Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo fal FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

27.9 arena score

#3 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 3 in Text-to-Image
Skill signature · Text-to-Image

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

20.6 arena score

#13 of 32 in Image Editing

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent realism in the texture of the red book and wooden table.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'partially visible through glass' effect for the plant.
  • + Accurate physical properties of glass like thicknesses and reflections.
  • The sphere is resting on the bottom rather than floating, though the prompt didn't specify floating, it looks slightly off-center.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong composition with centered elements.
  • + Good lighting work with a caustic light effect on the table surface.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the glass, which looks slightly less realistic than resting on the bottom.
  • The perspective of the book on top of the cube feels slightly warped at the edges.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific spatial relationships and lighting. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced a slightly more convincing image due to the highly realistic textures of the book cover and the natural distortion of the plant seen through the glass, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B had a slightly more synthetic look to the glass/sphere interface.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent preservation of the man's identity, clothing, and hairstyle.
  • + Realistic integration of the man into the car's interior with high level of detail on the dashboard.
  • + Dynamic sense of motion with the blurred road and background mountains.
  • The car's exterior paint color changed from white to a more champagne/silver tone.
  • The steering wheel is positioned on the left side, but the character is sitting on the right reaching across.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Perfectly preserves the white color and exact exterior model of the car from the source.
  • + Great environmental lighting and accurate California coastline scenery.
  • + Correct perspective for the car driving on the road.
  • The man is barely visible, reduced to just the top of his hair behind the seat.
  • Fails to meaningfully integrate the second source image (the man) into the composition.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the edit instructions much more successfully by featuring the man as the primary subject, preserving his specific clothing and features from the source image. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B preserved the car's color more accurately, it essentially hid the man, failing the core part of the edit request.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent depiction of motion blur on the background vehicles.
  • + Highly realistic skin texture and age-appropriate details on the hands and face.
  • + The composition feels authentic to the 'imperfect framing' request, appearing like a true street snap.
  • The bike frame has some structural inconsistencies near the front basket.
  • The tools on the ground look a bit like abstract shapes upon close inspection.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + The side-profile composition and shallow depth of field create a very cinematic look.
  • + Great detail in the toolkit and the mechanical components of the bicycle.
  • + Effective use of reflections on the wet pavement.
  • The white car in the background lacks the requested motion blur, looking too static.
  • The subject's skin appears slightly too smooth compared to the 'natural skin texture' prompt.
  • The positioning of the subject's left hand on the bike frame is a bit awkward.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the complex stylistic cues much better than the other model, specifically capturing the motion blur and the imperfect framing of a candid photo. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a beautiful cinematic image, it ignored the motion blur requirement and felt slightly more 'staged' than the prompt requested.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent execution of the braided hair with colorful beads.
  • + Superior lifelike skin texture and realistic eye detail.
  • + Perfectly captures the battle-worn aesthetic with believable dirt and scars.
  • Slightly more cluttered background due to the proximity of the torch flame.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Great engraving detail on the plate armor.
  • + Strong lighting symmetry with balanced torches in the background.
  • + Good texture on the leather straps and chainmail.
  • The hair braids and beads look more generic and less intricately tied into the hair.
  • Skin appears slightly more plastic or 'perfected' compared to model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo takes the lead due to its more realistic treatment of the character's face and eyes. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has excellent armor engravings, but its depiction of the beaded braids is less detailed and the overall look feels slightly more synthetic.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent typography with clean, readable sans-serif fonts.
  • + Highly realistic food photography with vibrant colors.
  • + Professional layout that adheres strictly to the requested sections and grid style.
  • Nonsensical pricing ($160-$300 for a pizza) affects realism.
  • Small text contains gibberish/lorem ipsum placeholder text.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Clean grid alignment for the images.
  • + Vibrant accents used throughout the layout.
  • + Includes more reasonable price points ($4-$9).
  • Significant spelling errors in various headings and main title.
  • The 'Mains' category shows a pizza, lacking food variety across sections.
  • Typography is cluttered and harder to read compared to the other model.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produces a far more professional and aesthetically pleasing design with superior food photography and better typographic balance. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B attempts a similar grid structure, it fails with significant spelling errors and a messy layout that lacks the premium feel of its competitor.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent exploded view with clear separation between all layers
  • + Highly detailed, fiery texture on the text consistent with the prompt
  • + Superior lettuce and tomato textures providing a photorealistic food appearance
  • The 'MAGIC BURGER' text is slightly thinner and less readable than in the competitor's version

