Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

17.1 arena score

#54 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

23.4 arena score

#27 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'soft window light from the left' instruction
  • + High clarity and realistic glass reflections
  • + Clean, modern composition
  • The plant is more 'next to' the cube than 'behind' it as requested
  • The red book looks a bit like a plastic prop

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfect placement of the plant behind the cube, visible through the glass
  • + Realistic texture on the red book with worn edges
  • + Strong sense of depth and atmospheric lighting
  • The base of the sphere has a slight clipping artifact with the bottom of the cube
  • There are small white dust artifacts scattered across the image

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions very well. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a cleaner, high-quality image with better lighting, while Wan 2.5 (Preview) excelled at the specific transparency task of showing the plant behind the glass cube, though it had more artifacts.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Handles raindrops on lens/visible rain well
  • + Good center-focused composition for a portrait
  • The subject is standing with the bike, not repairing it
  • Anatomically incorrect hand positioning on the handlebars
  • Lack of 'imperfect framing' or 'motion blur' requested

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Accurately depicts the 'repairing' action with tools and posture
  • + Captures excellent natural skin texture and elderly features
  • + Excellent reflections and shallow depth of field
  • Lacks obvious motion blur from cars
  • Composition is a bit clean for 'imperfect framing'

Verdict: Wan 2.5 is much more successful at capturing the core action of the prompt, showing the man physically crouched and working with tools, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext simply shows a man standing over a bike. Wan 2.5 also provides superior skin texture and realism, feeling like a genuine street photo compared to the slightly staged look of FLUX.1 Kontext.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Ornate engraved plate armor is highly detailed with complex filigree.
  • + Dramatic warm lighting creates a strong cinematic mood.
  • + Effective shallow depth of field with soft bokeh.
  • Failed to include the requested braided hair with beads.
  • The skin appears somewhat smooth/plastic rather than displaying realistic dirt and scars.
  • The facial expression feels slightly static compared to the battle-worn prompt.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent adherence to specific details like braided hair with beads and visible dirt/scars.
  • + High-quality texture on the leather straps, tattered cloth, and mail.
  • + Superior lifelike eyes that convey a weary, battle-worn emotion.
  • The torch in the background is a bit distracting and less 'soft bokeh' than the other sparks.
  • Engraving on the metal is elegant but slightly less intricate than Model A.

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the winner as it accurately rendered every specific prompt requirement, including the braided hair with beads and the gritty skin textures. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a high-quality cinematic image, it missed key character details and opted for a more stylized, clean look for the face.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Features a bold, high-contrast editorial layout.
  • + Photographs of food have realistic textures and appetizing lighting.
  • + Uses a modern, asymmetric balancing of text and imagery.
  • Text is largely illegible and nonsensical.
  • The food imagery doesnt clearly map to the section titles provided.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent adherence to the requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains).
  • + Features a clean, professional grid that looks like a real menu.
  • + Clear bold sans-serif fonts used for category headers.
  • Food photos are repetitive and look a bit artificial/plastic.
  • The red and green divider lines are a bit generic.

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) significantly outperformed the competition by correctly implementing all requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains) in a logical grid layout. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced more realistic and artistic food photography, it failed to create a functional menu structure, resulting in a design that was more of a collage than a professional menu.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent typography rendering for the primary title
  • + High-quality realistic texture on the charcoal and flames
  • Failed to provide the 'exploded view' requested in the prompt
  • Minor spelling error in 'LNHLY'
  • Starburst price tag is a flat graphic rather than fiery and glowing

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfectly executed the 'exploded' burger request with deconstructed components
  • + Text integration follows the fiery/glowing aesthetic much better
  • + Dynamic composition with a strong sense of motion
  • Smaller text is slightly less crisp than Model A
  • The 'melting' effect on the main title might be too intense for some advertising contexts

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) followed the complex layout instructions much better than FLUX.1 Kontext [dev], successfully deconstructing the burger parts as requested and styling the price starburst to match the fiery theme. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] had very clean text, it failed the core visual requirement of an 'exploded' burger, showing a fully assembled one instead.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Features a clean, centered layout
  • + Accurately represents a chalkboard texture
  • + Completes the third menu item more naturally based on the partial prompt
  • Several spelling errors including 'Mashroom', 'Risoktso', and 'Octpus'
  • Severe repetition artifacts in the text like 'with with' and duplicated prices
  • Date text at the top is messy and illegible

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent spelling accuracy across all menu items and the date
  • + Highly realistic chalk smudge effects and varied handwriting style
  • + Followed instructions for elegant cursive-style font in the title
  • Omitted 'Herbs' from the second menu item
  • Line breaks in the third item are slightly awkward

