FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs vs FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent photographic realism and lighting
• + Captures the interaction of light through glass and reflections beautifully
• + Follows all spatial instructions perfectly

• − The sphere is quite large relative to the 'small' descriptor in the prompt

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Accurately depicts a 'small' sphere as requested
• + Clean and minimalist composition with accurate objects
• + Good adherence to the background plant requirement

• − The sphere appears to be floating unnaturally within the cube
• − The lighting is flatter and less dynamic than the other model

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent handling of reflections on the wet pavement
• + Sharp and clear details on the bicycle frame and wheels
• + Successful inclusion of rain as a visible weather element

• − The subject appears to be sitting/posing rather than 'repairing' the bike
• − The composition feels center-weighted and artificial, lacking the requested 'imperfect' framing
• − No visible motion blur from the cars in the background

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Realistic candid composition with the requested imperfect framing
• + Natural skin textures and lighting that feel authentically photographic
• + Captures the intent of 'repairing' or adjusting the bike better than the pose in A

• − The bike's handlebars and cables are a bit nonsensical in their construction
• − The rain effect is subtle and looks slightly more like a filter than atmospheric depth
• − Lacks significant motion blur for the passing cars

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent high-contrast dramatic lighting with strong rim light
• + Intricate engraving on the breastplate follows the form of the armor
• + Vibrant bokeh and spark effects that create a sense of environment

• − Missed the prompt instruction for braided hair and beads
• − The armor material looks slightly like bronze or painted plastic rather than steel

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully incorporated the braided hair and bead details from the prompt
• + Highly realistic skin texture with lifelike eyes and subtle scarring
• + Exceptional material definition on the leather straps and woven cloth underlayer

• − The lighting is a bit flatter and less dramatic than image A

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Features a high density of food photography in a modern grid.
• + Uses bold sans-serif typography that feels contemporary.
• + Vibrant food colors pop against the clean white background.

• − Text consists of gibberish characters and symbols.
• − Layout is slightly cluttered and lacks clear price information.
• − The food sections are poorly defined and hard to distinguish.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Excellent layout that clearly delineates appetizers, pizza, and mains.
• + Includes semi-legible pricing and descriptions which enhances realism.
• + Follows the minimalist prompt with clean lines and balanced whitespace.

• − The 'Pizza' photo is inaccurately placed next to the 'Mains' section.
• − Fewer food photos compared to the 'grid' request in the prompt.
• − Contains minor text spelling errors typical of AI.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Clean text rendering for the main title and starburst element.
• + Good use of the coals and fire at the bottom for lighting and atmosphere.
• + Strong color contrast between the burger and the dark background.

• − Failed to produce an 'exploded' burger, showing a fully assembled one instead.
• − Contains a spelling error in 'ONLY', rendered as 'LNHLY'.
• − The lighting on the burger feels a bit flat compared to the fiery surroundings.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully attempted the deconstructed/exploded look with suspended components and dripping sauce.
• + Excellent fiery typography that matches the prompt's aesthetic perfectly.
• + Superior lighting and texture on the burger ingredients, creating a more professional ad feel.

• − Included the price twice, cluttering the composition.
• − Missed the 'starburst' requirement for the price tag.
• − The suspension of ingredients is relatively subtle compared to a full 'exploded' view.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Features a very authentic chalk texture with variations in stroke thickness.
• + Correctly interprets the 'elegant cursive' request for parts of the text.
• + Captures the cozy café aesthetic with warm lighting.

• − Significant spelling errors throughout, including 'Mashroom', 'Risoktso', and 'Octpus'.
• − Date formatting is messy and mostly illegible.
• − Repeated words like 'with with' disrupt the flow.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Nearly perfect spelling for all complex menu items including 'Truffle Mushroom Risotto'.
• + Excellent rendering of the specific date: April 30, 2026.
• + Consistent and clean handwriting-style layout.

• − Missed the 'elegant cursive' requirement for the title.
• − The text looks slightly more like a digital chalk font than authentic hand-shading.
• − Minor typo in the footer: 'Ask we ous gluten tree'.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Features a very clean, high-resolution render of the astronaut and horse.
• + Good lighting on the subject's face inside the helmet.

• − Fails the spatial prompt entirely, showing the horse behind the astronaut rather than riding on top.
• − The composition is static and lacks the 'cinematic' energy requested.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the difficult logical prompt, showing the horse physically mounted on the astronaut's back.
• + Excellent cinematic composition with dynamic posing and a more complex background.
• + Includes a small extra astronaut character to help sell the 'riding' concept.

• − The horse's back hooves are poorly rendered and blurry.
• − A strange floating artifact resembling a satellite wing is cut off at the edge of the frame.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent character expressions, effectively capturing the bored passenger and professional driver contrast.
• + Strong photorealistic quality and lighting on the capybara's fur.
• + Very clear focus and high detail on the passenger seat interactions.

• − The capybara only has one hand on the steering wheel instead of both front paws.
• − The proportions of the capybara's head to the jacket make it look slightly like an anthropomorphic character rather than a natural capybara in clothes.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully placed both front paws on the steering wheel as requested.
• + The capybara's anatomy and face shape feel more authentic to the animal.
• + The taxi driver cap explicitly says 'TAXI', which adds to the prompt's theme.

• − The passenger is blurry and lacks the distinct 'bored businesswoman' clarity of the other model.
• − The lighting is a bit flatter compared to the more cinematic feel of Image A.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Strong, vibrant central jack-o-lantern illustration.
• + Clearly legible main title and date text.