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Bold, high-impact typography that is very easy to read
  • + Strong sense of motion with the radial sparks and tilted composition
  • + Vibrant colors and a very clean graphic design look
  • Failed to fully execute the 'exploded' burger request, as most layers are still touching
  • The burger layers appear more like a standard double cheeseburger than a disassembled magic burger

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt more accurately by showing a true 'exploded' view where all components are suspended in mid-air, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B generated a mostly assembled burger. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B has more impactful typography, FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo captures the 'magic' and 'motion' of the floating ingredients much better.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent spelling accuracy for a complex prompt and handwriting style.
  • + Realistic chalk texture with convincing dust smudges and varying stroke weight.
  • + Very natural-looking café environment in the background.
  • The pricing on the third item is a bit repetitive ('- 9' then '$9').

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Strong chalk texture and realistic wood grain on the frame.
  • + Clear, legible handwriting that matches the requested style.
  • Significant spelling errors including 'Riott Risoto', 'Octoopus', and 'fress'.
  • Included a random repeat of the price '-$28' in the middle of a line.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo significantly outperformed FLUX.2 [klein] 9B by maintaining near-perfect spelling across all menu items. While both models captured the 'handwritten chalk' aesthetic well, FLUX.2 [klein] 9B suffered from numerous typographical errors and layout hallucinations, whereas FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced a professional, usable menu image.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Successfully incorporates the character's face, sunglasses, scarf, and shirt details.
  • + Matches the studio lighting and yellow background of the source image.
  • Horrific anatomical failure with a second female head growing out of the character's torso.
  • Fails to replicate the specific crossed-leg pose from Image 1, resulting in a floating figure.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Perfectly replicates the complex body pose from Image 1.
  • + Integrates the character's clothing and accessories seamlessly into the action.
  • + Preserves the anatomy and spatial relationship with the red stool.
  • The head angle is slightly less dynamic than the original source face but remains structurally sound.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the instructions perfectly, successfully mapping the character from Image 2 onto the complex pose in Image 1 with high anatomical fidelity. In contrast, FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo suffered a major hallucination, including a severed/additional female head and failing to replicate the specific physical interaction with the stool.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere
  • + High level of detail in the astronaut suit and horse's fur
  • + Coherent composition including a large planet curve
  • Failed to follow the negative constraint of the horse being on top of the astronaut
  • Rendered a traditional 'astronaut riding a horse' scene instead of the surreal reversal requested

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Sharp rendering of celestial bodies and galaxies
  • + Clear facial detail within the astronaut helmet
  • Completely ignored the prompt's specific instruction to have the horse on top
  • Includes nonsensical AI-generated text at the bottom of the image
  • Composition feels slightly cluttered with too many floating planets

Verdict: Both FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo and FLUX.2 [klein] 9B failed the primary challenge of the prompt, which was the surreal reversal of the horse being on top of the astronaut. However, FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the superior image due to its more immersive cinematic lighting and the absence of the garbled text found in the FLUX.2 [klein] 9B output.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Successfully transfered the clothing, scarf, and shades from Image 2.
  • + High image resolution and clarity.
  • Completely failed the identity preservation requirement, replacing the person in Image 1 with the person from Image 2.
  • Distorted the hand on the right side of the image.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Perfectly preserved the identity, facial features, and skin details of the person in Image 1.
  • + Accurately applied the clothing elements from Image 2 to the target subject.
  • + Maintained the original background and pose exactly.
  • Added extra jewelry that was not present in Image 2.
  • Small anatomical glitch on the right thumb.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo failed the core instruction to keep the person's face from Image 1, instead merging the two images and defaulting to the subject of Image 2. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the prompt perfectly, maintaining the identity of the person with vitiligo while realistically dressing them in the requested clothing.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent photographic cinematic lighting and texture.
  • + Better positioning of hands/paws on the steering wheel.
  • + The passenger is correctly seated in the back seat as requested.
  • Internal car perspective feels slightly cramped or inconsistent with the roof sign placement.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Realistic interior lighting from the phone screen onto the passenger.
  • + Good capture of the capybara's professional facial expression.
  • Failed the spatial prompt: the passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat, not the back seat.
  • Text on the hat is gibberish ('NEW TALA').

