Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

16.5 arena score

#58 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Seedream 5.0 Lite

23.7 arena score

#23 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

50.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Seedream 5.0 Lite

50.0%

win rate

50.0% 0.0% ties 50.0%
Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic quality with sharp focus and realistic textures
  • + Accurate depiction of a 'small' blue sphere relative to the cube
  • + Captures the soft window light from the left perfectly with realistic reflections
  • The glass cube has an unusually thick or mirrored base that wasn't explicitly requested

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions and object placement
  • + The glass cube looks very realistic and transparent
  • + Realistic shadows cast by the book and the cube on the table
  • The overall image is slightly soft/blurry compared to the other model
  • The sphere appears more matte than expected for the lighting conditions

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more visually striking image with much higher sharpness and detail, though Seedream 5.0 Lite also executed the prompt accurately with a slightly more natural-looking glass cube structure.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent full-body perspective and framing
  • + Realistic rain texture and pavement reflections
  • + Subjects and objects are rendered clearly with no major anatomical errors
  • The subject is posing with or sitting on the bike rather than 'repairing' it as requested
  • Lacks the requested motion blur from passing cars
  • The background cars are static and facing the wrong direction for the lane

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Accurately depicts the 'repairing' action with specific focus on the bike chain
  • + Captures the 'motion blur' from a passing car perfectly
  • + Composition feels more 'candid' and follows the 'imperfect framing' prompt
  • The bike chain and derailleur area are physically nonsensical/jumbled
  • The subject's hands have minor anatomical blending issues with the bike parts

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the complex action requirements of the prompt much better, capturing the specific act of repairing and the motion blur of traffic, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a high-quality but static portrait of a man standing with a bike. Though FLUX.1 had fewer technical artifacts, Seedream 5.0 Lite felt much closer to the requested 'candid street photo' aesthetic.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent high-contrast warm lighting reflecting off the armor.
  • + Highly detailed and intricate engraving on the plate armor.
  • + Strong emotional intensity and lifelike eyes.
  • Missed the prompt requirement for braided hair with beads.
  • The skin textures appear slightly smoother than the requested battle-worn look.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Followed all prompt details including the braided hair with beads.
  • + Superior texture on the cloth underlayer and leather straps.
  • + More authentic depiction of scars and dirt on the skin.
  • The lighting on the armor is a bit flat compared to Model A.
  • The bokeh sparks are less prominent in the background.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt with significantly higher accuracy, specifically including the braided hair with beads which FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] ignored completely. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more dramatic lighting effect, Seedream 5.0 Lite delivered better texture on the secondary materials like the leather straps and under-tunic.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent grid composition with balanced negative space.
  • + High-quality, vibrant food photography that feels modern.
  • Garbled, nonsensical text that fails to follow the section naming instructions.
  • The layout is more of a magazine spread than a functional restaurant menu.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect adherence to text instructions, including the specific sections requested.
  • + Legible, professional typography with clear pricing and descriptions.
  • + Logical layout that functions as a real-world menu.
  • The food photography is slightly less vibrant than Model A.
  • A few minor spelling errors (e.g., 'FAIITAS').

Verdict: While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] creates a more visually artistic layout with superior food photography, it completely fails to produce legible text or follow the specific section prompts. Seedream 5.0 Lite delivers a fully functional, professional menu with correct sections and readable fonts, making it the far superior choice for this specific prompt.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite
50% wins 0% ties 50% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent text rendering and placement
  • + Very clean, high-resolution visual quality
  • + Includes all requested text elements perfectly
  • Failed the core prompt instruction of an 'exploded' burger, showing multiple whole burgers instead
  • Used the wrong currency symbol (Pound instead of Euro)
  • Composition feels more like a pattern than an action shot

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly captured the 'exploded' burger concept with individual layers floating
  • + Correctly used the Euro currency symbol
  • + Effective lighting and sense of motion with sauce droplets and embers
  • Text for 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' is less prominent and lacks the glow of the title
  • Slightly less crisp text rendering on the main title compared to the other model

Verdict: While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] has superior text legibility and graphic design polish, it failed significantly on the primary prompt requirement: an 'exploded burger'. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the compositional instructions much more accurately, including the correct currency and the specific deconstructed arrangement requested.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent chalk-like texture on the 'TODAY'S SPECIALS' text
  • + Clean and centered composition
  • + Captures the essence of a hand-drawn chalkboard well
  • Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items such as 'Risoktso' and 'Octpus'
  • Muddled text for the date and repeating words in the second menu item
  • Title is in block capitals rather than the requested elegant cursive

