Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Krea [dev] Black Forest Labs HiDream I1 Fast HiDream AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

18.8 arena score

#48 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

HiDream I1 Fast

18.2 arena score

#50 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

HiDream I1 Fast

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic realism with natural lens blur and lighting.
  • + Highly accurate glass physics including reflections and realistic thickness.
  • + Perfect adherence to spatial prompts including the plant behind the glass.
  • The sphere is slightly dark, making it look more like cobalt glass than a simple blue sphere.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Bright, clear colors for the sphere and book.
  • + Good composition with a nice shallow depth of field.
  • The sphere appears to be floating rather than resting on the surface.
  • The glass cube edges are extremely thin and inconsistent, lacking realistic refraction.
  • The red book has a strange texture that looks like a plastic block.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a far more realistic image with convincing glass textures, reflections, and lighting that perfectly matched the prompt's request for soft window light. HiDream I1 Fast struggled with the physics of the scene, showing a floating sphere and non-refractive glass edges, resulting in a more artificial appearance.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' street photography style.
  • + Highly realistic skin textures and natural-looking rain interaction.
  • + Accurate representation of 50mm lens compression and depth of field.
  • The position of the hands on the bicycle looks more like pushing than repairing.
  • The bicycle's chain and drivetrain geometry is slightly warped.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Strong cinematic atmosphere with vibrant reflections and bokeh.
  • + Better captures the specific action of 'repairing' or adjusting the bike.
  • The man appears to be sitting on air or floating slightly above the bicycle frame.
  • The background cars look static despite the prompt asking for motion blur.
  • The overall image has a slightly AI-generated 'smoothness' that lacks the requested 'no stylization' grit.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the winner as it perfectly captures the messy, candid aesthetic of real street photography with convincing textures and realistic motion blur on the passing cars. While HiDream I1 Fast creates a beautiful image, it fails on some physical interactions (the man floating) and feels more like a staged digital painting than a raw candid photo.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Exceptional realism in lighting and skin textures.
  • + Sophisticated, intricate engraving on the armor that feels historically grounded.
  • + Subtle and natural-looking scars and battle-wear.
  • Hair beads are very small and less prominent than requested.
  • A bit dark in the overall composition.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Strong adherence to the braiding and colorful beads in the hair.
  • + Vibrant lighting with clear bokeh effects in the background.
  • + Highly detailed leather straps and sword hilt visible.
  • Skin has a slightly artificial, airbrushed quality compared to FLUX.1.
  • The main facial scar looks like a superficial smudge or paint rather than a healed wound.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produces a much more cinematic and realistic image with superior lighting and texture, especially on the metal and skin. While HiDream I1 Fast followed the specific detail of the beads more literally, it lacks the depth and lifelike quality found in the metalwork and eyes of the FLUX.1 output.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent professional composition with a clean vertical grid layout.
  • + Clean and legible hierarchy with distinct sections for Appetizers and Mains.
  • + High-quality realistic food photography that fits the restaurant aesthetic.
  • Nonsensical placeholder text under the headings.
  • Duplicate 'Appetizers' section heading instead of 'Pizza'.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Included a large bold header with vibrant accent colors.
  • + Good use of the requested food grid layout.
  • Very poor text rendering with significant gibberish and artifacts.
  • The layout feels cramped and lacks the professional finish of a real menu.
  • Frequent artifacts in food images, especially in the pizza crusts.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produces a much more professional and realistic menu design that closely follows the minimalist grid prompt. While HiDream I1 Fast captures the vibrant accents requested, its poor text rendering and awkward composition make it less usable than the clean aesthetic provided by FLUX.1 Krea [dev].

