FLUX.1 Kontext [max] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent handling of caustics and light refraction through the glass.
• + Realistic textures on the wooden table and sparking blue sphere.
• + Accurately represents light coming from a window side.

• − The glass cube has an open top rather than being a solid cube, making the book appear to be hovering over an edge.
• − The blue sphere is slightly off-center.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Clean, minimalist composition with good spatial alignment.
• + The glass cube looks more like a traditional, fully enclosed object.
• + Strong adherence to all prompt elements including placement.

• − The blue sphere appears to be floating rather than resting on the surface.
• − Lighting is a bit flat compared to the more dynamic shadows in the other image.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent depiction of the requested 'repairing' action with a focus on the drivetrain.
• + Stronger adherence to the 'reflections on wet pavement' and 'shallow depth of field' requirements.
• + Consistent realism in the background street objects like signs and bollards.

• − Physicality of the rain feels like a static filter overlaying the entire frame.
• − The bicycle chain and cassette details are slightly anatomically incorrect.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Natural skin texture and facial features are exceptionally lifelike and fit the 'Japanese man' prompt well.
• + Better execution of the 'candid' feel with organic lighting and a softer, more realistic rain effect.

• − Failed the core prompt instruction of 'repairing' the bicycle; the man is simply leaning over the handlebars.
• − The background cars and architecture are somewhat mudded and less distinct compared to Model A.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent skin texture with visible pores and realistic hair detail
• + Vibrant and dynamic bokeh sparks that create a sense of depth
• + Highly intricate engraving on the plate armor with strong contrast in lighting

• − The eyes appear slightly glowing or supernatural, which might detract from a 'lifelike' request
• − Missing the requested beads in the braids

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully included beads in the hair braids as requested
• + Subtle and realistic scarring and dirt on the face
• + Stronger adherence to the requested cloth underlayer and leather strap textures

• − The skin texture is slightly smoother and less detailed compared to Model A
• − The torchlight reflection on the armor is somewhat more muted

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Features a highly professional grid layout with many photo assets
• + Excellent use of whitespace for a modern minimalist look
• + Consistent photography style across all images

• − Text is largely illegible gibberish
• − The food variety is poor as it is almost exclusively pizza
• − Includes script fonts that deviate from the 'bold sans-serif' request

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to section headers (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
• + Uses bold sans-serif fonts as requested
• + Legible prices and more varied food categories depicted

• − Layout is slightly less balanced with inconsistent text alignment
• − The 'Pizza' photo is under 'Mains', causing a logical mismatch

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent typography rendering with clean, readable fonts.
• + Strong sense of motion with debris and glowing embers.
• + The burger looks very appetizing with crisp vegetable textures.

• − The 'exploded' effect is minimal as the core burger is still mostly assembled.
• − Missing the 'starburst' element for the price tag.
• − The suspended bun pieces on the sides look slightly unnatural and disconnected.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + The 'exploded' burger effect is better achieved with vertical separation of the bun.
• + Higher intensity of the fiery, glowing effect on both the text and the background.
• + Very realistic melting cheese and texture on the patty.

• − Included the price tag twice, creating a cluttered and confusing layout.
• − Failed to include the price in a 'starburst' as requested.
• − The 'MAGIC BURGER' text has some slightly inconsistent lighting on the letters.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent text legibility and spelling accuracy throughout the image.
• + Realistic chalk smearing and board texture that enhances authenticity.
• + Successfully follows the instruction to include the specific handwritten text snippets requested.

• − The title is in print-style handwriting rather than the 'elegant cursive' requested.
• − The lighting has a slightly harsh glare in the center.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully captured a more textured, grainy chalk aesthetic in the lettering.
• + The layout is well-balanced with consistent spacing between menu items.

• − Contains significant spelling errors in the footer text, such as 'ous' and 'tree' instead of 'for' and 'free'.
• − Failed to provide the 'elegant cursive' title requested in the prompt.
• − The text looks slightly digitalized or embossed rather than purely handwritten chalk.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent photorealism in the textures of the spacesuit and horse fur.
• + Beautiful cinematic lighting and atmospheric lens flare effects.

• − Completely failed the semantic instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Perfectly adhered to the complex surreal instruction of having the horse on top.
• + Maintained high visual quality and detail while executing a difficult spatial layout.
• + Strong composition with multiple planes of depth and planetary details.

• − Minute clipping where the horse's back leg meets the astronaut's shoulder.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent fur texture rendering on the capybara.
• + Logical placement of the woman and phone in the background.
• + Clean, readable 'TAXI' text on the driver's cap.

• − Only one paw is clearly holding the steering wheel, despite the prompt's request for both.
• − The composition feels slightly cramped near the front of the vehicle.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Included both paws on the steering wheel as requested.
• + Good use of depth with the passenger clearly visible in the back seat.
• + High mechanical accuracy for the car's interior pillars and window frames.

• − The passenger's hands look slightly distorted near her face/phone.
• − The 'TAXI' text on the cap is slightly warped compared to model A.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent adherence to the gothic font style for the title.
• + Very moody, dark parchment aesthetic that fits the 'cinematic lighting' request.
• + Correct text transcription for the main event details.

