FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent surface reflections consistent with window light
• + Vibrant colors and high-quality textures
• + Correctly identifies the blue sphere inside the cube

• − The glass cube lacks a back wall, appearing more like a glass stand or a three-sided frame

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfectly rendered glass cube with clear edges and corners
• + Sophisticated depth of field and realistic lighting
• + High level of detail on the book spine and table wood grain

• − The blue sphere is significantly smaller than Model A, though still within prompt parameters

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Good clarity on the subject's face
• + Correct colors and atmospheric lighting for a rainy city
• + High resolution with clean details on the bicycle frame

• − Subject is just standing with the bike rather than repairing it
• − Composition feels less like a candid street photo and more like a centered portrait
• − Cars in the background lack motion blur

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to the 'repairing' action with realistic posture
• + Successfully captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' feel requested
• + Stronger visual storytelling with the puddle ripples and motion-blurred vehicle

• − The transition between the man's arm and the bicycle gears is a bit muddled
• − The bicycle's rear wheel and chain assembly have some anatomical inaccuracies

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent engraving detail on the plate armor
• + Strong use of rim lighting and warm tones
• + Clean, cinematic composition

• − Missed the request for hair braided with beads
• − Skin appears too clean for a 'battle-worn' description
• − Metal looks slightly matte/plastic rather than reflective

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to specific details like braided hair with beads
• + Convincing battle-worn appearance with realistic scars and dirt
• + Superior texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer

• − Armor engravings are slightly less sharp than Model A
• − The torch in the background is a bit distracting

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent photographic quality and food lighting
• + Clean, high-end editorial layout style
• + Beautifully sharp textures in the food images

• − Nonsense text and typography fail to create a functional menu structure
• − The grid feels more like a portfolio than a restaurant menu
• − Does not clearly label sections like appetizers/pizza/mains

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Strict adherence to the requested menu structure including specific sections
• + Logical layout with item names and price points
• + Better use of vibrant color accents to differentiate categories

• − The food photos are small and lack the detail of the other model
• − Several spelling errors in headings such as MINS for Mains
• − Low resolution feel to the secondary text and price tags

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent typography rendering for the 'MAGIC BURGER' title
• + High visual contrast with the coal and fire elements

• − Completely failed the 'exploded burger' requirement, showing a fully assembled burger
• − Text error in the secondary message rendering as 'LNHLY'
• − Graphic style feels more like a 2D illustration than a photorealistic ad

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfectly followed the prompt for an 'exploded' burger with suspended components
• + Text and price starburst feature the requested fiery, glowing effect
• + Higher level of photorealistic detail and sense of motion

• − The top bun looks slightly isolated from the rest of the dynamic elements

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent chalk texture and weight on the title
• + Clear, legible handwriting style

• − Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items such as 'Mashroom' and 'Risoktso'
• − Failed the 'April' text prompt, rendering garbled characters instead
• − Included repetitive text like 'with with' and duplicated prices

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect spelling and prompt adherence for all menu items and dates
• + Beautiful aesthetic with a realistic slate-style chalkboard and cafe background
• + Excellent elegant cursive style as requested in the title
• + Consistent chalk texture and believable handwriting variations

• − Slightly tight margins on the right side of the board

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent anatomical rendering of the horse and the astronaut's face.
• + High clarity and clean, cinematic lighting.
• + Followed the prompt better by placing the horse on the astronaut's back.

• − The composition is a bit static with a very plain black background.
• − The 'riding' aspect is slightly ambiguous, looking more like the horse is standing behind him.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Highly detailed backgrounds with galaxies and a realistic Earth.
• + Dynamic sense of movement in the horse's mane and tail.
• + Great overall cinematic atmosphere.

• − Significant anatomy error with a multiple-bodied or nested horse structure.
• − Failed to correctly interpret 'horse on top' of the astronaut, instead placing the horse alongside/behind.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + The capybara's expression is very professional and human-like as requested.
• + Good lighting on the subject's fur and the yellow hat.

• − Only one front paw is on the steering wheel while the other rests on its lap.
• − The businesswoman looks concerned/staring rather than bored and looking at her phone.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the instruction of having both front paws on the steering wheel.
• + The background cityscape is more vibrant and accurately represents a New York night scene.
• + The businesswoman's posture and behavior perfectly match the 'bored and looking at phone' description.

• − The capybara's head shape is slightly more distorted compared to a real capybara's profile.
• − The lighting inside the car is a bit bright for a night scene.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent typography style for the main title
• + High-contrast glowing jack-o-lantern

• − Several spelling errors in the scroll banner and location text
• − Background is a flat black rather than the requested moody night sky and parchment texture
• − Composition feels cramped and lacks cinematic lighting

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested details including addresses and dates
• + Beautiful cinematic atmosphere with moody sky, fog, and moon
• + Accurately captures the 'dark parchment' and 'spooky border' requirements

• − The jack-o-lantern face is slightly generic compared to Model A

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Successfully added thick hair that blends well with the existing beard color.
• + Maintained the exact pose and framing of the original image.