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully rendered the date 'APRIL 30, 2026' with high accuracy
  • + Uniform and readable handwriting style across all text
  • + Texture of the chalkboard looks very realistic with dust and smudges
  • Failed the spelling on 'Herbs' (rendered as Heriss) and 'Butter' (rendered as Beliter)
  • Spelling mistakes in the footer text like 'frese opstoons'
  • Underlined text was not requested in the prompt

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] has a more artistic chalk texture for the header but suffers from severe word repetition and garbled text in the middle section. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the better choice as it successfully renders the specific date requested and keeps the menu items mostly legible, despite a few minor spelling errors.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully follows the difficult logic of having the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • + High facial detail and clean rendering of the space suit.
  • + Excellent lighting consistency between the two subjects.
  • The horse's placement is more 'attached to the back' than clearly 'riding'.
  • The scale of the floating planets in the background feels a bit repetitive.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Vibrant, cinematic nebula background.
  • + Good overall texture on the horse's fur and mane.
  • Completely failed the negative constraint/logic prompt; the astronaut is riding the horse.
  • Anatomical issues with the horse's rear legs and tail.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the clear winner as it successfully interpreted the specific structural requirement of the prompt ('horse on top, not vice versa'), which is a known challenge for AI models. Seedream 5.0 Lite defaulted to the common trope of an astronaut riding a horse, ignoring the explicit instruction and providing a generic result.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic lighting and depth of field
  • + High level of texture detail in the capybara's fur
  • + Accurately captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger
  • The capybara only has one hand on the steering wheel, failing the 'both front paws' instruction
  • The capybara's face looks slightly more like a groundhog or rodent hybrid than a distinct capybara

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly adheres to the 'both front paws on the steering wheel' instruction
  • + Very recognizable capybara anatomy and features
  • + Superior environmental storytelling with the 'NYC' text on the hat and blurred Manhattan background
  • The passenger's hands and phone interaction are slightly less refined than Model A
  • The perspective of the dashboard and steering wheel is slightly warped

Verdict: While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more polished, cinematic image with superior lighting, Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the specific prompt instructions more accurately, particularly regarding the positioning of both paws on the wheel. Seedream 5.0 Lite also captured the distinctive look of a capybara and the New York vibe more effectively, making it the preferred choice for prompt adherence.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Clean layout with clear main title text
  • + Good color contrast between the dark background and the glowing pumpkin
  • Several typos in the secondary text and location name
  • Lacks the 'parchment' texture requested
  • The border is very simple rather than having distinct thorns and webs

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect adherence to text prompts with zero spelling errors
  • + Excellent atmospheric detail including parchment texture and cinematic lighting
  • + Border design accurately includes webs and thorns as requested
  • The transition between the parchment and the 'window' into the spooky scene is a bit sharp

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it followed every instruction, including complex text and specific textures like parchment and thorns. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] suffered from significant spelling errors and failed to capture the 'vintage' parchment aesthetic requested.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully added a very full head of hair as requested.
  • + Maintains the general color palette and environment of the original.
  • Failed to preserve facial features, significantly altering the subject's face to look like a younger, different person.
  • The hair texture and hairline look somewhat artificial and overly groomed compared to the rugged source image.
  • Changed the style of the glasses.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent preservation of original facial features, skin texture, and glasses.
  • + The added hair has a very natural, realistic texture and growth pattern that matches the man's age.
  • + Perfectly maintains the lighting and background of the source image.
  • The hair density is slightly lower than 'full, thick' request, but fits the character much better.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner because it successfully applied the edit while perfectly preserving the identity of the person in the source image. In contrast, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] completely changed the man's facial structure, resulting in a different person entirely, which fails the primary requirement of image editing.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent 3D material quality with soft, clay-like textures.
  • + Very clean and bold typography that is easy to read.
  • + Accurate solid light blue background and minimalist composition.
  • The flag icon is stylized incorrectly and does not resemble the Japanese flag.
  • The sushi piece is a strange hybrid that doesn't clearly represent a specific type accurately.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly rendered Japanese flag icon.
  • + Higher variety and more realistic representation of sushi types (Nigiri and Maki).
  • + Excellent 45° isometric perspective and diorama base adherence.
  • The text 'JAPAN' is not perfectly top-centered as requested.
  • The 'JAPAN' text has some slight kerning/rendering artifacts (the 'N' looks a bit squeezed).

