Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [max] Black Forest Labs FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

23.7 arena score

#23 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

27.1 arena score

#5 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent handling of light physics and caustics on the tabletop
  • + The glass cube has realistic thin-walled construction
  • + High artistic quality with atmospheric soft lighting
  • The blue sphere has a fuzzy or textured surface rather than a smooth glass/polished finish

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions
  • + The blue sphere has a realistic glass-like transparency and reflection
  • + Includes the window to the left as suggested by the lighting direction
  • The glass cube walls appear very thick and slightly inconsistent in perspective

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial prompt perfectly. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner for its superior rendering of the blue sphere's material and more natural integration of the plant behind the glass, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [max] gave the sphere a strange, non-reflective texture.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent high-contrast reflections and wet pavement texture
  • + Realistic skin texture and age-appropriate hands
  • + Cinematic composition with a natural candid feel
  • The rain effect looks like a static overlay of white lines
  • The bicycle geometry is slightly warped near the chain and rear wheel

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully captures motion blur of passing cars in the background
  • + Stronger narrative with scattered tools on the ground
  • + Realistic rain splatter effect on the man's jacket
  • The handlebars of the bicycle merged into the frame in a nonsensical way
  • Hand-bicycle interaction is anatomically confusing with a floating tool
  • Slightly less realistic, more painterly skin tone compared to the other image

Verdict: Both models captured the mood of the prompt well, but FLUX.1 Kontext [max] produced a much more believable person and more realistic material textures. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash handled the motion blur and background activity better, its failure to maintain the mechanical structure of the bicycle and the man's hands makes it less effective overall.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent metallic texture and elaborate engraving details on the armor.
  • + Highly realistic lighting and skin texture with fine pores and sweat.
  • + Dynamic hair texture and believable facial features.
  • Missed the presence of beads in the hair braids.
  • The sparks appear slightly streaky rather than circular bokeh.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully included beads in the hair as requested.
  • + Features clear leather strap textures and underlayer cloth.
  • + Exceptional facial detail including realistic scars and dirt.
  • The lighting on the armor is somewhat flat compared to the skin.
  • The composition is a bit stiff and centered compared to the more cinematic framing of its competitor.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the prompt more closely by including the specific 'beads' in the hair and showing clear leather straps, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [max] produced a more cinematically lit image with superior metallic reflections and skin realism but missed the bead detail. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is preferred for its adherence to all requested elements and excellent facial characterization.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Clean, professional layout with excellent use of negative space.
  • + High-quality, isolated food photography that integrates well with the white background.
  • + Clearer text hierarchy and a consistent visual style.
  • Text is mostly gibberish with several spelling errors for 'Restaurant' and 'Pizza'.
  • Contains primarily pizza photos despite mentioning mains and appetizers.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully included specific headers for 'Appetizers', 'Pizza', and 'Mains'.
  • + Vibrant color accents and a bold grid structure define the sections well.
  • + Pricing column is logically aligned and visually clear.
  • The grid layout is slightly cluttered with overlapping color borders.
  • Food photography is repetitive, showing almost exclusively pizzas under all category headings.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the prompt's structural requirements more closely by including the specific section headers requested, though it suffered from repetitive imagery. FLUX.1 Kontext [max] produced a more elegant and professional-looking graphic design, but the text was significantly lower in quality and it failed to clearly separate the menu sections.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent photographic texture on the burger patty and lettuce
  • + Strong sense of motion with debris and glowing embers
  • + All text is perfectly legible
  • The burger is mostly stacked rather than 'exploded' into mid-air components
  • The starburst for the price is very small and lacks impact
  • Floating bun halves on the sides look a bit disjointed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' composition with separated layers
  • + Superior text integration with the requested fiery, glowing effect
  • + The price starburst perfectly follows the prompt instructions
  • The burger patty texture is slightly less detailed than Model A
  • A few sauce droplets look a bit uniform and digital

Verdict: While both models followed the text requirements well, FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captured the 'exploded' layout of the burger components much more effectively than FLUX.1 Kontext [max]. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash also executed the fiery text effects and the starburst element exactly as requested, creating a more cohesive advertisement.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent text legibility and accuracy
  • + Captures the chalkboard smudging/eraser marks realistically
  • + Includes all requested menu items with correct pricing
  • The 'elegant cursive' request for the title was not fully met, as it is in simple print caps
  • The text looks a bit too much like a digital marker rather than grainy chalk

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Beautiful chalk texture with authentic grain and pressure variations
  • + Title follows the 'cursive' instruction more closely
  • + Superior café atmosphere and background bokeh
  • Duplicated the '$9' price on the final item line
  • The 'Brown Butter' text is slightly less crisp than Model A

