Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs HiDream I1 Full HiDream AI

Settled by community votes across 16 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

17.1 arena score

#54 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

HiDream I1 Full

15.2 arena score

#60 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

HiDream I1 Full

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 16

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent optical realism with a reflective mirror-like base inside the cube.
  • + Highly detailed textures on the book pages and the wooden table surface.
  • + Perfect adherence to spatial prompts, placing all elements exactly as described.
  • The plant in the background is slightly oversaturated compared to the rest of the scene.
  • The blue sphere appears a bit large, pushing the definition of 'small'.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Beautiful natural lighting and soft shadows on the wooden table.
  • + Accurately represents the 'small' scale of the blue sphere.
  • + Convincing glass refraction effects.
  • The blue sphere is floating unnaturally in the center of the cube.
  • The perspective of the cube is slightly skewed, looking less like a perfect cube.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more grounded and physically plausible image with superior texture work on the book and table. While HiDream I1 Full captured the soft lighting beautifully, it failed on physics by having the sphere float in mid-air, making FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] the more successful interpretation of the prompt.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent depiction of raining texture and wet pavement reflections.
  • + Realistic skin textures and clothing details.
  • + High technical clarity in foreground elements.
  • Composition feels very centered and posed, missing the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' requested.
  • Cars in the background are frozen rather than showing 'motion blur'.
  • The bicycle geometry is slightly warped near the pedals and chain.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Successfully captures a 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' feel requested in the prompt.
  • + Atmospheric lighting with deep reflections relative to the environment.
  • + Subject is actively engaged in 'repairing' rather than just holding the bike.
  • Significant anatomy/object merging: the man's leg is passing through the bicycle frame.
  • Low resolution and grainy quality on the subject's face.
  • The bicycle is disproportionately small for the man.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a much higher quality image with better skin textures and rain effects, though it ignored the 'imperfect framing' and 'motion blur' instructions. HiDream I1 Full captured the requested candid mood and street photography aesthetic better, but suffered from severe clipping issues where the man's leg incorrectly passes through the bike frame. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner for its superior technical execution and realistic rendering.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Natural skin texture and lighting
  • + Highly detailed and realistic engraving on the plate armor
  • + Clean composition with professional shallow depth of field
  • Missed the request for braided hair with beads
  • The 'battle-worn' scars and dirt are very minimal and look a bit like makeup

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'braided hair with beads' and 'dirt and scars' prompts
  • + Strong realization of the 'battle-worn' aesthetic
  • + Brilliant eyes and high-contrast armor textures
  • Over-sharpened image quality leading to some digital artifacts in the hair and facial textures
  • The torch in the background is slightly distracting and lacks the subtle lighting of Model A

