Black Forest Labs' aesthetically-tuned 12-billion parameter flow transformer optimized for high-quality images with incredible aesthetics, suitable for personal and commercial use
Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
#48 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Seedream 4.5
#9 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
100.0%
win rate
Ties
0.0%
Seedream 4.5
0.0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent photorealistic lighting and shallow depth of field.
- + Accurately places a blue sphere inside the cube.
- + Highly realistic glass reflections and refraction.
- − The sphere is quite large compared to the requested 'small' sphere.
- − The book is slightly too small for the top of the cube.
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfectly captures the scale of a 'small' blue sphere relative to the cube.
- + The plant visibility through the glass is very clear and well-executed.
- + Great adherence to the layout instructions.
- − The glass cube has some slight perspective distortion on the vertical edges.
- − The lighting is a bit harsher than the requested 'soft' window light.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the complex spatial relationship of the objects. FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a more aesthetically pleasing, professional-grade photograph with superior lighting, while Seedream 4.5 better captured the specific scale of the 'small' sphere.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent handling of the rainy atmosphere and wet pavement reflections.
- + Realistic character design that feels candid and natural.
- + Good composition with a clear 50mm look.
- − The man is standing with his hands on the bike rather than actively repairing it.
- − Lack of significant motion blur on the passing cars as requested.
Seedream 4.5
- + Accurately depicts the 'repairing' action from the prompt.
- + Perfect execution of motion blur from a passing car in the background.
- + Strong adherence to the imperfect framing and street photography aesthetic.
- − The skin texture on the hands appears slightly muddy or overly wrinkled compared to real life.
- − Minor lighting inconsistency on the rain droplets on his coat.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Seedream 4.5 captured the specific technical requests more accurately, particularly the motion blur and the actual act of repairing the bike. FLUX.1 Krea produced a beautiful, realistic image, but the man is simply standing with the bike, making it feel more like a portrait than a scene of a repair.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent symmetry and centered composition
- + Intricate engraving on the armor plates
- + Strong adherence to the 'beaded hair' prompt requirement
- − Lighting feels a bit flat on the face compared to the metal
- − The 'blood' or dirt on the face looks somewhat like wine stains rather than realistic battle grime
Seedream 4.5
- + Outstanding skin texture with realistic scars, dirt, and pores
- + Superb use of warm torchlight and dynamic color range
- + Highly detailed rendering of the leather straps and multi-layered fabric
- − The braids are a bit cluttered behind the ear
- − Asymmetrical composition might be seen as less 'portrait-like' for some users
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Seedream 4.5 stands out for its superior textural details in the skin and materials, creating a more lifelike and immersive scene. While FLUX.1 Krea provided a clean, symmetrical portrait, Seedream 4.5 better captured the requested 'battle-worn' aesthetic with more convincing lighting and surface grit.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Includes a realistic 2x4 grid layout for food photos
- + Sophisticated professional aesthetic suitable for a real restaurant
- + Includes more detailed typographic elements like item descriptions and prices
- − The text is largely gibberish/unreadable under headings
- − Repeats the 'Appetizers' section heading twice
Seedream 4.5
- + Extremely clean and simple minimalist layout
- + Text is highly legible and follows the sections requested exactly
- + Vibrant color-coded borders provide clear visual organization
- − Generic design feels a bit like a digital presentation slide rather than a printed menu
- − The food photography is slightly less varied than the grid in Model A
Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea (dev) produces a more realistic menu that feels like a professional marketing asset, though its text rendering is messy. Seedream 4.5 offers superior clarity and prompt adherence regarding the specific sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains), but the layout is slightly too basic for a 'professional' design. Seedream 4.5 is the preferred choice here for its legibility and clear adherence to the requested content structure.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent photorealistic rendering of the burger textures.
- + Clean, professional typography and layout reminiscent of a high-end food ad.
- + Effective use of atmospheric fire and glowing embers.
- − Failed to place the price in a starburst as requested.
- − The burger components are stacked rather than 'exploded' or separated in mid-air.
- − Contains small AI-generated Gibbs/halftone-like text at the bottom.