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on complex text rendering. FLUX.1 Kontext [max] produced very clear, accurate text but failed the 'cursive' instruction, whereas FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captured the requested chalk texture and cursive style much more realistically, despite a minor pricing duplication error on the last item.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent anatomical clarity of the horse and lighting integration.
  • + High-quality fur and suit textures.
  • + Clean, cinematic background with balanced lens flare effects.
  • Completely failed the logic-check prompt: the astronaut is on top of the horse, not vice versa.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Dynamic composition with multiple celestial bodies and atmospheric debris.
  • + Great detail on the space suit and saddle equipment.
  • Completely failed the logic-check prompt: despite the specific instruction, the astronaut is riding the horse.
  • The horse's hind legs look slightly distorted in perspective.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut, instead defaulting to the standard 'astronaut riding a horse' trope. FLUX.1 Kontext [max] is the preferred choice for its superior visual polish, cleaner rendering of the horse's anatomy, and more sophisticated lighting compared to FLUX.2 [dev] Flash.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent photorealistic fur texture and lighting
  • + Cinematic side-view composition that feels professional
  • + Accurate rendering of the taxi driver cap with legible text
  • The passenger is holding a phone to her ear like a call instead of looking at it as requested
  • Only one paw is clearly on the steering wheel

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfectly captures the businesswoman's bored expression looking down at her phone
  • + Shows both paws clearly on the steering wheel as requested
  • + Composition allows for better visibility of the city background through the windshield
  • The capybara's paws look slightly mutated with sharp talons
  • Text on the driver cap is nonsensical/garbled
  • The 'TX' sign on top of the car is oddly placed in middle of the roof structure

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [max] produces a much higher quality, photorealistic image with superior textures and lighting, but it misses a few specific prompt details like the passenger's action. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash nails the passenger's bored behavior and phone usage perfectly, but suffers from anatomical issues with the capybara's paws and lower overall image clarity. FLUX.1 Kontext [max] is the preferred choice for its professional aesthetic and believable integration of the animal into the scene.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with almost perfect spelling and alignment.
  • + Deep atmospheric lighting that makes the jack-o-lantern really pop against the dark parchment.
  • + Sophisticated border design that integrates well with the dark theme.
  • Repeated the location text at the bottom.
  • The date uses commas rather than the requested dots as separators.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Classic vintage illustration style with a well-carved central pumpkin.
  • + Detailed border featuring the requested thorns and webs distinctly.
  • + Good layout for the scroll banner.
  • Includes hallucinations in the 'Back' text line.
  • The 'Location' text has a slight alignment issue with the rest of the block.
  • Lighting is flatter compared to the cinematic lighting in the other model.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [max] is the winner due to its superior text rendering and cinematic lighting, which perfectly captured the 'polished' and 'spooky' tone. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivered a great illustration, it introduced messy artifact text near the bottom and lacked the visual depth of its competitor.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent preservation of the background and jacket.
  • + Adds realistic texture and lighting to the hair that matches the scene.
  • + The hair style integrates naturally with the existing beard.
  • Subtly altered the eyes and facial structure, making the person look like a slightly different individual.
  • The hairline looks a bit too perfect or 'stamped on' at the forehead.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Perfectly preserves every facial feature and the original identity of the subject.
  • + Maintains the exact background and clothing from the source image.
  • + Provides a very thick head of hair as requested.
  • The afro hair texture looks slightly disconnected from the beard texture.
  • The lighting on the hair is a bit flat compared to the harsh sunlight in the rest of the scene.

Verdict: Both models succeeded in adding hair while preserving the majority of the image. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the winner because it perfectly maintained the person's facial features and identity, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [max] subtly changed the subject's face to look like someone else.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent text rendering with stylized typography
  • + High visual clarity and soft, appealing textures
  • + Good inclusion of extra touches like chopsticks and soy sauce
  • Failed to include the requested flag icon
  • The diorama base has a less realistic wood texture

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Accurately included the small flag icon as requested
  • + Highly realistic wood material on the diorama base
  • + Excellent 3D miniature 'clay' or 'food model' aesthetic
  • Shadow of the base is cut off at the bottom
  • Nori strips are rendered a bit awkwardly over the fish

