Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Krea [dev] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4 Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

18.8 arena score

#47 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4

25.6 arena score

#11 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Recraft V4

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a clear soft glow from the left.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the wood and the red book cover.
  • + Clean, minimalist composition with professional depth of field.
  • The plant is very dark and blurry, making it difficult to see it clearly through the glass.
  • The glass cube has a very thick bottom edge that looks slightly unnatural.

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully positions the plant so it is clearly visible through the glass as requested.
  • + Realistic glass refraction effects on the bottom surface.
  • + High level of detail in the wooden table texture.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating in the center of the cube without support.
  • The red book has slightly warped edges and a distracting seam on the spine.
  • The lighting is more uniform and less 'directional' than the 'light from the left' prompt suggests.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is preferred for its superior lighting and realistic book rendering, whereas Recraft V4 struggled with the book's geometry and made the sphere appear to float. However, Recraft V4 did a better job of actually showing the plant through the glass as specifically requested.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent handling of the rainy atmosphere and reflections on the pavement.
  • + The man's skin texture and facial features look natural and detailed.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'imperfect framing' request by cropping the subject at the bottom.
  • The man appears to be simply holding the bike rather than actively repairing it.
  • The car in the background has a slight visual artifact where it blends into the white lane line.

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully captures the action of 'repairing' the bike with a realistic posture.
  • + Very effective motion blur on the passing car, matching the prompt well.
  • + The 50mm shallow depth of field is well-represented with a busy but blurred background.
  • The front wheel of the bicycle is not logically connected to the frame.
  • The man's face is obscured and less detailed compared to Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but they succeeded in different areas. Recraft V4 captured the 'repairing' action and the 'motion blur' more accurately, but suffered from significant anatomical errors in the bicycle's construction. FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a more coherent and high-quality image of the man and the environment, although the subject is standing still instead of repairing the bike.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field with cinematic bokeh sparks
  • + High-contrast lighting creates a dramatic and moody atmosphere
  • + Highly detailed engraving on the pauldrons
  • Blood splatters look more like paint splashes than battle wear
  • Lower environmental context compared to Model B

Recraft V4

  • + Realistic skin textures with grit, dirt, and lifelike eyes
  • + Clearly conveys the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with dents and scuffs on the armor
  • + Specific braiding with beads matches the prompt perfectly
  • The armor design on the shoulders is slightly less practical/grounded in fantasy realism
  • Lighting is a bit flatter across the face

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the winner as it better captures the 'battle-worn' aspect of the prompt, showing realistic dirt, scuffs on the armor, and better integration of the braided hair and beads. While FLUX.1 Krea (dev) has a very cinematic, clean aesthetic, it feels more like a studio portrait than a warrior in the field.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Effective layout with a clear grid for food photography
  • + Includes specific section headers as requested
  • + Professional presentation of a realistic one-page menu
  • Text is largely gibberish/illegible
  • Includes duplicate 'Appetizers' section instead of 'Pizza'

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect text rendering with legible descriptions and prices
  • + Includes all three requested sections: Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains
  • + Extremely clean, minimalist aesthetic with high-quality isolated food photography
  • The 'grid' is a bit loose compared to a traditional layout
  • Missing a main 'Menu' header at the top

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it produces fully legible, professional text and accurately includes all requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains). While FLUX.1 Krea [dev] has a good structural layout, its text is nonsensical and it fails to include a specific Pizza section, repeating Appetizers instead.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and texture on the burger components
  • + Clear and legible typography with a professional layout
  • + Strong atmosphere with the fiery background and glowing coals
  • The price is not in a starburst as requested
  • The 'exploded' effect is quite subtle compared to the request
  • The text lacks the requested fiery/glowing effect, appearing mostly as flat white

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' dynamic composition
  • + Text rendering accurately follows the 'fiery, glowing effect' and 'starburst' requirements
  • + Great sense of motion with crumbs and sauce droplets
  • Lighting on the burger feels a bit flat compared to the background
  • Some minor artifacting where the cheese meets the patty

