FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent photographic realism with natural textures on the wood and dust on the glass.
• + Accurate cube geometry and physically plausible placement of objects.
• + Captures the 'soft window light' beautifully with realistic shadows and reflections.

• − The sphere is slightly off-center and rests on the bottom rather than being a central focal point.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + High vibrant color contrast and clean, modern aesthetic.
• + The glass cube has very sharp, clear edges and interesting internal reflections.

• − The sphere is levitating, which wasn't specified and looks less realistic.
• − The glass shape is more of a rectangular prism than a cube.
• − The book texture looks somewhat synthetic compared to the rest of the image.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent adherence to the 'repairing' prompt with visible tools and concentrated posture
• + Highly realistic skin textures and clothing details
• + Effective motion blur on the background vehicles following the prompt's request

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Atmospheric cinematic lighting with high-contrast reflections
• + Good use of bokeh and shallow depth of field

• − Anatomical failure where the bicycle frame is broken/missing behind the front wheel
• − The subject is just holding the bike rather than repairing it
• − The man's feet and the bicycle appear to be floating or poorly integrated with the ground

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent adherence to the 'beads in hair' and 'ornate engraved plate' prompts
• + Stronger overall composition with clear visible armor and clothing textures
• + Effective use of the warm torchlight source reflecting off the metal surfaces

• − The scar on the forehead looks a bit superficial and painterly compared to the rest of the realism

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Extremely lifelike and intense eye detail
• + Excellent skin texture and sweat/dirt realism
• + Dramatic lighting and tight professional portrait framing

• − Failed to include the beads in the hair as requested
• − The armor details are mostly cropped out or blurred, missing the 'ornate engraved' aspect

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent typography with clean, readable bold sans-serif fonts
• + High-quality, appetizing food photography that looks professional
• + Cohesive layout with vibrant color accents and logical sections

• − Nonsensical pricing ($250 for a pizza) and slight spelling errors in small body text
• − The layout feels a bit crowded with images, leaving less room for text

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Elegant, minimalist layout that feels very modern and high-end
• + Creative presentation showing the menu alongside cutlery for context
• + Good use of white space to enhance the minimalist aesthetic

• − Text is largely illegible/gibberish beyond the headers
• − The food images are quite small and lose detail in the grid layout

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Perfectly followed all text instructions, including the fiery glowing effect and starburst shape.
• + Dynamic 'exploded' view accurately shows all individual components suspended in mid-air.
• + Superior photographic texture on the burger patty, bun, and fresh vegetables.

• − The sauce droplets have a slightly unnatural, stiff look.
• − The background fire detail is slightly lower resolution than the foreground burger.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + High contrast lighting and vibrant colors create a dramatic atmosphere.
• + Excellent crispness and clarity on the central burger structure.

• − Failed to create an 'exploded' burger, keeping most components contained within the bun.
• − Completely ignored the request for a fiery/glowing text effect and a starburst for the price.
• − Duplicated the 'MAGIC BURGER' text and included illegible gibberish at the bottom.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and pressure variations.
• + Perfect spelling and coherent layout of the requested menu items.
• + Consistent and authentic handwriting style that looks hand-drawn.

• − The date line is slightly less 'elegant cursive' compared to the main title.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Elegant layout with decorative flourishes.
• + Good contrast between the text and the board background.

• − Significant text errors including 'Chipkies', '$228', and 'Herbss'.
• − Text looks more like a digital font than actual chalk on a board.
• − Repeated the octopus item across two lines incorrectly.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent anatomical realism of the horse.
• + High cinematic quality with realistic planetary backgrounds.
• + Superior lighting and texture on the space suit.

• − Failed the negative constraint: astronaut is on top, not the horse.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Creative interpretation of the horse body appearing like a spacecraft module.
• + Dynamic and colorful composition.
• + Maintains a surreal aesthetic.

