Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 Black Forest Labs Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

19.0 arena score

#47 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

17.1 arena score

#55 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent internal reflections and light refraction through the glass cube.
  • + Realistic wood grain and soft window lighting depth.
  • + The blue sphere has high-quality caustic effects.
  • The 'cube' is actually a tall rectangular prism.
  • The sphere is resting on a visible internal shelf not mentioned in the prompt.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + The object is a true geometric cube.
  • + The red book has very realistic textured fabric and paper detail.
  • + Accurately represents the plant behind the glass without artificial internal structures.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the cube without support.
  • The reflections on the side of the cube look more like mirrors than transparent glass.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 followed the geometric prompt more accurately by providing a true cube, though the sphere appears to defy gravity. FLUX.1 provided a more aesthetically pleasing and physically grounded scene with superior lighting, even though it interpreted the cube as a rectangular prism.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Natural, imperfect framing that feels like a genuine street photo
  • + Excellent reflections on the wet pavement
  • + Good sense of depth with the 50mm lens look
  • Lack of visible rain or moisture on the subject's clothing
  • The cars in the background are stationary rather than having the requested motion blur
  • The man is holding the handlebars rather than actively 'repairing' the bike

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Excellent depiction of rain with visible droplets on the man's jacket and hat
  • + Active 'repairing' posture with the man using a tool on the chain
  • + Captures the atmosphere of a rainy Japanese street very effectively
  • Missing the specific 'motion blur' requested for passing cars
  • Clothing and hat look slightly more stylized than 'no stylization' allows

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 is the superior image because it accurately depicts the 'repairing' action and the 'light rain' requested in the prompt, with highly detailed textures on the wet clothing. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 provides a good street photography composition but fails to show actual rain or a clear repair task, making the man look as if he is simply standing with his bike.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Intense, lifelike eye detail and texture
  • + Dramatic lighting that correctly falls across facial contours
  • + Strong adherence to the shallow depth of field request
  • Prompted 'braids with beads' are very thin and barely noticeable
  • Skin texture appears slightly over-sharpened
  • The armor is mostly obscured by the tight crop

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Excellent depiction of ornate engraved metal and leather straps
  • + Clear interpretation of the braided hair with beads
  • + Atmospheric bokeh sparks and visible light source
  • Lighting on the face is a bit flat despite the proximity of the torch
  • Lower level of realism in the skin and eye textures compared to Image A
  • The facial scars look painted on rather than integrated skin texture

Verdict: While FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 captures a much more intense and lifelike facial portrait with incredible eye detail, Imagen 4.0 provides a better overall interpretation of the prompted elements like the ornate armor, leather straps, and specific hairstyle. Imagen 4.0 is preferred for its superior composition and adherence to the technical details of the paladin's gear.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent typography rendering for complex text blocks
  • + Clean, professional white layout that mimics a traditional menu
  • + Clear section headers for appetizers, pizza, and mains
  • Photos look slightly repetitive and less realistic
  • The grid layout is a bit cramped
  • Contains some spelling errors like 'APPTIZERS' and 'PIZZAL'

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + High-quality, vibrant food photography
  • + Dynamic grid composition with colorful accents
  • + Strict adherence to the requested minimalist yet vibrant aesthetic
  • Text consists largely of gibberish words
  • Layout feels more like a poster than a functional multi-item menu

