FLUX.1 Krea [dev] Black Forest Labs vs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic lighting and depth of field
• + Accurate depiction of glass refraction and reflections
• + Clean and simple composition that follows all logical spatial constraints

• − The sphere is quite dark, appearing almost black/navy instead of a vibrant blue

Wan 2.7

• + High level of detail in the textures of the wood and book cover
• + Clearer visibility of the green plant through the glass
• + Bright, vibrant blue sphere as requested

• − The glass cube has perspective issues, with some edges appearing like mirrors rather than transparent glass
• − The reflection of the sphere on the left is physically incoherent with the scene

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent depiction of motion blur from passing cars
• + Strong adherence to the shallow depth of field and 50mm look
• + Consistent wet pavement reflections and rainy atmosphere

• − The subject is just standing with the bike rather than actively 'repairing' it
• − Structural issues with the bicycle frame near the pedals

Wan 2.7

• + Subject is clearly engaged in the act of repairing the handlebars
• + Highly realistic skin textures and clothing details with wet patches
• + Brilliant environmental reflections and complex background details

• − Lack of motion blur on the background vehicles as requested
• − Minor anatomical issues with the length of the man's left arm

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent dramatic lighting with high-contrast shadows
• + Highly detailed and intricate engraving on the plate armor
• + Very lifelike eyes and skin texture captured in cinematic lighting

• − Blood splatter looks more like fresh paint than 'faint scars and dirt'
• − The braids are relatively simple compared to the other model

Wan 2.7

• + Perfect adherence to the 'faint scars and dirt' prompt with realistic facial weathering
• + The hair braids and beads are more complex and varied
• + Armor shows more realistic signs of wear and tear alongside the engraving

• − Lighting is somewhat flat and less cinematic than the competing model
• − Background torch is a bit distracting and lessens the 'shallow depth of field' effect

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Strong minimalist aesthetic with a clean vertical grid
• + Excellent use of bold sans-serif headers
• + High-quality, realistic food photography photography

• − Text is largely illegible gibberish except for headers
• − Repeats the section header 'Appetizers' twice while missing 'Pizza'

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully includes individual photos for various items in a clear grid
• + Text is surprisingly legible and descriptive
• + Better adherence to the specific requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)

• − Layout feels a bit crowded and busy for a 'minimalist' prompt
• − Includes several extra non-prompted elements like the pen and garnishes around the paper

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the bun and patty.
• + Clean and legible typography for the main title.
• + Physically grounded lighting from the fire below.

• − Failed to place the price in a starburst as requested.
• − The burger is barely 'exploded'; it looks mostly stacked.
• − Includes garbled AI text at the bottom of the frame.

Wan 2.7

• + Perfectly captures the 'exploded' dynamic with separated flying ingredients.
• + Accurately follows all text instructions, including the fiery font and the starburst price tag.
• + High sense of motion with sauce splashes and flying embers.

• − Stylistically leans more towards a 3D digital illustration than raw photorealism.
• − The lettuce and tomato look slightly artificial compared to the burger patty.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent chalk-on-board texture with realistic dust and smudges.
• + Handwriting looks truly organic and manual with natural variations.
• + Captures a realistic café atmosphere through lighting and framing.

• − Significant text errors including 'Gruffle' and 'Chvcruations'.
• − The bottom text becomes illegible and messy.

Wan 2.7

• + Perfect spelling adherence for all requested menu items.
• + Consistent and highly legible text across the entire board.
• + Includes thoughtful details like 'gluten-free' at the bottom.

• − The text looks like a digital font overlay rather than real hand-drawn chalk.
• − The 'handwritten' style is too uniform and lacks the requested natural variations and texture.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse and astronaut
• + Impressive cinematic lighting with realistic shadows
• + Creative integration of sci-fi tech onto the horse body

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut

Wan 2.7

• + Sharp resolution and vibrant colors
• + Balanced composition with interesting background elements like galaxies
• + Clear, high-quality rendering of the space suit

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut
• − Front right leg of the horse is anatomically incorrect/clumped

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + The capybara's fur and face are rendered with high photorealism.
• + Correctly placed a passenger in the back seat as requested.
• + The lighting and blurred city background feel very cinematic and appropriate for a night scene.