• − Significantly altered the facial features and glasses, making the subject look like a different person.
• − The hairline and hair texture look slightly artificial and 'photoshopped' compared to the beard.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent preservation of the original facial identity and eyewear.
• + The hair texture and lighting match the environment and original image perfectly.
• + Maintained the original skin texture and facial details while applying the edit.

• − The hairline on the forehead is a bit high and messy, though it fits the 'natural' request.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent soft 3D cartoon textures
• + Clean typography and layout
• + Adheres well to the simple diorama base request

• − The flag icon is stylized incorrectly and does not resemble the Japanese flag
• − The sushi itself is very abstract and lacks variety

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Includes an accurate Japanese flag icon
• + Higher detail in the sushi models while maintaining the cartoon aesthetic
• + Better implementation of the 'small raised diorama' request

• − The 'JAPAN' text is slightly thinner than requested but still bold

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Successfully translates the subject's features into a bold comic-book style caricature.
• + Incorporates a dog and a television set to represent the requested profession.

• − Completely misses the 'hockey' requirement of the prompt.
• − The 'JOB' text and other graphic elements are somewhat clunky and poorly integrated.
• − Distorts the hand and bottom right corner with visual artifacts.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements including the TV anchor profession, multiple dogs, and hockey sticks/pucks.
• + High-quality, polished digital illustration style with a clear caricature aesthetic.
• + Cleverly integrates the different themes into a cohesive news desk set.

• − The facial likeness is a bit more generic/Disney-fied compared to the source image's specific features.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Energetic composition that captures the requested movement and chase.
• + Bright, vibrant color palette with warm lighting.

• − Failed to include the baby bunny and red fox kit entirely.
• − Included two kittens instead of the specific animal variety requested.
• − Anatomical issues with the center kitten's paws and posture.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent prompt adherence including all four specific animals: retriever, kitten, bunny, and fox.
• + Beautifully detailed fur textures and expressive eye rendering.
• + Superior lighting with soft god rays and atmospheric dew sparkles.

• − Static composition feels more like a staged portrait than a 'playfully chasing' scene.
• − The fox's front leg anatomy is slightly obscured/blended into the grass.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the source composition and character poses
• + Clean line work and vibrant colors
• + Matches the specific structural details of the characters' clothing and hair very closely

• − Style leans more towards modern generic anime than the requested Studio Ghibli aesthetic
• − Lighting is flat and lacks the 'dreamy' quality requested

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli aesthetic with watercolor textures and soft pastel tones
• + Adds beautiful background details like the red bus and signs that enhance the nostalgic mood
• + Achieves the 'hand-painted' look much more effectively

• − Slight loss of facial likeness compared to the source image
• − Some minor blending artifacts in the lower-left corner textures

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the source image's background, dog, and person's appearance.
• + Realistic, subtle hair movement that looks natural for a light breeze.

• − The 'flying leaves' are barely noticeable and very small.
• − Fails to capture the 'energetic and lively' feel requested in the prompt.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Strong adherence to the 'energetic' and 'lively' aspects of the prompt with significant hair movement.
• + Clearly visible flying leaves that add depth and a sense of motion.

• − The leaves appear unnaturally sharp and overlaid rather than having motion blur.
• − Significant change to the jacket/clothing structure compared to the source image.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Perfect text rendering with correct accents
• + Clean minimalist vector aesthetic
• + Strong contrast that works well for branding

• − Missed the 'banner' element for the date
• − Iconography is very simple, almost abstract
• − Lacks the 'vintage' texture requested in the prompt

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Sophisticated vintage aesthetic with excellent cross-hatch shading
• + Accurately included the requested banner and steam elements
• + Superior textures and color palette that feels historically appropriate

• − Minor text alignment issue with the accent mark over the E
• − The cloche is Slightly off-center within the circular frame

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Follows the navy and red color palette accurately.
• + Attempts to include all specific keywords mentioned in the prompt.

• − The infographic structure is chaotic and lacks a logical flow.
• − Text rendering is poor with significant spelling errors and garbled characters.
• − The icons are abstract and don't clearly represent the requested objects like the Saturn V.

FLUX.2 [pro]

• + Excellent infographic layout with a clear, logical vertical flow.
• + High-quality vector illustrations that clearly represent the Saturn V, Lunar Module, and planetary orbits.
• + Clean typography and professional adherence to the flat-vector style.

• − Small amount of gibberish text in the smaller descriptions.
• − The 'Earth Orbit' step shows two Earths, which is slightly confusing.