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 successfully creates a realistic and readable menu layout with proper categorization, though its food photography is less impressive. Imagen 4.0 produces beautiful, high-end food images and a modern design, but fails to provide legible text or a realistic quantity of menu items. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 is the preferred choice for a practical design application.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Clean image quality on the central bun and toppings.
  • + Dynamic sense of motion with flying ingredients.
  • Significant text errors including 'LIIMITED' and 'NEEY'.
  • Incorrect pricing rendered as '€69' and '€.99' instead of '€6.99'.
  • Failed the 'exploded' request by keeping the core burger mostly assembled.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect text accuracy and spelling for all requested phrases.
  • + Excellent adherence to 'exploded' layout with clearly separated components.
  • + Glow/fire effect on text and starburst matches the prompt perfectly.
  • Minor repetition of sauce textures on both top and bottom bun.
  • The lettuce texture is slightly less photorealistic than some other components.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 followed all instructions perfectly, including the complex text and the 'exploded' layout of the burger components. In contrast, FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 struggled significantly with the text rendering, producing multiple typos and failing to correctly display the requested price.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + The chalk texture on the 'TODAY SPECIALS' title is very realistic.
  • + The lighting and mood accurately reflect the 'cozy café' setting.
  • Terrible text coherence with many misspellings and repetitive words.
  • The prices and layout are messy and illogical.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Highly legible handwriting that captures the requested style.
  • + Correctly spelled most of the complex menu items requested in the prompt.
  • + Followed the specific layout instructions much more closely than the competitor.
  • Included meta-commentary from the prompt instructions directly on the board.
  • The wood grain on the frame looks somewhat artificial compared to Model A.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 significantly outperformed FLUX.1 [schnell] in text rendering and prompt adherence, correctly spelling most items like 'Truffle Mushroom Risotto' and 'Grilled Octopus'. While Imagen 4.0 mistakenly included some of the descriptive prompt text on the board, FLUX.1 [schnell] produced nonsensical gibberish for the majority of the menu items, making it much less useful for this specific task.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Successfully interpreted the difficult 'horse on top' request by placing a horse riding on a mechanical astronaut-themed pack.
  • + Cinematic lighting and high detail on the Earth background.
  • + Captures the surreal quality requested in the prompt.
  • Anatomy is strange, with a second horse head appearing from behind.
  • The astronaut figure is represented more as a piece of equipment than a person.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Strong visual quality with sharp details and vibrant colors.
  • + Excellent composition with a dynamic horse pose and nebular effects.
  • Failed the core prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • Produces a conventional 'astronaut riding a horse' image despite the 'not vice versa' instruction.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 was the only model to attempt the role-reversal requested in the prompt, creating a surreal scene where the horse is carried. Although Imagen 4.0 produced a much more polished and aesthetically pleasing image, it completely ignored the specific spatial constraint to have the horse on top, resulting in a standard interpretation.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent fur texture on the capybara
  • + High photographic realism in the lighting and depth of field
  • + Accurately places the passenger in the back seat
  • The passenger is holding two phones unnaturally
  • The capybara's hat is more of a toy helmet than a realistic driver cap
  • The composition feels slightly cramped

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'bored' expression of the passenger
  • + The capybara's hat is a stylistically correct chauffeur/driver cap
  • + Clearer visibility of both paws on the steering wheel
  • The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat
  • The capybara's claws are slightly too long and prominent
  • Composition includes the exterior taxi light inside the frame unnaturally