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent typography with clean, professional font rendering.
  • + Photorealistic textures on the bun, lettuce, and meat patty.
  • + Accurate representation of the 'exploded' concept with space between layers.
  • The price is not inside the starburst element as requested.
  • The 'fiery, glowing effect' on the text is relatively subtle compared to Model B.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Successful integration of text into the starburst element.
  • + Dynamic fiery and glowing effects applied to the typography.
  • + Captures a playful aesthetic with additional flying ingredients like pickles.
  • Lower overall image quality with noticeable soft edges and artifacts.
  • The burger layers are mostly stacked together rather than being 'suspended in mid-air'.
  • Garbled text in the secondary 'Limited Time' circular stamp.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produced a much higher quality, professional-looking advertisement with sharp textures and legible text, though it failed to place the price inside the starburst. HiDream I1 Fast followed the starburst instruction and fire effects better, but the image is compositionally flatter and suffers from low-resolution artifacts. overall, FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is preferred for its superior realism and design clarity.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent text legibility and alignment.
  • + Accurately follows the specific list of menu items from the prompt.
  • + The 'Today's Specials' title is correctly rendered as requested.
  • Includes several hallucinated menu lines not requested.
  • The handwriting looks slightly too clean, bordering on a digital font look in some places.
  • Spelling errors in the middle section (e.g., 'Gruffle', 'Coman', 'Unvcuations').

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Good aesthetic for the café background and lighting.
  • + Captures the gritty chalk texture more realistically than model A.
  • + Included the 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies' item mentioned at the end of the prompt.
  • Severe text overlapping and garbled characters in the pricing area.
  • Failed to render the full names of the items correctly (e.g., 'Risote', 'Buter').
  • Inconsistent letter sizes that make elements crash into each other.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the better image because it maintains the layout and legibility of the menu, even though it added extra lines and had some spelling minor errors. HiDream I1 Fast struggled significantly with text rendering, resulting in overlapping characters and incomplete words that made the menu unreadable.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Successfully placed the image in a space-like environment with Earth in the background.
  • + Followed the 'horse on top' instruction, although interpretation resulted in a hybrid biomechanical merge.
  • + Achieved a higher level of detail and cinematic lighting.
  • Anatomy is nonsensical with the horse and mechanical parts merging.
  • The composition is cluttered and visually confusing.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Clean visual quality and realistic lighting for the subject.
  • + Well-rendered horse anatomy and rider positioning.
  • Failed the negative constraint entirely by placing the astronaut on top of the horse.
  • Failed the location constraint by placing the scene in a desert instead of space.
  • Lacks the 'surreal' quality requested in the prompt.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the clear winner because it attempted the specific spatial and inverted-riding instructions, resulting in a surreal, detailed image in space. HiDream I1 Fast completely ignored the core prompt details, producing a generic image of an astronaut in a desert which directly contradicted the 'horse on top' and 'in space' requirements.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur
  • + Accurately places the businesswoman in the back seat as requested
  • + Detailed taxi interior and lighting consistency
  • Includes an extra person in the passenger seat not mentioned in the prompt
  • The capybara's paws on the wheel are a bit bulky and less defined

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Shows the capybara with both paws on the steering wheel clearly
  • + Vibrant and cinematic background lights
  • Failed the spatial request by putting the businesswoman in the front passenger seat instead of the back
  • The capybara's hands transition into human-like fingers on the wheel
  • The capybara's head is not properly attached to its body

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the clear winner for its superior photorealism and adherence to the spatial requirements of the prompt, correctly placing the passenger in the back seat. While HiDream I1 Fast captured the 'hands on wheel' instruction well, it failed by putting the passenger in the front and exhibited significant anatomical errors where the animal's fur meets the human hands and clothing.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent gothic border with intricate web and thorn details
  • + Superior central jack-o-lantern rendering with atmospheric internal glow
  • + High visual clarity and a cohesive dark-parchment aesthetic
  • Text contains several spelling and grammar errors like 'Pasty' and 'You are are'
  • The text layout is a bit cluttered at the bottom

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Strong parchment texture effect and nice blue-toned moody night sky
  • + Clearer text rendering for the date and location headings
  • + Good inclusion of all requested elements including twisted trees and bats
  • Text on the scroll banner is cut off and garbled
  • Main title is missing the word 'Invitation'
  • Visual style is slightly more illustrative and less cinematic than requested

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produces a much more polished and atmospherically superior image with high-quality borders and lighting, although it struggles with specific text spelling. HiDream I1 Fast captures the layout of a poster well and handles the numbers correctly but fails significantly on the banner text and overall artistic detail. FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the preferred choice for its professional cinematic look and better interpretation of the gothic theme.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 45-degree isometric composition on a square diorama base.
  • + Extremely clean, minimalist aesthetic with high-quality PBR-like lighting and textures.
  • + Text is perfectly centered and integrated into the 3D scene's depth.
  • The sushi variety is limited to just one piece of nigiri.

