Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs Nano Banana 2 Google

Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

17.2 arena score

#54 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Nano Banana 2

28.4 arena score

#1 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Best Text-to-Image right now Top 2 in Image Editing
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana 2

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 17

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with natural window light.
  • + High photographic realism in textures and materials.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'partially visible through the glass' requirement.
  • The sphere is slightly large for the scale of the small cube.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Adds creative detail with readable text on the book spine.
  • + Good spatial arrangement of the plant behind the cube.
  • + Accurate rendering of the wooden table texture.
  • The glass cube appears more like a fish tank with a frame rather than a solid glass object.
  • The red book appears to be floating slightly above the glass surface.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a more aesthetically pleasing and physically coherent image with superior lighting and material properties. While Nano Banana 2 added a creative touch with the book title, it suffered from minor depth issues and a less convincing glass material.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent character rendering with realistic skin textures.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'red bicycle' requirement.
  • + Clear and aesthetically pleasing rainy day reflections.
  • Fails the prompt's action; the man is sitting on/walking the bike rather than repairing it.
  • The bicycle's anatomy is logically flawed with the frame passing through the man's leg.
  • Missing the requested motion blur from passing cars.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'repairing' action with tools and mechanical detail.
  • + Authentic urban Japanese setting with relevant signage and atmosphere.
  • + Highly realistic, candid street photography aesthetic with imperfect framing.
  • The man's right hand and the wrench are slightly distorted.
  • The motion blur on the passing car is subtle, though it does exist.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 captures the essence of the prompt much more effectively, showing a man actually performing a repair with tools in a realistic street setting. In contrast, FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produces a higher resolution image but fails significantly on the primary action and contains a major physical clipping error where the bike frame disappears into the subject's leg.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Strong cinematic lighting with warm torchlight highlights
  • + High-quality engraving detail on the pauldrons
  • Failed to include the requested hair braids and beads
  • The skin looks too clean for a "battle-worn" character with only a small face mark

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt details including braids, beads, and heavy dirt/scars
  • + Superior texture rendering on the leather straps, mail, and quilted underlayers
  • + Realistic depth of field with visible sparks and background torches
  • The sword hilt and hand are slightly crowded in the composition
  • Fewer bokeh circles compared to Model A, though sparks are more prevalent

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it captured every specific detail of the prompt, including the braided hair with beads and the gritty, battle-worn appearance. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a clean, cinematic portrait, it missed several key descriptive requirements like the braids and the intense dirt textures.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent visual quality and high-resolution textures in the food photography.
  • + Bold, experimental composition that feels high-end and modern.
  • + Good use of vibrant colors and clean negative space.
  • Text is mostly gibberish and poorly rendered.
  • The layout lacks the organizational structure of a functional menu.
  • No clear distinction between the requested sections for pizza or mains.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly accurate text rendering with legible items and prices.
  • + Perfect adherence to the requested categorization of Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.
  • + Effective grid layout that maintains a clean, professional aesthetic.
  • The food photography looks somewhat more generic/stock-like compared to Model A.
  • Slightly less 'bold' in its artistic interpretation of minimalism.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it functions as a real-world menu design, featuring legible text, organized categories, and a professional layout. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced higher-quality food photography but failed significantly on text rendering and menu organization, resulting in a abstract layout rather than a usable design.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent photographic rendering of the burger Patty and vegetables.
  • + Clean typography that is easily readable.
  • + Effective lighting on the charcoal and fire background.
  • Failed the main structural prompt of an 'exploded' burger; the components are stacked.
  • Minor typo in secondary text ('LINHLY' instead of 'ONLY').
  • The starburst is a flat graphic that doesn't match the 3D realism of the burger.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly followed the 'exploded' and 'suspended in mid-air' instruction.
  • + Exceptional integration of the fiery, glowing effect on both text and background.
  • + Dynamic composition with sauce splashes and flying embers that creates a sense of motion.
  • The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is slightly less fire-themed than the main title.
  • The price tag starburst is a bit jagged in its rendering.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully rendered the complex 'exploded burger' composition requested in the prompt, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a standard stacked burger. Nano Banana 2 also followed all text instructions with perfect spelling and superior atmospheric effects, creating a much more dynamic and cohesive advertisement.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent chalk texture on the 'Today Specials' header.
  • + Clean composition with a realistic wooden frame.
  • + Followed the prompt to include additional footer text.
  • Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items such as 'Mashroom', 'Risoktso', and 'Octpus'.
  • Repeated words and messy overlapping characters in the pricing section.
  • Failed to render the month 'April' correctly, producing illegible characters instead.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Flawless spelling and adherence to the requested text for all menu items.
  • + Superior environmental storytelling, showing the chalkboard within a cozy café as requested.
  • + Realistic chalk smudge effects and chalk pieces resting on the easel ledge.
  • The cursive in the title is a bit modern rather than 'elegant cursive', though still readable.
  • The chalk texture on the text itself is slightly cleaner/sharper than real chalk might be.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it followed all textual instructions perfectly without any spelling errors, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] suffered from numerous typos and illegible text segments. Nano Banana 2 also provided the requested 'cozy café' background, while FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] only showed the board against a plain wall.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent anatomical rendering of both horse and human.
  • + Clean, cinematic lighting and high resolution.
  • + Follows the prompt literally with the horse sitting on top of the astronaut.
  • The composition is a bit stiff and the astronaut appears to be wearing work boots instead of space boots.
  • The background is relatively empty compared to the 'cinematic' request.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Dynamic and highly creative composition with a beautiful galactic background.
  • + The iridescent coat on the horse adds to the 'surreal' quality requested.
  • + Stronger cinematic feel and usage of light.
  • The prompt requested the horse riding the astronaut, but this depicts the astronaut hanging from the side/bottom of the horse.
  • Some anatomical confusion where the astronaut's legs and the horse's harness merge.