Verdict: HiDream I1 Full followed the descriptive prompts much more closely, specifically capturing the braided hair, beads, and heavy battle damage that were missing or understated in FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]. However, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a much more photorealistic and naturally lit image, whereas HiDream I1 Full suffers from over-processing and excessive sharpening.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photo quality with vibrant, well-lit food photography.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'grid' layout requested in the prompt.
  • + Professional typography with varied font weights and clear sections.
  • The text content is mostly gibberish with several character artifacts.
  • Food items do not clearly represent the 'pizza' category mentioned.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Includes recognizable text for sections like 'APPETIZERS / PIZZA'.
  • + Follows a logical menu structure with price placeholders.
  • + Accurately represents the specific food categories requested.
  • Repetitive food photos, showing nearly the same pizza four times.
  • Composition is slightly unbalanced with uneven margins.
  • The 'grid' is less sophisticated and looks more like a basic template.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produces a much more visually appealing and professional design that aesthetic-wise feels like a real modern menu, despite the text being nonsensical. HiDream I1 Full follows the logical content of the prompt better by including pizza and organized categories, but it fails on the 'grid' variety by using nearly identical photos for every section.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully rendered the specific menu items requested in the prompt.
  • + Capture a realistic chalk texture with dusty edges and variations.
  • + Legible handwriting that follows a consistent menu structure.
  • Significant spelling errors throughout the text (e.g., 'Octpus', 'Mashroom', 'Risoktso').
  • The date at the top is obscured by garbled characters.
  • Repetition of words like 'with with' and redundant price markers.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Very clean aesthetic with a nice coffee cup illustration.
  • + The header text 'Today's Specials - April 30, 2026' is clear and well-formed.
  • + Consistent cursive style throughout the board.
  • Completely failed to follow the prompt's specific menu items (Truffle Mushroom Risotto, etc.).
  • All menu body text is unintelligible gibberish/placeholder text.
  • Prices and text are repetitive and nonsensical.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the textual instructions for the menu items, despite having several spelling and layout glitches. HiDream I1 Full ignored the requested content almost entirely, filling the board with gibberish words and repetitive prices, although its header and illustration were visually polished. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner for actually attempting the specific challenge requirements.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully followed the difficult spatial instruction of having the horse on top of the astronaut.
  • + High facial detail and clean rendering of the space suit.
  • + Great lighting and cinematic depth-of-field effect.
  • The positioning of the horse's legs is a bit anatomically ambiguous against the astronaut's back.
  • Missing a backpack/life support system on the suit.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Dynamic composition with a sense of movement.
  • + Excellent rendering of the earth and clouds in the background.
  • Failed the core prompt instruction by placing the astronaut on top of the horse.
  • Significant anatomical errors, including a fifth leg appearing near the horse's front.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the clear winner as it successfully interpreted the 'horse on top' reversal requested in the prompt, whereas HiDream I1 Full provided a standard 'astronaut riding horse' image. Additionally, HiDream I1 Full suffered from major anatomical defects, including an extra leg on the horse, while FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] remained coherent and high-quality.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur.
  • + Consistent lighting between the interior and exterior environments.
  • + The woman's expression perfectly captures the 'bored' instruction.
  • The capybara only has one paw on the steering wheel.
  • The capybara's head is slightly oversized and looks like a mask/suit.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Followed the instruction for both front paws on the steering wheel.
  • + Better cap design with clear 'TAXI' text.
  • + Good framing showing more of the car's exterior yellow color.
  • The composition places the capybara and woman side-by-side in the front, failing the 'back seat' instruction.
  • The human woman's hands and phone appear slightly distorted.
  • The capybara's fur texture looks slightly more synthetic compared to Model A.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more believable and high-quality image with superior lighting and texture, correctly placing the woman in the back seat as requested. While HiDream I1 Full followed the 'paws on wheel' instruction better, it failed the spatial requirement of having the passenger in the back, making the scene less coherent.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Strong cinematic lighting on the central jack-o-lantern.
  • + Captures the thorn border and twisted trees as requested.
  • + Most of the event details (date and time) are legible.
  • The text in the scroll banner and the location is garbled.
  • The layout feels slightly cramped with the large headline.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Excellent 'dark parchment' aesthetic and gothic typography.
  • + Correctly renders the phrase 'You are invited to a night of frights'.
  • + Balanced composition that incorporates all visual elements like webs and trees effectively.
  • Completely fails to render the specific date, time, and location details.
  • The main title is missing the word 'Invitation'.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the specific event details much better, but struggled with the secondary banner text and overall gothic atmosphere. HiDream I1 Full created a much more visually appealing and thematic invitation but failed significantly on the data-driven parts of the prompt like the date and location. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner for better overall adherence to the functional requirements of an invitation.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully added a full head of hair with realistic texture.
  • + Excellent preservation of the source background, clothing, and overall composition.
  • + Maintains the lighting and color grade of the original photo.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Added some hair length to the back of the head.
  • Completely failed to preserve the source image features, changing the face, glasses, and background.
  • Failed the primary instruction to add a full head of hair, leaving the top bald.
  • Introduced major artifacts, including a bizarre black object floating over the face.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the edit instructions perfectly, adding realistic hair while keeping the person's identity and environment intact. HiDream I1 Full failed on every metric, altering the entire image into a low-quality generation with significant artifacts and missing the core request of giving the person a full head of hair.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent text legibility and alignment
  • + Very clean, minimal 3D render style
  • + Accurate 45-degree isometric perspective
  • The flag icon is abstract and does not look like the Japanese flag
  • The sushi model is overly simplified compared to the rich detail requested
  • The layout feels a bit cramped due to large text size

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Beautifully detailed miniature 3D scene with varied sushi types
  • + Perfectly followed the diorama base requirement
  • + Sophisticated textures and materials on the sushi
  • Failed to include the requested flag icon
  • Text is somewhat smaller and less bold than requested
  • Missing 'at top-center' text positioning

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the text and icon instructions accurately but produced a very basic, singular sushi model. HiDream I1 Full created a much more visually appealing and professional-looking 3D miniature scene that fits the aesthetic of the prompt better, despite missing the small flag icon detail and having less prominent text. HiDream I1 Full is the likely winner for its superior visual quality and adherence to the 'miniature 3D cartoon scene' atmosphere.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Maintains the selfie perspective and clothing style of the original image.
  • + Successfully incorporates a TV and a dog into the caricature.
  • + Stylized comic-book aesthetic is vibrant and energetic.
  • Fails to include any hockey elements as requested.
  • The text 'JOB' is literal and lacks humor or integration.
  • Face geometry is somewhat distorted rather than intentionally caricatured.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Successfully includes all three themes: TV anchor (studio background), dog (shoulder), and hockey (game on the TV).
  • + The caricature style captures the subject's likeness while exaggerating features appropriately.
  • + High visual quality with clean lines and balanced composition.
  • The dog's placement on the shoulder looks slightly unnatural even for a caricature.
  • Lost the 'selfie' arm perspective from the original source image.

