.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a far more lifelike and gritty portrait that captures the 'battle-worn' essence of the prompt through superior skin texture and realistic weathering. While Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 features beautiful lighting and intricate armor patterns, it has a digital, illustrative quality that lacks the photographic realism requested.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Features a very clean and professional layout that feels like a real flyer.
  • + Text rendering is highly legible and follows font instructions perfectly.
  • + Color accents are used effectively to define different sections of the menu.
  • The food photos are slightly repetitive, with many appearing to be variations of the same pizza.
  • Appetizers section header is disconnected from the list located below the photos.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Excellent grid layout that integrates text boxes and photos harmoniously.
  • + High-quality, vibrant food photography with minimal artifacts.
  • + Incorporates playful geometric colorful accents as requested.
  • Text is somewhat garbled or contains nonsensical characters in some areas.
  • Less realistic as a 'finished' menu compared to the professional layout of the other model.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a more realistic and professional menu layout with excellent typography, while Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 excels in the aesthetic grid composition and high-quality food photography. FLUX.2 is the likely winner for its superior text rendering and better adherence to the 'professional' aspect of the layout.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent fiery typography that perfectly matches the 'glow' and 'embers' theme.
  • + Highly realistic food textures, particularly the juicy tomatoes and seared patty.
  • + Dynamic sauce droplets create a strong sense of frozen motion.
  • The composition feels slightly cluttered between the top text and the burger bun.
  • One slice of cheese appears to be floating unnaturally through the patty.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Clearer separation of ingredients, providing a more classic 'exploded' view.
  • + Clean, bold typography that is very legible and professional.
  • + Inclusion of extra details like onions and pickles which adds variety.
  • The 'MAGIC BURGER' text lacks the requested 'fiery effect' compared to the other model.
  • The lighting on the bottom bun and sauce looks slightly more artificial/rendered than photorealistic.
  • The starburst uses a comma instead of a period for the price (€6,99), which may not have been intended.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the stylistic cues of the prompt much more closely, particularly concerning the fiery effect on the text and the integration of the glowing embers. While Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 offers a cleaner layout and more distinct separation of burger components, it fails to deliver the specific 'fiery' treatment for the main title, making FLUX.2 the more accurate and visually impactfull result.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent text rendering with realistic chalk texture and smudges
  • + Authentic cafe background that adds to the 'cozy' atmosphere
  • + Accurately follows the item list and pricing without extra instructional text
  • The word 'Herbs' is partially cut off/disjointed on the second line

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Clean, legible handwriting style
  • + Follows the specific date and menu items requested
  • Includes instructional prompt text like 'Tittle Menu' and 'Footer' on the board
  • Text looks like a digital font rather than realistic chalk with physical variations
  • Contains typos like 'Berbs' instead of 'Herbs'

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo provides a much more realistic interpretation of the prompt, creating a believable chalkboard with natural texture and a cozy cafe environment. In contrast, Imagen 4.0 fails significantly by including the meta-instructions (like 'Tittle' and 'Footer') as visible text on the board and rendering the text in a way that looks like a digital script rather than actual chalk.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and textures
  • + Highly realistic space background with believable celestial bodies
  • + Consistent details on the horse's anatomy and movement
  • Completely failed the negative constraint: astronaut is on top, not the horse

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Vibrant, surreal color palette
  • + Clean rendering of the astronaut's suit and helmet reflection
  • + Dynamic mane and tail rendering
  • Completely failed the negative constraint: astronaut is on top, not the horse
  • Composition feels slightly flatter and less cinematic than the alternative