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) significantly outperforms FLUX.1 Kontext by producing near-perfect spelling and a much more realistic chalk aesthetic. While FLUX.1 Kontext struggles with repetitious artifacts and garbled text, Wan 2.5 handles the complex menu text with clarity and style.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully followed the specific instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut
  • + High anatomical clarity in the astronaut's face and the horse's head
  • + Clean, cinematic lighting that feels surreal and focused
  • The horse's hind legs appear somewhat detached from the composition
  • Relatively simple background compared to the other model

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Very vibrant and detailed space background with nebulae and planetary textures
  • + Great sense of motion and dynamic composition
  • Completely failed the negative constraint/instruction for the horse's position
  • Produced a cliche image instead of the requested surreal reversal
  • The horse's back right leg is anatomically messy and blends into the atmosphere

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly, creating a surreal image where the horse is riding the astronaut as requested. In contrast, Wan 2.5 (Preview) provided a high-quality but generic interpretation that ignored the prompt's specific instruction for the horse to be on top.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and skin textures for the human passenger
  • + Clear and accurate rendering of the capybara's fur and expression
  • + Stronger sense of 'night' atmosphere with realistic urban lighting through the window
  • The capybara only has one hand on the steering wheel, failing the prompt's specific instruction
  • The taxi interior looks more like a modern personal car than a classic New York taxi

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfect adherence to the instruction of having both front paws on the steering wheel
  • + Captures the iconic New York taxi aesthetic effectively, including the roof sign and dashboard meter
  • + The 'bored' expression of the passenger is very well-executed
  • The capybara's face looks slightly less realistic and more like a mask/person in a suit
  • Visible water droplets on the windshield are a nice touch but weren't requested

Verdict: While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] offers superior lighting and texture quality, it failed a specific instructional detail regarding the placement of the capybara's paws. Wan 2.5 (Preview) followed all prompt instructions perfectly and captured the New York taxi environment more authentically, making it the more successful thematic execution despite slightly lower facial realism.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Accurate date and time fulfillment
  • + Consistent gothic border style
  • + Clean central jack-o-lantern illustration
  • Major text hallucinations in the banner and location details
  • Lacks the requested parchment and moody sky elements
  • Graphic design feels flat and less cinematic

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent text rendering with zero spelling errors across all fields
  • + Rich cinematic lighting with a moody sky and parchment texture
  • + Detailed spiderweb and thorn border as requested
  • The jack-o-lantern has some minor fire-particle artifacts that break the vintage feel slightly

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) significantly outperformed FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] by accurately rendering every specific line of text requested, including the small banner and exact address. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] struggled with legibility and missed the environmental prompts like the sky and parchment, Wan 2.5 (Preview) delivered a professional, high-quality invitation layout.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully added thick, full hair with realistic texture
  • + Maintained the overall composition and jacket details
  • Significantly altered the facial features, making the person look younger and different from the source
  • Changed the glasses style and color from the original source image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent source preservation, keeping the face and glasses identical to the original
  • + Realistic hair texture and naturally integrated hairline
  • + Maintained the original lighting and color balance
  • The hair volume is slightly less 'full' compared to the other model, though still meets the prompt

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) provided a superior edit by successfully adding hair while perfectly preserving the identity, facial structure, and accessories of the person in the source image. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] added good hair but failed the image editing task by essentially generating a new face and changing the glasses, losing the likeness of the original subject.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent typography rendering for both words.
  • + Clean, solid background as requested.
  • + Strong minimalist aesthetic.
  • The 'flag icon' is incorrect and abstract.
  • The 3D model is over-simplified, looking more like a plastic toy than a 'refined texture' sushi.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Beautiful 3D render with high clarity and soft lighting.
  • + Correct Japanese flag icon inclusion.
  • + Better texture definition on the rice and salmon while maintaining the 'cartoon' feel.
  • The 'J' in 'JAPAN' has an unusual styling compared to the other letters.
  • Slightly less 'isometric' than Model A, opting for a standard 3D perspective.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt well, but Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a significantly more professional-looking 3D render with better attention to the 'refined textures' and 'flag icon' requested. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] had cleaner typography, its visual representation of the sushi was too simplistic and the flag was unrecognizable.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Maintains the selfie perspective and clothing from the source image
  • + Successfully incorporates the 'tv show anchor' profession via the background screen
  • Completely misses the 'hockey' requirement of the prompt
  • Text rendering for 'JOB' is random and the text on the dog tag is gibberish
  • The art style is more of a comic illustration than a caricature

