Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4 Pro Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

17.2 arena score

#54 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4 Pro

24.3 arena score

#18 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

50.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Recraft V4 Pro

50.0%

win rate

50.0% 0.0% ties 50.0%
Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with clear soft light from the left.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and plant leaves.
  • + Clear spatial arrangement of all requested objects.
  • The glass cube has a mirrored base which wasn't requested.
  • The 'sphere' inside looks slightly more like a solid plastic ball than glass.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Beautiful glass-on-glass material interaction between the sphere and cube.
  • + The blue sphere has a more sophisticated, translucent appearance.
  • + Excellent composition with the table edge and window treatment.
  • The plant is mostly to the side rather than 'behind' the cube.
  • The perspective of the red book is slightly awkward, appearing to hover slightly off the back edge.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions accurately. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a brighter, more vibrant image with perfect lighting, while Recraft V4 Pro excelled at rendering the refractive properties of glass. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner for better literal adherence to the plant's placement and the specific window lighting quality.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent anatomical rendering of the subject's face and hands
  • + High clarity and sharp focus on the central subject
  • + Accurate depiction of a red bicycle with realistic mechanical details
  • The subject appears to be posing for a portrait rather than repairing the bike
  • The background cars are static and lack the requested motion blur
  • The 'light rain' effect looks like a simple digital overlay and doesn't affect the subject's clothing

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Successfully captures the requested 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' feel
  • + Excellent use of motion blur and reflections to create a cinematic atmosphere
  • + The subject is actively engaged in the act of repairing the bicycle
  • The textures are more painterly/stylized, contrary to the 'no stylization' instruction
  • Visible distortions in the bicycle's geometry, especially around the handlebars and front wheel
  • The skin texture is less detailed and realistic compared to Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro better captures the spirit and composition of the prompt, successfully executing the 'candid', 'motion blur', and 'repairing' aspects, though it fails on the 'no stylization' requirement. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produces a much higher quality, realistic subject, but the image feels staged and ignores the specific atmospheric requests like motion blur and candid framing. Recraft V4 Pro is preferred for its superior adherence to the complex narrative elements of the prompt.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent warm lighting with dynamic highlights
  • + Intricate engraving on the armor
  • + High-quality skin texture and realistic eyes
  • Missed the request for braided hair with beads
  • The scars appear slightly like surface paint rather than deep skin texture

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to specific details like braided hair and beads
  • + Excellent depiction of dirt and weathering on the skin
  • + Exquisite texture on the metal engravings and leather underpinnings
  • Lighting is a bit more diffuse and less 'warm' than the prompt suggested
  • The armor structure around the neck is slightly awkward

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the winner because it successfully incorporated every specific element of the prompt, most notably the braided hair with beads which FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] completely ignored. While both models produced high-quality textures, Recraft V4 Pro's 'battle-worn' aesthetic felt more authentic and detailed.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Features a bold, modern editorial layout with a unique alternating grid.
  • + High-quality, vibrant food photography with good color contrast.
  • Text is largely gibberish and includes visual artifacts like overlapping letters.
  • Individual sections for appetizers, pizza, and mains are not clearly defined as requested.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Excellent typography with perfectly legible text and correct spelling.
  • + Highly functional layout that successfully incorporates all three requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains).
  • + Photorealistic food images that directly correspond to the item descriptions.
  • The grid layout is very traditional and slightly less 'creative' compared to a modern magazine style.

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the clear winner as it produced a fully functional, professional menu with perfectly rendered text and distinct sections for all categories. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] created a visually interesting layout, but failed at the specific prompt requirements for text content and categorization, resulting in a design that is aesthetically pleasing but unusable.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro
50% wins 0% ties 50% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent vibrant lighting and background atmosphere.
  • + All required text is present and legible.
  • + High-quality rendering of the fiery coal base.
  • Completely failed the 'exploded burger' aspect of the prompt; ingredients are stacked.
  • Minor typo in the word 'ONLY' rendered as 'LNHLY'.
  • The starburst element is a flat graphic rather than an integrated fiery effect.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded burger' instruction with dynamic suspension.
  • + Photorealistic textures on the ingredients and dripping sauce.
  • + Excellent integration of the fiery glowing effect on both text and starburst.
  • The background is a bit muted compared to the prompt's 'dark, fiery' request.
  • The bottom bun is cut off slightly by the frame.

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the clear winner as it successfully rendered the complex 'exploded' composition requested, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a standard stacked burger. Recraft V4 Pro also followed the stylistic text instructions more accurately, including perfectly legible text and a fiery starburst, while FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] had a spelling error and ignored the exploded layout.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent authentic chalk texture with realistic smudging and pressure variations.
  • + Captures a cozy indoor framing with warm lighting.
  • + The handwriting looks genuinely human-made with natural slants.
  • Several spelling and repetition errors like 'Mashroom', 'Risoktso', and 'with with'.
  • The date specifically requested 'APRIL' is rendered as unreadable gibberish.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to the complex text string requirements with zero spelling errors.
  • + Beautiful chalkboard smudging and authentic environmental context of a cafe entrance.
  • + Highly legible and well-organized layout.
  • The font looks slightly too uniform, more like a digital chalk font than varying hand-lettering.
  • The bottom line of small text uses a very clean sans-serif that looks digitally overlaid rather than chalk-drawn.