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner for its superior ability to render a recognizable flag and a varied, accurate assortment of sushi. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a visually striking image with great textures, but failed significantly on the specific icon request and provided a less convincing sushi model.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Strong caricature style with exaggerated features like the nose and teeth.
  • + Maintains the outfit and basic pose of the source image.
  • + Includes a TV screen referencing the profession.
  • Completely misses the 'hockey' requirement.
  • The text 'JOB' is a bit literal and lazy in its implementation.
  • The dog illustration is very simplistic compared to the rest of the image.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully incorporates all elements: TV anchor, dog, and hockey.
  • + Clean, professional cartoon/caricature aesthetic.
  • + Excellent text rendering for the job title.
  • The head is less 'exaggerated' in traditional caricature terms compared to Model A.
  • Hand holding the hockey stick is slightly deformed.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner because it actually followed all parts of the prompt, including the hockey requirement which FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] completely ignored. Seedream 5.0 Lite also created a much more cohesive scene that looks like a high-quality caricature, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] felt more like a filter applied over a collage.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Dynamic movement and energy that captures the 'playfully chasing' part of the prompt.
  • + Excellent shallow depth of field with realistic bokeh.
  • Failed to include all four requested animals, missing the fox and bunny entirely.
  • Visual style leans slightly more towards a CGI render than hyper-photorealism.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect prompt adherence, including the golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
  • + Beautifully rendered god rays and dew sparkles as requested.
  • + Highly expressive characters that capture a wholesome vibe.
  • The fox kit has a slightly cartoonish aesthetic compared to the other animals.
  • More of a static 'tumbled' pose than an active chasing scene.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it successfully rendered all four specific animals requested in the prompt, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] only generated three animals, none of which were the fox or bunny. Seedream 5.0 Lite also better captured the atmospheric details like god rays and dew sparkles, creating a more complete interpretation of the scene.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Expertly recreates the original pose and character layout
  • + Clean line work and vibrant colors
  • + Strong source preservation of clothing patterns and background structures
  • Art style reflects modern generic anime more than the specific Ghibli aesthetic
  • Lighting feels a bit flat and digital rather than hand-painted

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent adherence to the Studio Ghibli art style with softer line work
  • + Accurately captures Ghibli-esque facial features and expressions
  • + Achieves the requested soft, warm, painterly lighting mood
  • Slightly more distortion in the hands compared to Model A

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of preserving the composition of the original 'distracted boyfriend' meme. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a very clean and faithful recreation, but its art style is more reminiscent of modern digital anime. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner for this specific task as it perfectly captured the iconic Studio Ghibli aesthetic, including the characteristic facial features and hand-painted lighting requested in the prompt.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original image details and facial features
  • + Naturalistic wind effect on the hair
  • + Subtle but clear inclusion of flying leaves
  • The 'flying leaves' are very small and few in number
  • Overall energy is still quite calm compared to the 'dynamic' request

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Stronger visual representation of the 'leaves flying' instruction
  • + Good preservation of the source image character and background
  • + Adds a sense of depth by placing leaves in the foreground and background
  • The blowing hair looks slightly more structured and less natural than Model A
  • Large leaves occasionally look like flat overlays rather than part of the 3D scene

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of preserving the identity and composition of the source image while applying the edits. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] provides a more realistic and subtle hair-blowing effect, while Seedream 5.0 Lite better captures the 'energetic and lively' feel by adding more prominent flying leaves.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent typography rendering with the correct accent on 'Caffè'.
  • + Clean, bold vector look following the minimalism prompt.
  • + Good color contrast and balance.
  • Missed the request for a 'banner' for the establishment date.
  • The cloche icon looks more like a dome or a cupcake than a traditional food cloche.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully included the 'Est. 1720' banner requested in the prompt.
  • + The cloche dome is more recognizable and features the requested steam effect.
  • + Applied a nice subtle texture to the background for a vintage feel.
  • Incorrect accent mark used in 'Caffê' (circumflex instead of grave).
  • The composition feels a bit disconnected with a large gap between the text and the icon.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the specific prompt elements better by including the banner and a clear cloche dome with steam, and capturing the vintage texture. However, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more professional, cohesive logo design with correct spelling and typography, even though it missed the banner element.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Bold, graphic aesthetic that fits the modern vector style.
  • + Correctly utilizes the NASA-inspired color palette.
  • Contains severe text garbling and typos, such as 'APOLO' and illegible step descriptions.
  • The iconography is abstract and confusing, failing to represent the specific mission stages requested.
  • Layout is cluttered and lacks a clear logical flow.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent adherence to the sequential 6-step structure requested in the prompt.
  • + Very legible and accurate text rendering, including names and mission phases.
  • + Clean, professional flat-vector icons that clearly represent the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
  • The Earth and Moon icons use slightly more detail/shading than a strictly 'flat' vector style.
  • Minor spelling error in 'TRANSLUMAR' (should be Translunar).

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the complex instructions perfectly, providing a clear, numbered 6-step infographic with accurate iconography for each stage of the Apollo 11 mission. In contrast, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] failed to provide a logical sequence, had significant spelling errors in the headers, and produced abstract shapes rather than the requested icons. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence and clarity.

Next steps

Explore each model