DALL-E 2 OpenAI vs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

DALL-E 2

• + Clean geometric lines on the cube
• + Realistic wood surface reflection

• − Failed to include the red book on top of the cube
• − Replaced the small blue sphere with a massive blue planter
• − Composition is unbalanced and ignores several prompt instructions

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions in the prompt
• + High visual quality with realistic lighting and dust particles
• + Accurate rendering of glass transparency and reflections

• − The red book's reflection on the top facet of the cube looks slightly like a blue sphere

DALL-E 2

• + Successfully captures reflections on wet pavement
• + Embraces 'imperfect framing' with an obscured foreground element

• − Extreme blur makes the subject unrecognizable and the image nearly incoherent
• − Fails to show a face or clear 'elderly Japanese man' features

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt details including age, ethnicity, and activity
• + High visual quality with realistic skin textures and rain effects
• + Perfect execution of shallow depth of field and automotive bokeh

• − The composition is a bit too balanced and 'clean' for an 'imperfect framing' request
• − The bicycle kickstand and tool logic is slightly warped upon close inspection

DALL-E 2

• + Features a very close-up, gritty perspective
• + Includes strong bokeh effects

• − Extremely low resolution and lacks clarity
• − Fails to render recognizable lifelike eyes, braids, or facial features
• − Looks more like a photograph of a decaying miniature than a person

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfectly follows every instruction including braided hair with beads and engraved armor
• + Exceptional resolution and texture on leather and frayed cloth
• + Lifelike eyes and convincing lighting from the torch source

• − The character looks slightly young for a 'battle-worn' paladin
• − The sparks look a bit like floating orange dots rather than embers

DALL-E 2

• + Strong bold typography creates a modern aesthetic.
• + High-contrast visual design that feels artistic.

• − Fails to follow the layout request, appearing more like a magazine than a menu.
• − Text is completely illegible and nonsensical.
• − Food photos are distorted and unrecognizable within the geometric grid.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt instructions including specific category sections.
• + Clear, high-quality food photography arranged in a logical grid.
• + Professional layout that functions as an actual restaurant menu.

• − Some minor typos in headers and subtext.
• − The inclusion of the literal prompt words 'Modern minimalist' in the title is a slight prompt leakage.

DALL-E 2

• + Captures the glowing, fiery energy requested in the prompt.

• − Text is largely misspelled and illegible.
• − Visual quality is low with blurry textures and messy composition.
• − Missing specific required elements like the starburst and specific price text.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt elements, including complex text and price starburst.
• + High photorealistic detail in the food textures and splash effects.
• + Professional composition with clean, glowing typography.

• − The 'fiery background' is slightly more subtle than requested, focusing more on embers and smoke.

DALL-E 2

• + Captured a rough chalk-like texture.

• − The text is completely illegible gibberish.
• − The prompt's specific date and menu items were ignored.
• − The image quality is low with significant compression artifacts.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Exceptional text rendering that perfectly matches the requested date and menu items.
• + Highly realistic chalk aesthetic with smudges and natural variations.
• + Excellent composition and depth of field creating a cozy café atmosphere.

• − Included a price for the third item that was cut off in the prompt, though logically consistent.

DALL-E 2

• + Successfully followed the difficult positional instruction of putting the horse on top of the astronaut.

• − Resolution is very low and contains significant artifacts
• − The composition and artistic style are dated and lacks cinematic polish
• − The horse's anatomical detail is poor and looks like a statue or clay model

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent visual quality with sharp details and vibrant colors
• + Highly cinematic lighting and composition
• + Excellent rendering of textures like the astronaut's suit and the horse's fur

• − Completely failed the negative constraint/specific positional instruction

DALL-E 2

• + Attempts to show the device and hands in the foreground.

• − Extremely poor visual quality with severe anatomical glitches.
• − The animal does not resemble a capybara and looks more like an abstract statue.
• − Failed to follow the composition instructions, putting the human in the front/side and missing the businessman archetype.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt details, including the cap, jacket, and paws on the steering wheel.
• + High photorealism with convincing fur texture and atmospheric lighting.
• + Perfectly captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger in the back seat.

• − The paws look slightly more like humanoid hands with claws than natural capybara feet.

DALL-E 2

• + Successfully captures a weathered, vintage woodcut aesthetic
• + Follows the square format requirement

• − Text is largely nonsensical and garbled
• − Fails to include specific requested elements like the jack-o-lantern and digital clarity
• − Low resolution and messy visual artifacts

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent text rendering for all requested details and dates
• + High visual clarity with sharp details on the pumpkin, thorns, and webs
• + Follows all prompt instructions including the specific banner and border elements

• − The layout is very clean, which may feel a bit less 'vintage' and more like a modern digital graphic

DALL-E 2

• + Successfully captures the 45-degree isometric perspective.
• + Maintains a clean, minimalist blue background as requested.

• − Failed to render the text correctly, displaying only 'Sush'.
• − Missing the 'JAPAN' text and the required flag icon.
• − The 3D models for the food items are unrecognizable and low quality.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Followed all text instructions perfectly, including 'JAPAN', 'SUSHI', and the flag icon.
• + Excellent rendering of 3D miniature textures and soft lighting.
• + Created a high-quality, appealing diorama base and realistic cartoon sushi.

• − The perspective is more eye-level/front-facing than a true 45-degree top-down isometric view.

DALL-E 2

• + Features most of the requested animals in a simple layout.

• − Low visual fidelity with severe artifacts throughout the image.
• − Poor anatomy, particularly on the cat and the distorted central butterfly.
• − Missing the red fox kit and clear 'god rays' lighting.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to the prompt, including all four specific animals and environmental details.
• + Superior visual quality with ultra-detailed fur and clear, sharp resolution.
• + Beautiful artistic composition with effective use of god rays, dew sparkles, and golden hour lighting.

• − The fox's eyes appear slightly over-processed or unnatural.
• − One butterfly leg is noticeably missing on the rightmost insect.

DALL-E 2

• + Matches the simple vector emblem style requested.

• − Text is completely illegible and gibberish.
• − The steam element is poorly rendered and lacks clarity.
• − Low level of detail and polish compared to modern standards.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent typography with perfect spelling of 'Caffè Florian'.
• + High visual quality with clean vector lines and appropriate texture.
• + Successful inclusion of all prompt elements including the banner, steam, and date.

• − The layout is slightly more complex than 'minimalist' but remains professional.

DALL-E 2

• + Adheres to the color palette requested.
• + Captures a technical schematic aesthetic.

• − Text is nonsensical and contains severe spelling errors like 'ALLPOO'.
• − The logical flow of the infographic is chaotic and does not follow the requested steps.
• − Visual artifacts and messy line work make it look low-quality.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to the sequential steps of the mission.
• + Legible, correctly spelled labels and names.
• + Clean, modern flat-vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the NASA-inspired theme.

• − Includes a second moon graphic which is slightly redundant in the layout.
• − Iconography for 'Descent' and 'Landing' is clustered rather than separated as distinct steps.