• − Failed to render the banner text correctly, resulting in gibberish.
• − The 'The Arches' location was misspelled as 'THE ARGIIVAH'S'.
• − Composition feels a bit flat with a plain black background instead of moody sky.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Superior parchment texture and moody atmosphere with a full moon and misty sky.
• + Perfectly rendered scroll banner text with the exact phrase requested.
• + Elegant typography that matches the 'gothic' requirement much better than Model A.

• − Includes a line of hallucinated text ('Your: Vorkleat: Iight & Spans') between the date and time.
• − The location text 'The Arches' is slightly smaller than the surrounding text.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Adds a thick, full head of hair that fits the head shape well.
• + Preserves the overall lighting and background of the original image.

• − Slightly softens facial details, making the subject look a few years younger than the original.
• − The hair-to-skin transition on the forehead looks a bit airbrushed.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Provides highly realistic hair texture and stray strands near the temples.
• + Retains more of the original skin texture and facial pore details.

• − Also changes the underlying facial structures slightly (narrower nose/eyes) instead of purely adding hair.
• − The glasses frames are slightly altered in shape compared to the source.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent graphic design layout with clean, bold typography.
• + Very high clarity and a minimalist aesthetic that matches the 'ultra-clean' request.
• + Accurate solid light blue background color.

• − The flag icon is stylized and abstract rather than a recognizable Japan flag.
• − The sushi rendering is a bit overly simplified, looking more like clay than PBR materials.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Features a correct Japanese flag icon.
• + Superior material rendering with realistic textures on the salmon and rice grains.
• + Better execution of the 'diorama base' with visible wood grain and depth.

• − The typography is slightly less 'bold' and modern compared to Model A.
• − The background blue is a bit darker/desaturated compared to the 'light blue' request.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Successfully incorporates the profession (TV anchor) and the dog.
• + Preserves the subject's features and clothing style well in a comic-like format.
• + Bold, vibrant colors with distinct line work.

• − Completely missed the 'hockey' requirement.
• − Includes weird garbled text on the dog's bowl.
• − The background elements are cluttered and literal rather than artistic.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Captures a much more expressive and 'exaggerated' character style suitable for a caricature.
• + Excellent line work and shading quality.
• + Maintains a high level of facial recognition from the source image.

• − Failed to include the job elements, the dog, or the hockey requirement.
• − The background is blank and doesn't tell a story.
• − Did not fulfill the majority of the thematic prompt instructions.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Dynamic sense of movement with the characters leaping through the grass.
• + Excellent lighting on the butterflies and fur highlights.

• − Failed to include the baby bunny and red fox kit, showing only two cats and a dog.
• − The faces appear slightly more stylized and less hyper-photorealistic than the prompt requested.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully included all four distinct animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Superior fur texture and hyper-photorealistic rendering of the eyes and light rays.
• + Better adherence to the 'lush wildflower meadow' with a denser variety of flowers.

• − The composition is a bit crowded with all four animals close together.
• − The animals are sitting rather than 'chasing' and 'tumbling' as described.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the original image's composition and poses
• + Clean line work and distinct character expressions
• + Accurate translation of the clothing patterns and colors

• − Looks more like modern digital anime than the specific hand-painted Ghibli style
• − Colors are a bit too saturated and lack the requested pastel softness

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Perfect adherence to the Ghibli aesthetic with hand-painted watercolor textures
• + Uses the requested soft pastel color palette and gentle lighting
• + Captures a nostalgic, dreamy atmosphere much more effectively than Model A

• − Slightly less defined facial expressions compared to the source image's intensity

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and the dog's appearance from the source image.
• + Subtle and natural-looking wind-blown hair effect.
• + Changes to the background elements are minimal, maintaining the integrity of the original scene.

• − The 'flying leaves' are very small and sparse, barely fulfilling that part of the prompt.
• − Low impact on overall energy; the image still feels relatively static.

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully adds more noticeable flying leaves across the frame.
• + The hair has more volume and motion, contributing better to the 'energetic' feel.
• + Maintains good consistency with the source image's lighting and colors.

• − Slightly altered the woman's face and smile compared to the source, though the likeness is still strong.
• − One of the leaves near the woman's head looks a bit disconnected/artificial.

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Clean vector aesthetic
• + Perfect spelling of all prompt text
• + Bold and balanced typography

• − Failed to include the requested banner element
• − Cloche illustration looks a bit more like a dome or crown than a restaurant server

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Successfully included the requested banner element
• + Sophisticated vintage texture and shading
• + Better interpretation of the cloche dome icon

• − Typos in the text with 'EEST' instead of 'EST'
• − Slightly less 'minimalist' than requested due to detailed shading

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

• + Successfully uses a grid layout common for infographics
• + Follows the navy and muted red color palette well

• − Spelling errors in the main title ('Apolo')
• − Text is largely illegible/gibberish for the steps
• − Icons are abstract and do not clearly represent the Saturn V or Lunar Module

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

• + Correct spelling of 'Apollo 11' in the header
• + Includes a clear Saturn V illustration and trajectory arcs
• + Stronger visual appeal with a unified scene rather than fragmented icons

• − Includes a planet with rings (Saturn) which is inaccurate for an Apollo 11 mission
• − Step numbers and labels are confusingly placed (e.g., '4. Earth')
• − Misinterprets the request for a flat vector style by adding mountain textures