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Includes all requested elements: tv anchor desk, dogs, and hockey gear
  • + Captures an excellent caricature likeness with exaggerated facial features and a 'big head' style
  • + Creative integration of hockey, showing it on the monitor and including a stick
  • Loses the selfie/close-up composition of the original source image
  • Small artifacts in the dog's jersey and microphone details

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the clear winner as it successfully incorporated every element of the prompt, including the specific request for hockey which FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] ignored. While Wan 2.5 changed the composition from a selfie to a full studio scene, its execution of the 'caricature' art style was much more accurate and humorous.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent sense of motion and dynamic posing
  • + Clean and realistic lighting with natural-looking depth of field
  • + Highly appealing and consistent character designs
  • Failed to include the fox kit and the rabbit
  • Replaced requested species with two extra kittens

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfect prompt adherence, including all four specific animals requested
  • + Beautiful inclusion of god rays and dew sparkles as described
  • + Rich variety of wildflowers improving the composition
  • The fox kit's eyes have unnatural, slightly creepy glowing artifacts
  • Floating water droplets look a bit like digital artifacts rather than natural dew

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence, successfully including the golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit while Model A missed half of the requested animals. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a very clean and professional-looking image, Wan 2.5 (Preview) captured the specific magical elements like god rays and dew sparkles much more effectively.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original body poses and clothing details.
  • + Clean anime-style cel-shading and sharp line art.
  • + Accurately recreates the character expressions from the meme.
  • Lean more toward generic modern anime than the specific hand-painted Ghibli aesthetic.
  • Colors are a bit too saturated for the 'soft pastel' request.
  • The background remains quite static and lacks the requested 'dreamy' texture.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Strong adherence to the Studio Ghibli aesthetic with soft lighting and a nostalgic mood.
  • + Excellent use of pastel colors and painterly textures throughout the image.
  • + Maintains the source composition perfectly while adding thematic elements like floating leaves.
  • The man's facial expression is slightly more somber than the original 'distracted' look.
  • The character in the red dress has slightly less defined hair compared to Model A.

Verdict: While both models successfully translated the 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme into an anime style, Wan 2.5 (Preview) more accurately captured the specific Ghibli-inspired requirements, including the soft pastel palette, dreamy lighting, and painterly texture. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a high-quality illustration, but it felt more like a modern digital anime than the classic, hand-painted aesthetic requested.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's lighting and character appearance.
  • + Subtle and natural-looking hair motion that aligns with the wind direction.
  • + Maintains the original facial details and dog's appearance perfectly.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Strong adherence to the instruction for 'hair blowing in the wind' with more pronounced volume.
  • + Added more leaves across the frame to enhance the sense of motion.
  • + Good preservation of the overall composition and background elements.
  • The added leaves look like static green stickers without motion blur or realistic integration.
  • The hair flow is a bit more chaotic compared to the source.
  • Noticeable softening of details on the dog's face compared to the original.

Verdict: Both models successfully added the requested motion elements. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner because it maintained the high quality and original texture of the source image while adding motion organically, whereas Wan 2.5 (Preview) added leaves that look cartoonish and significantly lowered the sharpness of the original image.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Very clean vector minimalism
  • + Perfectly legible and accurate text rendering
  • + Strict adherence to the two-tone color palette
  • Missed the request for a banner element
  • The steam icon is very abstract and barely recognizable
  • The cloche dome looks more like a building or cupcake wrapper

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully included the requested banner element
  • + Beautiful textured background that hits the vintage vibe
  • + Clearer representation of a cloche dome and steam
  • Minor text artifacts in the word 'Caffè'
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model A due to gradients and multiple strokes

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a much more accurate interpretation of the specific prompt elements, particularly the banner and the textured background, creating a cohesive vintage identity. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] has cleaner vector lines and perfect typography, it ignored the banner instruction and the cloche dome illustration is less recognizable.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Stronger adherence to the flat-vector, minimalist iconography request.
  • + Captures the requested muted NASA-inspired color palette well.
  • Significant spelling errors in every label including the main title.
  • The layout is cluttered and the steps are not in a logical chronological order.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent visual clarity and high-quality vector illustrations.
  • + Perfect adherence to the sequence of steps with logical flow and legible text.
  • + Creatively included the crew names with appropriate iconography.
  • One of the astronauts appears to be wearing a helmet that looks more like a military helmet than a space gear.
  • The style is slightly more detailed than 'flat-vector', leaning into a semi-realistic illustration style.

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the clear winner as it provides a coherent, legible, and chronologically accurate infographic that follows every step of the prompt. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] struggled with basic spelling and layout, resulting in a disorganized and illegible graphic despite having a more 'authentic' flat-vector aesthetic.

Next steps

Explore each model