Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs Reve Image 1.0 Reve AI

Settled by community votes across 8 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

17.1 arena score

#54 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Reve Image 1.0

20.0 arena score

#42 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Reve Image 1.0

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 8

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic realism and textures
  • + Perfect interpretation of the soft window light and reflections
  • + Accurate spatial arrangement and object interaction
  • The glass cube has an open front/bottom rather than being a solid closed unit
  • The mirrored base inside the cube creates a slightly confusing perspective

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Successfully includes all prompt elements
  • + Good composition with a clear view of the plant through the glass
  • + Correct placement of the red book and blue sphere
  • The blue sphere is inexplicably floating in mid-air
  • The glass cube has a cyan/blue tint that isn't requested
  • Shadowing on the table is somewhat inconsistent with the light source

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt accurately, but FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a much higher quality image with superior textures and lighting. While Reve Image 1.0 captured the 'plant through the glass' element well, it failed on physics by having the sphere float, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] grounded the objects realistically.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent dramatic lighting and cinematic composition
  • + High-quality rendering of metallic engravings on the armor
  • + Strong portrayal of a 'battle-worn' character through facial expression
  • Failed to include the braided hair with beads as requested
  • Texture on leather and cloth underlayer is less prominent than in the competitor's image

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'hair braided with small beads' detail
  • + Excellent skin texture featuring both dirt and subtle scarring
  • + Highly detailed engraving on the plate armor and visible cloth underlayers
  • The character looks somewhat young for the 'battle-worn' description
  • Background bokeh is slightly distracting with more literal torch shapes

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 followed the specific prompt instructions much more closely, particularly by including the braided hair with beads which FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] omitted entirely. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more traditionally noble and cinematic portrait, Reve Image 1.0 excelled in capturing the fine details of the armor's texture and the character's skin.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Natural hair texture and lighting integration.
  • + High image resolution and overall clarity.
  • Significantly altered facial features, making the person look like a different individual.
  • Changed the shape of the glasses and removed skin texture and wrinkles.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Excellent preservation of the original person's facial features and skin texture.
  • + Maintains the original lighting and glasses design perfectly.
  • + Adds a full head of hair that follows the skull shape of the original image.
  • The hair texture has some digital artifacts and looks slightly painterly compared to the background.
  • The hair volume is a bit exaggerated in its height.

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the clear winner because it successfully performs the edit (adding hair) while strictly adhering to the requirement to preserve facial features. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] failed the 'source preservation' aspect by completely regenerating the face into a different, younger-looking man.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent typography with clean, bold execution
  • + Extremely clean, minimalist aesthetic
  • + High-quality soft lighting and smooth 3D textures
  • The flag icon is stylized into an unrecognizable geometric shape
  • The sushi design is overly simplified, lacking typical nigiri details

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Accurate Japanese flag icon
  • + Shows a variety of sushi pieces including nigiri and rolls
  • + Better representation of an isometric diorame with garnish
  • Text is slightly off-center and the layout is less balanced
  • The 3D modeling of the green sushi piece is a bit abstract and unrecognizable

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the winner because it accurately rendered the Japanese flag and provided a more recognizable variety of sushi as requested by the prompt. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] had superior typography and a cleaner overall finish, its failure to generate a recognizable flag and its extremely abstract sushi representation makes it less faithful to the prompt instructions.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully captures a comic-strip caricature style.
  • + Retains the denim shirt from the original image.
  • + Includes the dog and a reference to the TV anchor job via the monitor icon.
  • Completely failed to incorporate the hockey element.
  • Visual quality of the text and character features is a bit cluttered.
  • The caricature doesn't strongly resemble the subject's facial structure.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Perfectly incorporates all prompt elements (hockey jersey/stick, dog with headset, news desk).
  • + Excellent facial resemblance despite the 'bobblehead' caricature exaggeration.
  • + Humorous and polished visual style with vibrant lighting.
  • The hand holding the microphone is poorly rendered with too many fingers.
  • The dog's lower body is anatomically awkward where it meets the desk.

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the clear winner as it successfully incorporated every element of the prompt, including the specific 'hockey' request which FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] ignored. While Reve Image 1.0 has a minor issue with the hand anatomy, its ability to maintain the subject's likeness while creating a humorous, professional-looking caricature is superior.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original image's composition and poses.
  • + Crisp line art and clear facial expressions.
  • + Maintaining the exact patterns of the clothing like the blue plaid shirt.
  • Looks more like modern digital anime than the specific Ghibli hand-painted aesthetic.
  • Background lacks the requested 'dreamy outdoor' painterly feel.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli 'hand-painted' texture and soft pastel palette.
  • + Accurately renders the dreamy, nostalgic lighting and soft-focus background requested.
  • + Masterfully translates the character expressions into the Ghibli style.
  • Loses some of the fine detail in the face of the woman in the foreground due to blur.
  • Minor anatomical awkwardness in the man's hand tucked near his pocket.

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the clear winner as it successfully captured the specific 'Studio Ghibli' art style, including the hand-painted textures and soft lighting requested in the prompt. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] did a great job preserving the original image's structural details, it produced a generic modern anime look rather than the nostalgic, painterly aesthetic of the source material's target style.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's identity and background.
  • + Subtle and realistic hair movement that feels natural.
  • The addition of leaves is extremely minimal, with only about three tiny leaves present.
  • Does not fully capture the 'energetic and lively' feel requested in the prompt.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Successfully adds a large quantity of dynamic, flying leaves with motion blur.
  • + Stronger adherence to the 'windy' and 'lively' aspects of the prompt through dramatic hair movement.
  • + Maintains high character consistency with the source image.
  • Some digital artifacts appear around the edges of the floating leaves.
  • The intensity of the leaf effect slightly obscures some background details.

Verdict: While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] did a great job preserving the original image, it failed to meaningfully incorporate the requested flying leaves. Reve Image 1.0 fully embraced the prompt, adding a significant amount of motion through both a dramatic hair effect and numerous dynamic leaves, making it the more effective edit.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Reve Image 1.0

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Matches the requested navy and white color palette well.
  • + Captures a cohesive graphic design style across the various icons.
  • Significant spelling errors including the main title 'APOLO' and gibberish subtext.
  • Poor logical layout that doesn't clearly follow the 1-6 step sequence requested.

Reve Image 1.0

  • + Excellent flat-vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the 'modern infographic' prompt.
  • + Clear, sequential layout of icons that follows the mission steps accurately.
  • + Effective use of the NASA-inspired color palette including the muted red and light gray.
  • Several spelling errors in the headings like 'APQUO', 'LUNNR', and 'DESSENT'.
  • Missed a few specific text elements requested in the prompt.

Verdict: Reve Image 1.0 is the clear winner as it successfully created a structured, logical infographic that follows the requested 6-step mission sequence. While both models struggled with spelling, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a disorganized layout with mostly illegible text and abstract icons, whereas Reve Image 1.0 delivered clean, recognizable vector icons and a professional composition.

Next steps

Explore each model