FLUX.1 Krea [dev] Black Forest Labs vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium Stability AI

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Perfect adherence to spatial instructions including the sphere inside and the book on top.
• + Superior photorealism with convincing caustics, reflections, and soft window lighting.
• + High aesthetic quality with a well-balanced composition and realistic depth of field.

• − The plant is more behind the book than visible through the glass cube itself.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + The plant is clearly visible through the glass as requested.
• + Good lighting contrast on the sphere.

• − Failed spatial instruction: placed the red book inside the cube rather than on top.
• − The sphere appears to be floating mid-air above the red platform.
• − Lower overall image quality with noticeable digital artifacts and less realistic textures.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent realization of motion blur on the background vehicles.
• + High facial detail and realism in the subject's skin texture.
• + Strong composition that makes the red bicycle pop against the grey street.

• − Lacks significant wetness on the man's clothing despite the rain.
• − The bicycle is being held rather than repaired.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully captures a 'filmic' grain and gritty street photography aesthetic.
• + Good interaction between the subject and the bike in a hunching posture.
• + Reflections and water saturation on the pavement are very realistic.

• − Anatomical issues with the man's hands merging into the bicycle handles.
• − Muddled details on the bicycle's mechanical parts.
• − Does not effectively demonstrate the requested motion blur on the cars.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent engraving detail on the plate armor
• + Highly realistic cinematic lighting and atmosphere
• + Superior rendering of leather and cloth textures

• − The braids are very subtle and placed high on the head
• − The beads in the hair are small and less noticeable than the prompt implies

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successful inclusion of multiple braids and beads
• + Very lifelike and expressive eyes
• + Clear bokeh sparks in the background

• − The armor engravings look slightly flatter and less metallic than Model A
• − Artificial-looking sharp point on the center of the chest piece

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent typographic hierarchy with clear section headers
• + Realistic and appetizing food photography that looks professional
• + Clean, balanced layout that follows graphic design principles for a real menu

• − Repeats the 'Appetizers' heading twice
• − Gibberish text in the item descriptions

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Features a wider variety of food images
• + Good use of white space across the page

• − Disorganized layout with images and text floating without a strong grid
• − Poor text rendering and inconsistent font sizes
• − The food images are small and lack clarity compared to Model A

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the bun and patty.
• + Clear, professional layout of the requested text elements.
• + Good 'exploded' sense with the top bun and debris floating.

• − Failed to place the price within a starburst as requested.
• − The 'exploded' effect is limited mostly to the top bun.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Accurately placed the price within a starburst element.
• + Stronger sense of 'glow' and fiery atmosphere in the background.

• − Failed to create an 'exploded' burger, keeping all components stacked.
• − Formatting of the 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is slightly condensed and harder to read.
• − Lower level of detail in the food textures compared to the competitor.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent text legibility and accuracy for most of the prompt.
• + Very realistic chalkboard texture and lighting.
• + Clean, professional composition that follows the requested cursive/print mix.

• − Contains minor spelling hallucinations like 'Gruffle' and 'Lcoman'.
• − Text across the board looks slightly more like a digital font than natural chalk variations.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Captures a more authentic 'chalk texture' with visible dust and rough edges.
• + Includes creative flourished lettering.

• − Severe spelling errors throughout the entire board.
• − Completely fails the specific date and price points requested in the prompt.
• − The layout is cluttered and incoherent compared to the prompt's request.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent anatomical details on the horse
• + Cinematic lighting with a clear sense of depth and scale
• + High texture quality on the spacesuit and horse fur

• − Completely failed the semantic instruction 'horse on top'
• − Bizarre mechanical merging between the horse's torso and space equipment

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Clear, vibrant composition with an expansive starfield
• + Good use of the atmosphere curvature to frame the image

• − Failed the semantic instruction 'horse on top'
• − Anatomical issues with the horse's legs and the astronaut's positioning/limbs
• − Lower overall detail and realism compared to the competitor

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent photorealism in lighting and texture.
• + Correctly places the businesswoman in the back seat using her phone as requested.
• + Realistic capybara anatomy and cap integration.

• − Includes an extra person in the passenger seat not mentioned in the prompt.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Detailed capybara fur and whiskers.
• + Good composition with the capybara front and center.

• − Missed the detail about the businesswoman looking at her phone.
• − The businesswoman appears to be sharing the front seat area or awkwardly positioned in a narrow car.
• − Capybara paws look like sharp claws rather than the requested placement on a steering wheel.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Elegant composition with high-quality cinematic lighting.
• + Includes detailed scroll banners as requested.
• + Clean, professional-looking illustration style with a clear focal point.

• − Several spelling errors in the text including 'Pasty Halloween' and 'nights tright'.
• − Repetition of words like 'are are' in the bottom text.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Stronger adherence to the 'parchment' texture requirement.
• + Includes the requested twisted trees and moody sky successfully.
• + Fairly accurate layout for a physical poster.

• − Significant spelling failures and garbled text throughout the invitation.
• − The placement of jack-o-lanterns in the branches is less intuitive than a central one.
• − Lower overall visual polish compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent text rendering with clean, bold typography.
• + High-quality 3D miniature aesthetic with realistic PBR material textures on the salmon.
• + Included all requested elements including the flag icon and the raised diorama base.

• − The shadow length is a bit long for a minimalist graphic.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Good material rendering on the nori and roe.
• + Clean isometric 45-degree angle.

• − Failed to include the flag icon.
• − Text hierarchy is backwards, with 'SUSHI' being larger than 'JAPAN'.
• − Missing the requested 'raised diorama base', placing the plate directly in space.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent fur texture rendering and soft lighting.
• + Dynamic composition that suggests movement and playfulness.
• + Accurate representation of the requested animals, including butterflies.

• − Included two kittens instead of one kitten and one bunny.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Saturated colors and cheerful atmosphere.
• + Good central focus on the animal characters.

• − Failed significantly on animal count and identification; missing two of the four requested animals.
• − Highly stylized/illustrative look rather than the requested hyper-photorealism.
• − The central animal is an ambiguous kitten-bunny hybrid with odd anatomy.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Excellent vector illustration style with clean lines
• + Highly legible and accurate date text (Est. 1720)
• + Great use of texture and distressed borders for a vintage feel

• − Spelling error in the main name ('Flanelin' instead of 'Florian')

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Closer spelling of the name ('Florrian')
• + Strong vintage typographic hierarchy
• + Includes additional cafe elements like the coffee cup

• − Significant spelling error in the date ('Est 170' instead of '1720')
• − Cluttered composition compared to a minimalist logo
• − Poorly rendered steam detail

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

• + Strong typography for the main title with clear numerical sequencing.
• + Includes distinct, recognizable flat-vector illustrations like astronauts and a lunar map pin.
• + Uses the requested NASA-inspired color palette effectively.

• − The sequence of steps is illogical, mislabeling icons (e.g., Saturn as step 1 instead of a rocket).
• − Text descriptions for individual steps are garbled or missing.
• − Failed to include specific requested icons like the Saturn V or the Lunar Module.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

• + Successfully lists all six requested stages in a vertical infographic format.
• + Correctly interprets the 'Descent' and 'Landing' headers for the final steps.
• + Sophisticated vector-style aesthetic with consistent line work and muted color palette.

• − Iconography for the steps is inconsistent and does not clearly represent the objects described (e.g., Saturn V or Moon orbit).
• − Text contains significant 'AI gibberish' throughout the subtitles.
• − Composition is crowded and the large celestial body on the right lacks context.