FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8 Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with clear soft window light from the left.
• + Highly aesthetic and clean composition.
• + Beautiful refraction and caustic effects on the wooden table.

• − The glass object is more of a rectangular prism than a perfect cube.
• − The interior shelf inside the glass is an unnecessary addition not found in the prompt.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect geometric cube shape.
• + Detailed textures on the book cover and spine.
• + Accurate placement of all elements including the plant behind the glass.

• − The sphere appears to be floating unnaturally without support inside the cube.
• − Lighting is somewhat flat compared to the requested soft window light.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Excellent shallow depth of field with realistic background bokeh.
• + Natural and detailed skin texture on the subject.
• + Stronger 'candid' feel with messy framing as requested.

• − Fails to include motion blur on passing cars.
• − Anatomical issues where the man's hands interact with the handlebars.
• − The car in the background looks stationary, missing the energy of a street photo.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect execution of motion blur from passing cars.
• + Clean and realistic reflections on the wet pavement.
• + High anatomical accuracy in the hands and clothing folds.

• − Lighting feels slightly more studio-lit than authentic 'light rain' atmosphere.
• − Framing is a bit too balanced for 'imperfect framing' request.
• − Depth of field is less shallow than the requested 50mm look.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Excellent adherence to the 'torchlight' lighting prompt, creating high-contrast orange and black shadows.
• + Highly detailed skin textures showing pores, fine lines, and subtle battle-worn grime.
• + Accurate interpretation of 'ornate engraved plate armor' with clear decorative elements.

• − The 'braids with small beads' are very thin and difficult to see compared to a traditional thick braid.
• − The 'bokeh sparks' are present but look more like generic soft light circles than embers/sparks.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image failed to load or renders as a solid black block.
• − Complete lack of content following the text-to-image request.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Successfully includes all three requested sections: appetizers, pizza, and mains.
• + Layout follows a logical grid that feels like a functional, traditional menu.
• + Clean white background with balanced use of food photos.

• − Text rendering is poor with numerous spelling errors like 'ORCETERS' and 'SECCER'.
• − The food photography looks somewhat repetitive and generic.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Superior visual aesthetics with high-quality, vibrant food photography.
• + Typography is much cleaner and closer to a professional 'bold sans-serif' look.
• + Better overall composition that feels like a modern marketing mockup.

• − Failed to include a dedicated 'Pizza' section header, using 'For Pizzzans' instead.
• − Layout is slightly more cluttered, prioritizing photography over menu text legibility.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Clean rendering of the burger with good lighting balance.
• + Effective use of the 'starburst' element for the price.

• − Numerous spelling errors including 'LIIMITED' and 'NEEY'.
• − Incorrect price rendering, missing the '6' in the starburst and displaying €69.
• − Burger is not fully 'exploded' as some components are still stacked.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested elements with no spelling errors.
• + Excellent vertical 'exploded' composition that shows multiple layers clearly.
• + Superior adherence to the fiery/glowing text effect requested in the prompt.

• − Missed the 'starburst' requirement for the price.
• − Included some hallucinated fine print text at the bottom of the image.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + The chalk texture looks very authentic and dusty.
• + Natural variation in handwriting styles is present.

• − Significant spelling errors and repetitive lines (e.g., 'Risortto', 'Octemon', 'cokies').
• − Failed to render the title in the requested 'elegant cursive' style.
• − Layout is cluttered with overlapping and nonsensical prices.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Text is much more legible and adheres closer to the requested menu items.
• + Composition is cleaner with better spatial awareness between items.
• + Chalkboard border and lighting effects are visually appealing.

• − Failed to render the title in 'elegant cursive', using block letters instead.
• − Some repetition and stuttering in the bottom text ('fresh fresh daily').
• − Minor spelling artifacts in the dish descriptions.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Successfully followed the difficult logic instruction of the horse riding the astronaut.
• + High detailed textures on the mechanical components.
• + Creative interpretation of the astronaut as a robotic module.