Verdict: Recraft V4 followed every specific instruction of the prompt, including the complex text styling, price starburst, and the highly dynamic exploded layout. FLUX.1 Krea produced a more polished, high-end food photography look but failed several specific prompt requirements like the fiery text effect and the starburst element.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent chalk texture on the board and lettering
  • + High resolution rendering of the wooden frame
  • + Contains natural-looking handwriting variations
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'Gruffle', 'Lceman', and 'Chrucuations'
  • Repeats menu items instead of following the list accurately
  • Text looks like a digital font overlaying the texture in several spots

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect adherence to the requested text with zero spelling errors
  • + Includes charming chalk illustrations that complement the menu
  • + Great composition showing the café environment
  • Text style is a bit too uniform, leaning towards a 'chalk font' rather than organic handwriting
  • The 'cozy café' background is slightly blurry compared to the board

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed the complex text prompt perfectly with no spelling errors, whereas FLUX.1 Krea [dev] hallucinated extra words and misspelled several items. Recraft V4 also added relevant illustrations that fit the theme of a café menu beautifully.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + High visual clarity and cinematic lighting
  • + Creative interpretation of a space-faring horse with mechanical components
  • + Excellent rendering of the Earth in the background
  • Failed the core specific prompt instruction: 'horse on top, not vice versa'
  • Anatomical oddity where the horse's front legs emerge from a mechanical hull

Recraft V4

  • + Atmospheric and detailed background with asteroids
  • + Good lighting and texture on the horse's coat
  • + High detail in the astronaut's suit
  • Failed the core specific prompt instruction: 'horse on top, not vice versa'
  • Shows a conventional astronaut riding a horse, which is the 'vice versa' scenario restricted by the prompt

Verdict: Both models completely failed the logical constraint of the prompt to have the horse riding the astronaut rather than the astronaut riding the horse. However, FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a more striking, clean, and cinematic image with a unique cyborg-horse design, whereas Recraft V4 produced a more standard interpretation of the 'astronaut on a horse' trope.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur and the taxi's exterior paint.
  • + Clearer rendering of the 'TAXI' text on the cap.
  • + High visual clarity and cinematic lighting.
  • Added an extra person in the passenger seat not requested by the prompt.
  • The woman in the back is not clearly looking at her phone; she seems to be holding it awkwardly near her face.

Recraft V4

  • + Followed the character count correctly with only one passenger in the back.
  • + The passenger is clearly looking at her phone with the requested bored expression.
  • + The rainy window effect adds to the photorealistic atmosphere of New York at night.
  • The capybara's paws on the steering wheel look slightly like human hands with fur.
  • The 'NYC TAXI' text on the cap is a bit warped.

Verdict: Recraft V4 followed the scene instructions more accurately by only including the requested passenger, whereas FLUX.1 Krea [dev] added an extra person in the front seat. Recraft V4 also better captured the 'bored' interaction with the phone, although FLUX.1 Krea [dev] had slightly sharper textures and lighting.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent gothic border design with webs and thorns
  • + Strong vintage aesthetic with parchment-style color palette
  • + Good central focus with a glowing jack-o-lantern
  • Significant text errors including 'Pasty Halloween' and 'You are are invited'
  • Poorly formatted date and repeated time information in the banner

Recraft V4

  • + Flawless text rendering exactly as requested in the prompt
  • + Highly detailed and cinematic visual style with rain and leaves
  • + Accurate layout of event details at the bottom of the image
  • The 'scroll banner' requested is just a plain white tag
  • The spiderweb border looks slightly more like a vignette than a physical frame

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it followed all text instructions perfectly, including the specific date and location. While FLUX.1 Krea (dev) captured a more 'vintage' poster feel, it failed significantly on text accuracy, producing garbled words like 'Pasty Halloween'.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to the '3D cartoon' and 'soft texture' style instructions.
  • + Clean, minimalist composition that feels high-quality and deliberate.
  • + Accurate sushi material rendering with a sub-surface scattering effect on the salmon.
  • The textual layout is slightly clustered compared to the 'top-center' instruction.
  • The flag is placed in the food rather than as a separate icon as implied by the prompt.