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the prompt instructions more closely by including the requested Japanese flag icon and higher-quality PBR wood materials. While FLUX.1 Kontext produced better typography, the composition was marred by the omission of the flag and a more simplistic base texture.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Successfully incorporates all elements: microphone/studio, a dog, and a hockey stick.
  • + Preserves the subject's denim outfit and general facial structure well.
  • The caricature style is very generic and lacks the 'wow' factor.
  • Large black-rimmed glasses were added which were not in the original image.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent caricature execution with an exaggerated 'big head' style that maintains strong likeness to the source.
  • + Creative integration of themes, showing dogs playing hockey on a TV set built over an ice rink.
  • + High level of detail and professional illustration quality.
  • The clothing was changed from denim to a formal news anchor suit, though this fits the prompt's context.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is the clear winner for its superior interpretation of a 'caricature,' providing a much more creative and humorous layout that blends all requested elements (TV anchor, dogs, and hockey) into a cohesive scene. While FLUX.1 Kontext [max] maintains the source clothing better, its artistic style is flat and the inclusion of the hockey stick feels like an afterthought.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent adherence to the requested animal variety with one of each type.
  • + Beautiful golden lighting and god rays that feel very warm and cohesive.
  • + Stronger 'lush wildflower' feeling with dense foreground and background blooms.
  • The rabbit's eyes and face look slightly less realistic and more stylized.
  • Less sense of movement or 'chasing' as the animals are mostly sitting.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + High level of detail in fur textures and individual dew drops on the grass.
  • + Captures a better sense of action and tumbling with the animals in dynamic poses.
  • + Very clear, detailed butterfly rendering.
  • Failed to follow the exact animal count, providing two foxes and two rabbits instead of one each.
  • The lighting feels a bit more artificial with harsh glares on the animals' heads.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [max] adhered better to the prompt's specific request for one of each animal and captured a more whimsical, glowing atmosphere. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivered superior technical textures and detail—such as the dew sparkles and fur—but drifted from the prompt by doubling the number of foxes and rabbits.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original city street background composition.
  • + Stronger adherence to the specific 90s-era Studio Ghibli character design style.
  • + Maintains the distinct facial expressions and poses of the original meme perfectly.
  • Lighting is a bit flat compared to the 'dreamy' request.
  • The girl in the foreground has slightly generic anime eyes that lack the Ghibli depth.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Successfully incorporates a dreamy, nostalgic atmosphere with soft lighting and a sunset.
  • + Uses beautiful watercolor-like textures that feel very hand-painted.
  • + Creatively interprets the background with flowers and a Totoro-like silhouette.
  • Loses the urban city setting of the original meme, changing the context significantly.
  • Character faces are a bit more generic and less expressive than Model A.
  • The 'distracted' expression on the man is softened too much, losing the intensity of the source.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [max] is the winner for its superior preservation of the source image's layout and the iconic meme's spirit while perfectly capturing the Ghibli character aesthetic. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash provides a more 'dreamy' and artistic painterly style, it alters the background so much that it loses the context of the original photo.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
Before After
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Naturalistic hair motion that follows a consistent wind direction.
  • + Subtle and tasteful addition of leaves that doesn't clutter the frame.
  • + Maintains the subject's anatomy and posture more accurately.
  • The leash and hand positioning were slightly altered from the source image.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Very dramatic hair movement that significantly changes the energy of the photo.
  • + Strictly adheres to the 'leaves flying' instruction with a high volume of particles.
  • The hair motion defies physics by flowing symmetrically outwards from the head.
  • Many leaves appear as low-quality artifacts or flat overlays across the woman's body.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [max] provides a much more believable and high-quality edit, adding wind and leaves in a way that feels integrated into the scene's lighting and physics. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash certainly adds more 'energy,' the symmetrical hair and the messy distribution of leaves over the subject's clothes create a less professional, cluttered result.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent typography with a perfect grave accent on the letter 'E'.
  • + Clean vector aesthetic that fits the minimalist emblem style well.
  • + Well-balanced composition with an attractive, legible banner.
  • The steam element is very simple and could be more expressive.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Beautifully rendered cloche dome with sophisticated shading.
  • + Authentic vintage paper texture in the background adds character.
  • + Nice flow to the steam and banner design.
  • Text rendering error on 'CAFFÈ' where the accent is floating over the F instead of the E.
  • The banner layout makes the typography slightly harder to read compared to Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt closely, capturing the vintage aesthetic and required elements. FLUX.1 Kontext [max] is the winner because it rendered the text perfectly, including the specific 'CAFFÈ' accent, whereas FLUX.2 [dev] Flash placed the accent over the wrong letter.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

  • + Excellent typography rendering for 'APOLLO 11' and the astronaut names.
  • + High-quality vector aesthetic with clean lines and balanced composition.
  • + Successfully captured the 'NASA-inspired' muted color palette.
  • Failed the sequential numbering/logic of the steps, missing several requested phases like 'Earth Orbit'.
  • The Saturn V rocket is generic and does not resemble the actual iconic three-stage rocket.
  • Contains nonsensical floating text elements in the center.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Followed the specific mission steps much more accurately (Launch, Earth Orbit, Translunar, etc.).
  • + Rocket and Lunar Module iconography is more grounded in the actual designs of the Apollo mission.
  • + Excellent use of various graphic elements to show trajectories and landing sites.
  • Significant text rendering issues, particularly the 'Launch' and 'Moon' labels.
  • Layout is a bit cluttered compared to the clean vector style requested.
  • Some icons and labels are duplicated unnecessarily (e.g., 'Descent' appears twice).

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash followed the complex structural requirements of the prompt much better, including the specific mission phases and trajectories. However, FLUX.1 Kontext [max] produced a much cleaner, more aesthetically pleasing 'vector' style with superior text legibility, even though it failed to include all the requested steps.

Next steps

Explore each model