Verdict: FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] followed the specific spatial instruction of 'horse on top' much more accurately, resulting in a humorous and surreal image as requested. While Nano Banana 2 produced a more visually stunning and vibrant space scene, it failed the core premise of the prompt by having the astronaut effectively clinging to the underside of the horse rather than being ridden by it.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara.
  • + The woman's expression perfectly matches the 'bored and normal' instruction.
  • Failed the instruction to put both paws on the steering wheel.
  • The cap is a baseball cap rather than a traditional taxi driver cap.
  • The interior lacks specific taxi details like a meter or license.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully placed both paws on the steering wheel.
  • + Includes excellent environmental details like the fare meter, partition, and a custom 'Captain Cappy' license.
  • + The composition provides a much better sense of being inside an actual NYC taxi.
  • The cap is black/dark instead of the requested yellow.
  • The capybara's face is slightly less photorealistic compared to Model A.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the superior choice because it includes essential taxi-specific details like the fare meter and the partition, and accurately depicts the capybara with both paws on the wheel. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] has slightly better lighting on the subjects, it fails several specific prompt instructions and feels more like a standard car than a New York taxi.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully renders the large title text clearly.
  • + The central jack-o-lantern has high-contrast, glowing lighting.
  • Significant spelling and rendering errors in the scroll banner and location text.
  • Lacks the requested 'dark parchment' aesthetic, using a plain black background instead.
  • The composition is sparse and lacks the 'cinematic' depth requested.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'vintage gothic' and 'parchment' aesthetic with rich textures.
  • + Flawless text rendering across the title, scroll, and event details.
  • + Highly detailed composition including the requested webs, thorns, twisted trees, and moody sky.
  • The jack-o-lantern is slightly smaller in favor of overall scene details.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it perfectly captures the vintage gothic aesthetic and follows every prompt instruction, including the complex text and parchment texture. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] fails to handle the smaller text strings and lacks the artistic depth of a gothic invitation, resulting in a much simpler graphic.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully added thick hair that adheres to the prompt's density request.
  • + Maintains the general color palette and environment of the source.
  • Failed to preserve facial features, significantly altering the man's eyes and nose structure.
  • The added hair looks somewhat 'wig-like' and smoothed over compared to the rugged grain of the original image.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent source preservation, keeping the man's facial features and glasses identical to the source.
  • + Hair texture and color blend perfectly with the existing beard and the image's lighting/film grain.
  • The hairline transition on the forehead is slightly soft.
  • The volume of hair is a bit more conservative than the 'full, thick' request might imply.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner because it successfully applied the requested edit while perfectly preserving the identity of the person in the source image. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] added significantly more hair but failed the primary editing task of preserving facial features, resulting in a different-looking person.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent 3D cartoon style with soft, clay-like textures.
  • + Very clean and bold typography.
  • + Perfect adherence to the simple diorama and isometric request.
  • The flag icon is interpreted as an abstract shape rather than a Japanese flag.
  • The sushi illustration is overly simplified compared to the provided prompt's detail cues.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Outstanding material detail with realistic PBR textures on the fish and wood.
  • + Accurate Japanese flag icon and excellent typographic layout.
  • + Includes complex details like wood grain, moss, and various sushi types while maintaining an isometric look.
  • Slightly less 'cartoon' than requested, leaning more toward realistic miniature.
  • The lighting is a bit harsh on the top-right sushi pieces.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the prompt's technical requirements much more closely, including a correct flag icon, a diverse range of sushi, and highly realistic PBR materials. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] captured the 'cartoon' aesthetic well, its lack of detail and failure to render a recognizable flag makes it a less comprehensive response.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully converts the image into a bold, comic-book style illustration.
  • + Preserves the subject's clothing and basic facial features well.
  • + Includes a TV screen to represent the anchor job.
  • Completely misses the hockey component of the prompt.
  • The 'dog' is a very generic cartoon character rather than a caricature style.
  • Text in the image is nonsensical or irrelevant ('JOB', 'BEER?').