• − Anatomy is messy with extra horse heads and emerging limbs.
• − Composition is cluttered and lacks a clear focal point.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Exquisite visual quality and lighting.
• + Clean, cinematic composition with beautiful rendering of the Earth and space.
• + Perfect anatomical rendering of the horse and astronaut.

• − Failed the primary logic constraint by showing the astronaut riding the horse.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Excellent fur texture on the capybara
• + Includes two phones held by the passenger which, while odd, aligns with a modern tech-focused person
• + Correct perspective of a ride-share/taxi with the capybara in the driver's seat

• − The passenger is holding two phones simultaneously
• − The capybara only has one paw near the steering wheel while the other is raised
• − The hat looks more like a plastic toy than a driver cap

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Phenomenal lighting and cinematic night-time atmosphere
• + Both of the capybara's paws are correctly placed on the steering wheel
• + Superior photo-realism in the urban background and skin textures

• − The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat as requested
• − The woman is holding the steering wheel despite being a passenger

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Features a vibrant, glowing jack-o-lantern central focus.
• + Atmospheric, moody lighting with a good sense of depth in the background trees.

• − Significant spelling errors throughout the event details and banner text.
• − The layout of the bottom text is messy and disorganized.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent text rendering for the event details with zero spelling errors in the list.
• + Intricate border design featuring the requested thorns and webs.
• + Clear composition that resembles a professional flyer or invitation.

• − Includes some redundant, slightly garbled text in the center ("noickt or a night of frights").
• − The pumpkin lighting is a bit flat compared to the requested cinematic glow.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Excellent 3D miniature/cartoon aesthetic
• + Clean isometric perspective
• + High clarity and simple composition

• − Text is misspelled and repeated incorrectly
• − Failed to include the word 'SUSHI' in text
• − Missing therequested flag icon

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect text adherence with correct spelling and placement
• + Includes requested flag icon
• + Complex 3D modeling with great lighting and textures

• − Added extra elements like plants and steam not requested
• − Slightly busier composition than 'minimal' might imply

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Features a more cinematic lighting with distinct god rays.
• + Excellent texture work on the fur of the animals.

• − Failed to include a baby bunny, instead adding multiple cats/fox-like hybrids.
• − Anatomy on the bottom-right animal is distorted and unclear.
• − Faces appear slightly more stylized than hyper-photorealistic.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Successfully included all requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Superior composition with a more natural interaction between the animals and the environment.
• + Better adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' part of the prompt while maintaining a wholesome vibe.

• − The 'god rays' are less pronounced than in Image A.
• − The butterflies appear somewhat glowing/ethereal rather than fully realistic.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Successfully included 'Est. 1720' with correct spelling.
• + Captures the vintage aesthetic and vector emblem style well.
• + Followed the color palette instructions perfectly.

• − Major spelling error in the main brand name ('AFe FLAMILAN').
• − The cloche dome is tall and resembles a church dome more than a food cloche.
• − Messy typography arrangement inside the banner.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + High visual quality with professional vector-style shading.
• + Better representation of a food cloche with steam.
• + Clean, balanced composition and excellent use of the requested color palette.

• − Spelling error in the brand name ('Framilian' instead of 'Florian').
• − The banner text is slightly crowded.

FLUX.1 [schnell] FP8

• + Adheres strictly to the requested NASA-inspired color palette
• + Features clean, horizontal layout typical of infographics
• + Includes the Saturn V icon and lunar module as requested

• − Text is largely gibberish and incoherent
• − Iconography is inconsistent with significant overlap of shapes
• − Fails to clearly number the sequential steps as a timeline

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Superior visual composition with a balanced use of the lunar surface
• + Better legibility in large headings like 'APOLLO 11' and 'LANDING'
• + Clearer, more professional vector iconography for the spacecraft and planets

• − The small body text is mostly nonsense pseudo-English
• − Violates the 'stop at landing' constraint by including a rocket taking off from the moon
• − Iconography sequence is confusingly numbered/ordered