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 wins on photographic quality and correct spatial arrangement of the characters, though it fails significantly on hand/phone logic for the passenger. Imagen 4.0 better captures the requested 'bored' emotion and specific costume details like the hat, but it incorrectly places the passenger in the front seat, which contradicts the concept of a taxi ride.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Features a high-quality central glowing jack-o-lantern.
  • + Captures a moody, dark parchment atmosphere effectively.
  • Text rendering is poor with several misspellings and garbled words at the bottom.
  • The composition feels a bit cramped with text overlapping graphics.
  • Fails to include the 'thorns' in the border.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors.
  • + Includes all requested elements like thorns, webs, and twisted trees in a balanced layout.
  • + Artistic 'gothic' font choice matches the requested theme perfectly.
  • The scroll on the left side feels slightly disconnected from the overall composition.
  • The lighting is consistent but slightly more 'digital art' than 'cinematic parchment'.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 significantly outperforms FLUX.1 [schnell] by accurately rendering all requested text and including the specific border details like thorns and webs. While FLUX.1 [schnell] captures the atmospheric lighting well, its failure to produce legible event details makes it unsuccessful as a party invitation.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'cartoon' and 'isometric' style requested.
  • + Followed complex text instructions including the flag icon, despite a typo.
  • + Perfect solid light blue background and diorama base as specified.
  • Text rendering contains errors ('JA PAN' instead of 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' is missing).
  • The rice texture is a bit simplified compared to the fish.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Incredible realistic PBR materials, especially the salmon roe and tuna.
  • + Very high clarity and realistic textures for a miniature model.
  • Completely ignored the request for text ('JAPAN', 'SUSHI').
  • Failed to use a solid light blue background.
  • Is not 'cartoon' style as requested.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 much better understood the compositional requirements, including the isometric 3D cartoon style, background color, and the inclusion of text and a flag. Imagen 4.0 provided a much more realistic and visually impressive render of sushi, but it failed almost every specific layout and text prompt instruction.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Exquisite lighting with realistic god rays and warm golden tones.
  • + High-quality fur textures and adorable, expressive facial features.
  • + Captures the 'wholesome' and 'masterpiece' aesthetic through soft focus and bokeh.
  • Failed to include the requested baby bunny.
  • Includes multiple kittens instead of a variety of species.
  • The 'tumbling' aspect is missing as the animals are mostly sitting still.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Successfully includes all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox.
  • + Better dynamic composition showing movement, tumbling, and playful interaction.
  • + Clear depiction of dew sparkles on the grass as requested.
  • The fox's anatomy and face look slightly distorted and less 'baby-like' than the others.
  • The lighting feels a bit more artificial and 'digital illustration' rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'.
  • The scale between animals is inconsistent, particularly the kitten's large size compared to the puppy.

Verdict: FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 creates a much more visually stunning and realistic image with professional-grade lighting, but it failed on basic prompt adherence by omitting the bunny. Imagen 4.0 followed the prompt perfectly by including all four specific animals and depicting the 'tumbling' action, though its overall image quality feels slightly more like a high-end illustration than a photograph. Imagen 4.0 is the winner for its superior ability to handle complex multi-subject prompts.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Successfully captures a detailed vintage emblem style
  • + Good use of subtle paper-like texture
  • + Includes elaborate flourishes that match the vintage theme
  • Serious spelling errors in the main name 'Caffè Florian'
  • The cloche looks more like a building or dome than a food cover
  • Typography is jumbled and poorly aligned within the banner

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect text rendering for both the main name and the date
  • + Icon is simple, clean, and recognizably a cloche dome
  • + Excellent minimalist composition and balanced layout
  • Slightly more modern than 'vintage' style requested
  • The steam lines are very basic

Verdict: While FLUX.1 [schnell] captures a more authentic 'vintage' texture and feel, it fails significantly on the text rendering, misspelling the primary brand name. Imagen 4.0 provides a much more professional and usable logo with perfect spelling and a clean, minimalist interpretation of the requested cloche and banner elements.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

  • + Excellent typography rendering for the main title.
  • + Strictly follows the requested flat-vector style with icons.
  • + Clean infographic layout that flows well horizontally.
  • Nonsense filler text for the smaller descriptions.
  • The 'Saturn V' icon is just a white circle, lacking detail.
  • Missed the specific 'Translunar' and 'Descent' iconography requested.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + High-quality illustration of the Saturn V rocket.
  • + Text is perfectly legible throughout the graphic.
  • + Vibrantly captures the 'NASA-inspired' muted red and blue palette.
  • Failed to provide all 6 requested steps, stopping after Lunar Orbit.
  • Infographic flow is confusing with trajectory lines not connecting logically to the text.
  • Icons for Earth and Moon are repeated inconsistently.

Verdict: Both models struggled with the complex multi-step instructions, but for different reasons. FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 successfully followed the infographic structure and layout requested, though it failed to generate any readable text beyond the title. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 produced much better individual illustrations and perfect text rendering, but failed to include all six required mission steps, making it less useful as a full infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model