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the spatial instructions much better by placing the passenger in the back seat, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B placed her in the front. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo also featured a more cinematic composition with superior details on the capybara's fur and the taxi's exterior elements.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent texture on the Jack-o-lantern and trees
  • + Perfect text rendering with no spelling errors
  • + Balanced composition with high-contrast cinematic lighting
  • The thorn border is a bit cluttered at the top and bottom edge

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Elegant banner design for the secondary text
  • + Clear inclusion of the requested moon for the moody night sky
  • + Clean and readable typography
  • The Jack-o-lantern's surface looks a bit smoother and less realistic than in Model A
  • The thorn border lacks the intricate texture of Model A

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality invitations with perfect text. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo (Image A) is the slight favorite due to its superior texture work on the pumpkin and the gnarled trees, which gives it a more gritty, vintage feel, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B (Image B) has a slightly cleaner, more digital illustrative look.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent preservation of the original face, lighting, and background.
  • + Provides a very thick and full head of hair as requested.
  • The hair texture is slightly too uniform and lacks some realistic variation near the hairline.
  • The transition between the hair and the forehead feels a bit abrupt.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Natural integration of grey hairs that matches the existing beard.
  • + Realistic, chaotic hair texture that feels very organic.
  • + Preserves the original person and environment perfectly.
  • The hairline on the temple (left side of image) is slightly messy and blends into the glasses arm in a confusing way.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well at preserving the source image while adding the requested hair. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner because it successfully matched the Salt and Pepper color of the existing beard into the new hair, creating a more believable and cohesive look compared to the solid black hair in FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent text rendering and typography alignment.
  • + High-quality textures, especially the realism of the salmon and rice.
  • + Correct Japanese flag icon.
  • The lighting is a bit flat compared to the cartoon 'PBR' request.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Stronger 3D cartoon aesthetic as requested.
  • + Good isometric perspective and diorama composition.
  • Incorrect flag icon (displays a tri-color flag instead of Japan's).
  • Lower texture detail on the 'sushi' ingredients.
  • Text tracking/alignment is slightly less refined than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo significantly outperformed FLUX.2 [klein] 9B by correctly rendering the Japanese flag and providing much higher detail in the food textures. While both models followed the layout and text instructions well, the factual error regarding the flag and the muddier textures make FLUX.2 [klein] 9B the weaker choice.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent likeness preservation, capturing the subject's features accurately in caricature style.
  • + Very detailed background that integrates both the TV anchor desk and an active hockey rink perfectly.
  • + Cleverly incorporates dogs as both spectators and studio guests.
  • The text on the anchor desk is garbled and nonsensical.
  • The hands are slightly stylized to the point of appearing flat.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Classic caricature style with bold lines and expressive facial features.
  • + Good inclusion of all requested elements: hockey arena, dogs, and TV anchor equipment.
  • Lower likeness preservation; the face looks generic and less like the source image compared to the other model.
  • Anatomy issues with the hands, notably the right hand holding the microphone.
  • The inclusion of a US flag and random text characters feels cluttered and irrelevant to the specific prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the clear winner as it maintains a much stronger facial resemblance to the source image while executing a high-quality caricature style. It seamlessly blends the hockey and TV studio themes, whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produces a more generic caricature face and has notable issues with hand anatomy.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to the prompt, including all four specific animals listed.
  • + Exceptional rendering of dewdrops and realistic 'god rays' lighting.
  • + More realistic interaction between animals, creating a convincing tumbling effect.
  • The butterfly anatomy is slightly simplified.
  • The puppy's left hind leg is anatomically a bit unclear in the grass.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Bright, vibrant colors and very clean fur texture.
  • + Beautiful butterflies with varied colors and clear wing patterns.
  • + Excellent center-frame composition for the trio of animals.
  • Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt.
  • The kitten's paws have blending artifacts where they meet the other animals.
  • The ground looks a bit flat compared to the dew-covered realism of the other image.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the clear winner because it successfully included all four requested animals (dog, cat, fox, and bunny), whereas FLUX.2 [klein] 9B omitted the bunny entirely. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo also achieved a more sophisticated atmosphere with its realistic handling of sunrise dew and lighting effects.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Expertly preserves the exact expressions of the original meme characters.
  • + Captures the intricate pattern details of the plaid shirt perfectly.
  • + Nails the Ghibli color palette with soft pinks and warm, textured lighting.
  • The background remains a city street which feels slightly less 'dreamy' than the anime landscapes.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Excellent Ghibli-style character design with clean line art.
  • + Creates a beautiful, dreamy countryside background that fits the aesthetic perfectly.
  • + Maintains the composition and character positioning very well.
  • Loses the specific 'offended' and 'lustful' facial expressions that define the original meme.
  • Simplifies the textures of the hair and clothing significantly compared to the source.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo is the superior choice for this edit because it preserves the soul of the original meme by maintaining the specific facial expressions while perfectly applying the hand-painted Ghibli texture. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B creates a very pretty typical anime scene, it turns the 'distracted boyfriend' into a generic person, losing the comedic impact of the source image.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
Before After
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'windy' hair request with natural-looking flow
  • + High level of source preservation with minimal changes to background and facial identity
  • + Good distribution of flying leaves throughout the scene
  • Some leaves appear semi-transparent or look like digital artifacts
  • Small leaf artifacts appearing directly on the woman's face and jacket

