FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a clear soft window light from the left
• + Realistic texture on the wooden table and leather-bound book
• + Consistent reflections within the glass and on the bottom surface

• − The glass box lacks a front face, appearing more like a frame or open shelter than a 'cube'
• − The plant behind the glass is quite blurry, reducing the 'visible through' effect

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Perfect structural representation of a glass cube with visible edges and faces
• + High-quality text rendering on the book's spine
• + Clearly demonstrates the plant visible through the glass panels

• − The sphere is levitating rather than sitting on the surface, which may not be physically intuitive
• − The lighting is more diffused and less directed from the left compared to the other model

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent skin texture and facial details
• + Accurate depiction of rain droplets and atmospheric haze
• + Strong composition with a centered, engaging subject

• − The subject is posing with the bike rather than 'repairing' it
• − The framing is very clean and centered, missing the 'imperfect framing' request
• − Background cars are static rather than showing motion blur

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Successfully handles the 'motion blur from passing cars' request
• + The subject's pose better reflects the 'repairing' aspect of the prompt
• + Captures the 'candid street photo' feel with more authentic urban movement

• − The bicycle frame geometry is slightly warped near the pedals
• − The rain effect is much less visible compared to Model A
• − The skin texture is slightly smoother and less detailed than Model A

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent handling of the cinematic lighting and bokeh sparks.
• + High detail on the ornate engraving of the plate armor.
• + Clear skin textures including requested scars and dirt.

• − The hair lacks the specific 'braids with small beads' requested in the prompt.
• − The leather straps are barely visible in the composition.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image is a complete failure, resulting in a solid black frame.
• − Total lack of prompt adherence or visual information.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent high-resolution food photography that looks appetizing and professional.
• + Clean, modern grid layout that perfectly balances text and imagery.
• + Strong adherence to the 'bold sans-serif' requirement with high-impact typography.

• − Text consists of gibberish words and non-existent characters.
• − The food items depicted do not clearly align with the 'pizza' or 'mains' labels.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Includes realistic pricing and structured menu content with correct category headers like 'Appetizers' and 'Mains'.
• + Successful presentation of the menu as a physical object with a realistic perspective mockup.
• + Good use of vibrant accents and icons for a casual dining feel.

• − The food photos look overly cluttered and repetitive, featuring mostly pizza despite other section labels.
• − Text rendering has several spelling errors like 'Pizzzans' and 'Appet Love'.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent typography rendering for the main title
• + Clean, professional-looking fire and coal assets

• − Failed to create an 'exploded' burger, showing a fully assembled one instead
• − Typographical error in 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' (spelled 'LNHLY')

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Successfully followed the 'exploded burger' and 'motion' prompt requirements
• + Perfect spelling for all text elements
• + Dynamic composition with flying ingredients adds to the sense of action

• − Text size for the secondary message is very small compared to the main title
• − Slightly less 'fiery/glowing' effect on the price text compared to the title

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent chalk texture and realistic handwriting aesthetic.
• + Centered composition on a clean chalkboard frame.

• − Numerous spelling errors like 'Mashroom' and 'Risoktso'.
• − The date text 'APRIL' is mangled and illegible.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Accurately renders the date 'APRIL 30, 2026' in clear handwriting.
• + Better context with the cafe background visible in the reflection/sides.

• − Repeats words frequently like 'mushroomm', 'fresh fresh', and 'Cookies'.
• − The bottom half of the menu becomes cluttered with repetitive, nonsensical text strings.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Successfully followed the specific instruction of having the horse on top of the astronaut.
• + High facial detail and realistic skin texture on the human.

• − The 'riding' stance is a bit ambiguous, appearing more like the horse is floating directly behind and slightly above.
• − The background is quite empty and lacks the cinematic quality of the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Superior cinematic composition with dynamic lighting and high-quality planet details.
• + Extremely high level of background detail including multiple space objects and atmosphere.

• − Failed the negative constraint/specific instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse, not the other way around.
• − The astronaut's anatomy and gear show minor clipping with the horse's back.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent adherence to the composition prompt by placing the woman in the back seat.
• + Accurately represents the businessman's bored expression while looking at her phone.
• + High-quality fur texture and capybara facial expression.

• − The capybara only has one paw on the steering wheel instead of two.
• − The lighting on the capybara's head is slightly flat compared to the background city lights.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Beautiful cinematic lighting and highly realistic city bokeh through the window.
• + Correctly places both paws on the steering wheel as requested in the prompt.
• + Crisp text rendering of the word 'TAXI' on the cap.

• − Failed the spatial part of the prompt by placing the passenger in the front passenger seat.
• − The passenger is looking at her phone with two hands on the dashboard/wheel area, which is ergonomically confusing.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent typography for the main title and event dates
• + Effective spooky thorn border and jack-o-lantern illustration
• + High contrast with a clean layout suitable for a digital invite

• − Text in the scroll banner is garbled and unreadable
• − Failed to incorporate the 'parchment' texture, opting for a flat black background
• − Location text is misspelled as 'The Argiiah's'

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Beautiful parchment scroll texture and lighting that fits the 'cinematic' prompt
• + Accurate rendering of the secondary scroll banner text and all event details
• + Highly intricate background featuring twisted trees and a moody sky

• − Included a redundant and slightly misspelled line of text below the banner
• − Main title text omitted the word 'Party'
• − Overall design is a bit crowded compared to Model A

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent text readability and bold typography
• + Very clean, minimalist aesthetic
• + Solid bold colors that pop against the background

• − The flag icon is stylized incorrectly as a geometric shape rather than the Japanese flag
• − Text textures are flat and lack the requested 3D cartoon depth
• − The sushi anatomy is slightly nonsensical with the nori wrapping

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + High-quality miniature 3D rendered textures with realistic lighting
• + Correct depiction of the Japanese flag alongside legible text
• + Detailed sushi variety on a well-composed diorama base

• − Includes more garnish and elements than the 'minimal' request specified
• − Small bug artifact visible on the wooden plate
• − Text is slightly less prominent than the bold style requested

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Captures a sense of motion and playfulness
• + Excellent lighting and depth of field
• + Clean, high-resolution textures on the flowers and fur

• − Failed to include all four animal types requested
• − Includes two cats instead of a fox and a bunny
• − The 'tumble' looks more like a synchronized run

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Successfully included all four distinct animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit
• + Beautifully rendered god rays and soft morning atmosphere
• + High detail in the fur and 'big expressive eyes' characteristic

• − Animals are sitting relatively still rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling'
• − The anatomy is slightly stylized/painterly rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent typography accuracy with the name and date
• + Clean minimalist vector style
• + Perfect adherence to the requested color palette

• − Missing the 'banner' element specified in the prompt
• − Steam effect is very basic and looks slightly detached
• − The cloche icon looks more like a cupcake or a crown

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Sophisticated vintage visual aesthetic
• + Included the banner element requested in the prompt
• + Superior shading and texture details

• − Misspelled 'Florian' as 'Framilian'
• − Less minimalist than Image A
• − The cloche looks a bit like a dome/building

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Strongly adheres to the requested color palette
• + Good vector-style flat icons
• + Accurate spelling of 'Apollo' (mostly)

• − Text is highly garbled and messy throughout the bottom half
• − Layout is unorganized and hard to follow as a mission sequence
• − Poor font rendering makes it look like a placeholder

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent layout that uses the lunar surface as a stylistic base
• + Strict adherence to the 6-step sequence including specific requested icons
• + High visual appeal and professional infographic composition

• − Text contains several gibberish phrases and typos in headers
• − Includes some orange tones that weren't in the requested NASA palette