• − Included an extra human figure in the passenger seat that was not requested.
• − The 'TAXI' text on the cap is a bit simplistic and looks like a plastic toy helmet.

Wan 2.7

• + The capybara's paws are clearly visible and correctly positioned on the steering wheel as requested.
• + The taxi driver cap looks like authentic uniform headwear.
• + Excellent representation of the bored businesswoman looking at her phone.

• − The passenger is in the front seat instead of the back seat as requested.
• − The capybara's fur texture appears slightly more illustrated/stylized compared to Model A.
• − There is some anatomical weirdness with the passenger's hands and the way she holds the phone.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Features a very high-quality, glowing jack-o-lantern
• + Captures a dark, moody cinematic atmosphere effectively
• + Ornate border design matches the gothic aesthetic

• − Numerous spelling errors in text (e.g., 'Pasty Halloween', 'nighls Trighl')
• − Text layout is repetitive and cluttered at the bottom
• − Missed some specific text elements requested in the prompt

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent text rendering with near-perfect spelling of all details
• + High level of detail in the border including thorns, skulls, and vines
• + Composition is clear and well-organized for an invitation

• − The lighting is less 'cinematic' and more illustrative/cartoonish
• − The jack-o-lantern face is quite basic compared to the other model

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'icon' style and simplicity.
• + Clean, professional typography that fits the cartoon aesthetic.
• + Superior handling of lighting and shadows on the diorama base.

• − Shows only one piece of sushi, which may feel a bit sparse for the prompt.
• − The 'flag icon' is rendered as a physical object rather than a graphic element as suggested by the text layout instructions.

Wan 2.7

• + Provides a more detailed and colorful variety of sushi types.
• + Excellent material rendering on the salmon and tuna textures.
• + Good placement of the flag icon alongside the text.

• − The text is slightly off-center and feels more like an overlay than integrated into the scene.
• − The chopsticks are inconsistently sized and positioned.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent soft lighting and atmospheric god rays.
• + Very expressive and cute facial features on the animals.
• + High-quality fur textures and realistic depth of field.

• − Missed the rabbit completely, substituting it with a second kitten.
• − Lower variety in flora compared to the other model.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully included all four requested animals (dog, cat, rabbit, fox).
• + Beautiful rendering of dew drops and diverse wildflowers.
• + Strong adherence to the 'playful chasing' action described.

• − The fox's face looks slightly distorted and less realistic than the other animals.
• − The kitten's pose is a bit awkward with its mouth open.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent vintage engraving style with artistic line work
• + Authentic subtle texture on the background
• + Strong cloche dome illustration with integrated steam

• − Major spelling errors in the brand name ('FLANDORIN' instead of 'Florian')
• − Cluttered composition where the text overlaps the graphic elements awkwardly

Wan 2.7

• + Accurate spelling of 'Caffè' and legible 'Est. 1720' banner
• + Clean, balanced vector emblem composition
• + Excellent adherence to the 'classic typography' and 'cloche dome' requirements

• − Minor spelling error in the main name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian')
• − The steam lines look a bit thin and detached compared to the rest of the logo

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Bold, clean typography for the main title.
• + Crisp vector shapes and consistent color palette application.

• − Fails significant parts of the step-by-step logic, including nonsensical icons for steps 3 and 4.
• − Text is mostly garbled and non-informative.
• − The layout is disorganized with random number placement and nonsensical arrows.

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent adherence to all 6 requested steps with relevant icons.
• + High-quality text rendering and inclusion of educational supporting details.
• + Professional, vertical infographic layout that is easy to follow.

• − One minor spelling error under step 5 ('DESCRIPT' and 'Deccent').
• − Small typo in 'Tranquiliry'.