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Creates very well-defined, crisp flying leaves
  • + Achieves an excellent sense of motion in the hair without losing the woman's likeness
  • + Superior source preservation, maintaining the dog and background perfectly
  • A few leaves appear slightly flat against the camera plane

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions exceptionally well, adding dynamic hair and leaves while maintaining almost 100% of the original image's composition and subject identity. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B is the winner because the added leaves are more solid and naturally rendered compared to the slightly noisy, transparent artifacts found in the FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo version.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent typography including the correct grave accent on 'Caffè'.
  • + Beautifully integrated banner with classic engraving-style details.
  • + Perfect execution of the grainy, vintage paper texture requested.
  • The steam lines are slightly separate from the cloche knob.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Clean vector-style execution with bold shapes.
  • + Good use of negative space in the steam illustration.
  • Typography is less 'classic' and feels more generic.
  • The banner transparency/shading is inconsistent with a minimalist logo.
  • The grain texture on the background is less convincing than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo followed the prompt much more effectively, specifically capturing the 'classic typography' and 'subtle texture' requirements with higher sophistication. While FLUX.2 [klein] 9B produced a decent vector emblem, FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo's layout of the 'Est. 1720' banner and the refinement of the text makes it a superior professional-looking logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo

  • + Excellent text rendering for most labels including names of the astronauts.
  • + Accurate and detailed representation of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
  • + Comprehensive layout that follows all requested infographic steps.
  • Includes some redundant repetitive labels like 'Translunar' appearing twice.
  • The text 'Saturn Vicon' merged the object and the concept of an 'icon'.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

  • + Stronger flat-vector aesthetic with a clean, cohesive design language.
  • + Excellent color palette adherence following the NASA-inspired theme.
  • Numerous spelling errors in text labels such as 'AOILLO', 'EARDHT', and 'LANDINING'.
  • The flow of the infographic icons is disjointed and non-linear compared to the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo produced a far more functional infographic with readable text and accurate icons, despite some minor label repetition. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B captured the 'flat-vector' style and color palette better, but failed significantly on spelling and logical progression of the mission steps.

Next steps

Explore each model