• − Failed the negative constraint: astronaut is on top, not the horse.
• − The horse's front legs exhibit slightly messy anatomy compared to Model A.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent adherence to the 'front paws on steering wheel' instruction
• + Higher realism in the taxi interior and exterior city lights
• + The female passenger is correctly positioned in the back seat

• − The passenger is sitting in the front seat instead of the back as requested
• − Minor texture blurring on the capybara's hands compared to the fur

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Atmospheric lighting and bokeh
• + Characteristically accurate capybara facial features

• − Failed to place the capybara's paws on the steering wheel
• − The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat next to the driver
• − The composition feels less like a real taxi interior and more like a studio set

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Perfect text rendering with zero spelling errors across all requested fields.
• + Strong adherence to the vintage parchment aesthetic with a high-quality thorn and web border.
• + Excellent composition that feels like a professional invitation layout.

• − The jack-o-lantern's glow is a bit flat compared to the atmospheric lighting in the background.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Beautiful cinematic lighting and depth with a striking full moon and silhouettes.
• + High visual contrast and vibrant colors that make the jack-o-lantern pop.

• − Significant text errors including redundant text duplication ('Party Party') and spelling mistakes ('You inivted').
• − Layout feels cluttered with repeated location and time lines at the bottom.
• − Fails the square format requirement, instead producing a vertical poster.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent text rendering and alignment.
• + High-realism PBR textures on the fish and rice.
• + Includes the requested flag icon next to the text.

• − The sushi looks more realistic than the requested 'cartoon' style.
• − The diorama base is slightly more complex than 'minimal' compared to the overall scene.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Perfectly captures the 'miniature 3D cartoon' aesthetic with soft, pillowy textures.
• + Great use of color and composition for a diorama.
• + Accurate 45-degree isometric projection.

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
• − The text 'SUSHI' is relatively small and lacks the 'large bold' impact of the model A text.
• − Incorporated extra garnishes (tomatoes/onions) that weren't specifically requested.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Successfully included all four requested animals (dog, cat, rabbit, fox).
• + Excellent dynamic composition showing interaction and playfulness.
• + Beautiful rendering of dew sparkles and atmospheric god rays.

• − Some minor anatomical blurring where the animals overlap.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Very soft, high-quality lighting and fur rendering.
• + Wholesome and cute aesthetic with consistent color palette.

• − Failed to include the fox kit completely.
• − The animals are sitting relatively still rather than 'tumbling together' as requested.
• − The kitten and bunny look very similar in color and facial structure.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Perfect spelling of the brand name including the grave accent on the letter 'e'.
• + Excellent minimalist vector aesthetic with clean, balanced proportions.
• + Highly effective use of texture and warm tones to create a vintage feel.

• − The steam effect is a bit simple compared to the resto of the detailing.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Intricate etching style on the cloche dome adds a premium vintage look.
• + Elegant border designs that enhance the overall logo presentation.

• − Failed to spell the restaurant name correctly, outputting 'FRATILIAN' instead of 'Florian'.
• − The typography is a bit cluttered with extra decorative lines that reduce readability.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

• + Excellent typography with nearly perfect spelling for all steps and labels.
• + High level of detail in the lunar module and rocket illustrations while maintaining a clean aesthetic.
• + Logical layout that follows a semi-chronological flow from launch to landing.

• − Included 'Saturn Vicon' as literal text instead of interpreting it as an icon of a Saturn V.
• − Repeated labels like 'Translunar' and 'Landing site' create some visual clutter.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Stronger adherence to the 'flat-vector' and 'minimalist' infographic style requested.
• + Follows a clear numeric step system (though numbers are slightly duplicated).

• − Poor text rendering with several illegible words and misspellings like 'Deseert'.
• − The icons are generic and do not accurately represent the specific Apollo hardware (e.g., the rocket looks like a generic cartoon rocket).
• − The composition is less informative and feels more like a template than a completed infographic.