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the clear winner due to its perfect spelling and full adherence to the menu items, despite the lettering looking a bit more like a font than unique handwriting. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] has superior artistic chalk textures and 'soul' in the handwriting, but it fails significantly on legibility and basic spelling, making it less useful for the specific prompt.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully followed the specific instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut
  • + Clear and clean visual render with good lighting on the suit
  • + Accurately depicts the surreal nature of the 'reversed' concept
  • The composition is a bit static with a plain background
  • The astronaut's hands and the integration with the horse could be more more dynamic

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Excellent cinematic atmosphere and background detail
  • + High-quality lighting and particle effects
  • + Strong sense of motion and scale
  • Failed the primary task constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse instead of vice versa
  • Falls into the cliche of 'astronaut on a horse' which the prompt explicitly tried to avoid

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner because it adhered to the difficult logic constraint of having the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, creating a truly surreal image as requested. Recraft V4 Pro produced a visually stunning and cinematic image, but it completely ignored the specific spatial instruction, defaulting to a standard horse-riding astronaut.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur and the jacket.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'bored' expression of the businesswoman in the background.
  • Failed to place both paws on the steering wheel, with one resting on the driver's lap.
  • The lighting inside the car is a bit flat compared to the exterior.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Successfully placed both paws on the steering wheel as requested.
  • + Fantastic cinematic composition with realistic rain on the windows and vibrant bokeh lights.
  • + The capybara's anatomy and posture feel more naturally integrated into the driver's seat.
  • The businesswoman's face is slightly less detailed and her expression less 'bored' than model A.

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro captures the prompt's requirements more completely, including the specific detail of both paws on the steering wheel and a more vivid Manhattan night atmosphere. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] has impressive texture work, Recraft V4 Pro provides a more dynamic and cinematically cohesive scene that better aligns with the requested layout.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Strong composition with a large, readable main title
  • + Includes the thorn border and twisted trees as requested
  • Text rendering is poor with significant spelling errors in the scroll and location
  • Lacks the atmospheric mood and 'cinematic lighting' requested in the prompt
  • Does not show the moody night sky

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Excellent text rendering with perfect spelling across all fields
  • + Highly cinematic lighting and atmospheric moody night sky
  • + Perfect adherence to the border (webs/thorns) and background elements (moon, bats, trees)
  • The layout places the main title below the pumpkin, which is slightly less traditional for a poster

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the clear winner as it followed every instruction, including complex text and atmospheric details, with perfect accuracy. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] suffered from significant spelling errors and failed to render the requested background atmosphere.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft, clay-like textures.
  • + Very clean, bold typography that is easy to read.
  • + Perfect adherence to the 45-degree isometric perspective and diorama base.
  • The flag icon is abstract and does not represent the Japanese flag.
  • Interpretation of sushi is slightly oversimplified, almost appearing like a toy.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + High-fidelity PBR textures with realistic rice grains and salmon marbling.
  • + Indicates the correct Japanese flag icon.
  • + Higher variety of sushi types within the scene.
  • The 'diorama base' is made of salt or ice, which looks a bit messy compared to the 'ultra-clean' request.
  • The text is smaller and has less visual impact than Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] captures the 'cartoon' and 'bold text' aspects of the prompt more effectively, creating a stylized and clean graphic. However, Recraft V4 Pro provides much better material realism (PBR) and correctly identifies the Japanese flag, making it the better choice for a more sophisticated 3D miniature look.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent dynamic lighting with a warm, joyful atmosphere
  • + Clean composition with good separation from the background
  • Failed to include the bunny and fox kit mentioned in the prompt
  • Animals have a slightly stylized 'plastic' look rather than true hyper-photorealism

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit
  • + Exceptional fur detail and photorealistic texture
  • + Successfully captured god rays and dew sparkles on the wildflowers
  • The fox kit has three ears, which is a significant anatomical artifact

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro followed the complex prompt much more accurately, including all four specific animal types whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] only included three. While Recraft V4 Pro suffered from a minor anatomical glitch on the fox, its superior texture, lighting, and prompt adherence make it the preferred choice for a complex multi-subject scene.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent typographic clarity and bold weight
  • + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic
  • + High contrast with a warm color palette
  • The 'Est. 1720' is not in a banner as requested
  • The cloche dome is very abstract and lacks representative detail

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Successfully includes the requested banner for 'Est. 1720'
  • + Elegant typography matches the vintage theme perfectly
  • + The cloche illustration includes steam and better detail while maintaining a logo feel
  • The 'Caffè' accent mark is slightly detached
  • Composition is a bit more complex, leaning slightly away from 'minimalist' compared to Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the clear winner as it followed every part of the prompt, including specific details like the banner and the cloche with steam. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a very clean and professional vector logo, it ignored the banner instruction and used a more generic typeface.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Recraft V4 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Follows the color palette closely with a navy background.
  • + Captures a stylized, abstract vector aesthetic.
  • Text is largely nonsensical and crowded.
  • The iconography is messy and does not clearly follow the requested steps.
  • Contains spelling errors in prominent titles like 'APOLO'.

Recraft V4 Pro

  • + Excellent adherence to all six requested steps with clear, matching icons.
  • + Perfect typography and text layout with no spelling errors.
  • + Clean, professional flat-vector aesthetic that follows the NASA palette perfectly.
  • The Saturn V rocket is slightly elongated/thin compared to real-world proportions.

Verdict: Recraft V4 Pro is the clear winner as it perfectly followed the complex multi-step instructions and provided legible, accurate text. In contrast, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] failed to provide readable text and the icons were chaotic and difficult to interpret.

Next steps

Explore each model