Verdict: Both FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo and Imagen 4.0 significantly failed the specific logic constraint 'horse on top, not vice versa,' instead producing conventional images of astronauts riding horses. While both are high-quality, FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the slight winner for its superior atmospheric lighting and more detailed, cinematic background.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara fur and jacket.
  • + Captures the 'bored' expression of the businesswoman perfectly.
  • + Lighting feels authentic to a night-time street scene with reflective surfaces.
  • The businesswoman is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The capybara's hands look more like human-monkey hybrids than capybara paws.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Correctly places the businesswoman in the back seat as requested.
  • + Very clean composition and high resolution.
  • + Capybara paws are rendered with a more animal-like, clawed appearance.
  • The businesswoman's expression looks slightly too tense or angry rather than 'normal and bored'.
  • The overall image has a slightly CGI/smooth aesthetic compared to the requested photorealism.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo achieves a much higher level of photorealism and better atmosphere, but it fails the spatial requirement of placing the passenger in the back seat. Imagen 4.0 follows the prompt's layout perfectly and maintains high detail, though its lighting and textures feel slightly more artificial.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent vintage aesthetic with a dark, weathered parchment feel.
  • + Superior composition with a large, detailed central jack-o-lantern.
  • + Includes all requested text elements with perfect spelling and professional layout.
  • The thorns and webs are slightly overlapping the text, making it a bit busy.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Vector-like clarity and clean typography.
  • + Effective use of atmospheric lighting in the background trees.
  • Lacks the requested 'vintage gothic' feel, looking more like a modern cartoon.
  • Oddly shaped scroll element on the left side that feels out of place.
  • Small central pumpkin lacks the presence requested in the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo captures the 'vintage gothic' and 'parchment' requirements much more effectively, creating a cohesive atmospheric piece. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 delivers a cleaner, more digital-looking image, but it misses the historical, dark mood requested by the user and has a strange vertical scroll artifact on the left.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent typography rendering with the correct words and flag icon
  • + Follows the isometric diorama perspective and solid blue background perfectly
  • + Clean, high-quality 3D rendered aesthetic with consistent lighting
  • The salmon texture is slightly repetitive across both pieces

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Realistic material textures, especially the ikura and avocado
  • + Good variety of sushi types on the plate
  • Completely failed to include requested text (JAPAN, SUSHI)
  • Failed to provide the requested solid light blue background
  • Did not include the flag icon

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed every instruction in the prompt, including the specific typography, background color, and isometric diorama base. Imagen 4.0 provided a realistic image of sushi but completely ignored the text, flag, and background color requirements.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting with realistic golden hour sun rays and atmospheric dew drops.
  • + Superior fur texture and detail that looks realistic rather than illustrated.
  • + Dynamic and natural composition with animals interacting in a believable depth of field.
  • The kitten's mouth and expression look slightly unnatural/distorted.
  • Small anatomical glitch where the fox's tail appears to be emerging from its side or poorly connected.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Clean, vibrant colors and very clear subjects with no major anatomical distortions.
  • + Charming character design with expressive, large eyes as requested in the prompt.
  • + High level of detail in the variety and placement of wildflowers.
  • Lacks photorealism; the image has a distinct 'digital illustration' or 3D render look.
  • The lighting is flat and the sun rays look like a graphic overlay rather than natural light interaction.
  • The fox's back legs and tail connection look stiff and anatomically awkward.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt's request for a 'hyper-photorealistic' scene much more effectively, producing natural lighting and realistic textures. While Imagen 4.0 created a very cute and clean image, it failed a key part of the prompt by delivering an illustrative, synthetic style instead of realism. FLUX.2 captured the 'wholesome vibe' through depth and atmosphere, making it the more successful 8K masterpiece.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent handle on vintage texture and distressed paper effect
  • + Superb typography with appropriate shading and accent marks
  • + Sophisticated emblem layout with a high-quality woodblock-print feel
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model B due to detailed shading

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Clean minimalist vector style that looks modern-retro
  • + Accurate spelling and good color palette
  • + Simplified cloche design fits a modern logo context well
  • The 'Est. 1720' banner is very small and lacks the 'vintage' presence of the prompt
  • Lacks the subtle texture requested on the background

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt much more effectively, specifically capturing the 'vintage' and 'subtle texture' requirements with a professional emblem design. While Imagen 4.0 is cleaner and more minimalist, it lacks the requested texture and the classic, established feel provided by the detailed banner and typography in the FLUX output.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Includes all identified mission steps from the prompt.
  • + Excellent layout with clear labels and a logical flow of the mission's trajectory.
  • + Strong details like the inclusion of astronaut names and a detailed Saturn V.
  • Has a literal text string that says 'Saturn Vicon' instead of just 'Saturn V'.
  • The flat-vector style is slightly inconsistent, with some icons having much more detail than others.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Very clean aesthetic with a consistent flat-vector style and iconography.
  • + Excellent typography and adherence to the specified NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + Good use of simplified vector elements that match the requested 'modern' feel.
  • Misses the final two steps (Descent and Landing) requested in the prompt.
  • The 'Launch' label is placed next to a globe instead of the rocket.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the complex list of instructions much better by including all mission stages, though it unfortunately included a literal typo from the prompt's formatting ('Saturn Vicon'). Imagen 4.0 has a superior aesthetic for a professional infographic, but it failed to follow the sequence through to the landing stage.

Next steps

Explore each model