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Offers a nice variety of sushi types including nigiri and maki rolls.
  • + Good 3D cartoon style with soft shading.
  • + Inclusion of chopsticks adds to the dish's narrative.
  • Text rendering is messy with a floating artifact next to the word SUSHI.
  • Lighting is a bit flat compared to the requested realistic PBR style.
  • The flag icon is somewhat distorted and poorly placed within the text block.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the clear winner for its superior visual clarity, professional lighting, and perfect text rendering. While HiDream I1 Fast provides a more varied selection of sushi, it fails the 'ultra-clean' requirement with graphical artifacts and less sophisticated materials.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent fur texture rendering and individual hair detail
  • + Highly dynamic composition that captures the requested 'tumbling' and 'chasing' action
  • + Superior lighting with clear god rays and atmospheric depth
  • Missing the baby bunny, replacing it with a second kitten
  • The fox's tail transition to the white tip is slightly abrupt

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Cute and cohesive character design with expressive eyes
  • + Good color saturation and pleasant morning warmth
  • + Accurate depiction of a tabby kitten's markings
  • Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt
  • Static composition lacks the sense of motion/play requested
  • Noticeable anatomical flaw with a floating paw/limb on the left side

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is the clear winner as it better captures the requested action and hyper-realistic lighting, creating a scene that feels alive rather than posed. While both models failed to include the bunny, HiDream I1 Fast has more significant anatomical errors and a much more static composition.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent line work with a sophisticated woodcut/engraving style
  • + Beautiful textured background that enhances the vintage aesthetic
  • + High artistic quality for a logo emblem
  • Failed to spell the name correctly, writing 'Café Flanelín' instead of 'Caffè Florian'
  • Includes gibberish text at the very bottom

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Perfectly spelled the main name 'Caffè Florian'
  • + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic that adheres well to a logo style
  • + Good use of warm brown and cream tones
  • Typo in the date banner, writing 'EST. 17210' instead of '1720'
  • The steam effect looks a bit like moons or abstract symbols and isn't very clear

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea (dev) produces a much more visually impressive and detailed vintage emblem, but it fails significantly on name accuracy. HiDream I1 Fast correctly spells 'Caffè Florian' and adopts a cleaner vector style, but suffers from a major typo in the established date. FLUX.1 Krea is the artistic winner, but HiDream I1 Fast is more functional as a request-matching logo despite its smaller date error.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]
HiDream I1 Fast

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Krea [dev]

  • + Excellent typography for the main title
  • + High-quality vector aesthetic with crisp lines and a clean NASA-inspired palette
  • + Good use of the rule of thirds in the landscape composition
  • Failed to include the specific requested icons (no Saturn V, no Lunar Module)
  • Numerical ordering is non-linear and confusing with an unexpected '0' digit
  • Text elements in the body are nonsensical or garbled

HiDream I1 Fast

  • + Follows the logical flow of the infographic more closely with labeled steps
  • + Includes relevant iconography like the rocket and the lunar flags
  • + Uses the requested color palette effectively within a clear frame
  • Significant spelling errors throughout the text (e.g., 'DESCENG', 'OPBIT')
  • Visual quality is lower with some fuzzy lines and aliasing artifacts
  • Layout is crowded and icons don't always match the label next to them

Verdict: FLUX.1 Krea [dev] produces a much cleaner and more professional-looking vector graphic but fails significantly on the prompt's structural and iconographic requirements. HiDream I1 Fast attempts to follow the step-by-step instructions and labels, but is marred by severe spelling errors and lower visual fidelity. FLUX.1 Krea is the better image visually, but HiDream I1 Fast is slightly more useful as a template for an actual infographic structure.

Next steps

Explore each model