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect text placement and typography choice for a clean graphic look.
  • + Higher detail in the diorama base (crushed ice texture) and sushi variety.
  • + Strict adherence to the 'flag icon' instruction by placing it independently at the top.
  • The lighting is a bit harsh, creating some dark, high-contrast shadows.
  • Leans more toward photorealism than the requested '3D cartoon' miniature style.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but they interpret '3D cartoon' differently. FLUX.1 Krea (Dev) captures the soft, stylized aesthetic of a 3D isometric render much better, while Recraft V4 excels at the graphic design elements like typography and icons but provides a more photorealistic food scene. FLUX.1 Krea is the likely winner for its superior visual cohesion and adherence to the requested art style.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent light scattering and warm, golden hour atmosphere
  • + Strong character expressions that feel joyful and aligned with the prompt
  • + High detail in the fox and retriever's fur textures
  • Completely failed to include the bunny requested in the prompt
  • Substituted a second kitten instead of the bunny
  • Butterflies appearing out of thin air without a clear source in the background

Recraft V4

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: retriever, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Superior rendering of 'dew sparkles' and complex wildflower flora
  • + Better dynamic movement with the butterfly chasing action
  • The fox's front legs look slightly unnatural in their stride
  • The background foliage is a bit cluttered compared to the cleaner composition of Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it followed the prompt's specific subject list, whereas FLUX.1 Krea [dev] failed to include the bunny. Furthermore, Recraft V4 did a much better job capturing the specific environment details like the god rays and dew sparkles requested in the text.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent vintage etching texture and style.
  • + Included the requested banner and steam elements with high detail.
  • + Effective use of warm brown tones and paper-like background texture.
  • Significant spelling error in the main brand name ('FLANOR’IN' instead of 'Florian').
  • The composition feels slightly cluttered around the central text.

Recraft V4

  • + Perfect spelling and high-quality typography.
  • + Cleaner, more professional minimalist vector aesthetic.
  • + Accurate interpretation of 'Caffè Florian' with the correct accent mark.
  • Missing the requested banner element for the 'Est. 1720' text.
  • The steam is very simple compared to the more artistic interpretation in the other model.

Verdict: Recraft V4 is the preferred choice because it successfully renders the text 'Caffè Florian' correctly and with elegant typography, whereas FLUX.1 Krea [dev] failed significantly on the brand name spelling despite having a more intricate vintage illustration style. While FLUX.1 Krea [dev] captured the 'banner' and 'texture' keywords better, the legible and accurate branding in Recraft V4 makes it more viable as a logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
Recraft V4

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Strong visual contrast and use of space for an illustrative poster feel.
  • + Accurate count of four crew figures (though three were on the mission).
  • Icons do not match the specific steps requested (e.g., Saturn V, lunar module).
  • Text is largely gibberish or nonsensical character sequences.
  • The numbering is illogical and the layout does not follow a clear chronological flow.

Recraft V4

  • + Excellent adherence to all six specific infographic steps with accurate icons.
  • + Perfect text rendering for titles, descriptions, and crew names.
  • + Strict adherence to the requested NASA-inspired color palette and flat-vector style.
  • The layout is slightly scattered rather than a linear or circular path.
  • The crew section is placed to the side rather than integrated into the flow.

Verdict: Recraft V4 followed every specific detail of the prompt, providing all six correct icons and flawlessly legible text for each step of the mission. FLUX.1 Krea produced a more visually striking single-image illustration, but failed significantly on the infographic content, text accuracy, and specific icon requirements.

Next steps

Explore each model