Seedream 4.5
- + Followed the 'fire effect' text instruction perfectly for the main title.
- + Successfully included the price inside a glowing starburst.
- + Better sense of motion with blurred, flying ingredients (lettuce, tomato, pickles).
- − The burger is mostly assembled rather than fully 'exploded' with all layers visible.
- − Minor lighting inconsistency on the bottom bun relative to the fire.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 adhered much better to the specific stylistic prompts, including the fiery text and the price in a starburst. While FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a more polished, realistic product photograph, it failed to incorporate several requested design elements.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Features a clean, centered composition with a realistic wooden frame.
- + Excellent legibility on the title and date.
- + Good chalk dust texture on the surface of the board.
- − Significant text errors including 'Gruffle Mushroom' and 'Grilled Butter & Chrcuations'.
- − The font style looks too clean and digital, lacking the requested 'handwritten' natural variation.
- − Unnecessary extra lines of text that deviate from the specific prompt list.
Seedream 4.5
- + Matches the 'handwritten' requirement much better with variable letter sizes and a natural slant.
- + Accurately renders almost all text from the prompt with high fidelity.
- + Captures the 'cozy café' atmosphere in the background with bokeh lighting effects.
- − Minor spacing issue where 'Risotto' repeats a price line.
- − Small chalk smudges/artifacts in the empty space of the board.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it successfully captured the requested handwritten aesthetic and provided much more accurate text rendering than FLUX.1 Krea [dev]. While FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a clean image, it failed on the specific menu items, creating nonsense words like 'Gruffle' and 'Chrcuations', whereas Seedream 4.5 followed the prompt's content and style guidelines closely.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse
- + High cinematic lighting with realistic Earth backdrop
- + Crisp resolution and clear mechanical textures
- − Failed the spatial relationship prompt; shows the astronaut on top
- − The horse's middle section is fused with a mechanical box
Seedream 4.5
- + Beautiful background colors and nebulous effects
- + Good sense of motion and movement through the stars
- − Failed the spatial relationship prompt; shows the astronaut on top
- − The horse has five legs visible due to some blending with the astronaut's leg
- − The reins are physically impossible, passing through the horse's neck
Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt instruction to place the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, instead defaulting to the more common image of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the superior image due to its higher technical quality and more realistic lighting, whereas Seedream 4.5 contains significant anatomical errors such as extra limbs and clipping artifacts.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent fur texture on the capybara
- + High photographic clarity and cinematic lighting
- − Failed to include a single businessman; instead added two women, one of whom is in the driver's seat alongside the capybara
- − The taxi is a two-door coupe which is unrealistic for a NYC cab
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfect adherence to the prompt character count and positioning
- + Captures the bored expression of the passenger very well
- + Better steering wheel placement with paws clearly gripping it
- − The capybara's face is slightly less detailed compared to Model A
- − The lighting on the taxi roof sign is missing or cut off
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 followed the prompt's instructions much more accurately, including specific details like the single bored passenger and the capybara's grip on the wheel. FLUX.1 Krea [dev] suffered from a logic error by placing a second female passenger in the front seat, which cluttered the composition and ignored the 'sitting in the back seat' instruction for the human.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent gothic illustration style with a vintage parchment feel
- + Highly detailed and decorative border with webs and thorns
- + Consistent artistic aesthetic throughout the composition
- − Several major spelling errors and typos in the text including 'Pasty Halloween' and 'nights Tright'
- − The layout of the text is slightly cluttered with overlapping elements
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfect text rendering with zero spelling errors for all requested details
- + Superior cinematic lighting and realistic textures on the jack-o-lantern
- + Clean, professional layout that functions well as a readable invitation
- − Lacks a complete border as requested, only featuring thorns at the bottom and webs at the top corners
- − The background tree silhouettes are less 'twisted' and artistic compared to the other model
Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] captures the vintage gothic aesthetic perfectly with beautiful illustration, but fails significantly on text legibility and spelling. Seedream 4.5 delivers a much more functional invitation with flawless text and impressive cinematic lighting, making it the superior choice for a practical design task.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent typography and layout consistent with the requested 'cartoon' and 'clean' aesthetic.