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements, including hockey and dogs.
  • + Captures the essence of a traditional hand-drawn caricature very effectively.
  • + Highly creative integration of themes, such as the 'W-K9 News' microphone and the dog in a jersey.
  • The facial exaggeration is quite extreme, bordering on a different person.
  • The hand holding the drawing is slightly messy near the thumb area.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully incorporated every element of the prompt (TV anchor, dogs, and hockey) into a cohesive and humorous caricature. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced a clean comic-style image but failed to include the hockey theme and had less creative details overall.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Strong bokeh and lighting effects
  • + Adorable character expressions
  • Failed to include the rabbit and fox kit
  • Included two kittens instead of a variety of animals
  • Butterflies look a bit like stickers against the light

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to all entities in the prompt including puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
  • + Beautiful interpretation of 'god rays' and morning dew
  • + Rich variety in wildflower colors and types
  • The fox kit has a slightly dark and unusual paw position
  • The puppy's tail has a slightly strange curve

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully included all four requested baby animals, whereas FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] failed to generate the bunny and fox kit. Nano Banana 2 also provided better environmental detail, capturing the dew sparkles and lush meadow variety more effectively.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the original subjects' poses and expressions
  • + Clean, high-resolution line work
  • + Accurately recreates the modern street background from the source image
  • Style is more generic modern anime than the requested Studio Ghibli style
  • Colors are a bit too saturated and lack the 'soft pastel' watercolor feel

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli 'hand-painted' watercolor aesthetic
  • + Excellent use of soft pastel colors and dreamy, nostalgic lighting
  • + Creative transformation of the background into a charming European-style village
  • Facial features are slightly less sharp than Model A
  • The man's expression is slightly altered to look more worried than wandering-eyed

Verdict: While both models successfully translated the iconic meme into an illustration, Nano Banana 2 adhered much better to the specific 'Studio Ghibli' style request with its watercolor textures and soft color palette. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] preserved the source image details more accurately but resulted in a more standard digital anime look that missed the intended nostalgic mood.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Before After
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original features.
  • + Subtle and natural-looking hair movement that fits the environment.
  • + Correctly adds small leaves as requested in the instructions.
  • The dynamic movement is quite minimal and lacks the 'energetic' feel requested.
  • One of the added leaves appears to be floating unnaturally between the subject's head and the background.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Strong adherence to the 'energetic and lively' instruction with significant hair motion.
  • + Large, varied leaves add a clear sense of depth and wind direction.
  • + The adjustment of the facial expression to a more open smile enhances the lively feel.
  • Significantly alters the woman's face (nose and mouth shape), failing to preserve the source identity.
  • Some leaves appear slightly blurred or low-resolution compared to the rest of the scene.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the creative directives for dynamic movement and energetic feel more successfully, but it significantly changed the subject's facial features. FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] maintained perfect source preservation but the resulting 'motion' is very stagnant and barely noticeable compared to the original. Nano Banana 2 is the better choice for a motion-based edit despite the lack of perfect identity preservation.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Excellent text clarity and spelling
  • + Very clean, minimalist vector aesthetic
  • Missed the requested banner element
  • Missing the requested background texture

Nano Banana 2

  • + Followed all prompt details including the banner and background texture
  • + Beautiful vintage illustration style with high-quality cross-hatching
  • + Dynamic composition within the circle emblem
  • Minor spelling error in the main name ('CAFFÈ' has an extra character line or stroke issue)
  • The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly distorted on the banner

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 followed the complex prompt instructions much more closely, including the specific banner and textured background. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] produced cleaner typography, it ignored several key stylistic requirements, making Nano Banana 2 the better overall interpretation of the vintage emblem request.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

  • + Successfully used a navy background to capture the NASA-inspired palette.
  • + Included the requested number of steps for the mission.
  • Text is largely illegible and contains numerous spelling errors (e.g., 'APOLO').
  • The iconography is abstract and lacks the specific details requested in the prompt.
  • The layout is cluttered and does not follow a clean, modern vector aesthetic.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to the clean, flat-vector style with crisp, professional lines.
  • + Correctly interpreted and visualized every step of the mission with appropriate iconography.
  • + Included high-quality, legible typography and relevant extra details like the crew names.
  • Missed the navy blue background, opting for a light gray/white main canvas instead.
  • Included a fourth unidentified figure in the crew section which is historically inaccurate.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner for its superior visual clarity, professional vector execution, and near-perfect adherence to the complex multi-step prompt. While FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] captured the dark color palette better, its illegible text and confusing iconography make it ineffective as an infographic, whereas Nano Banana 2 created a cohesive, educational, and aesthetically pleasing design.

Next steps

Explore each model