Verdict: HiDream I1 Full is the clear winner as it is the only model that followed the instructions to include all three requested elements (TV anchor, dog, and hockey). While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] maintained the original photo's composition better, it completely ignored the hockey requirement and provided a less polished caricature style.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Dynamic action with animals jumping and chasing
  • + Excellent lighting and depth of field
  • + Clean, high-resolution rendering of fur
  • Failed to include a rabbit or a fox kit
  • Included two cats instead of the diverse set of animals requested
  • Fur texture on the white animal looks slightly digital

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Successfully included the red fox kit and tabby kittens
  • + Vibrant colors and prominent 'god rays' lighting
  • + Soft, painterly aesthetic that fits the 'wholesome' vibe
  • Failed to include the baby bunny
  • Anatomy issues with the fox's leg placement
  • Lacks the 'tumbling' and 'chasing' action requested in the prompt

Verdict: HiDream I1 Full followed the animal variety requirements much better than FLUX.1 Kontext [dev], including a distinct fox and tabby kittens, although both missed the bunny. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more realistic and dynamic composition with better action, but it failed the primary prompt instruction to include four different animal types, instead rendering a pup and two kittens.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original image's composition and character poses
  • + Highly accurate translation of clothing details and colors into an anime medium
  • + Clean linework that maintains the exact structure of the street and background
  • Art style leans more toward generic modern anime than the specific painterly aesthetic of Studio Ghibli

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Better captures the whimsical Studio Ghibli artistic vibe with soft textures and character design
  • + Colors are warmer and reflect the nostalgic mood requested in the prompt
  • Significantly alters the source image, changing character identities and clothing completely
  • Loses the specific 'distracted boyfriend' meme posing and interaction that defines the source image

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the superior model for this image editing task because it perfectly preserves the iconic composition and poses of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme while translating it into an illustrated style. HiDream I1 Full captures the Ghibli aesthetic much better, but it fails as an edit by completely changing the recognizable elements and faces of the source image.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original source image elements.
  • + Subtle and realistic wind effect applied to the hair.
  • + Maintains the likeness of the woman and the dog perfectly.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Strongly emphasizes the 'energetic and lively' instruction.
  • + Dynamic use of flying leaves across the composition.
  • Completely fails to preserve the source image, removing the dog entirely and changing the woman's appearance.
  • The subject's hands and face are distorted compared to the original.
  • Unrealistic number of leaves for the background environment.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the editing instructions perfectly by adding wind to the hair and placing a few leaves in the air while keeping the woman and her dog exactly as they were in the original. In contrast, HiDream I1 Full failed as an image editor, generating a completely new image that removed the dog and changed the woman's face and pose, losing all consistency with the source.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Perfect text rendering for the main brand name
  • + Clean vector aesthetic
  • + High contrast and legible typography
  • Failed to include the requested banner for the 'Est. 1720' text
  • The 'cloche' looks more like a dome or a cupcake liner
  • Minimal texture variation

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Accurately followed the 'banner' prompt instruction
  • + Creative 'transparent' cloche effect showing a coffee cup
  • + Good use of warm brown tones and subtle paper texture background
  • Completely missed the main brand name 'Caffè Florian'
  • The cloche handle is slightly off-center
  • Typography in the banner is a bit generic

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a much more usable logo by correctly spelling the brand name with great legibility, though it missed the banner element. HiDream I1 Full followed layout instructions like the banner and cloche more literally but failed the primary task of including the restaurant's name. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is the winner for delivering a complete brand identity despite the minor missing decorative element.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
HiDream I1 Full

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully captures some of the specific text such as 'APOLO 11' (though misspelled) and 'DESCNT'.
  • + Follows the navy/red/white color palette guidelines well.
  • + The icon style is consistent across the different steps.
  • Contains significant spelling errors ('APOLO', 'TRANGULIITY') and gibberish text.
  • The icons are highly abstract and do not clearly represent the requested mission phases like Saturn V or the Lunar Module.
  • Failed to correctly number or order the requested steps.

HiDream I1 Full

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'Saturn V' and 'Earth' iconography requests.
  • + Properly spelled 'APOLLO' and captures the flat-vector, clean infographic aesthetic much better than the competitor.
  • + Sophisticated composition with a clear central focal point and balanced side elements.
  • Failed to include all six requested steps, stopping after the initial few stages.
  • Includes some meta-text in labels (e.g., '+ ICON', '+ UNG') suggesting it misinterpreted the prompt's instructions as text to be rendered.
  • The central rocket design resembles a space shuttle more than a Saturn V.

Verdict: HiDream I1 Full is the clear winner as it provides a professional-grade vector illustration that actually looks like an infographic, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced messy, abstract icons and significant text hallucinations. While HiDream I1 Full failed to include all six steps requested, its visual quality and adherence to the NASA-inspired aesthetic are vastly superior.

Next steps

Explore each model