- + Very clean shadow work and 3D modeling on the diorama base.
- + High-clarity textures that perfectly match the PBR (Physically Based Rendering) request.
- − The flag is placed physically on the plate as a 3D object rather than as a graphic icon near the text.
- − Minimalist approach only includes one piece of nigiri.
Seedream 4.5
- + Includes a variety of sushi types (nigiri and maki) which adds visual interest.
- + Great depth of field and soft lighting that gives a high-quality miniature feel.
- + Adheres well to the diorama and garnish instructions.
- − Text is slightly off-center and the flag icon is poorly integrated with the pole.
- − The black text feel a bit harsh compared to the 'gentle' lighting and soft textures of the scene.
- − The diorama base texture is a bit grainy/noisy compared to the requested 'refined' textures.
Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the winner as it perfectly captured the clean, commercial-style typography and the 'ultra-clean' aesthetic requested in the prompt. Seedream 4.5 produced a beautiful 3D render of the sushi itself, but the text placement and graphic elements felt less cohesive and slightly unpolished in comparison.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent character rendering with very clean fur textures
- + Natural-looking butterflies and lighting effects
- + High clarity and professionalism in the animal portraits
- − Missed the baby bunny completely, substituting it with a second kitten
- − The animals feel more like they are posing than 'tumbling together'
Seedream 4.5
- + Includes all requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit
- + Dynamic movement and 'tumbling' energy that matches the prompt
- + Captures the 'god rays' and 'dew sparkles' atmospheric details effectively
- − The fox kit has over-exaggerated, slightly cartoony eyes compared to the other animals
- − Some minor blending issues where the kitten's paws meet the grass
Verdict: While FLUX.1 Krea produced a very high-quality image with beautiful lighting, it failed the prompt adherence by omitting the baby bunny and adding a second kitten. Seedream 4.5 successfully included all four specified animals and better captured the kinetic energy of them tumbling together in the dew, making it the more accurate representation of the prompt.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Excellent vintage illustrative style with detailed engraving-like lines.
- + Sophisticated use of texture on the background and within the emblem.
- + Includes all requested elements like the steam, cloche, and banner.
- − Serious spelling errors in the main name ('FLANOR’IN' instead of 'Florian').
- − The banner is empty, with the date moved to a separate frame below it.
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfect text rendering with the correct spelling and accent for 'Caffè Florian'.
- + Adheres strictly to the layout instructions, placing 'Est. 1720' inside the banner.
- + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic that works well as a modern-retro logo.
- − The 'steam' illustration is a bit generic/simple compared to the rest of the logo.
- − Slightly less 'vintage' character in the line work compared to the other model.
Verdict: While FLUX.1 Krea (dev) has a more beautiful and artistic engraving style, it fails significantly on text accuracy by misspelling the primary brand name. Seedream 4.5 produces a much more functional logo with perfect typography and correct placement of all prompt elements, making it the superior choice for a logo design task.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
- + Successfully uses the requested navy and white palette.
- + Captures a playful flat-vector aesthetic.
- − Fails to follow the specific 1-6 numerical steps logic correctly.
- − Icons for Saturn V and Lunar Module are replaced with generic astronauts and planets with rings.
- − Text is largely garbled and unreadable.
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to all 6 specific steps of the mission.
- + Includes accurate iconography for the Saturn V, Lunar Module, and Moon.
- + Legible text and logical infographic flow that follows a timeline layout.
- − Icon for 'Descent' (step 5) looks more like a generic satellite than a descending lunar module.
- − The composition is a bit bottom-heavy with a lot of white space at the base.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it followed every specific instruction regarding the mission steps and iconography, whereas FLUX.1 Krea [dev] failed to generate the correct icons and sequence. Seedream 4.5 also produced perfectly legible text and a logical layout suitable for a real infographic.
Explore each model
ByteDance's latest image generation model unifying text-to-image and image editing in a single architecture, with improved text rendering and 30-40% faster generation than v4.0