• − Included a duplicate line for 'The Arches, NYC' at the bottom.
• − The jack-o-lantern's glow feels a bit flat compared to the other model.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Superior lighting and composition with the addition of a glowing moon.
• + The scroll banner is more elegantly rendered and legible.
• + Details like the thorns and webs in the border are more delicate and intricate.

• − Hallucinated extra nonsense text ('Your: Vorkleat: Iight & Spans') in the middle of the event details.
• − The date uses a comma instead of a period (30,10,2026), slightly missing the prompt instruction.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent texture in the individual hair strands.
• + Natural-looking hairline integration on the forehead.
• + Maintains the facial identity and lighting of the original image well.

• − Slightly jagged or 'stray' hairs on the right side of the head look a bit digital.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Smooth and well-styled head of hair that fits the head shape naturally.
• + Preserves facial features and clothing details perfectly from the original.
• + Realistic hair density and color match for the existing beard.

• − The hairline on the forehead is slightly less integrated than in model A, looking a bit more 'pasted' on.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent typography with clean, consistent brown lettering.
• + Highly detailed materials including the texture on the fish and realistic soy sauce.

• − Completely missed the requested flag icon.
• − The chopsticks are slightly floating and not perfectly integrated with the base.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Includes the requested small flag icon as specified in the prompt.
• + Follows the 'minimal garnish' instruction very well with a single piece of sushi and wasabi.

• − The 'JAPAN' text has inconsistent shading and character thickness.
• − The rice texture looks a bit more like bubbles than soft, refined sushi rice.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Successfully incorporates all elements: TV anchor desk, microphone, dog, and hockey stick.
• + Preserves the denim jacket and specific hair color from the source image.
• + Captures the caricature style with exaggerated eyes and a wide smile while retaining likeness.

• − The hand holding the microphone is poorly rendered with anatomical issues.
• − Added glasses that were not present in the original source image.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent preservation of the source image's pose and clothing.
• + Clean, vibrant illustration style.

• − Completely failed to incorporate the requested professions and hobbies (TV anchor, dogs, hockey).
• − Did not create a caricature beyond a generic cartoon filter of the face.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Successfully includes all four distinct animals: golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Distinct fur textures for each species, especially the fluffy fox and puppy.
• + Excellent lighting with clear god rays and a soft bokeh effect.

• − The rabbit's face looks slightly stylized rather than hyper-photorealistic.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + High level of expressive detail in the faces of the animals.
• + Subtle and beautiful lighting in the background.

• − Failed to include the bunny; there are two kittens and zero rabbits.
• − The fox and kittens look slightly more generic in their features compared to the distinct species in the other image.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Successfully captures the iconic 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme composition and poses.
• + Excellent stylistic translation into Studio Ghibli-inspired watercolor and line art.
• + Maintains very high adherence to the original clothing colors and patterns.

• − The blue eyes on the woman in red are a slight departure from the source material.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Perfectly replicates the Ghibli aesthetic with soft pastel tones and painterly textures.
• + Preserves the source image's character expressions and clothing details accurately.
• + Captures the dreamy, nostalgic mood requested in the prompt.

• − Image B is nearly identical to Image A, showing very little variation in the specific model output.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Excellent depiction of wind-blown hair that maintains realistic flow and texture.
• + Added leaves are distributed logically throughout the scene.
• + Successfully modified the subject's stance and the dog's tail to increase the sense of motion.

• − The fingers on the hand touching the dog are slightly elongated and warped.
• − Some minor changes to the facial features of the woman compared to the original.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Strong prompt adherence with wind-swept hair and flying leaves.
• + Good preservation of the source image's overall lighting and color palette.
• + Keeps the anatomy of the dog and woman more consistent with the source.

• − The leaves appear a bit static, like they are floating rather than caught in a gust.
• − The hair on the left side of the woman's face has some slightly digital artifacts where it meets the background.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Perfect typography including the correct grave accent on 'Caffè'.
• + Sophisticated vintage texture with grainy details that feel authentic to letterpress printing.
• + Well-executed banner ribbon with balanced proportions.

• − The steam trails are quite thin compared to the rest of the illustration.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Stronger, bolder steam graphic that balances well with the cloche dome.
• + Consistent warm brown and cream color palette.
• + High clarity in the 'Est. 1720' text on the banner.

• − The accent on 'Caffè' is rendered as a straight line rather than a traditional grave accent.
• − The spacing between characters in 'FLORIAN' is slightly less refined than in the other version.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

• + Features a very clean, high-quality flat-vector illustration of the Lunar Module.
• + Displays a clear, logical progression from launch to surface landing.
• + Adheres well to the requested NASA-inspired color palette with muted red and navy.

• − Text labels are riddled with spelling errors like 'LUNEAR MODULLE' and 'TRANSLUNAR LAARTH'.
• − Incorrectly labels the Earth as 'MOON'.
• − Includes a random ringed planet (Saturn) which wasn't part of the mission context.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Stronger adherence to the requested 'navy' background for a modern poster look.
• + Includes an actual NASA logo and the 'Tranquility' landing site reference.
• + Composition feels more like a modern infographic with dashed orbital lines.

• − The rocket anatomy is illogical, with Saturn-like rings intersecting the tip of the Saturn V rocket.
• − Text is poorly rendered and overlapping in several places, making it hard to read.
• − Fails to provide the specific 6-step numbered list requested in the prompt.